 is it theoreticallly possible for ubuntu to be backported to the ti99/4a ?
[00:10] <bazhang> a calculator?
[02:59] <bazhang> appears to be indeed
[06:10] <rww> nobody's spoken in #ubuntu for 25 minutes. Who broke the channel?
[06:10] <elky> shh, you'll wake them
[06:11] <Flannel> rww: Ubuntu is mature enough that all the bugs are fixed and everyone knows how to accomplish everything.
[06:11]  * ldunn giggles
[06:12] <Flannel> rww: Someone discovered that there's a channel mode that fixes the distro, it's +m, for maturation.
[06:20] <rww> 35 minutes
[06:21] <rww> and ended
[06:23] <pleia2> I'll have what Flannel is drinking :)
[07:03] <rww> apparently I am a "unity nazi"
[07:03] <ldunn> o.o
[07:04] <rww> (CyberCiphers is PMing me)
[07:04] <rww> gord: you'll probably find that amusing, given past conversations
[07:04]  * rww goes to bed
[09:03] <bazhang> have chaoshax in PM
[09:03] <bazhang> thought it was a good idea to post that in #ubuntu
[09:15] <bazhang> removed the +q , may want to watch nonetheless
 DaVamps-Ubuntu: yes, except if you want to share /home with Windows, use FAT32
[09:20] <bazhang> augh
[10:58] <Omega> ikonia why was Guest11991 kicked?
[10:59] <ikonia> Omega: that's not your concern
[10:59] <Omega> So if I see someone happen in a community IRC channel and I don't know understand the reasoning it's not my concern?
[11:00] <ikonia> correct
[11:00] <Omega> Whose concern is it then?
[11:01] <Myrtti> mainly the person who got kicked
[11:01] <Myrtti> if you read the channel guidelines, you might get the idea why the kick happened
[11:02] <Myrtti> !guidelines | Omega
[11:02] <Omega> For the record, I don't know Guest11991, I just found it weird that he told someone not to advertise and got kicked.
[11:03] <Omega> Myrtti: That is like telling someone "if you knew the law, you'd know why he was executed"
[11:03] <Myrtti> thanks for your concern
[11:04] <Omega> Myrtti: Are you able to tell me why he was removed from the channel?
[11:05] <Myrtti> Omega: if we would discuss kicks and bans with people who arent in anyway related to the incident, we'd double or triple our workload. So we categorically, with few exceptions, don't
[11:06] <Myrtti> Omega: it is up to ikonia to do so, I have limited IRC access atm
[11:06] <ikonia> I don't feel it' something you need to concern yourself with, the matter is resolved
[11:07] <Myrtti> does look like that with a quick glance
[11:10] <Myrtti> Omega: ahem?
[11:11] <Omega> Myrtti: The problem is that you are stopping discussion altogether
[11:11] <Omega> Myrtti: Not even mentioning the reason
[11:11] <ikonia> Myrtti: sorry, I'm just following something else to make sure something dangerous is not given as help
[11:12] <ikonia> Omega: ok - so that's the answer, we don't discuss other peoples bans/kicks with other people.
[11:13] <Omega> We are to trust blindly that channel operators always act rationally and that no abuse occurs?
[11:13] <ikonia> correct
[11:13] <ikonia> we regulate ourselves as a group and this is being discussed
[11:14] <oCean> Omega: but there's peer review between ops
[11:15] <Omega> ok, well that's all I wanted to know, good day.
[11:15] <ikonia> no problem
[13:33] <mernilio> hm.. my plan was to get to the "real" ubuntu channel..i dont want to hang around you op-fuckers :-)
[13:33] <IdleOne> mernilio: with that attitude you aren't getting into #ubuntu either. have a nice day.
[14:38] <Myrtti> awwwwww
[14:59] <Myrtti> ultimediaos...
[15:00] <Myrtti> oh lordy
[16:46] <ikonia> has anyone seen gnomefreak in a while ?
[16:47] <IdleOne> saw him logon yesterday iirc
[16:47] <IdleOne> was in -ot, didn't speak.
[16:47] <ikonia> fine, just not seen him in a while
[16:48] <IdleOne> probably busy with life. I read somewhere people have those.
[16:48] <mneptok> rofl
[16:48] <IdleOne> us AI bots well you know.
[16:48] <mneptok> i installled the Xubuntu 11.10 beta on the wife's new laptop. first thing you see when booting is a black screen with the single text message "error: incompatible license"
[16:49] <IdleOne> that's a bug but doesn't seem to affect anything
[16:49] <mneptok> "disconnected from Plymouth:
[16:49] <IdleOne> I saw it at bug jam few days ago
[16:49] <IdleOne> that isn't good.
