| micahg | nigelb: wow, you're on planet mozilla before me...not surprising, I'm not on planet ubuntu yet | 00:55 |
|---|---|---|
| nigelb | micahg: :) | 04:44 |
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
| m_conley | chrisccoulson: #thunderbird-unity? | 13:00 |
| MissDjax | hello ! | 13:20 |
| MissDjax | :) | 13:20 |
| MissDjax | I am new to Thunderbird... I installed it from synaptic (ubuntu natty), version 3.1.13, according to the web, the latest stable version is 6.*, I am a bit confused about that | 13:21 |
| MissDjax | could someone explain ? | 13:21 |
| === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | ||
| MissDjax | oh well, fuck off | 13:28 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, lovely, polite person :) | 13:34 |
| chrisccoulson | doesn't realize that we don't spend every waking minute staring at IRC channels ;) | 13:34 |
| bhearsum | hehe | 13:55 |
| knome | chrisccoulson, wait, what, you don't?! | 14:08 |
| chrisccoulson | knome, i don't ;) | 14:15 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, now i've got an environment in the datacenter that can create our source packages, i might write a cron job which monitors the upstream repo's and automatically builds and publishes a new tarball on p.c.c/~chrisccoulson every time a new tag is added ;) | 14:18 |
| === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
| micahg | chrisccoulson: wow, that's an interesting proposition | 14:35 |
| chrisccoulson | it should be pretty easy to do | 14:35 |
| micahg | I still feel better about manually generating them though | 14:35 |
| chrisccoulson | and the package already contains everything we need to automatically get the correct translations | 14:36 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: unless we'll be able to verify against an upstream hash | 14:36 |
| chrisccoulson | there already automatically created though. the cron job would just run the same command as i do manually to create the tarball | 14:36 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: right, I guess I'm just paranoid about stuff :) | 14:38 |
| joelesko | micahg: I just looked at the firefox packaging and I didn't realize how much it changed. | 15:07 |
| joelesko | chrisccoulson: The new packaging system looks really nice and it has the information I needed to build seamonkey for lucid | 15:08 |
| joelesko | I will convert seamonkey to the firefox packaging method. It looks very clean. | 15:11 |
| micahg | joelesko: great, if you can start from the packaging we have and prepare a merge I'd be happy to review next week | 15:13 |
| micahg | joelesko: please use one bzr commit for each groups of changes | 15:13 |
| chrisccoulson | hi joelesko | 15:18 |
| chrisccoulson | which firefox branch did you look at btw? | 15:18 |
| joelesko | I looked at ~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-trunk.head | 15:23 |
| joelesko | I hope that is the right one. | 15:23 |
| chrisccoulson | joelesko, yeah, that's the right one | 15:24 |
| chrisccoulson | does that mean seamonkey will get language packs? :) | 15:25 |
| joelesko | Very easy to read, I like the formatting. | 15:25 |
| joelesko | If it's in the firefox package, I'll see what I can do. Since seamonkey, firefox, thunderbird are all based on the same code, it should. | 15:26 |
| joelesko | I'm sure I'll need your help when I get there. | 15:27 |
| joelesko | micahg: Can you define 'group of changes'. This is going to be a big change from what is out there now for seamonkey | 15:27 |
| joelesko | I checked out the current seamonkey branch and was going to work from there. | 15:28 |
| joelesko | I was planning on modifing the firefox files and then after a local build works, check it in. | 15:30 |
| joelesko | Is that what you were thinking? | 15:30 |
| micahg | joelesko: basically something that would be one changelog entry | 15:39 |
| joelesko | That makes sense. Thanks | 15:40 |
| micahg | joelesko: thank you! 2.3.3 is out, so we can go with that | 15:41 |
| joelesko | Yeah. I packaged it for lucid, maverick, natty and oniric and that what I wanted to go with. | 15:42 |
| micahg | joelesko: once we get caught up, if we can get someone to do the testing/packaging prep, I'm happy to upload seamonkey with everything else and push it out on release day | 15:42 |
| joelesko | That would be awesome. You would want it for the releases as well, right? | 15:43 |
| joelesko | There was a problem with yasm in lucid becaused of the accelerated jpeg processor, but there is a flag in the config to disable it for lucid | 15:44 |
| joelesko | The rules file in firefox showed me how you do that. | 15:44 |
| micahg | joelesko: yes, lucid-oneiric would be great | 15:45 |
| micahg | joelesko: we might be able to push a yasm-1.1.0 package to lucid, but I'd have to look into that next week | 15:45 |
| chrisccoulson | yes, we need the latest yasm for firefox at some point | 15:46 |
