| micahg | Laney: opencv finished, I'm testing wallch with the changes | 04:20 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | lenios: so, asm3 doesn't even build in oneiric | 04:25 |
| micahg | Laney: new opencv uploaded, so in ~5-6 hours you should be able to retry your build | 04:40 |
| micahg | Laney: I mean no-change-rebuild opencv, not new :) | 04:40 |
| dholbach | good morning | 06:44 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| Laney | micahg: oh, cool. wallch worked then | 08:15 |
| Laney | ? | 08:16 |
| micahg | Laney: hmm, failed in LP worked locally, maybe it didn't publish, trying again | 08:16 |
| Laney | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641670 | 08:19 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 641670 in docky "docky: Spelling Error" [Minor,Open] | 08:19 |
| * Laney giggles | 08:19 | |
| micahg | Laney: wallch finished, so go ahead and retry yours | 08:31 |
| Laney | okey dokes | 08:31 |
| Laney | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdecodeqr/0.9.3-5ubuntu1/+build/2784201 | 08:33 |
| Laney | keep an eagle eye out | 08:33 |
| micahg | we | 08:34 |
| micahg | err, we'll see how much longer I'm awake, but will check in the morning | 08:34 |
| lenios | build of asm3 lacking mh_clean... | 08:45 |
| Laney | micahg: yeah, looks like it worked | 08:50 |
| Laney | good call | 08:50 |
| micahg | awesome | 08:50 |
| lenios | i can get the latest asm3 build, but i need to remove the mh_clean added in debian/rules (which is said to clean up after the maven helpers) | 08:55 |
| lenios | looks like maven-repo-helper >= 1.5 is needed to use mh_clean | 09:00 |
| lenios | and oneiric only have 1.2 | 09:00 |
| micahg | so, basically eclipse needs to go in a PPA for oneiric | 09:09 |
| lenios | wait, maven-repo-helper is actually 1.5.2 in oneiric | 09:09 |
| lenios | i think i can put it in my ppa | 09:11 |
| lenios | what i don't know is why asm3 building is not finding maven-repo-helper even if it's in Build-Depends-Indep. I do have to install the package on my machine | 09:14 |
| Laney | how are you building it? | 09:29 |
| lenios | i install maven-repo-helper (i don't know why it doesn't work without it), and then use pbuilder and pdebuild | 09:31 |
| Laney | you sometimes need extra packages to run a clean target | 09:34 |
| lenios | and how do i specify extra packages when uploading to ppa? | 09:45 |
| Laney | by "run a clean target" I meant in order to build the source package on your machine | 09:46 |
| Laney | dpkg-buildpackage -S or similar | 09:46 |
| Laney | if you need to add extra packages then put them in build-depends(-indep) | 09:47 |
| Laney | lenios: I just built asm3 and it worked just fine | 09:50 |
| Laney | try pbuilder build asm3_3.3.2-1.dsc | 09:51 |
| lenios | there's no problem with 3.3.2? | 09:51 |
| lenios | you mean 3.2? | 09:51 |
| lenios | try http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/asm3/asm3_3.3.1-1.dsc | 09:52 |
| lenios | i don't have any issues with latest ubuntu (3.2) but they added an mh_clean in debian/rules in the 3.3.1 | 09:52 |
| Laney | what release are you trying to build on? | 09:53 |
| lenios | i dget the debian dsc and try to build on oneiric | 09:53 |
| lenios | it works... only if i install maven-repo-helper before using pbuilder | 09:53 |
| Laney | what /exact/ commands are you using? | 09:54 |
| Laney | 3.3.1 works fine too. | 09:54 |
| Laney | (I am using sbuild as opposed to pbuilder though) | 09:54 |
| lenios | using pdebuild with http://pastebin.com/wqz3buBy | 09:55 |
| Laney | never used it, but I suspect that the problem is you need maven-repo-helper and/or ant installed to build the source package. This happens /outside/ of pbuilder. | 09:58 |
| lenios | would it work on ppa? | 09:58 |
| Laney | that's why I suggested just doing pbuilder build ...dsc | 09:58 |
| Laney | should do | 09:59 |
| lenios | pbuilder build ...dsc works for me too | 10:03 |
| Laney | great | 10:03 |
| Laney | so what happens is that when you build a source package, the clean target from debian/rules is invoked, and sometimes this needs extra packages | 10:03 |
| lenios | i see | 10:04 |
| === kentb-afk is now known as kentb | ||
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| jtaylor | hm how does one do a bzr-merge-upstream when the patches are applied in the branch? | 16:49 |
| jtaylor | as the new upstream may conflict with the patches | 16:50 |
| jtaylor | why does bzr do this, it only causes me problems and I don't see any advantage .. | 16:51 |
| tumbleweed | do what? applied patches? | 16:59 |
| jtaylor | yes | 16:59 |
| tumbleweed | because then bzr can manage them. Yes it's currentyl very not-ideal | 17:00 |
| tumbleweed | eventually they should be managed as a patch queue | 17:00 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| jtaylor | gna, what should be a 2 minute operation turns into 30 minutes, screw bzr I'll make a debdiff | 17:12 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| tumbleweed | :) | 17:13 |
| Laney | because of .pc conflicts? | 17:13 |
| cjwatson | jtaylor: quilt pop -a; bzr merge --force; while quilt push; do quilt refresh; done | 17:15 |
| jtaylor | yes but verifing the patch is unecessarilty painful | 17:15 |
| cjwatson | WFM | 17:15 |
| jtaylor | btw force does nto seem to work with merge-upstream | 17:23 |
| cjwatson | jtaylor: no - that's a bug I think | 17:49 |
| micahg | jtaylor: heh, Debian just uploaded a fixed version of tahoe-lafs | 19:26 |
