[00:10] <michaelh1> Hi there.  For some reason I can't assign people to the gcc-linaro aspect of https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/736661 - any ideas why?
[00:14] <michaelh1> Huh, I can if I click on 'Importance' and do it via the +editstatus page.  On the main page the (!) icon doesn't show beside the user name...
[00:17] <wgrant> michaelh1: AJAX is currently disabled on bugs with more than 10 tasks. The status/importance edit buttons become normal links to the edit form in that case, but assignee apparently doesn't :/
[00:22] <michaelh1> wgrant: OK.  Should I file a bug?
[00:23] <wgrant> michaelh1: Please do.
[00:27]  * micahg thought we had one for that...
[00:28] <michaelh1> lp 843415 (got ubot go!)
[00:28] <micahg> ah, the assignee part...
[00:28]  * michaelh1 finally figures out the ubot magic
[00:28] <wgrant> bug 1234
[00:29] <wgrant> It guesses most thing :)
[00:29] <wgrant> +s
[00:29] <wgrant> And mup is even more liberal.
[00:29] <wgrant> #1234 will work there.
[00:34] <michaelh1> Bah.  Access to private list archives is still broken.
[00:35] <michaelh1> bug 663923
[07:43] <hakermania> Hey, I've made a branch and I've already uploaded 2 revisions. Now I want to have a file to the Downloads Section on the front page of my project. Should I 'Create release'?
[07:44] <wgrant> hakermania: Yep, download files are part of a release.
[07:48] <hakermania> wgrant, and what's a milestone? It asks for this.
[07:51] <wgrant> hakermania: Milestones are often used for tracking bug fixes, eg. bugs to be fixed in 1.0 would be targeted to the 1.0 milestone. A release is a special state of a milestone, so you need to create one if it doesn't already exist.
[07:54] <hakermania> wgrant, the name (of the milestone) should be like Wallch 2.2?
[07:55] <wgrant> hakermania: Just 2.2
[07:55] <hakermania> ok thanks
[08:10] <mrevell> Hallo
[08:16] <hakermania> mrevell, hallo
[08:17] <hakermania> wgrant, The Downloads section is just an alternative to provide some files?
[08:17] <wgrant> hakermania: Normally people use it to provide downloadable tarballs or installers or similar.
[08:19] <mrevell> Hi hakermania
[08:20] <hakermania> wgrant, installers == deb files?
[08:20] <steev_> hi all, i submitted a bug recently ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zeitgeist/+bug/843598 ) and it was marked as a duplicate (i agree completely, i'd seen a bug report previously) but the issue i'm seeing is, apport retracing service marks it as a duplicate, but, the link it gives for the duplicate bug gives a 404
[08:20] <steev_> ah, that's why
[08:20] <steev_> because it's private
[08:22] <steev_> can someone with access peek in there and let me know if it's fix committed/fix released/if there is a workaround?  because currently, zeitgeist likes to use up all my cpu :)
[08:23] <lifeless> hakermania: no, installers == .exe for windows, or .damage for mac
[08:23] <lifeless> erm .dmg :)
[08:23] <hakermania> lifeless, so I shouldn't have DEB files as Downloads?
[08:23] <lifeless> no
[08:23] <lifeless> they are best put in a PPA
[08:24] <bigjools> s/put/built/
[08:25] <hakermania> lifeless, so, to understand better, branches are the current developing code (UNSTABLE) available on the net, and at the 'Downloads' should be the last STABLE tarball?
[08:27] <lifeless> hakermania: branches - yes. downloads yes-for-a-given-release.
[08:27] <lifeless> you can have multiple releases all with their own downloads
[09:03] <sladen> wgrant: Why is bug #843027 a question, not a bug?
[09:04] <sladen> wgrant: a question, implies that there might be an answer, and that I could then effect that answer
[09:04] <wgrant> sladen: Regular data issues are not bugs in Launchpad.
[09:04] <wgrant> Bugs are problems in the code or production setup.
[09:05] <sladen> wgrant: so +answers are used for the running instance at lp.net?
[09:05] <wgrant> sladen: Roughly, yes.
[09:06] <diwic> I'm having problems with a launchpad daily recipe that fails to build. I think it's a bug in launchpad because it builds fine here, but on launchpad it claims it cannot install "dh-autoreconf", and as a consequence, it fails to build the source package.
[09:06] <wgrant> Needs a code fix? It's a bug.
[09:06] <wgrant> Production issue? Maybe RT, possibly a bug.
[09:06] <wgrant> Data issue like that? Question.
[09:07] <sladen> wgrant: mmhmm.  okay
[09:07] <diwic> It's only the oneiric build that fails, the natty one succeeds. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/79186964/buildlog.txt.gz
[09:09] <wgrant> diwic: apt is great at giving error messages, as usual. The problem appears to be that libxcb-atom1-dev has been removed.
[09:10] <wgrant> libxcb-util0-dev may replace it, but I'm not sure.
[09:10] <diwic> wgrant, thanks. Looking into it.
[09:10] <diwic> Somewhat strange that it keeps dh-autoreconf from being installed though?
[09:11] <diwic> Or does it just give up when it finds one it can't install, but installs everyone above that and none below?
[09:12] <wgrant> diwic: apt works in strange ways :/
[09:12] <wgrant> I'm not entirely sure of details.
[11:24] <steev_> so what does one do when a bug is closed as a duplicate, but the duplicate bug is set private?
[11:31] <steev_> i read through https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/434733 and i somewhat understand the reasoning of the choice, but it's particularly frustrating when it's an app that continuously keeps crashing
[11:33] <wgrant> It's really an apport bug. It shouldn't mark bugs as dupes of a private one.
[11:33] <wgrant> LP can't really do any more.
[11:38] <steev_> screw it, go for the easy fix, apt-get purge zeitgeist :)
[13:27] <dobey> help with timeout OOPS please? :) OOPS-2076CI50
[17:43] <bobweaver> Hi there I am verry new to launch pad and bzr.  My question is once I upload all my keys and sign the ubuntu code of conduct. do I then make the "team"  then upload files via bzr ?
[17:43] <bobweaver> or make foles using bzr then make team then upload to launchpad ?
[17:44] <bobweaver> or make files* using bzr then make team then upload to launchpad ?
[18:41] <GTRsdk> how do I get my PPA set so apt-get source packagename works?
[19:09] <lifeless> GTRsdk: add a deb-src line to your /etc/apt/sources.list.d/$ppa.list file
[19:32] <YokoZar> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/79194124/buildlog.txt.gz  <--- 2 days in a row now been getting "bzr: out of memory" build failures -- known issue?
[19:37] <dobey> YokoZar: too much history. bzr similarly eats all my ram trying to branch lp:webkit
[20:25] <exarkun> Can I hide downloads?