[08:48] <AfC> A build failed in a PPA. I think I've identified the problem, have made a fix here, and need to resubmit the build. Do I need to bump the version number of the package (eg ...~natty1 to ...~natty2)?
[08:49] <AfC> Since ...~natty1 never built [there], I'm wondering if the bump is necessary. Of course the ...natty1_source.ppa.upload is here, so I guess the question is removing that & reuploading correct?
[08:49] <bigjools> you need to bump the version
[08:50] <bigjools> don't kid yourself it's the same version if you make changes
[08:56] <dholbach> hey
[08:57] <dholbach> can somebody tell me why the lp:xwax upstream code import fails?
[10:49] <apw> OOPS-2089CJ49 -- can anyone tell me if there is any point in waiting and retrying with this oops, or am i just dead
[12:33] <gmb> https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: gmb | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[12:35] <nigelb> gmb: I'm sure you missed the /topic bit :P
[12:35] <gmb> nigelb: Good catch :)
[12:48] <danilos> dholbach, I wonder if that code import is failing due to bug 854647? jelmer probably knows better, though :)
[12:49] <danilos> dholbach, jelmer: referring to lp:xwax, fwiw :)
[12:50] <jelmer> ah, yes
[12:51] <jelmer> lp:xwax is indeed failing because of bug 854647
[12:51] <jelmer> I have a MP up that fixes it
[13:02] <dholbach> thanks jelmer - you rock
[13:02] <dholbach> thanks danilos - you rock too! :)
[14:18] <wookey> My duploads aren't working:
[14:18] <wookey> [ Uploading job insserv_1.14.0-2cross1_source
[14:18] <wookey> insserv_1.14.0-2cross1_source.changes 1.2 kBdupload fatal error: Can't upload insserv_1.14.0-2cross1_source.changes: Data connection already open, starting transfer
[14:18] <wookey> Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied. at /usr/bin/dupload line 558
[14:19] <wookey> Does that mean anything to anyone?
[14:19] <wookey> line 558 is the ftp-upload function
[14:19] <wookey> gpg --verify says the signature is good
[14:19] <Laney> ftp→keyserver communication borked, your upload should work anyway
[14:22] <wookey> how long should I wait for an email saying 'upload worked/failed'? it's had a few mins.
[14:25] <bigjools> wookey: a few minutes
[14:42] <wookey> OK. I waited a while, did it all again and no complaints this time
[17:58] <jhobbs> is there a way to get emails for blueprint updates for a project?
[18:30] <bullgard4> I wonder what an "Apport retracing service" is. I found it in Launchpad on a bug report as an option.
[21:27] <ScottSanbar> Hi, All!  Help! Google does not help! Here are the buildlog and files location for a recipe that does not install the binary or man files only the doc files for a package I created called hello.  The same package builds fine when I use debuild on my PC:  https://code.launchpad.net/~scott-sanbar/+recipe/hello-1.0-daily http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~scott-sanbar/hello/main/files
[21:28] <ScottSanbar> This is the same package I mentioned yesterday but with the shebang added back into the rules file as suggested on IRC which got rid of some warnings but did not add in the missing files in the .deb
[21:41] <james_w> ScottSanbar, building either the source package created by the recipe, or the branch directly doesn't produce a working deb here
[21:41] <james_w> so it seems that you have something in your environment that is making it work when it "shouldn't"
[21:42] <james_w> my guess is because you locally have files that aren't in the branch that were the result of running auto*
[21:42] <james_w> because the branch doesn't contain the configure script, and debhelper doesn't know how to do anything with it
[21:44] <mwhudson> ScottSanbar: try using pbuilder/pdebuild instead
[21:44] <mwhudson> ScottSanbar: it's a bit of a pain to set up, but well worth it
[22:46] <poolie> hi
[22:46] <poolie> does anyone actually like the 'translation template imported' mails?
[22:57] <RAOF> poolie: No.  Who is their intended audience?
[22:57] <poolie> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/855150
[22:57] <poolie> i don't know
[22:57] <poolie> i would speculate the logic was "someone might want to know about this, so we'll send mail"
[22:58] <poolie> but it's not necessarily a good tradeoff
[23:01] <poolie> RAOF, and i see it also sends mail to cancelled accounts
[23:03] <RAOF> Win!