[00:58] <Exodus> bdmurray, hello, i was reading somewhere you are working on a project to have multilingual launchpad, I was wondering how progress with that is going? and any other information about that project.
[03:27] <Tohuw> This bug has been invalidly marked: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/852972 For some reason, Brad Figg decided my bug was against Jaunty, but it really isn't. The install started life as an 11.04. The kernel might not be the most current for 11.04, but it is certainly at least as new as what shipped in the image.
[03:27] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 852972 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel 2.6.28 Returns NAK bailout from sendbytes on startup (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Won't fix]
[03:28] <Tohuw> It is unclear to me what the failure is, as I don't understand what "sendbytes: NAK bailout" means and have found no reliable source to explain it.
[03:31] <Tohuw> So, how do I go about getting https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/852972 reviewed?
[03:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 852972 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel 2.6.28 Returns NAK bailout from sendbytes on startup (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Won't fix]
[03:33] <Tohuw> Ah, I just realized my mistake :( I wrote 2.6.28, it is actually 2.6.38. Should I just refile the bug, as this bug is incorrect?
[03:41] <Tohuw> Okay, I've cleaned my bug up considerably: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-backport-natty/+bug/852972 Can someone place it out of wontfix please?
[03:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 852972 in linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) "Kernel 2.6.38 Returns NAK bailout from sendbytes on startup (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Won't fix]
[07:03] <sl0wpoke> Hi there.  I think I have a triage-ready bug (#268365), but I'm not on Bug Control, so I can't mark it.  Could someone help?
[07:03] <sl0wpoke> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file/+bug/268365
[07:03] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 268365 in file (Debian) (and 1 other project) "file doesn't recognize .hs files as haskell, thinks they're java (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Unknown,New]
[07:03] <sl0wpoke> Yes.
[07:07] <micahg> sl0wpoke: confirmed on oneiric, setting to triaged, thanks
[07:07] <sl0wpoke> Thanks, much appreciated.
[07:07] <micahg> sl0wpoke: BTW, something should be confirmed as affecting the devel release if possible for the default task to be triaged
[07:08] <sl0wpoke> My mistake.  This was actually my first try.
[07:09] <micahg> sl0wpoke: no problem, you did good research into the matter
[07:10] <micahg> sl0wpoke: you might want to check out testdrive which helps you set up the devel release in a vm for testing
[07:10] <sl0wpoke> Ah, I hadn't done that.  Thanks for the advice.
[07:11] <sl0wpoke> Was this not in devel because it's so old?
[07:11] <micahg> sl0wpoke: no, I confirmed it affected the devel release as well
[07:12] <micahg> well, it was filed 3 years ago during the intrepid cycle
[07:12] <sl0wpoke> Er, just for reference, where does that page live?
[07:12] <micahg> but, just because it's old, doesn't mean it's not valid
[07:12] <micahg> sl0wpoke: which page?
[07:13] <sl0wpoke> Is there a separate report somewhere that I should have looked up?  Or should I have simply confirmed both entries on the given page?
[07:13] <sl0wpoke> (The one for #268365)
[07:13] <micahg> sl0wpoke: no page, I have the devel release installed, I pulled the ghc source which has haskell files, and ran file on a few of them
[07:14] <sl0wpoke> Oh, I see.
[07:15] <sl0wpoke> micahg: thanks again for your help and your patience.
[07:17] <micahg> sl0wpoke: feel free to ask any triage related questions here, someone should be able to answer
[09:20] <chalcedony> i upgraded to 11.04 and now it can't see my ps2 keyboard. i found this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1594898&highlight=natty+ps2+keyboard  - the last post says it's the .gconf  - is this likely to be the case?
[11:00] <QUIKI> Hello!
[11:02] <QUIKI> Is this the place where I can report a bug or get help fixing it?
[11:47] <hggdh> oh hasty people
[11:52] <jibel> hggdh, maybe his bug was that he couldn't stay more than 5 min connected to IRC, who knows ;-)
[11:54] <hggdh> heh
[12:42] <RedSingularity> jibel: Do you have any known bugs with libwebkit causing update manager to fail?