| chrisccoulson | joelesko, you can use this patch in seamonkey - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.lucid/view/head:/debian/patches/use-new-yasm-in-lucid.patch | 15:46 |
| chrisccoulson | and the versioned yasm package from the firefox-next PPA is what we'll push to lucid (which is co-installable with the current version in lucid) | 15:46 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: there's no need to version the binary since it's a build time dependency | 15:47 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, right, but upgrading the current version might make something else in lucid unbuildable in the future | 15:48 |
| chrisccoulson | should you need to rebuild something else which uses it | 15:48 |
| chrisccoulson | which is why i created a co-installable version | 15:48 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I'd just push a new source and change the binary package name, not the yasm binary | 15:48 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, then they wouldn't be co-installable | 15:48 |
| chrisccoulson | they would conflict with each other | 15:49 |
| micahg | they don't have to be and that's fine | 15:49 |
| micahg | I need to finish with NSS right now, happy to debate this later | 15:49 |
| chrisccoulson | ok, i need to disappear for a bit and do some exercise before dinner | 15:53 |
| chrisccoulson | woohoo - fully automatic, without touching my connection at all - https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/ :) | 15:54 |
| micahg | awesome! | 15:54 |
| === ejat is now known as fenris | ||
| === fenris is now known as Guest40004 | ||
| === Guest40004 is now known as ejat | ||
| bhearsum | chrisccoulson: wait, the normal course of action is to require someone to push a button to generate builds? | 17:15 |
| chrisccoulson | bhearsum, yeah, that person is currently me. i've been turning the handle manually on daily builds because i need to sign the uploads | 17:17 |
| bhearsum | ah | 17:18 |
| bhearsum | right, i forgot about the signing stuff | 17:18 |
| chrisccoulson | bhearsum, i still need to sign them, but i've created a separate account (https://launchpad.net/~chrisbot) with its own key, which can't upload to our primary archive | 17:18 |
| chrisccoulson | so i can have a passwordless key, which is hosted in our datacenter | 17:19 |
| bhearsum | ah | 17:19 |
| chrisccoulson | i wouldn't do that any of my other keys though :) | 17:20 |
| chrisccoulson | hmmm, i've got to wait a whole week for my new laptop :( | 17:22 |
| chrisccoulson | lets hope my current one doesn't die completely before then | 17:23 |
| debfx | m_conley: what do you think about my patch on bug #817598? it would make the messaging menu work on kde | 17:29 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 817598 in messagingmenu-extension "Doesn't work when libunity isn't installed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/817598 | 17:29 |
| * m_conley looks | 17:29 | |
| m_conley | debfx: i think your patch might be slightly out of date - can you rebase it, and do a review request on lp:messagingmenu-extension? | 17:31 |
| debfx | ok, will do | 17:33 |
| chrisccoulson | what's wrong with installing libunity on KDE? it's not like it pulls in unity, and it's, like 350kB | 17:35 |
| knome | i suppose the "wrong" in that is kde | 17:36 |
| * knome hides | 17:36 | |
| chrisccoulson | KDE already gives us enough pain, especially with that monstrous patch we have in firefox which breaks every couple of days ;) | 17:36 |
| knome | eww | 17:39 |
| debfx | chrisccoulson: more like 1MB due its dependencies | 17:41 |
| debfx | m_conley: https://code.launchpad.net/~debfx/messagingmenu-extension/lp817598/+merge/74489 | 18:01 |
| m_conley | debfx: thanks | 18:02 |
| micahg | bhearsum: launchpad also supports automatic daily builds, but they require a vcs hosted on LP which doesn't import from hg yet | 19:05 |
| bhearsum | ah | 19:05 |
| micahg | I'm considering that for chromium which is hosted in svn | 19:06 |
| bhearsum | ok, so it's saner than it sounded earlier :) | 19:06 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, that wouldn't work for thunderbird anyway, as the thunderbird source comes from multiple repo's, and i think the launchpad recipes can only come from one source branch | 19:16 |
| chrisccoulson | i don't think that chromium is hosted in a single repo is it? | 19:17 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I think so, not sure | 19:17 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, yeah, the chromium source is hosted in multiple repo's, like thunderbird is | 19:18 |
| chrisccoulson | so launchpad recipe's are pretty much a non-starter for that | 19:18 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: well, I'll figure that out later | 19:19 |
| FernandoMiguel | evening | 20:40 |
| === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!