[00:29] <lemelinm> Y a-t-il quelqu'un qui teste Oneiric beta1?
[13:17] <jibel> ubuntu desktop posted to the tracker, (ku|lu|myth|xu)buntu and ubuntu studio are also there
[13:18] <paultag> does anyone happen to know where our version of lintian.debian.o is? I can't find it on Launchpad
[13:19] <paultag> really any lintian reports on the archive
[14:18] <charlie-tca> Good morning
[14:21] <jibel> good morning charlie-tca
[14:22] <charlie-tca> jibel: Thank you very much for doing some of those tests!
[15:19] <skaet> cloud images have been posted to tracker
[15:26] <jibel> Daviey, could someone from your team test RAID1 and iSCSI today or tomorrow morning so we don't discover last minute critical issues ? (unless you plan a respin of server images soon of course)
[15:27] <Daviey> I think there may well be a re-spin.
[15:33]  * patdk-wk hates respins :(
[15:35] <Daviey> Didn't we decide to start calling them twirls?
[15:35] <patdk-wk> test invalidators
[15:35] <Daviey> patdk-wk: Do you know who is doing manual tests atm?
[15:36] <patdk-wk> I'm downloading iso's for the esx and iscsi tests
[15:42] <Daviey> patdk-wk: Rocking!  Will you be at UDS?
[15:43] <patdk-wk> where is uds?
[15:44] <cr3> patdk-wk: orlando
[15:44] <patdk-wk> freaking hell :(
[15:44] <patdk-wk>  Iwas suppost to be there the week before
[15:44] <patdk-wk> and we are moving offices that week :(
[15:44] <patdk-wk> it's going be hell
[15:45] <patdk-wk> but will be there in november :(
[15:45] <patdk-wk> so close
[15:45] <patdk-wk> parents live in orlando
[15:45] <cr3> patdk-wk: you need to synchronize moving offices with ubuntu releases, much easier that way :)
[15:46] <cr3> patdk-wk: you could even have similar milestones, beta-move, rc-move, ff-move, etc :)
[15:46] <patdk-wk> not with my boss :)
[15:47] <patdk-wk> they signed the paperwork last thursday for the lease
[15:47] <patdk-wk> they won't let me start on a phone line or internet access till next week
[15:47] <patdk-wk> we move in nov 1st
[15:47] <patdk-wk> to me, that is a 3 month project
[15:47] <patdk-wk> not a 1 month
[15:47] <cr3> patdk-wk: best of luck to you, moving is always very painful :(
[15:48] <patdk-wk> well, sounds like they are willing to get all new equipment, so we don't have to *move* critical services too much
[15:48] <patdk-wk> but no burn-in time for anything :(
[15:50] <Daviey> patdk-wk: sorry to hear that.. would have liked to buy you a drink. :)
[15:51] <patdk-wk> I'll make one sometime
[15:51] <patdk-wk> maybe not till the next lts, but :)
[15:55] <cr3> hi folks, how would you feel if we had more, much more, conversations about checkbox and the ubuntu-friendly programme in this channel?
[16:15] <patdk-wk> looks like 10min left on iso downloads
[17:44] <patdk-wk> iscsi looks broken again :(
[18:12] <patdk-wk> well, iscsi works, but bringing up networking takes a good 5min, doesn't happen on local install :(
[19:11] <Daviey> patdk-wk: :/
[19:11] <Daviey> patdk-wk: Can you raise a bug with as much detail as possible
[19:12] <patdk-wk> I'll try, it will be later
[19:12] <patdk-wk> but what should I file against, and what info?
[19:12] <patdk-wk> everything works, it's just sits there for so long
[19:12] <Daviey> thanks patdk-wk !
[19:13] <patdk-wk> I don't file bugs from testing enough to remember :)
[19:14] <patdk-wk> this is pretty sad, been on this phone call with HP for 3 hours so far, and only managed to get one replacement sas drive
[19:14] <Daviey> :(
[19:14] <patdk-wk> gave me lots of time to test :)
[19:15] <patdk-wk> now onto next HP issue, why does their drive array only give me 240iops and 170MB/sec when it's a raid10 of 60 sas 10k disks
[19:28] <calebH> so, is 11.10 going to launch with gnome 3.0 instead of 3.2?  and has anyone heard of plans to add 3.2 to the repositories?
[19:31] <patdk-wk> it's way too late to add 3.2
[20:11] <calebH>  @patdk-wk: that's what I was just thinking
[20:12] <calebH> it's too bad too, cuz I'm looking forward to this 3.2 release.  Hopefully there will be a PPA :)
[20:12] <patdk-wk> oh, it will be in ppa, if it isn't now
[20:12] <patdk-wk> and I would believe it is now :)
[20:13] <calebH> oh, that's true - I didn't even think about looking now
[20:34] <xdatap1> hi guys