AlanBell | is there a way in the LoCo directory to see all the events you are registered to attend? | 11:22 |
---|---|---|
AlanBell | perhaps a personalised ical feed? | 11:22 |
nigelb | Fairly sure there isn't a personalized ical feed. | 11:23 |
AlanBell | so am I. Would be cool though | 11:26 |
mhall119 | AlanBell: file a bug | 11:27 |
mhall119 | write a patch if you can | 11:28 |
nigelb | RSS would be complicated | 11:29 |
nigelb | But having a profile page would be awesome. | 11:29 |
AlanBell | yeah, will file a bug | 11:29 |
AlanBell | are there any recent patches with test scripts to look at? | 11:30 |
AlanBell | I couldn't work out how to do a meaningful test for https://code.launchpad.net/~alanbell/loco-directory/backbutton/+merge/73526 | 11:31 |
AlanBell | who should bug 773243 be assigned to? | 11:54 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 773243 in ubuntu-website "Ubuntu website advertises "Fully compatible with Microsoft Office" (affects: 4) (heat: 18)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/773243 | 11:54 |
nigelb | AlanBell: summit should have good tests | 12:52 |
james_w | mhall119, https://code.launchpad.net/~james-w/awstrial/remove-maverick-text/+merge/75572 | 15:26 |
mhall119 | james_w: I was actually joking about you doing awstrial work, that's in ISD's hands now | 15:28 |
james_w | yeah | 15:28 |
james_w | I was hoping it would still work though :-) | 15:28 |
mhall119 | I'll take it, don't get me wrong, it's less work for me | 15:28 |
mhall119 | james_w: I got an error running your multi-sprint tests | 17:00 |
james_w | oh | 17:01 |
james_w | pastebin and I'll fix it | 17:01 |
mhall119 | it's in the MP | 17:01 |
mhall119 | looks like maybe you're using a newer version of Django? | 17:01 |
mhall119 | it can't find assertIs | 17:01 |
james_w | ah | 17:02 |
james_w | assertEqual will suffice | 17:02 |
james_w | mhall119, fixed | 17:04 |
james_w | also argle, non-deterministic behaviour to try and write a test for | 17:06 |
james_w | well, I'll just fix the code and keep the test I think | 17:07 |
james_w | this is some private meeting fixes I'm working on, not the multi sprint branch | 17:07 |
mhall119 | ok | 17:07 |
mhall119 | james_w: my only concern about the multi-sprint is that once you add a Sprint record, you lose the default which uses the summit name | 17:10 |
mhall119 | this may cause confusion | 17:11 |
james_w | hmm | 17:11 |
mhall119 | we'll just have to make sure people know about it | 17:11 |
james_w | ok | 17:11 |
mhall119 | so right now we'll have uds-p spring | 17:11 |
mhall119 | sprint | 17:11 |
james_w | I would have put some text on the admin page, but I wasn't sure how | 17:11 |
mhall119 | and if Marianna adds the Linaro sprint, suddenly it won't check the uds-p sprint anymore | 17:11 |
mhall119 | I think just making them aware will suffice for this cycle, but we might want to discuss how to keep it consistent going forward | 17:12 |
mhall119 | either dropping the use of a default, or adding the default as a sprint on initial save of a Summit object | 17:13 |
james_w | ah, that's a good idea | 17:13 |
james_w | I'll set this one up, so it won't be a problem unless anyone changes them | 17:14 |
mhall119 | ok | 17:14 |
mhall119 | awesome test case for it though | 17:16 |
mhall119 | james_w: both your branches have landed in trunk, I also updated http://ec2-50-16-76-22.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ to the latest trunk and migrated the DB | 17:26 |
mhall119 | james_w: you can test importing multiple sprints on there if you have one for linaro ready to go | 17:26 |
james_w | woop | 17:26 |
james_w | thanks | 17:26 |
james_w | I don't, but now that I know this is approved I will create one for testing | 17:27 |
mhall119 | I just ran lpupdate on there with the default sprint | 17:27 |
james_w | hmm, it will happily import from staging, I'll try that | 17:27 |
mhall119 | man, having this ec2 running trunk sure is nice | 17:28 |
james_w | yep | 17:30 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: nigelb: james_w: summit now has 43 unit tests, and they're all passing \o/ | 17:37 |
