| === Turl is now known as devnullbaseband | ||
| === devnullbaseband is now known as N01_77_30P | ||
| === N01_77_30P is now known as Turl | ||
| === Pendulum_ is now known as Pendulum | ||
| cjohnston | mhall119: james_w nigelb... status.ubuntu.com continues to have issues where the script stops running due to the server running out of memory and then the lock file is not removed. I would think that this is not relevent to the apache setup? | 16:33 |
|---|---|---|
| james_w | I don't know | 16:33 |
| nigelb | cjohnston: Apache is what usually ends up eating the memory. | 16:33 |
| nigelb | We haven't figured out why yet. | 16:34 |
| james_w | I don't know why we don't get any error messages from the cron run | 16:34 |
| cjohnston | I thought IS was saying it wasn't | 16:34 |
| james_w | unless cron itself is what is getting killed | 16:34 |
| cjohnston | james_w: I get some sort of messages at times saying it ran out of memory | 16:34 |
| nigelb | I've not had IS tell me that Apache wasn't causing the problem. | 16:34 |
| james_w | I don't see those ones I don't think | 16:34 |
| james_w | just the lockfile ones | 16:34 |
| james_w | well, ok, I haven't had one for a week | 16:35 |
| james_w | but it's apparently died several times in that week | 16:35 |
| cjohnston | ya | 16:35 |
| * cjohnston has g2g.. bbl | 16:35 | |
| mhall119 | james_w: do we have a patch for the url-encoded blueprint links yet? | 16:36 |
| james_w | no | 16:37 |
| james_w | I was hoping to get to it today | 16:37 |
| mhall119 | ok | 16:37 |
| mhall119 | cause we need to request a production deployment soon to fix the private ical bug | 16:37 |
| james_w | mhall119, the one that breaks the link? | 16:39 |
| james_w | yeah, we should fix that soon | 16:39 |
| mhall119 | the private ical bug is throwing an exception because of the change to Schedule.from_request wasn't applied to that view | 16:39 |
| james_w | the url-encoding one should be easy, so I'll do that in a few minutes | 16:39 |
| james_w | trying to figure out how some sessions got scheduled on Monday morning currently | 16:40 |
| james_w | is there a way to see the admin log for all users, not just myself? | 16:40 |
| mhall119 | I think if you are superuser you can see all of it | 16:41 |
| mhall119 | but it won't show changes made outside of /admin/ | 16:41 |
| james_w | yeah | 16:42 |
| james_w | it says "my actions" at the top though | 16:42 |
| james_w | perhaps we should do something like http://stackoverflow.com/questions/987669/tying-in-to-django-admins-model-history | 16:42 |
| james_w | or https://bitbucket.org/q/django-simple-history/src | 16:43 |
| mhall119 | there are several to choose from | 16:44 |
| mhall119 | including https://bitbucket.org/mhall119/django-audit/wiki/Home | 16:45 |
| === MichealH` is now known as Guest53887 | ||
| === Ronnie1 is now known as Ronnie | ||
| === MichealH` is now known as Guest6567 | ||
| james_w | mhall119, are you running the autoscheduler on cranberry? either by hand or from cron? | 17:23 |
| james_w | argh, it's enabled in cron | 17:24 |
| james_w | I've disabled it again | 17:25 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: http://summit.ubuntu.com/admin/schedule/crew/add/ why is it only listing those few attendees? I guess we need to somehow define the summit to make it easier and only have a list of attendees that are attending the summit | 17:30 |
| james_w | they are the ones tagged with "Willing to be crew" in their attendee record I guess | 17:34 |
| cjohnston | According to Daniel there are a whole lot more who are willing to crew. | 17:36 |
| cjohnston | james_w: that is the list of people who were at the last UDS and crewed. | 17:38 |
| james_w | >>> Attendee.objects.filter(crew=True) | 17:39 |
| james_w | [<Attendee: mike.basinger>, <Attendee: itnet7>, <Attendee: jwcampbell>, <Attendee: scottritchie>, <Attendee: joey>, <Attendee: jderose>, <Attendee: rrnwexec>, <Attendee: lyz>, <Attendee: nigelbabu>, <Attendee: bcurtiswx>, <Attendee: vish>, <Attendee: frmdrt>, <Attendee: rkite>] | 17:39 |
| james_w | http://summit.ubuntu.com/admin/schedule/attendee/2499/ | 17:40 |
| james_w | the box needs to be checked on those records as appropriate | 17:40 |
| cjohnston | nigel isnt even coming to this UDS, so I cant imagine he has willing to crew checked | 17:41 |
| cjohnston | and everyone that Daniel picked he said had marked "Willing to Crew" | 17:42 |
| cjohnston | plus, as I said, that's the exact list from last UDS | 17:42 |
| cjohnston | http://summit.ubuntu.com/admin/schedule/attendee/2809/ nigels box isnt checked | 17:42 |
| james_w | http://summit.ubuntu.com/admin/schedule/attendee/2226/ | 17:47 |
| james_w | it is for last UDS | 17:47 |
| james_w | I didn't filter by summit at all | 17:47 |
| cjohnston | there isnt a way to filter by summit.. they are just defined by days | 17:47 |
| james_w | right | 17:47 |
| cjohnston | So somehow it needs to know what summit its for, and then display a list of willing to crew for that summit | 17:48 |
| james_w | but that list I just pasted is anyone who has ever had that box checked for any summit | 17:48 |
| james_w | well, anyone who still has any box checked | 17:48 |
| james_w | you are right | 17:48 |
