[01:22] <test34> ikonia is a kidop?
[01:23] <ikonia> test34: is a time waste
[01:23] <ikonia> ?
[01:23] <Pici> what?
[01:23] <ikonia> test34: what version of ubuntu are you using
[01:23] <test34> ikonia, Does Ubuntu 11.10 use the UUID for /etc/crypttab ?
[01:24] <ikonia> test34: I'm not discussing anything with you until you confirm what version of ubuntu you are using
[01:24] <ikonia> test34: you've been confusing in #ubuntu+1 about what version you are using and for some reason refuse to confirm what you're using, which is because I believe you are trying to use #ubuntu+1 for non-development support
[01:25] <ikonia> actually - I'm not intersted in silly games, I'm going to bed. You can stay out of the channel until I return in the morning
[01:25] <ikonia> good night
[01:26] <test34> ikonia, fixing a bug would be development.. I'm using 11.04.. and if you confirm that 11.10 still use the parition name instead of the UUID inside the file /etc/crypttab the the bug must still exist
[01:26] <IdleOne> test34: You were fully aware that #ubuntu+1 is for 11.10 you joined right after I told another user to go there to discus 11.10 and started asking for support for 11.04. Now I know you think how different can it be really be but there are significant changes in the dev version that may or may not have anything to do with the issues you are having in 11.04. Please use the appropriate channel for the version you are using.
[01:27] <IdleOne> bug fixes are a dev issue but not necessarily have anything to do with the dev version.
[01:29] <IdleOne> Now please use #ubuntu for support with 11.04 and you can return tomorrow and discuss with ikonia about removing the ban in +1
[01:29] <test34> I only wanted to try to prevent someone else to experience this very important bug... but anyways have fun
[03:20] <mneptok> ikonia: responding to name-calling with more name-calling is not productive.
[03:21] <mneptok> one man's opinion.
[04:43] <rww> 04:43 < vibhav> he cant even understand subtle humour
[04:43] <rww> oh gods, this is funny
[04:46] <vibhav> so where were we?
[04:46] <vibhav> ooops
[04:46] <rww> oh good, i thought i was going to have to do work
[05:02] <elky> if he highlights me once more for no good reason, he's going to find himself banned from everywhere I can touch.
[05:27] <bazhang> axi93 seems to be offering suspect advice
[05:30] <Myrtti> blaah
[05:30] <Myrtti> to sleep more or no..
[05:31] <bazhang> more sleep is always a good idea
[07:44] <elky> happygolucky seems intent on annoying people
[08:07] <rww> given #defocus, I am all kinds of unsurprised
[09:57] <oCean> !isitout
[09:58] <oCean> what's the !isitout supposed to be when it is not out yet?
[10:01] <Tm_T> "no, "it" is in" ?
[10:02] <jussi> !-isitout
[10:06] <jussi> !no, isitout is <reply>no, not yet, way too early! :)
[11:11] <LjL> i can't watch attentively, i'm testing my new Amiga (which is giving issues) :(
[11:12] <ikonia> LjL: as in "new" or new old
[11:15] <LjL> ikonia: new old, unfortunately... i should have bought a new one i guess. but this came with an accelerator card which i wanted. however, the floppy drive doesn't work, and that's a huge bummer :(
[11:15] <ikonia> LjL: I lifted mine out of my parents loft a few weeks ago, I'm going to bring it home next time I'm up there
[11:18] <LjL> ikonia: which model is it?
[11:19] <ikonia> A1200
[11:19] <ikonia> OLD
[11:19] <LjL> ikonia: mine is an A1200 too, it's as new as an Amiga gets really :P
[11:19] <LjL> ikonia: it's a good Amiga
[11:19] <ikonia> true, I've got a 500 somewhere that I bought a few years ago
[11:20] <LjL> ikonia: does it have an HDD?
