[00:29] <Sarvatt> ricotz: hopefully wayland should be working by the morning, just uploaded mesa to build against that new wayland checkout
[00:29] <Sarvatt> fighting 8 hour build queues
[00:30] <Sarvatt> bryceh: ok to mark wayland in edgers work item done now if you know where it is, i think it was assigned to someone else because i'm not seeing it
[00:34] <Sarvatt> got a wayland-demos ready to upload but it needs new mesa built first
[00:34] <ricotz> Sarvatt, nice
[00:34] <Sarvatt> added it to my daily update script too
[00:35] <Sarvatt> but cant really run it out of there since it has to build before mesa..
[00:35] <ricotz> perhaps you can ping a friendly archive-admin to bump the priority
[00:36] <ricotz> if mesa isnt using new api bit right away it should work
[00:42] <bryceh> Sarvatt, ok will do
[02:33] <ScottK> Sarvatt: Does bug 839808 (on Natty) look like anything you've seen before?
[03:23] <bjsnider> i can never seem to understand what these mesa build failure logs mean. i can usually understand other build failures but not the mesa ones
[07:04] <tjaalton> bryceh: hey, do you know if the apport hooks in natty had bugs, like running apport-collect xxxx for a bug against -evdev only collects Dependencies.txt and nothing else?
[09:59] <bryceh> tjaalton, nope
[10:00] <bryceh> tjaalton, ubuntu-bug xserver-xorg-input-evdev seems to work (just re-confirmed it), so theoretically the hook should work for apport-collect as well
[10:00] <bryceh> there are a couple apport bugs I'm aware of that could result in that behavior
[10:01] <bryceh> for instance, if a bug report was filed against multiple packages, and -evdev wasn't the original thing it was filed against, apport-collect will try to use the hook from whatever the first target was.  (Or something like that...)
[10:01] <bryceh> so, the Dependencies.txt is because apport is using an apport hook for some other package (which evidently doesn't have a hook defined)
[10:02] <bryceh> the other bug is that if a package has differing binary and source package names, apport only works if you give it a binary name (so no ubuntu-bug xorg-server)
[10:02] <bryceh> but that second bug it'll error out before even filing the bug
[10:07] <tjaalton> yeah this one was against unity originally
[10:08] <tjaalton> but has only -evdev as the package
[10:15] <bryceh> yeah, I'd guess apport-collect is trying to use unity's package hook
[10:16] <bryceh> *yawn* night
[10:33] <tjaalton> heh, night
[16:42] <cnd> bryceh, fyi, Carlos Garnacho sent me three patches for fixing some touch grab issues
[16:42] <cnd> I'm testing them out now, but I hope to push them to the packaging repo soon
[17:44] <cnd> bryceh, the patches look good, I've pushed them to the ubuntu branch
[17:44] <cnd> do you know when the next release will be uploaded?
[17:49] <bryceh> cnd, of xserver?  no I don't; assuming raof and tjaalton have some plans
[17:51] <cnd> ok
[17:51] <tjaalton> if we can just upload without an ffe, then I can test it locally tomorrow and upload if no issues pop up?
[17:51] <bryceh> tjaalton, sounds good
[17:51] <cnd> tjaalton, that was something I was wondering about
[17:52] <cnd> since there's an upstream micro version bump
[17:52] <tjaalton> yeah it's a stable update, so shouldn't need any paperwork
[17:52] <cnd> cool
[20:20] <bjsnider> that's a build failure i understand
[20:37] <Sarvatt> bjsnider: welcome to my world of fun, by the time i get one part of the build system fixed another change is introduced upstream making it fail again :P
[20:38] <Sarvatt> fixed one uploaded and i test built it locally to be sure
[20:40] <bjsnider> fixing a problem like the one i just saw is easy enough, but what about the log from last night?
[20:40] <bjsnider> that was a completely meaningless failure message
[20:41] <Sarvatt> i filed https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40668 about that
[20:41] <ubot4> Freedesktop bug 40668 in Other "Mesa compilation failure with wayland master" [Normal,Resolved: duplicate]
[20:41] <Sarvatt> it wasn't compiling with wayland master or the wayland checkout we had in oneiric