james_w | yay | 17:38 |
nigelb | You guys are awesome :) | 17:38 |
nigelb | I propose a hacking session every UDS. | 17:38 |
mhall119 | *after* or *before* every UDS | 17:38 |
nigelb | *at* | 17:38 |
mhall119 | ok, but no deployments | 17:38 |
nigelb | Yeah | 17:38 |
nigelb | This puts all the stakeholders + people who can fix into one place. | 17:39 |
mhall119 | well we've had sesssions at the last 2 UDSs | 17:39 |
james_w | this seems to be working ok | 17:39 |
nigelb | Yeah :) | 17:40 |
james_w | it fails to import blueprints from staging, as it's hardcoded to production | 17:40 |
james_w | but it imported users fine | 17:40 |
james_w | so I think we're good to deploy this | 17:40 |
nigelb | Hrm, we should take it out into a config | 17:40 |
james_w | any objection to a deployment on trunk to summit.ubuntu.com? | 17:40 |
mhall119 | not from me, but it's going to require some extra work this time because we re-set the South history | 17:41 |
james_w | ah | 17:41 |
mhall119 | so we'll need to ./manage.py reset south | 17:41 |
james_w | I can do it, but some clues about that would be appreciated | 17:41 |
mhall119 | the ./manage.py migrate schedule 0001 --fake | 17:41 |
mhall119 | and ./manage.py migrate sponsor 0001 --fake | 17:41 |
mhall119 | then ./manage.py migrate | 17:42 |
james_w | ok | 17:42 |
james_w | should I merge trunk to stable and production branches first? | 17:42 |
mhall119 | not to stable, once trunk merges to production we're going to be done with stable | 17:43 |
james_w | ah¸ok | 17:43 |
james_w | I'll get some lunch and tackle this | 17:43 |
mhall119 | ok, when do you want to try for a production deployment? | 17:43 |
mhall119 | we need to let jcastro know to expect it | 17:44 |
nigelb | mhall119: why do you want to get rid of stable? :( | 17:44 |
mhall119 | nigelb: because once trunk merges to production, trunk will be our new stable | 17:44 |
nigelb | But what if want to make unstable fixes and stable fixes? | 17:45 |
mhall119 | so we'll go back to only 2 branches, trunk and production | 17:45 |
nigelb | Like james_w did have to do a bit back. | 17:45 |
mhall119 | you make unstable fixes in feature branches from now on, and propose them back into trunk | 17:45 |
nigelb | ah, ok. | 17:45 |
nigelb | Nothing undeployable goes into trunk. | 17:45 |
nigelb | Makes sense. | 17:45 |
james_w | let's say 1:15 from now | 17:45 |
mhall119 | james_w: wow, that soon? ok | 17:45 |
mhall119 | james_w: do you know how to make a proper backup of postgres? | 17:46 |
james_w | is there a reason to wait? | 17:46 |
mhall119 | not that I know of | 17:46 |
mhall119 | except letting people know it's going to happen | 17:46 |
mhall119 | and backing up the db prior | 17:46 |
james_w | yeah, I'll see about the db backup | 17:48 |
nigelb | mhall119: pg_dump | 17:48 |
james_w | downtime should be short, and I don't think anyone is using it much right now | 17:48 |
mhall119 | nigelb: yeah, but what parameters do we want? | 17:48 |
mhall119 | james_w: I'm checking with jorge on that | 17:48 |
nigelb | database name? | 17:48 |
nigelb | and I'd guess username and password. | 17:48 |
james_w | https://code.launchpad.net/~james-w/summit/fix-autoscheduling-conflict-with-private/+merge/75594 was the problem I was fighting with earlier | 17:48 |
nigelb | mhall119: "pg_dump summit" should work. | 17:50 |
nigelb | unless it fails for authentication | 17:50 |
nigelb | you can get credentials from settings.py anyway. | 17:50 |
mhall119 | james_w: can't we compare user records by their primary key? | 17:51 |
mhall119 | also, why did you remove local_settings.py.sample? | 17:52 |
=== Ronnie2 is now known as Ronnie | ||
james_w | mhall119, that wasn't intentional, I must have used mv rather than cp | 18:12 |
james_w | mhall119, compare by primary key, you mean implement __eq__ for Attendees? | 18:12 |
mhall119 | james_w: no, I mean using attendee.pk instead of attendee.name | 18:21 |
james_w | ah | 18:21 |
james_w | that should work | 18:22 |