[11:20] <ikonia> little internal one
[11:20] <Myrtti> just for the record, this sweat guy is creeping me out, he first sent me a memoserv message "pay your bills" (I do have an email saying it was him, and it has his hostname on it, even if he claimed on -offtopic that he didn't send any memoserv messages) and then aiming his weird (semi-?)sexual advances at me, believing I'm male
[11:21] <LjL> ikonia: it's worth between 60 and 100 pounds with an HDD, fyi
[11:22] <ikonia> I won't be selling it
[11:22] <Daviey> http://guru.meditation.daviey.com/
[11:22] <LjL> heh
[11:22] <ikonia> I like it
[11:22] <bazhang> Myrtti, doubt he'll be around much longer, if the current path continues
[11:22] <ikonia> I can assure you he won't
[11:23] <Myrtti> also, if it comes to arbitration of the issue later on, I already state I won't be available for it
[11:28] <bazhang> now in #ubuntu
[11:28] <ikonia> siletn, so no issue
[11:28] <ikonia> silent
[11:35] <oCean> URineffe1tualOP (~happygolu@c-76-108-222-32.hsd1.fl.comcast.net) has joined #ubuntu
[11:36] <bazhang> urineffectualtroll
[11:43] <bazhang> d'oh!
[11:43] <ikonia> how tedious
[11:51] <bazhang> back again in -ot
[11:56] <topyli> again, ~beefy@c-76-110-80-206.hsd1.fl.comcast.net (banned)
[12:01] <topyli> ~A_Fag_Ban@c-76-110-88-27.hsd1.fl.comcast.net
[12:02] <elky> http://privatepaste.com/ec69059097
[12:03] <elky> I think we can safely temporarily ban *.hsd1.fl.comcast.net
[12:03] <ikonia> cool, I'll shink the ban I've just placed down
[12:04] <tsimpson> elky: /who only shows people you share channels with, as everyone is +i by default on freenode
[12:05] <elky> tsimpson, yes, temporarily
[12:05] <Myrtti> tsimpson: it is still a good representation of the percentages we are talking about
[12:06] <tsimpson> all I said was /who only shows people you share channels with
[12:07] <tsimpson> ie, not really representative of the network user base
[12:07] <elky> 3 in #ubuntu, 1 in ##php
[12:07] <ikonia> I'll remove the ban in a few minutes
[12:07] <Myrtti> no hurry...
[12:08] <ikonia> well, I don't want people who try to join to get "you are banned"
[12:08] <topyli> what about this guy joining from in.comcast.net? bad luck or...
[12:09] <ikonia> bad luck I feel
[12:09] <Myrtti> the only people coming from florida with comcast is sweat
[12:09] <Myrtti> in my lastlog of the past 24h or so
[12:09] <ikonia> but my eyebrows also went up
[12:09] <elky> i think floridans tend to go with bell
[12:10] <ikonia> 13:10 -!- jpmh [~chatzilla@c-98-245-172-142.hsd1.co.comcast.net]
[12:10] <ikonia> that's him I think
[12:10] <ikonia> 12:36 -!- happygol1cky [~happygolu@c-98-254-178-253.hsd1.fl.comcast.net] has
[12:10] <ikonia> joined after the last happygol1cky kick
[12:11] <ikonia> probaby trying a different client has he was changing idents earlier
[12:11] <elky> note the .co.
[12:11] <ikonia> ahhh
[12:11] <Myrtti> he would have already joined -ot
[12:12] <Myrtti> as I said, the only people coming from florida with comcast is swear
[12:12] <Myrtti> sweat
[12:12] <ikonia> I missed the co
[12:12] <ikonia> I'll remove the ban, see if it's ok now
[12:12] <Myrtti> I doubt it is but who knows
[12:13] <ikonia> well, I'll just put it back if he comes back and leave it longer
[12:13] <elky> if you're concerned, set the channel to muted, op up
[12:13] <Myrtti> yyyeaahhhhhh
[12:13] <ikonia> how wrong could I be
[12:14] <Pici> :/
[12:14] <jussi> ikonia: that ban is broken - you forgot the *.
[12:14] <ikonia> did I, oops
[12:15] <elky> niko, how many online from the 98 range for .hsd1.fl.comcast.net?
[12:15] <ikonia> well spotted
[12:15] <ikonia> it's not just 98, he was 78 a few minutes ago
[12:16] <elky> likewise 78
[12:16] <ikonia> comcast appears to be a bit more random
[12:16] <elky> yeah, but if it's possible to do a temp kline, it's worth trying at least :P
[12:16] <elky> he'll lose interest sooner if he can't connect to the network
[12:18] <elky> also, s/78/76/
[12:24] <ikonia> he's still sat there as BanMeIfUsuckCock
[12:27] <elky> meh. past pumpkin time. ciao.
