[00:12] <brokencodes> hello...
[00:12] <brokencodes> still persuing login prompt... http://paste.ubuntu.com/692648/
[00:12] <brokencodes> it stops RIGHT there, next action suppose to be getty, never gets there
[00:12] <brokencodes> or
[00:12] <brokencodes> getty dies?
[00:34] <brokencodes> it boots fine in qemu-system-arm, with its kernel, but not with the target kernel for this board, and they are the same processor / variant
[00:34] <brokencodes> only getty seems to fail
[00:36] <tmzt> qemu won't boot your board's kernel unles you add support to qemu for your hardware
[00:36] <brokencodes> you thinking backwards
[00:36] <brokencodes> qemu boots fine
[00:36] <brokencodes> board stops at getty
[00:37] <phh> you're sure you're not just doing getty at the wrong place ? :D
[00:37] <phh> i mean wrong serial port
[00:38] <brokencodes> how to redirect getty?
[00:38] <phh> ????
[00:38] <phh> wat ?
[00:39] <brokencodes> kernel bootargs includes console=/dev/ttyS0 115200n81
[00:39] <phh> ah i forgot ubuntu no longer uses inittab for getty ...
[00:40] <brokencodes> debian does same damn thing
[00:40] <brokencodes> stops at getty
[00:40] <phh> brokencodes: well what's the getty command line on debian ?
[00:41] <brokencodes> I dont know
[00:41] <phh> OKAY
[00:41] <mikejf> brokencodes: What does the 'exec' line of '/etc/init/ttyS0.conf' say?
[00:41] <phh> how do you know if it ever tries to start ?
[00:41] <brokencodes> I would have to trace the initscripts
[00:41] <tmzt> it's upstart isn't it?
[00:42] <brokencodes> give me a min, I go back inside, hook up the devboard, we can investigate it...
[00:42] <phh> mikejf: /etc/init ? http://doc.ubuntu-fr.org/console_serie is saying /etc/event.d :(
[00:42] <phh> tmzt: that's why i meant it's easier on debian :p
[00:42] <phh> good old inittab ..
[00:43] <brokencodes> ok, then we will stick with debian for now
[00:43] <phh> brokencodes: mikejf just gave you the path for ubuntu ...
[00:43] <brokencodes> hooking upthe debian drive,and reloading the kernel image over tftp, saving to nand
[00:48] <brokencodes> added another line to inittab... waiting to see result
[00:49] <brokencodes> rebooting
[00:50] <brokencodes> I have a login prompt!
[00:51] <brokencodes> YAY
[00:51] <brokencodes> thank you
[00:53] <phh> .
[00:58] <brokencodes> what is " . "
[00:58] <brokencodes> ?
[14:33] <ogra_> janimo, the current mx5 images should be fie for testing (ignore the isos next to them)
[14:34] <janimo> ogra_, cool, I'll download
[14:34] <ogra_> *fine even
[14:44] <janimo> ogra_, good the image at least has correct partitions :) flashing it now
[14:54]  * janimo wishes we had headless images. Easier to test than desktop
[14:54] <janimo> for common bringup bits
[14:55] <ogra_> well, i used to build server
[14:56] <ogra_> but we are already massively interfering with beta builds already
[14:56] <ogra_> i cant just randomly build stuff anyome at this stage of the release
[14:56] <ogra_> sorry for that
[15:03] <utlemming> janimo, orga_: what type of builds do you need?
[15:03] <ogra_> utlemming, test builds in the datacenter on the builder
[15:03] <utlemming> I'm making cloud-images daily for ARM images -- one that has a boot loader configured for serial and the other is flat partition
[15:04] <utlemming> both are in qemu QCOW2 format, so they'll need to be converted
[15:04] <utlemming> http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/oneiric/current/
[15:08] <janimo> ogra_, the mx5 image boots up to X fine, resize seems to have gone well too.
[15:08] <ogra_> awesome
[15:09] <janimo> Nothing else shows up - no installer - though. Progress anyway.
[15:09] <janimo> Need to see if omap works first, and mx5 should match it in terms of functionality
[15:09] <ogra_> hmm, not much time left to fix it though
[15:09] <ogra_> you need to have all fixes in today
[15:09] <ogra_> if possible
[15:09] <janimo> well, need to see if omap works first, as they may not be mx5 related issues at all
[15:10] <ogra_> so fixing mx5 now broke ac100 :(
[15:14] <topi1> hi
[15:15] <topi1> i have a problem with compiling util-linux2.19 on my beagleboard:
[15:15] <topi1> http://paste.ubuntuusers.de/402767/
[15:16] <topi1>  with an x86 gcc its all ok
[15:16] <topi1> can anybody help me?