mhall119 | james_w: I've got to pick up the kids from school in a few minutes, so just ping me before you deploy to make sure i'm around | 18:23 |
james_w | ok | 18:23 |
mhall119 | you can go ahead and merge trunk->production if you want though | 18:23 |
james_w | I'll hang back to start anything in production | 18:23 |
james_w | ok | 18:23 |
mhall119 | james_w: once this goes out, let's talk about how to fix the caching (or at least providing a means of force-clearing it) | 18:25 |
james_w | yeah | 18:25 |
james_w | I was thinking about that in the shower this morning | 18:25 |
james_w | I've made the .pk change and re-instated local_settings in the autoscheduler branch | 18:26 |
james_w | and pushed up a small js branch for a bug I found while testing private meetings | 18:26 |
mhall119 | cool, I'll review later, it can go out after this deployment | 18:27 |
james_w | yeah | 18:27 |
james_w | they are important fixes, but don't block deployment | 18:27 |
james_w | and once we've done this one we should be able to do frequent deployments of well-tested changes :-) | 18:27 |
mhall119 | I'm thinking, about the cache, that we make a signal that gets fired whenever some code changes the schedule | 18:27 |
james_w | and invalidate everything? | 18:28 |
mhall119 | that way we can start with a specific URL that you can hit to fire the signal, but also start adding it into the places where it needs to be and eventually not need the URL | 18:28 |
mhall119 | james_w: that's what we should discuss | 18:28 |
james_w | ok | 18:28 |
mhall119 | ok, leaving now, bbl | 18:28 |
james_w | let's do so later | 18:28 |
james_w | bye | 18:28 |
mhall119 | james_w: okay, I'm back | 18:53 |
james_w | cool | 18:56 |
james_w | just did the merge to production | 18:56 |
nigelb | james_w: I <3'd your RT. | 18:58 |
nigelb | "summit is such a fuster cluck" | 18:58 |
james_w | pg_dump done | 19:01 |
james_w | new code in place | 19:01 |
mhall119 | did you touch the .wsgi files? | 19:01 |
james_w | not yet | 19:01 |
james_w | I'm thinking that should happen after the migrate commands | 19:02 |
mhall119 | ah, right | 19:02 |
james_w | starting those now based on your instructions | 19:02 |
james_w | You have requested a database reset. | 19:02 |
mhall119 | did you just do the --fake migrations? | 19:02 |
james_w | This will IRREVERSIBLY DESTROY any data for | 19:02 |
james_w | the "south" application in the database "summit". | 19:02 |
james_w | Are you sure you want to do this? | 19:02 |
james_w | Type 'yes' to continue, or 'no' to cancel: | 19:02 |
james_w | reset first right? | 19:03 |
mhall119 | yes | 19:03 |
mhall119 | we have a backup anyway, right? | 19:03 |
james_w | yeah | 19:03 |
james_w | migrations done | 19:04 |
james_w | touching wsgi files | 19:04 |
james_w | crossing fingers | 19:04 |
james_w | looks good to me | 19:05 |
mhall119 | looks good to me too | 19:05 |
james_w | anyone see any problems? | 19:05 |
james_w | we have the new code as well :-) | 19:05 |
nigelb | Hrm, today link is falling off the top menu :( | 19:05 |
james_w | not for me | 19:06 |
nigelb | what browser? | 19:06 |
mhall119 | nigelb: no it's not | 19:06 |
james_w | firefox | 19:06 |
mhall119 | nigelb: I get "There are no sessions scheduled for today." | 19:06 |
mhall119 | what do you get? | 19:07 |
nigelb | mhall119: No, I meant its not staying in the top menu | 19:07 |
mhall119 | also, are you going to /today ot /uds-p/today ? | 19:07 |
nigelb | but dropped down | 19:07 |
mhall119 | hmmm, not for me | 19:07 |
mhall119 | nigelb: what URL are you seeing this on? | 19:07 |
nigelb | summit.ubuntu.com | 19:08 |
mhall119 | nigelb: try ctrl+refresh? maybe you have old theme dadta | 19:08 |
nigelb | mhall119: http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/today.png | 19:08 |
mhall119 | or maybe your font settings are causing it? | 19:09 |
nigelb | maybe because I don't have Ubuntu font. | 19:09 |
nigelb | Right. | 19:09 |
cjohnston | whats up with microblogging? | 19:14 |
cjohnston | are all of those curacao rooms for hacking? | 19:15 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: the Hackfest is from a track being assigned to the room | 19:15 |
