=== kentb is now known as kentb-out === maxb_ is now known as maxb [07:52] sigh.. Truecrypt would definitely need some love.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/849760 [07:52] Ubuntu bug 849760 in debian-installer "alternate installer does not allow multiple partitions to have bootable flag "on"" [Undecided,New] [07:53] but IMHO manual setup is more advanced and it should not restrict the number of bootable partitions [08:03] whoa [08:03] I'm trying to install from daily oneiric alternate amd64 and I get error "The installer cannot find a suitable kernel package to install" O.o [08:06] cjwatson: hmm.. proc is not mounted to /target/proc [08:06] shouldn't it be? === lool- is now known as lool [08:35] hmm.. more interestingly /target/etc/apt/suorces.list is empty [08:44] hmmh.. OK. I think I just got unlucky with the daily installer [08:44] now it screams that libreoffice-core has unmet dependencies [08:47] reverting to beta1 alternate installer [09:39] Wellark: yes, we fixed that apt/eglibc bug yesterday. *sigh* at unmet dependencies, not much I can do except wait for libreoffice to finish building everywhere [09:39] hm, that's odd actually, it has [09:39] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/current/report.html doesn't list anything [09:40] * cjwatson syncs an alternate image [10:19] cjwatson: well, I'm going to try again, this time with beta1 CD [10:19] I really need _some_ working system :D [10:20] of course this is all my fault as I want to stick with the windows installation and even make it more painful by adding truecrypt in the mix :D [11:45] ubiquity: evand * r4940 trunk/ (debian/changelog ubiquity/nm.py): [11:45] ubiquity: Handle APs going away while trying to query their properties [11:45] ubiquity: (LP: #838068). [11:52] cjwatson: OK, now installing with beta1 [11:52] grub-install to /dev/sda3 fails [11:52] "This is a fatal error" [11:53] hmm.. something wrong with the paths perhaps.. [11:53] "grub-installer: /usr/bin/grub-setup: error: cannot read '/grub/core.img' correctly. [11:54] should be '/boot/grub/core.img' [11:54] no. that path is relative to the root of the filesystem in question [11:54] you have a separate /boot [11:54] yeah [11:54] and it's mounted [11:54] irrelevant [11:54] ok [11:54] grub-setup uses grub's own filesystem code to read it [11:54] what do you need? [11:55] the appropriate grub-setup command run with -vv [11:55] I'm in the installers shell right now [11:55] ok, doing chroot [11:55] you'll probably want to run 'grub-install --debug --force /dev/sda3' first to get the right command' [11:55] running.. [11:56] and if /proc and /sys aren't mounted, mount them; they were mounted when running grub-install, they just may not be mounted now [11:56] they are [11:56] I checked [11:56] odd.. [11:56] "Installation finished. No error reported. [11:56] + exit0 [11:57] crappy cache coherency perhaps ... [11:57] "/usr/bin/grub-setup: info: opening the core image '/boot/grub/core.img' [11:57] I'll give it a go in a while and see if I can track anything down, can't right now though [11:58] are you absolutely sure that the '/grub/core.img' should be absolute of the boot partition and not absolute to the root? [11:58] yes. [11:59] I am also absolutely sure that trying to diagnose the problem based solely on a glance at the messages isn't going to work :-) [11:59] nice. :-) [11:59] usefull debug XD [11:59] core_path_dev = grub_make_system_path_relative_to_its_root (core_path_dev_full); [11:59] is fairly explicit (and that variable's what's printed in the error message you quoted earlier) [12:00] while the "opening the core image" message is core_path, a different variable [12:01] OK. [12:01] I have to leave for an hour or so [12:01] but I'll be back [12:01] I'll leave the machine as it is for now [13:33] cjwatson: back. kinda. [13:33] have to go to get child from daycare soon [13:34] I expect to be in meetings for most of the rest of the day [13:37] ok, I'll then try to figure out something :) [14:20] <{Axxes}> hi everyone! does anybody know wavemaker? [14:23] cjwatson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/830892 - why would you not be able to mix pycairo and GI bindings? pycairo doesn't seem to touch any part of gobject. [14:23] Ubuntu bug 830892 in ubiquity "ubiquity-dm crashed with AttributeError in run(): 'Pixbuf' object has no attribute 'render_pixmap_and_mask' (dup-of: 830061)" [High,Triaged] [14:23] Ubuntu bug 830061 in ubiquity "ubiquity-dm crashed with AttributeError in run(): 'Pixbuf' object has no attribute 'render_pixmap_and_mask'" [High,Fix released] [14:25] ev: we needed to pass bindings of cairo types to GDK functions, and the GI GDK bindings expect GI cairo bindings not pycairo [14:25] or at least that's how it seemed to me [14:25] if you find a clever way to dodge that then by all means do :) [14:26] Gdk.cairo_set_source_pixbuf in particular [14:26] ah, right [14:26] and I think root.create_similar_surface probably returned a GI cairo type [14:26] annoying that cairo doesn't do the hand me a filename and I'll feed you back an image surface thing [14:26] yeah [14:27] I think you're probably right that a little C helper is easiest :-/ [14:28] indeed, I'll get cracking on that [16:58] ubiquity: evand * r4941 trunk/ (9 files in 5 dirs): Use a small C program to set the desktop wallpaper (LP: #830061). [17:04] ev, i think you might have broken the accessibility profile setup in that commit [17:05] oh yes [17:05] good catch [17:05] fixing now, thanks [17:05] sure np [17:07] ubiquity: evand * r4942 trunk/bin/ubiquity-dm: Unbreak last commit. [17:43] cjwatson: bug #838981 might be the same problem [17:43] Launchpad bug 838981 in grub2 "Upgrade to Beta 1 does not install grub to partition" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/838981 === kentb is now known as kentb-afk