=== plars-afk is now known as plars
[02:35] <sl0wpoke> Hi there, I've got a bug (#855862) that I think needs to be marked wishlist.  Could someone from BugControl mark it?
[02:35] <sl0wpoke> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/855862
[02:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 855862 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "File selection: direction doesn't select file in next row (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[02:38] <macer1> sl0wpoke, hmm...I don't see a wishlist option in bug status...
[02:38] <micahg> macer1: it's an importance
[02:39] <macer1> oh importance. I can not set it, sorry, I am only in bugsquad as for now.
[02:47] <sl0wpoke> I asked around in #gnome about whether anyone had a comment; no one offered one.
[02:47] <sl0wpoke> It would appear that's the intended functionality.  It doesn't seem to be a bug per se.
[02:48] <sl0wpoke> micahg: Maybe you could answer this question: are reports like this what the "opinion" tag is for?
[02:48] <sl0wpoke> Because I couldn't find an explanation of "opinion" on the wiki.
[02:49] <micahg> sl0wpoke: we don't officially use it in UBuntu
[02:49] <sl0wpoke> Ah, I see.
[02:49] <micahg> sl0wpoke: that's a dupe
[02:51] <sl0wpoke> micahg: So what is your opinion on this bug?  Invalid?  Wishlist?  I'm a little puzzled.
[02:51] <micahg> sl0wpoke: it's a duplicate
[02:52] <sl0wpoke> micahg: Shucks, that's what I forgot.  But hypothetically, supposing it wasn't, what would be an appropriate action on this one?
[02:53] <micahg> sl0wpoke: low probably
[02:53] <sl0wpoke> But not invalid.
[02:54] <micahg> no, why would it be invalid?
[02:54] <micahg> it's a regression
[02:59] <sl0wpoke> micahg: I thought it probably should be considered valid, but thought that perhaps it could be considered a valid/intended program behavior.
[03:22] <micahg> sl0wpoke: possibly, but that's upstream's call
[03:22] <micahg> sl0wpoke: so, have you found the duplicate bug yet?
[03:23] <sl0wpoke> Not yet, no.
[03:25] <sl0wpoke> micahg: #757830
[03:25] <sl0wpoke> micahg: #757830/
[03:26] <micahg> bug 757830
[03:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 757830 in indicator-appmenu (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "No left-side wrap-around in indicator menus if no application menu (affects: 1) (heat: 1)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/757830
[03:26] <micahg> sl0wpoke: nope, this is nautilus specific
[03:26] <sl0wpoke> Ah.  Hm.
[03:59] <micahg> sl0wpoke: I can't seem to find it :(
[04:06] <sl0wpoke> micahg: I've been looking; I can't seem to find a duplicate either.  Thus far, anyway.
[05:02] <sl0wpoke> micahg: I went ahead and marked 855862 'confirmed' if you'd like to set an importance.
[05:31] <RedSingularity> bug 855862
[05:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 855862 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "File selection: direction doesn't select file in next row (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/855862
[09:25] <bil21al> how can i get the log file of update manager?? can anybody tell me??
[11:25] <korrawit> Hello. I think that bug 629364 and bug 537433 are duplicates of each other. But I just wonder: if I mark 629364 as duplicate of 537433, what about "one hundred papercuts" project in 629364?
[11:47] <korrawit> 20 min ... no answer, so I marked it as duplicate as I proposed.
[12:00] <bil21al_> ubot
[12:27] <hggdh> no, they are not duplicates of each other. I unduplicated them
[13:55] <bil21al_> when we are running apport and filing a bug than when the bug info transfer from terminal to firefox than there is crash ,destop is with out launcher and top bar and after 5-6 sec it came back  did any body noticed  it??
[14:07] <hggdh> bil21al: sounds like compiz or unity died and restarted
[14:08] <hggdh> and no, I did not notice it
[14:08] <bil21al> hggdh:ok
[14:46] <bil21al> in which pakage shuold we report the gnome player bug hggdh:
[14:46] <bil21al> totem or else??
[15:14] <jibel> mvo, thanks for fixing 853233 :)
[15:15] <mvo> jibel: all kudos go to evfool for this one
=== jah is now known as bsmartt
=== bsmartt is now known as bsmartt`
[16:06] <bil21al> jibel:
[16:06] <bil21al> can a reporter confirm his own bug ??