mhall119 | I'm not sure what's up with twidenash | 19:15 |
cjohnston | Right.. I know that... I assume that those rooms are only for the hackfest tho? | 19:16 |
james_w | cjohnston, they are Linaro rooms, assigned to teams to use for hacking | 19:17 |
james_w | as Linaro isn't planning to schedule a full roster of sessions, but spend some time hacking as well | 19:17 |
james_w | mornings for discussion, afternoons for hacking | 19:18 |
james_w | mhall119, let me know when you want to discuss caching | 19:18 |
cjohnston | gotcha | 19:18 |
mhall119 | james_w: should those be private rooms then, so that public meetings aren't auto-scheduled into them? | 19:20 |
james_w | hmm | 19:20 |
james_w | double hmm | 19:21 |
james_w | probably shouldn't be openly scheduled | 19:21 |
cjohnston | We don't have a way of displaying the private rooms yet | 19:21 |
james_w | maybe they should be private, I'm not sure | 19:21 |
james_w | I'll have a look | 19:22 |
cjohnston | What does marking a room closed do? | 19:23 |
mhall119 | james_w: can you either give g+w ./summit/media/js or run: bzr branch bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~django-foundations-dev/twidenash/2.0/ ./twidenash | 19:23 |
cjohnston | Does that allow manually scheduling? | 19:23 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: only through the django admin | 19:23 |
cjohnston | hmm | 19:23 |
cjohnston | So we need a way to mark a room as avoid auto scheduler | 19:23 |
cjohnston | Like a 'Manual Scheduling' | 19:24 |
cjohnston | because, unless Linaro has a reason to have them private, there isn't really a reason that they shouldn't be displayed to anyone. | 19:25 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: maybe "Reserved" would be a good type description | 19:26 |
cjohnston | That would work.. | 19:26 |
james_w | mhall119, done both | 19:30 |
cjohnston | james_w: what do you think about a reserved status.. That way the room is still "Public" but the autoscheduler doesn't schedule stuff in there.. similar to private, just being visible to everyone | 19:31 |
cjohnston | on the edit page stuff can be manually scheduled | 19:31 |
mhall119 | fixed microblogging | 19:33 |
cjohnston | cool | 19:33 |
james_w | cjohnston, maybe | 19:36 |
james_w | I need to look in to whether we want the schedule for these rooms to be displayed at all | 19:36 |
cjohnston | ok | 19:37 |
james_w | we are using the tracks feature though | 19:37 |
james_w | so it would only autoschedule sessions in the linaro-hacking track | 19:37 |
james_w | in to those rooms | 19:37 |
cjohnston | right... | 19:37 |
james_w | so if we just schedule it how we want the autoscheduler will leave it along | 19:37 |
james_w | alone | 19:37 |
cjohnston | wont the conflict resolver mess with it if conflicts arise? | 19:38 |
james_w | nope | 19:39 |
james_w | not if we manually schedule everything | 19:39 |
james_w | the conflict resolver doesn't change hand-scheduled stuff | 19:39 |
cjohnston | gotcha | 19:39 |
cjohnston | mhall119: oops | 20:21 |
nigelb | james_w: the rescheduler does. | 20:21 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: yeah, sorry about that | 20:22 |
james_w | nigelb, does what? | 20:22 |
mhall119 | statik has requested an official build and release of the latest django-openid-auth though | 20:22 |
nigelb | james_w: move things around | 20:22 |
james_w | nigelb, where? | 20:22 |
cjohnston | whats the eta on that mhall119 | 20:22 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: dunno, let me ask | 20:22 |
nigelb | james_w: I think its commented out now. So we may be okay. | 20:22 |
cjohnston | be even more awesomer if the memory issues get fixed instead | 20:22 |
mhall119 | yeah, that's the big concern | 20:23 |
cjohnston | thats why i asked about getting them switched | 20:23 |
cjohnston | maybe you can say thats a good idea or something | 20:23 |
nigelb | Worst case, we could just spawn an ec2 for summit. | 20:23 |