| jtaylor | yes talk about bad timing ._. | 19:26 |
| jtaylor | I'll take care of syncing it next cycle | 19:26 |
| Laney | is there a diff left? | 19:32 |
| jtaylor | nothing worth syncing | 19:32 |
| jtaylor | and I don't want to check the package again for screwups ._. | 19:33 |
| jtaylor | well I might also bug someone from sr to fix it in natty ._. | 19:36 |
| jtaylor | it never ends with that package | 19:36 |
| micahg | jtaylor: I was wondering if you fixed that with the security upload | 19:36 |
| jtaylor | I was thinking about doing it | 19:37 |
| jtaylor | hmm I should ahve added the missing mock dep ... | 19:37 |
| micahg | right :) | 19:38 |
| jtaylor | that only fixes 50% but saves another upload | 19:38 |
| micahg | jtaylor: what do you mean 50%? | 19:38 |
| jtaylor | there are two issues | 19:38 |
| jtaylor | mock is the easy one | 19:38 |
| jtaylor | well the one where upstream does not disagree with me | 19:39 |
| jtaylor | for solving the pycryptopp issue there are two possibilities | 19:40 |
| jtaylor | the screw some users which have some broken corner case non package managed installation | 19:40 |
| jtaylor | or update a package in an sru | 19:40 |
| * ScottK votes SRU | 21:13 | |
| ScottK | Security updates should be a minimal change, so two uploads is appropriate in any case. | 21:14 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| * davidsarah catches up | 22:37 | |
| davidsarah | so that's all fixed in http://packages.debian.org/sid/tahoe-lafs 1.8.3-2, right? | 22:55 |
| * davidsarah checks the Ubuntu packages | 22:58 | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| davidsarah | hmm. I have tahoe-lafs 1.7.1 installed on Maverick. I run Update Manager and install everything it prompts about. shouldn't that apply the security fix? | 23:06 |
| davidsarah | it doesn't | 23:06 |
| davidsarah | I'm not prompted to install any new tahoe-lafs package | 23:06 |
| ajmitch | davidsarah: pastebin the output of 'apt-cache policy tahoe-lafs' - launchpad says it was published 3 hours ago | 23:09 |
| * ajmitch can see the package on security.ubuntu.com, too | 23:10 | |
| davidsarah | http://codepad.org/PnsARp1P | 23:21 |
| * davidsarah looks on security.ubuntu.com | 23:21 | |
| ajmitch | that is the version that was uploaded a few hours ago by jtaylor | 23:21 |
| davidsarah | really? | 23:21 |
| ajmitch | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tahoe-lafs/1.7.1-0ubuntu1.1 | 23:21 |
| davidsarah | I grepped for the fix | 23:22 |
| * davidsarah checks they didn't make a mistake doing that | 23:22 | |
| ajmitch | diff between -0ubuntu1 & -0ubuntu1.1 is on the page if you want to check that | 23:22 |
| davidsarah | oh, it is updated | 23:24 |
| davidsarah | why didn't my original grep find that? | 23:24 |
| * ajmitch shrugs | 23:25 | |
| ajmitch | as long as it is really fixed now? :) | 23:25 |
| davidsarah | still checking | 23:26 |
| davidsarah | yes, it is fixed | 23:27 |
| ajmitch | great | 23:28 |
| davidsarah | but why didn't I see a summary of the update in Update Manager? | 23:28 |
| ajmitch | I don't know what parts are involved in update manager listing changelogs | 23:28 |
| davidsarah | it didn't mention that tahoe-lafs was being updated at all | 23:30 |
| davidsarah | (but it was, because I ran the same 'grep -Rn fills-holes /usr/share/pyshared/allmydata' command before and after running Update Manager, so it had not already been updated) | 23:30 |
| ajmitch | don't know, sorry, I don't tend to use update-manager | 23:30 |
| davidsarah | I used it because I figured that is what a non-developer/techie user might use, and I wanted to see what they would see | 23:31 |
| ajmitch | it could depend on when it had checked for updates, if you'd checked automatically, and if security updates are set to install automatically | 23:31 |
| davidsarah | I didn't explicitly turn on any automatic updating, and I tend to turn off options like that if I see them | 23:32 |
| broder | changelogs are fetched from a separate server. there at least used to be a delay between archive publishing and changelog generation. i don't know if there still is | 23:33 |
| ajmitch | broder: the package should still appear in u-m even if there's no changelog | 23:34 |
| davidsarah | yes, that's what I thought | 23:34 |
| broder | summary of the update> i thought you were referring to the description section | 23:34 |
| ajmitch | "Install security updates without confirmation" is an option in software sources, I don't know if it's the default | 23:34 |
| davidsarah | I was referring to the top pane | 23:35 |
| * davidsarah looks whether that is set | 23:35 | |
| broder | you...did click the "check" button, right? | 23:35 |
| davidsarah | yes | 23:35 |
| broder | might just have not gotten to your mirror yet | 23:35 |
| ajmitch | right, but it is installed now, somehow :) | 23:36 |
| davidsarah | yes, but I'm trying to understand why the package... what ajmitch said | 23:36 |
| broder | ...oh, i see. that's what i get for not paying attention | 23:36 |
| ajmitch | so I was trying to figure out if it was silently installed, but I don't know update-manager's behaviour | 23:37 |
| broder | you could go look in /var/log/apt/ | 23:37 |
| davidsarah | oh, /var/log/apt/history.log does include: tahoe-lafs:amd64 (1.7.1-0ubuntu1, 1.7.1-0ubuntu1.1) | 23:39 |
| davidsarah | maybe I just missed it in the list of updates | 23:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!