[01:45] <ScottL> TheMuso, could you help me on a few points?
[01:45] <ScottL> 1. can you help make sure some updates get pushed to the repos
[01:45] <ScottL> 2. possibly explain what is involved in pushing to the repos
[01:46] <ScottL> 3. suggest a method that i can acquire the ability to push to the repos?
[01:46] <ScottL> any help would be appreciate :)
[01:46] <ScottL> oh, on any of those points
[03:49] <micahg> ScottL: for #3: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Per-package_Uploaders
[03:49] <micahg> the same rules apply for a packageset which ubuntustudio has
[04:01] <micahg> ScottL: I'd suggest throwing any updates in the sponsorship queue
[04:01] <micahg> !sponsoring | ScottL 
[04:01] <micahg> ScottL: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess
[08:34] <astraljava> ScottL: Sorry, I've been really swamped with 'real-life' issues lately. I'm gonna get things updated today, and bug the necessary people. Thanks for asking, and sorry I've been out of reach.
[11:55] <ScottL> thanks micahg!  i will certainly read those today :)
[11:56] <ScottL> astraljava, don't worry friend, these things happen, i just want to make sure we have redundancy for such things
[12:21] <ScottL> perhaps it is my reading comprehension that is deficient, but i do not explicitly see how i request sponsorship for a fix
[12:23] <ScottL> i see notes to updating the code, filing bugs, attaching your work, making debdiffs, et al
[12:24] <ScottL> but between two different pages i did not see it say, "in order for sponsors to know your package needs sponsorship you need to do $ACTION
[12:34] <astraljava> ScottL: Yes, redundancy is good. :)
[12:36] <astraljava> ScottL: Are you talking about a  FFe, or just needing an upload of something that doesn't require it? In the former case, a bug needs to be filed, and ubuntu-sponsors team needs to be subscribed on it, but in the latter, only asking for uploading on #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-release should be sufficient.
[15:51] <micahg> ScottL: usually, unless it's urgent, it's better to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors than poke someone in ubuntu-devel for upload (unless there's a patch pilot in the /topic, they're made to be poked)
[15:57] <scott-work> astraljava and micahg: my internet at work was dodgy for a bit, checking logs
[15:58] <scott-work> astraljava: i'm surprised that #ubuntu-motu wouldn't be the place to ask for uploading/sponsorship, doesn't make me right/others wrong, just presenting my own personal biased thinking :P
[15:59] <scott-work> but i shall remember -release and -devel for uploading/sponsorship
[16:00] <scott-work> micahg: but i see you are saying to just subscribe ubuntu-sponsors unless it's urgent, i shall do that then
[16:00] <scott-work> thank you two :)
[16:01] <micahg> scott-work: well, right before beta 2 freeze could be considered urgent, I hope to be piloting a little later
[20:23] <astraljava> scott-work: I suppose -motu is as good a place as the aforementioned, but on the two former there's bound to be a higher percentage of people privileged enough to do the job requested.
[20:23] <astraljava> scott-work: I made the modifications, and asked for the upload, but didn't find any traces of the nautilus-image-whatwasthat.
[20:24] <astraljava> Will have to check again when new images have been spinned.
[20:26] <astraljava> Oh, and ubuntustudio-menu is of version 0.15, with falktx's changes. I haven't tested the new images yet, but I will do that soon. Forgive me, but I forget, did we have the lightdm-greeter theme existing? (I will of course comb the backlog for it)
[20:27] <falktx> astraljava: I haven't seen the package report for it, so I assume no
[20:32] <astraljava> falktx: Just found the link to the tarball. Is the 0.1 the latest version of it?
[20:33] <falktx> should be
[20:34] <falktx> astraljava: link?
[20:34] <astraljava> http://kxstudio.sourceforge.net/tmp/ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme_0.1.tar.gz
[20:36] <micahg> anything need to go in for beta 2?
[20:37] <falktx> astraljava: beh, that's not on launchpad...
[20:37] <falktx> micahg: ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme 
[20:37] <falktx> oh, and ubuntustudio-icons
[20:38] <micahg> those are both new packages and need FFes
[20:40] <micahg> and I don't know if 20 minutes is enough for a new source audit
[20:40] <falktx> micahg: *-icons is not new
[20:41] <falktx> micahg: it's already packaged, and the code is already updated in the branch
[20:41] <falktx> it just needs an update
[20:41] <falktx> micahg: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-icon-theme/UbuntuStudio
[20:42] <micahg> ah, it's called ubuntustudio-icon-theme
[20:43] <falktx> micahg: can you update it?
[20:44] <falktx> micahg: I already made a bug report for it - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-icon-theme/+bug/846483
[20:44] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 846483 in ubuntustudio-icon-theme (Ubuntu) "icons do not play nice with XFCE" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[20:44] <micahg> yes, but I believe you need a UIFe for it at this point
[20:45] <micahg> oh, totally broke?
[20:45] <falktx> micahg: this is a fix
[20:46]  * falktx wonders how to get ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme into the repos...
[20:46] <micahg> falktx: you forgot to close the bug in the changelog
[20:47] <falktx> micahg: ah, yes, I created the bug after the package :)
[20:47] <falktx> micahg: do I really need to close it?