nigelb | Really, I'm not that scared about the memory issues. | 20:24 |
cjohnston | do you actually think they would point summit to an ec2? | 20:24 |
nigelb | Yes, given enough pressure. | 20:24 |
james_w | nigelb, the reschedule code only acts on autoscheduled events | 20:25 |
nigelb | james_w: AH! | 20:25 |
nigelb | the "auto" flag, right. | 20:25 |
cjohnston | and you don't think that when we actually add load to summit cranberry will get worse? | 20:25 |
james_w | ywp | 20:25 |
nigelb | cjohnston: I can't say that for sure. | 20:25 |
nigelb | No one can. | 20:25 |
nigelb | Because we don't know what's causing the problems | 20:25 |
nigelb | Its intermittent. | 20:26 |
cjohnston | thats my point... that we need to figure it out | 20:26 |
nigelb | Personally, I think its something to do with apache config. | 20:26 |
nigelb | But someone needs to spend time figuring that out. | 20:26 |
cjohnston | yup | 20:26 |
nigelb | I don't have access, neither do you. | 20:26 |
nigelb | That leaves IS or mhall119 / Daviey / james_w. | 20:26 |
cjohnston | but do mhall119 Daviey and james_w have the correct access to figre it out? | 20:27 |
nigelb | And we probably need root at some point. | 20:27 |
nigelb | So, they don't have all the access. | 20:27 |
mhall119 | I only have write access to the summit directory | 20:27 |
nigelb | We're screwed with a ghost of a problem. | 20:27 |
cjohnston | throw harvest back on cranberry and give us guanabanana | 20:27 |
nigelb | And, to make things even more complicated, its one of those things you have to be watching happen. | 20:27 |
cjohnston | or wtf ever it is | 20:28 |
nigelb | Its guanabana. | 20:28 |
cjohnston | whatever | 20:28 |
cjohnston | :-P | 20:28 |
cjohnston | nigelb: mhall119 are there any of the emails that would be better than another to attach to the RT? | 20:38 |
nigelb | pick any | 20:38 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: for the memory issue? | 20:41 |
mhall119 | none of the django ones will be especially helpful, because the error gets thrown at random places, whatever happened to be executing when it ran out | 20:41 |
cjohnston | I attached the most recent I have | 20:42 |
cjohnston | james_w: keeps spamming me :-P | 20:44 |
james_w | I can stop working if you want :-) | 20:44 |
cjohnston | nope | 20:44 |
cjohnston | yay | 20:48 |
cjohnston | mhall119: nigelb james_w are we good with marking [summit-hackers] figure out a way to import data locally for testing to postpone? | 20:49 |
nigelb | Yes, go ahead | 20:49 |
cjohnston | same with [summit-hackers] JSON export of data to be used for local testing: TODO | 20:49 |
cjohnston | [summit-hackers] Add more content/direct links on the front page: TODO | 20:49 |
nigelb | the last one is DONE | 20:49 |
nigelb | is it it? | 20:49 |
cjohnston | [summit-hackers] Making user roles for different users providing different levels of access: TODO | 20:49 |
james_w | oh my | 20:49 |
cjohnston | more content direct links on front page is different than main nav matching | 20:49 |
nigelb | ah | 20:50 |
james_w | I reeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllly hate model_mommy | 20:50 |
nigelb | You shouldn't forget a single model | 20:50 |
nigelb | Or mummy doesn't work ;) | 20:50 |
nigelb | The launchpad way is more awesome. | 20:50 |
cjohnston | [summit-hackers] Create a mutable item to where meetings in the past are muted: TODO <--- this one is where the rescheduler doesnt reschedule stuff in the past? | 20:50 |
nigelb | cjohnston: That was also for rooms being closed etc. | 20:51 |
nigelb | Like sessions happen in Room X on day 1. | 20:51 |
nigelb | We close that room. | 20:51 |
nigelb | To facilitate that, we delete the room. All hell breaks loose. | 20:51 |
cjohnston | So we need to fix that prior to this uds | 20:51 |
nigelb | Actually, we need to make room availability better. | 20:52 |
nigelb | Like mark time periods where the room is unavailable. | 20:52 |
cjohnston | we have that | 20:52 |
nigelb | Then we should just tell jcastro to use that next time. | 20:53 |
cjohnston | There is busy times... | 20:53 |