[12:28] <ikonia> night
[12:29] <Myrtti> elky: nini loverly
[12:29]  * Pici waves
 Windows Server discriminates Ubuntu!
[12:36] <ikonia> ?
[12:36] <bazhang> in #ubuntu
[12:42] <ikonia> I am getting fedup of actionparsnips random and sloppy advice, he's changed, it's garbage now
[12:48] <ikonia> well BanMeIfUsuckCock is still sat waiting for the ban to be removed
[12:59] <Pici> gj
[12:59] <ikonia> idiot
[13:00] <Myrtti> :-DDDDD
[13:54] <Pici> fyi, I'm seeing some issues with releases.ubuntu.com via ipv6, just in case we get any weird reports in #u
[14:04] <ikonia> interesting
[14:05] <ikonia> Pici: are you on v6 ?
[14:05] <Pici> ikonia: my linode is, and I'm tunneling through it.
[14:06] <ikonia> very cool
[14:11] <mneptok> 23:27 <+bazhang> axi93 seems to be offering suspect advice
[14:11] <mneptok> don't believe them! don't believe them! don't get bitten twice! you got some sus-sus-SUS-pect advice!
[14:12] <mneptok> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJRZ-s6Lq-o
[14:12] <Myrtti> lääkkeet
[14:17] <mneptok> Myrtti: kyllä!
[15:28] <ikonia> removed the florida ban in -ot
[16:30] <oCean> wow
[17:04] <mneptok> 11:01 < SealedWithAKiss> Window's is so much better than Ubunut. It makes me sick to think that this OS was even created *Violently vomits on Ubuntu developers*
[17:04] <mneptok> 11:03 [Freenode] CTCP VERSION reply from SealedWithAKiss: xchat 2.8.6 Ubuntu
[17:04] <mneptok> irony overdose. i'm off to the bank.
[17:05] <rww> well of course, you have to test something to be able to violently throw up on it
[17:06] <ikonia> I can't be bothered with letting these idiots play games, they know it's not how you behave with people, so can go elsewhere
[17:07] <Pici> Jordan_U: Its not really helpful to shoo trolls into -offtopic :/
[17:08] <Jordan_U> Pici: Sorry, somewhat distracted at the moment. Did they actually continue on there?
[17:08] <Pici> yes, was kicked, but just came back
[17:08] <Jordan_U> :(
[17:58] <Doomtron_> Hello, I'm banned at #ubuntu-br because of flood, but I someone banned me when I wasnt in the channel and now Idk if I get ban because of a flood that I did at, more or less, 3a.m (by the way the 3 peoplethat was in there was laughing) or another flood, that I dont remeber to another flood.
[17:59] <Doomtron_> Sorry my english
[18:00] <Doomtron_> So, how can I discover who banned me, and the reason of the ban? The ops let some comment for the ban ?
[18:16] <ikonia> Doomtron_: the channel #ubuntu-irc contains the ops you need to speak to
[18:18] <Doomtron_> ikonia: ok
[20:44] <genii-around> Could someone please tell me my last two disconnection strings? Quassel kept crashing...
[20:45] <Pici> genii-around: Read error: Connection reset by peer
[20:45] <Myrtti> Presario-R3200-PJ850EA-ABF
[20:45] <Myrtti> damnit
[20:45] <genii-around> Pici: Thanks!
[20:45] <Myrtti> *sigh*
[20:46] <h00k> Myrtti: It's okay, I lubs you anyway.
[20:47] <Myrtti> ♥
[21:02] <mneptok> Myrtti: have you taken up archaeology?
[21:02] <mneptok> (sorry, "physical anthropology")
[21:03] <Myrtti> depending on the definition
[21:05] <mneptok> Myrtti: i ask because you mentioned "Presario"  ;)
[21:06] <Myrtti> oh that was a mispaste from #xubuntu
[21:06] <mneptok> yes, but a Presario? really? is this still 2011?