[20:47] <micahg> falktx: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#FeatureFreeze_for_new_packages
[20:47] <falktx> ok, I'll update the branch
[20:48] <astraljava> falktx: It is now.
[20:48] <astraljava> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/+junk/ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme
[20:49] <micahg> falktx: can you jump into #ubuntu-release to discuss the icon update?
[20:49] <astraljava> Oh crap, how did the +junk get in there?
[20:49] <falktx> astraljava: thanks!
[20:49] <astraljava> I didn't notice it.
[20:49] <falktx> hehe, junk...
[20:49] <falktx> what a cute name ubuntu gives for these things...
[20:50] <astraljava> It's embarrassing, for so many reasons. :D
[20:50] <falktx> astraljava: scott-work: do you have screenshots of *before* any icon changes? (ie, the normal behaviour?)
[20:51] <astraljava> falktx: Is this what you're looking for? http://astraljava.kapsi.fi/(X)ubuntu_studio_cropped.png
[20:52] <falktx> astraljava: no, that doesn't show the missing icons
[20:53]  * falktx is trying to get the new icons into beta-2
[20:56] <astraljava> falktx: You got 3 minutes. :D
[20:56] <astraljava> Not really, that's just the freeze.
[20:56] <falktx> I'm trying
[20:56] <astraljava> Ok, which icons are we looking at?
[20:57] <falktx> astraljava: they didn't even know US was going to change to XFCE!
[20:57] <knome> lol
[20:59] <knome> i need to see how photoshop will create asymmetric circular gradients
[20:59] <knome> yay!
[20:59] <astraljava> falktx: Who didn't?
[21:00] <astraljava> knome: I'm sorry, I don't do hebrew.
[21:00] <falktx> astraljava: the ubuntu dev guys
[21:00] <knome> ;)
[21:00] <astraljava> falktx: Well, they're too busy with the vanilla, they have no time to think about the derivates.
[21:00] <micahg> falktx: I hope you've tested this :)
[21:00] <astraljava> And quite frankly, it's just as well, as we're still heavily leaning on their power for the foundation etc.
[21:01] <falktx> micahg: yes, I did
[21:01] <astraljava> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio/ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme
[21:01] <astraljava> micahg: I suppose this needs an FFe as well, right?
[21:01] <falktx> micahg: what else can we do to make this happen?
[21:02] <micahg> falktx: which one, I'm test building then uploading the icon package
[21:02] <knome> ah great! the inner glow -effect does exactly what i want
[21:02] <knome> WOOOOOHOOO
[21:02] <falktx> micahg: the icon
[21:02] <falktx> micahg: lightdm theme I think it's too late, right?
[21:02] <micahg> well, you can file for the FFe
[21:03] <falktx> micahg: but the lightdm thing is not 100% working right now, it's missing some postinst rules
[21:03] <falktx> but now at least the code is up, thanks astraljava
[21:04] <micahg> falktx: icons uploaded
[21:05] <falktx> ah, nice!
[21:05] <astraljava> falktx: Okay, then we have a problem. I included that in desktop already. I need to get that off quick, because I already asked for an upload of ubuntustudio-meta.
[21:05] <falktx> astraljava: it's safe to use
[21:05] <falktx> astraljava: but it will not "just work"
[21:05] <micahg> I can't do meta, I don't have enough time ATM
[21:06] <astraljava> Ahh... okay then, it can stay then.
[21:06] <falktx> the package will install
[21:06] <astraljava> micahg: No worries, I asked on -release.
[21:06] <falktx> micahg: thanks for the icon upload! where can I find you if I need more help?
[21:06] <micahg> I can do it later tonight though
[21:06] <astraljava> micahg: Thanks a bunch for your efforts!
[21:06] <micahg> falktx: I idle in here
[21:06] <falktx> nice
[21:07] <falktx> wow, this was fast... :)
[21:08] <falktx> micahg: I'll mark the bug as fixed then
[21:08] <micahg> falktx: LP should do that
[21:08] <falktx> ah, yeah
[21:08] <falktx> I'm new to all these stuff
[21:09] <micahg> falktx: that's why I had you close it in the changelog (also since if anyone had a question why the upload was done this late, there's a reference)
[21:09] <falktx> yep, got it
[21:11] <astraljava> I like this sort of thing, at the office we're utilizing git+redmine for it, very similar to bzr+LP (the bug management side of it)
[22:02] <scott-work> ach, sorry, been really busy at work today
[22:02] <scott-work> it looks like we dont' need a screenshot for the icons now
[22:03] <scott-work> micahg: do you think it is possible to get the lightdm package in before final release at all?  not just before B2?
[22:04] <scott-work> going home, micahg i'll catch your response as ScottL
[22:07] <astraljava> ScottL: I would think we'll get it in. After all, it's only affecting our distribution, nothing else depends on it.
[23:08] <ScottL> and it is only a lightdem theme as well, shouldn't be too hard to check it
[23:13] <falktx> hey
[23:13] <falktx> ScottL: fixed menu and icons will be in beta!
[23:18] <ScottL> yeah, thank you falktx !