cjohnston | the ability to add three different times | 20:53 |
cjohnston | i dont know if you can add more if you use all three | 20:54 |
cjohnston | like say monday wednesday thursday afternoon and friday arent available | 20:54 |
cjohnston | I am wondering with all the additional rooms if the schedule is going to be too wide for the screen | 20:55 |
nigelb | we should get the schedule to be better. | 20:55 |
nigelb | that still bothers me | 20:55 |
cjohnston | i wonder if the screens will be available a few days prior to uds | 20:56 |
nigelb | ask elmo | 20:56 |
cjohnston | mhall119: nigelb james_w https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-o-summit what else do you think we can postpone? | 20:58 |
nigelb | the render.py | 20:59 |
cjohnston | nigelb: did you ever finish the api bug you were working on? | 20:59 |
nigelb | No | 21:00 |
nigelb | I don't think I will get to it either. | 21:00 |
nigelb | I need more time. | 21:00 |
james_w | Fix scheduling conflict resolution and notification | 21:00 |
james_w | what's that one? | 21:00 |
james_w | Making user roles for different users providing different levels of access <- I'm not sure we'll get to that one | 21:01 |
cjohnston | I'm not hugely familiar with the API (read don't know how to do it on my own) but I think thats an important bug to fix to make summit hugely improved | 21:01 |
james_w | hmm, we should likely turn the reschedule script off on the last day | 21:01 |
james_w | oh no, it won't fight with the admins, so it's ok | 21:01 |
nigelb | james_w: it usually is turned off. | 21:01 |
nigelb | we forgot last time :-) | 21:02 |
james_w | well it shouldn't be | 21:02 |
james_w | perhaps add a rule to not reschedule anything that starts in the next N hours? | 21:02 |
james_w | Allow people to define their own Busy times, check them for scheduling conflicts <- busy times are implemented, there's just no non-admin interface | 21:03 |
nigelb | can we hackup a form for that? | 21:03 |
nigelb | I think it should be "easy" | 21:03 |
james_w | we could | 21:03 |
cjohnston | yup | 21:04 |
james_w | I'm not inclined to | 21:04 |
cjohnston | well.. i dont know about easy | 21:04 |
nigelb | I wish we had more hands for ubuntu webdev. | 21:04 |
cjohnston | teach czajkowski to hack summit | 21:04 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: we can still get a JSON read-only API in before UDS | 21:24 |
james_w | does anyone know if we are getting Guidebook again this time? | 21:25 |
mhall119 | cjohnston: django-openid-auth_0.4 is building in our PPA now, I should be able to re-open that RT tomorrow | 21:25 |
mhall119 | james_w: I haven't heard either way, I assume we are | 21:25 |
cjohnston | james_w: we are afaik | 21:38 |
cjohnston | mhall119: sweet | 21:38 |
cjohnston | james_w: i dont know that we should mark the private rooms bug as released.. | 22:23 |
cjohnston | we still dont have a way to display that someone is in a private meeting in a private room | 22:23 |
=== Ronnie1 is now known as Ronnie | ||
james_w | cjohnston, true, but we can live without it if we have to | 23:05 |
james_w | I say file another bug | 23:05 |
james_w | 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) | 23:22 |
=== Ronnie2 is now known as Ronnie | ||
cjohnston | james_w: have a moment to help me debug code? | 23:29 |
james_w | sure | 23:44 |
cjohnston | james_w: https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/summit/trackleads | 23:45 |
cjohnston | I'm getting an error with inner() which is in decorators.py | 23:46 |
cjohnston | inner() takes at least 3 arguments (2 given) | 23:46 |
cjohnston | I'm sure my lead isn't right.. I'm just lost on getting it right | 23:46 |
james_w | why does the lead need to go in there? | 23:47 |
james_w | inner() gets the arguments from the url | 23:49 |
james_w | so it's taking the summit-name from the start | 23:49 |
james_w | and expecting to get the lead next | 23:50 |
james_w | but urls.py isn't set up to pass that through | 23:50 |
cjohnston | ok | 23:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!