[12:42] <RedSingularity> I thought I remember you asking about that in a report somewhere.....
[15:04] <bdmurray> pedro_: any idea where bug 850373 belongs?
[15:04] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 850373 in ubuntu "Lock screen does not change wallpaper (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/850373
[15:07] <pedro_> bdmurray, could be g-s-d , i'll reassign it
[15:08] <bdmurray> pedro_: I've a similar one where with a dual monitor setup my wallpaper only shows up on one monitor and it shows up centered between the 2 monitors so half of it is missing
[15:11] <seb128> bdmurray, pedro_: it's a gnome-screensaver bug
[15:11] <seb128> well at least for the "change with the capplet" case
[15:11] <seb128> it seems it doesn't monitor the key
[15:12] <seb128> not sure how "wallch" works
[15:12] <pedro_> i'm updating the description, it's easy to reproduce just changing the background with the capplet
[15:12] <seb128> right, in that case it's gnome-screensaver which doesn't monitor the key
[15:12] <seb128> restarting gnome-screensaver makes it pick the right image
[15:12] <pedro_> bdmurray, could you file one for that in gnome-control-center? i've seen a couple of multi monitor bugs with the wallpaper
[15:12] <seb128> so the config on disk is ok
[15:13] <seb128> pedro_, bdmurray: the dual monitor is nautilus or gnome-settings-daemon, those display the background
[15:13] <bdmurray> its in the screensaver that it looks funny though
[15:14] <seb128> oh
[15:14] <seb128> so gnome-screensaver as well
[15:38] <bdmurray> pedro_: bug 854800
[15:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 854800 in gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) "screensaver background only shows part of my wallpaper on a multi-monitor setup (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/854800
[16:46] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: just an fyi that last bug pattern required quite some changes
[17:09] <macer1> !poll
[17:09] <ubot4> Usually, there is no single "best" application to perform a given task. It's up to you to choose, depending on your preferences, features you require, and other factors. Do NOT take polls in the channel. If you insist on getting people's opinions, ask BestBot in #ubuntu-bots.
[17:10] <macer1> oops
[17:10] <macer1> sorry
[17:10] <macer1> wrong channel
[17:10] <macer1> I was trying to write this on #ubuntu-bots
[19:00] <jimmy_mac> hello! I may have found a bug in the SSH client for 64 bit Ubuntu and Debian. 32 bit systems don't seem to have it. Should I report it here?
[19:04] <roadmr> jimmy_mac: could you file a bug report on launchpad.net?
[19:05] <jimmy_mac> I was just reading the instructions for that now, I should be able to do so, thanks for pointing me in the right direction
[19:05] <roadmr> jimmy_mac: you can run "ubuntu-bug openssh-client"
[19:05] <roadmr> jimmy_mac: that'll collect a bunch of useful debugging information, then it will direct you to launchpad.net where you'll be able to fill in details about the bug you're seeing
[19:06] <roadmr> jimmy_mac: great, let me know if you get stuck, thanks for your report!
[20:22] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: There were a lot of errors??  I think that was the one I couldn't test locally.
[20:24] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: not errors it only was matching the master and none of the duplicates
[20:24] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: was the title off?
[20:26] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: this is what it ended up looking like
[20:26] <bdmurray> +       <re key="Title">update-manager crashed with UnicodeEncodeError in get_dbus_message\(\): 'ascii' codec can't encode character(s)?( u'\\.*')? in position \d+(-\d+)?: ordinal not in range\(128\)</re>
[20:26] <bdmurray> and something similar for the Traceback
[20:28] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: ah and you used the +d for the ordinal range instead of the number.  Wouldnt that number have been the same for all reports tho?
[20:28] <bdmurray> so there were multiple different characters in different ranges
[20:29] <bdmurray> I'm guessing its something like a sentence being passed on the message bus and maybe its different for each translation?
[20:30] <RedSingularity> that makes sense.  Ok :)