[21:06] <mneptok> :)
[21:07] <charlie-tca> Xubuntu users have older computers, sometimes
[21:08] <rww> older computers that are powered by mice in wheels
[21:08] <charlie-tca> I suppose he would laugh at my Micron PII, too :)
[21:08]  * Myrtti nods
[21:08] <Myrtti> I've got a new computer powered by mice
[21:08] <Myrtti> well, "new"
[21:08] <charlie-tca> huh, me too
[21:08] <Myrtti> MPC-L Viglen
[21:09] <mneptok> charlie-tca: would you like me to boot my Mac Quadra 605 (68040 at 25Mhz) that runs OpenBSD? ;)
[21:09] <popey> I must take that off hilight
[21:09] <charlie-tca> I have a nice, almost new, PIII here
[21:09] <Myrtti> popey: you do
[21:09] <rww> popey: hrm?
[21:09] <charlie-tca> mneptok: not familiar enough with mac systems, but going by the speed, it seems a bit slow to me
[21:10] <mneptok> charlie-tca: c1993 hardware
[21:10] <Myrtti> rww: MPC-L Viglen
[21:10] <Myrtti> it's like marmite to popey
[21:10] <Myrtti> MARMITE I tell you
[21:10] <charlie-tca> heh, I was right! At least mine is about 1996
[21:11] <mneptok> charlie-tca: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_Quadra_605
[21:11]  * rww assumes it's some computer from before he was born, wanders off
[21:12] <mneptok> youngsters.
[21:12] <charlie-tca> hehe, it is a bit old for me. I need things that don't need a ppc port, at least
[21:13] <charlie-tca> I do have an older 386-25 here, complete with the monitor, though
[21:13] <charlie-tca> I haven't decided what to do with that one, yet
[21:57] <mneptok> i am about to get on my motorcycle, drive across the Rio Grande to Intel's Rio Rancho fab, and punch someone in the head for this iwlagn regression.
[22:00] <IdleOne> don't forget your passport
[22:00] <rww> mneptok is illegal in 13 states
[22:00] <IdleOne> and 2 provinces
[22:02] <rww> and Australia
[22:02] <IdleOne> nobody wants to go back to Australia
[22:03] <mneptok> rww: IdleOne already said "provinces," which covers Aussie, whether or not they want to admit it. >:)
[22:03] <mneptok> (and the Rio Grande in Albuquerque is 100% US on both sides)
[22:03] <rww> I'm too used to calling them "convic... *dodges rocks from elky*
[22:05] <IdleOne> mneptok: cover your arse and bring the passport
[22:05] <mneptok> rww: speaking of convicts, this commercial almost makes me want to try the game - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCuh5mh6lVc
[22:05]  * rww has no youtubes access
[23:53] <cwillu_at_work> quick question:  what's the policy general regarding people asking about btrfs?  is there any?
[23:53] <cwillu_at_work> in the sense of "things often recommended but known to cause problems"
[23:54] <mneptok> cwillu_at_work: BTRFS is an install-time supported filesystem
[23:55] <mneptok> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/btrfs
[23:55] <mneptok> thus, it is a supported package
[23:55] <mneptok> the big caveat is the same one that goes along with LUKS and cryptfs. "Put it on /boot and you're asking for problems."
[23:55] <rww> and as with other occasionally-problematic things like Wubi, some people choose not to support it. that is fine. complaining at length about it (for example) would be offtopic and not fine.
[23:56] <cwillu_at_work> okay, can I provide you some information about that then?
[23:56]  * cwillu_at_work follows btrfs development very closely, and has used it extensively for a few years now
[23:56] <cwillu_at_work> because calling it "supported" is causing people to misconstrue the stability
[23:58] <cwillu_at_work> power cuts can and do cause unmountable filesystem (although it's expected that the upcoming fsck will be able to recover), there are BUG_ON's which are known to be triggered unnecesarily (which will kill the system if used for the installation target)
[23:59] <mneptok> cwillu_at_work: this is better raised as a packaging and "this is included in Main?!?!?!" discussion than an IRC editorial issue.
[23:59] <cwillu_at_work> mneptok, I didn't realize it was actually listed as a supported target
[23:59] <mneptok> !info btrfs