[09:17] <hrw> did someone built xmbc for armel?
[09:18] <twb`> hrw: doesn't appear to be in the archive at all
[09:18] <hrw> twb`: I know
[09:18] <twb`> File an RFP
[09:18] <hrw> would not ask if it would be ;D
[09:18] <hrw> https://launchpad.net/~team-xbmc/+archive/unstable/+packages has source packages
[09:42] <rbasak> I'm having trouble "PXE" booting my pandaboard. I'm doing "setenv pxecfg_ram 0×88000000" yet "pxecfg get" reports "Load address: 0x0" and then it crashes. Has something changed since the docs I'm reading, or am I just using an old u-boot version?
[09:46]  * rbasak asks in #u-boot
[10:22] <jamespage> rbasak: this works for me - https://gist.github.com/1205751
[10:57] <rbasak> Thanks jamespage. Why the second partition?
[10:57] <jamespage> rbasak: I don't think you actually need that if you are just using for PXE boot/install
[10:58] <jamespage> but that is a standard 2 partition layout
[10:59] <rbasak> Ah OK
[10:59] <rbasak> I've not seen ENV.txt before
[10:59] <jamespage> I got that off the Ubuntu ARM QA page
[11:00] <jamespage> my arm preseed pulls that script in the late_command onto the install system
[11:00] <jamespage> so I can just login and re-image the SD card ready for a fresh network install
[11:00] <jamespage> reboot and off you got - tada!
[11:01] <rbasak> OK that worked, I think it was the MLO/u-boot.bin binaries that I was using that didn't have proper support
[11:01] <rbasak> Now I just need to fix the cobbler end - it's not booting an i386 kernel for some strange reason :-)
[11:02] <jamespage> rbasak, I did jot a few notes
[11:03] <jamespage> http://pad.ubuntu.com/arm-server-netboot
[11:03] <rbasak> thanks!
[11:18] <janimo> ppisati, hi, do you need to do anything special in cross kernel builds for the linux-tools package? I read they were special in some regard and may need extra cross libs
[11:38] <rbasak> jamespage: all working, no issues at all following your instructions - thanks!
[11:39] <jamespage> rbasak, np - glad it was helpful
[12:45] <nasatyo> test
[13:00] <ppisati> janimo: never cross compiled linux-tools
[13:01] <ppisati> janimo: when i recompiled it, i did it on the panda
[13:01] <ppisati> janimo: after it's not much stuff
[13:01] <janimo> ppisati, but when you build a source package, does it not build the tools too?
[13:01] <ppisati> janimo: no
[13:01] <ppisati> janimo: ah wait
[13:01] <janimo> hmm, I thought it is the same source. perf & co
[13:01] <ppisati> janimo: i alwats cross compile just one kernel flavour
[13:01] <ppisati> janimo: yep, same source
[13:02] <ppisati> janimo: but i just cross the kernel
[13:02] <janimo> ah
[13:02] <janimo> I thought everything that is built on the servers is also cross compiled before by devs while testing
[13:03] <ppisati> janimo: just cross compile the kernel because is handy
[13:03] <ppisati> and much faster
[13:03] <janimo> jcrigby, have you cross-compiled  linux-tools for the kernels you maintain?
[13:03] <janimo> ppisati, indeed
[13:11] <ppisati> "
[13:17] <rsalveti> janimo: there are a few patches specifically for proper cross support at linux-linaro
[13:17] <rsalveti> afaik for scripts and so on
[13:18] <rsalveti> maybe jcrigby also fixed the tools
[13:58] <jcrigby> janimo, I am able to cross compile with do_tools on.  There are some patches there that make it work.  You also need some arm libs installed.
[13:59] <janimo> jcrigby, is this written up somewhere? Specifically which patches and which libs :)
[13:59] <jcrigby> janimo, no but I will do that and put it in a wiki and let you know.
[13:59] <janimo> jcrigby, I'd like to do a full cross-build of a kernel tree for a single flavour, the toshiba ac100, and to follow linaro/ubuntu kernel processes
[14:00] <janimo> jcrigby, thanks a lot!
[14:00] <jcrigby> janimo, np.  Something I've been meaning to do for some time.