| james_w | but it also needs that box checking for some people for uds-p | 17:49 |
| cjohnston | ok.. | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | i just checked another one | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | why are they not remaining checked | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | because you click willing to crew in the sponsorship application | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | i guess because these are imported from | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | LP | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | as people actually attending | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | vs sponsorship? | 17:50 |
| cjohnston | So we need to check users marked as attending in LP against their sponsorship applications to see if they marked that they are willing to crew | 17:51 |
| james_w | I'm not sure | 17:53 |
| james_w | I've never looked at the sponsorship stuff | 17:54 |
| cjohnston | nigelb: ^ ? | 17:54 |
| cjohnston | Bug #855772 | 17:57 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 855772 in summit "Attendees list not marking attendees as willing to crew (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/855772 | 17:57 |
| mhall119 | james_w: why don't we want autoschedule running in cron right now? | 18:16 |
| james_w | mhall119, it's annoying Stephen Doel | 18:26 |
| james_w | he's trying to schedule a bunch of things at particular times, and it's throwing them all over the schedule complicating that | 18:26 |
| mhall119 | maybe we should make a new summit state, post-sponsorship but pre-scheduling | 18:29 |
| james_w | and have the autoscheduler not act during that time? | 18:41 |
| mhall119 | yeah | 18:46 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: Create a mutable item to where meetings in the past are muted I think really needs to be done so that we dont have issues of stuff getting moved around after it happens | 20:05 |
| mhall119 | we fixed what was causing it, but we didn't actually provide a way to make sure it never happens | 20:08 |
| mhall119 | also, I think there was confusion | 20:08 |
| mhall119 | the opposite of immutable is not muted | 20:08 |
| mhall119 | personally I think that entire line can just go away | 20:09 |
| cjohnston | Ok.. I do think that we need to provide a way to make sure it doesnt happen | 20:12 |
| cjohnston | Do you think there is any way that email came from info obtained by summit? | 20:16 |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: I don't think so | 20:28 |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: have we even determined yet if it was legitimate or spam? | 20:29 |
| mhall119 | the UDS registration form uses tfaforms.com | 20:30 |
| cjohnston | No idea... | 20:36 |
| mhall119 | I'm inclined to think they were legit | 20:40 |
| james_w | mhall119, https://code.launchpad.net/~james-w/summit/fix-overeager-escaping/+merge/76478 <- there's that fix | 21:03 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: and i didnt get it.. but ive completed my forms | 21:05 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/loco-directory/+spec/subteam-calendar thoughts? | 21:46 |
| cjohnston | nigelb: ping | 22:49 |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: I'm not sure there's enough demand to warrant it | 23:24 |
| mhall119 | we'd have to make LD aware of subteams to begin with | 23:25 |
| cjohnston | thats pretty much what my reply said | 23:25 |
| mhall119 | there may be a larger case to be made for making LD sub-team aware, in which case this request would be a more minor feature request on top of that | 23:27 |
| cjohnston | ya.. im not about to offer that though | 23:28 |
| mhall119 | as it is, it should be a wishlist bug, not a blueprint | 23:29 |
| * cjohnston says wont fix | 23:30 | |
| mhall119 | I'm okay leaving it open as a wishlist item | 23:30 |
| mhall119 | I'm not opposed to the feature | 23:30 |
| cjohnston | summit doesnt have a virtual env setup does it? | 23:30 |
| mhall119 | I'm just opposed to putting in the effort unless I see more of a need or want | 23:30 |
| mhall119 | you can make one, it has a requirements.txt | 23:31 |
| cjohnston | thats why i say wontfix because as of right now i dont see enough need or want | 23:31 |
| mhall119 | I save wontfix for "over my dead body will this ever be implemented" | 23:31 |
| mhall119 | if someone submits a working patch to implement this, I'd accept it | 23:31 |
| knome | i use "wontfix" when i want somebody else to do it | 23:32 |
| knome | ;) | 23:32 |
| cjohnston | ;-) | 23:32 |
| cjohnston | it sucks that we are so far behind times with the version of django we use | 23:33 |
| mhall119 | you mean 1.2? | 23:33 |
| cjohnston | yes | 23:33 |
| cjohnston | if you run a current version of ubuntu, it becomes a pita | 23:33 |
| mhall119 | you mean like natty? | 23:34 |
| cjohnston | like oneiric | 23:34 |
| mhall119 | oneiric isn't current | 23:34 |
| cjohnston | it will be in a month | 23:34 |
| cjohnston | so whats the difference | 23:34 |
| mhall119 | a month | 23:54 |
| mhall119 | also support | 23:54 |
| cjohnston | make a make file for me for summit | 23:54 |
| cjohnston | ;-) | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!