[16:50] <IdleOne> try +1 must be a bug filed
[17:07] <ikonia> I only put a ban on as he started sending me messages insulting me
[17:08] <IdleOne> Why people get so emtional at the no cursing rule is beyond me
[17:08] <IdleOne> emotional*
[17:09] <ikonia> it's really easy to have a conversation without it
[17:13] <mneptok> fuckin'-a right it is
[17:13] <ikonia> Hmmmmm not really helpful
[17:14] <ikonia> not really a fan of it either, pretty hard to complain that a users doing it when we are using the same langauge
[17:22] <Bigboabby> there is an operator abusing his privellages I wish to report please
[17:22] <IdleOne> which?
[17:23] <Myrtti> go ahead then
[17:23] <Bigboabby> having a laugh with a newbie, then I get kicked! I didnt swear or abuse or cause insult
[17:23] <mneptok> ikonia: this from the person that responds to users' insults by insulting them himself?
[17:24] <mneptok> ikonia: when you live in a glass house ...
[17:24] <Bigboabby> i even spoke to the user I was having fun with, he is currently in query with me and we are contuning this laugh
[17:25] <Bigboabby> I ended a sentense with  #$%#$# and I got kicked! so this is how OPs act in ubuntu world ?
[17:25] <Bigboabby> notice I still have not pointed finger or mentioned nicks
[17:26] <ikonia> mneptok: yes, I took that on board
[17:26] <IdleOne> Bigboabby: the usage of the @#$%$ after being told that obfuscating is still cursing even though you meant it as a joke is like you were daring the ops to remove you.
[17:27] <Bigboabby> I bloody well was not!
[17:27] <Bigboabby> dont people have a sense of humour these days?
[17:27] <IdleOne> no.
[17:27] <Bigboabby> IdleOne: you said it all
[17:27] <IdleOne> alright then guess we are done.
[17:27] <Bigboabby> one is supposed to trust an op, not fear them
[17:28] <Bigboabby> so.. thats that.. apparently I was daring an op? that is the conclusion?
[17:28] <mneptok> Bigboabby: one is supposed to follow channel guidelines, not ignore them
[17:28] <Bigboabby> *sigh*
[17:29] <Bigboabby> some social channel.. okay, Ill respect this, but I may take it further, as its just not a way to conduct operator privellage, I should have been warned first!
[17:30] <ikonia> I should point out that during that whole conversation the users is insulting me in pm
[17:31] <ikonia> and is now making threats to report me/us to freenode
[17:32] <ikonia> I've not responded to him at all
[17:57] <Myrtti> !search share
[18:40] <oCean> PerfieM  supposed to be in #u ?
[18:40] <rww> yes
[18:41] <ikonia> it can't be good that everyone asks that
[18:42] <oCean> rww: what does that mean?
[18:42] <rww> what does what mean?
[18:42] <rww> as far as I know, PerfieM does not currently have any active bans in #ubuntu
[18:42] <oCean> "yes" - are they allowed?
[18:42] <oCean> 42821 seems active
[18:42] <ikonia> oh come on, look what he's just done
[18:42] <oCean> that
[18:43] <ikonia> why does he do this ?
[18:43] <oCean> is so..
[18:43] <ikonia> rww: I'm assumine you've spoke to him
[18:43] <rww> oCean: then I must have missed it, I reviewed and removed them a week or two ago
[18:43] <rww> ikonia: yes, they're well aware of our expectations
[18:43] <ikonia> then why has he just done what he's done
[18:43] <rww> because she doesn't care
[18:43] <ikonia> (not expecting you to account for him)
[18:43] <ikonia> sorry, "she"
[18:44] <rww> np, i got that wrong for a while too
[18:44] <oCean> rww: nvm, I can't keep track of all those specifics, but BT is so slow, then I ask here if anyone remembers active bans.
[18:44] <rww> oCean: no, it's quite possible that there were active bans that i missed. gateways are a pain
[18:45] <oCean> rww: I pasted wrong BT id, I meant 42724 (is yours)
[18:47] <rww> I removed that :S
[18:47]  * rww kicks BT
[19:39] <oCean> * Dalailamer (57906827@gateway/web/freenode/ip.87.144.104.39)
[19:40] <oCean> in #u+1, matches lars t his range
 i heard formatting is dangerous
[19:55] <bazhang> yep him
[19:56] <oCean> he mentioned his bug again
[19:56] <oCean> *sigh*
[20:00] <bazhang> heh
[20:13] <oCean> oh, man
[20:15] <bazhang> his bug messages are exactly the same: Need Help!
[20:16]  * oCean admires bazhangs patience
 what's the best way to virtualize a macos on ubuntu?
[20:40] <bazhang> thought server was allowed desktop not
[20:41] <Myrtti> pretty much yeah