[16:10] <bil21al> anybody
[16:10] <bil21al> hggdh
[16:10] <charlie-tca> no
[16:10] <hggdh> bil21al: no
[16:11] <bil21al> ok and u see this bug bro https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/856862
[16:11] <hggdh> bil21al: patience also helps. Unnecessarily pinging others will *not* make them prone to answer you
[16:12] <bil21al> hggdh : ok
[16:13] <hggdh> I resetted it to New. bil21al, can you reproduce?
[16:14] <bil21al> no
[16:14] <hggdh> then please state you could not reproduce, and then we wait for somebody else
[16:15] <bil21al> i staied but he changed again and than he confirmed by himself  so i again state this thank you bro.
[16:30] <bil21al> anybody have experienced same issue ? v
[16:30] <bil21al> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/857197
[16:34] <hggdh> bil21al: this may be caused by the mirror you are using
[16:35] <bil21al> so can i fix it by myself??
[16:35] <hggdh> usually hash sum mismatchs happens when the mirror is first updating the summary files, then updating the package files themselves
[16:36] <hggdh> bil21al: yes -- (1) wait a bit and try again; (2) check which mirror you use, and raise the issue with the mirror admins
[16:37] <bil21al> ok
[16:39] <hggdh> bil21al: the IRC channel for the mirror-admins is #ubuntu-mirrors
[17:31] <steemed> I've found a bug in Unity, I'm not sure if it has been found...
[17:32] <ashams> Guys, Hi
[17:32] <ashams> Just want to check my application status(to bug-control team membership), it was sent on 16 Sept, but i had no replies so far. During the last month a lot of my msgs was(for some reason) cosidered SPAM, So, if anyone here subscribed to this mailing list, please check for it among spam msgs.
[17:32] <ashams> Anyway, here's a link: https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-bugcontrol/msg03494.html
[17:32] <ashams> Thanks.
[17:33] <steemed> But in oneiric, when I drag a window up to the title bar, it automatically snaps to fullscreen, but then a big orange box is shown to indicate it will be made fullscreen if I go closer to the top
[17:39] <hggdh> ashams: I accepted it in the list last week, but did not have time to look at it yet
[17:39] <hggdh> ashams: yes, it was received
[17:40] <hggdh> steemed: yes, this is an indication that it will get to be full-screen. What is the problem there?
[17:42] <steemed> hggdh: The problem is that it fullscreens with the title bar at first, but after it "snaps" and you let go as the indicator comes up, it only fullscreens the window *excluding* the Unity bar
[17:43] <steemed> Try unsnapping Firefox then snapping it back with the indicator showing
[17:45] <hggdh> well, yes, it will not overwrite the indicator bar
[17:46] <steemed> I mean. It is so hard to explain
[17:49] <steemed> hggdh: dragging a window up to the indicator bar will snap it to fullscreen with the titlebar being integrated into it
[17:49] <steemed> With NO indicator
[17:50] <steemed> But if you keep dragging the window up to the absolute top of the screen, the indicator shows up. Once you release while the indicator shows up, the window is technically full screen but not integrated with the indicator bar
[17:50] <steemed> The title bar that is
[17:50] <hggdh> steemed: it would be better if you took a screenshot and showed it; I am not sure I follow you
[17:50] <steemed> Several screenshots coming up
[17:51] <ashams> hggdh: Thanks man :D
[17:51] <steemed> ~
[17:54] <steemed> hggdh: http://imgur.com/a/WVl4D
[17:54] <steemed> First screen shows an already fullscreen window
[17:55] <steemed> Second screen shows me detaching it and dragging it back all the way to the top
[17:55] <steemed> Third shows the result
[17:56] <hggdh> steemed: yeah, it is a bug
[17:56] <hggdh> third should show the same as the first
[17:56] <steemed> Yeah
[17:56] <hggdh> interesting that I could not reproduce here
[17:57] <steemed> The window *has* to be fullscreen at first
[17:57] <hggdh> may be either I am more up-to-date than you, or related to video card
[17:57] <steemed> And this is on oneiric
[17:57] <steemed> I also installed ccsm if that makes any difference
[17:57] <hggdh> steemed: I used my firefox window, which was on full screen, and played on taking it out and putting it back. And I am running oneiric as well
[17:58] <steemed> Did you drag it to the absolute top of the screen? Beyond the title bar?
[17:58] <hggdh> I do not have it. May be related to a plugin?
[17:58] <steemed> Maybe
[17:58] <steemed> I have to go anyways
[17:58] <steemed> I'll mess around in the configs and see if that fixes anything
[20:42] <steemed> hggdh: you there?
=== jrib is now known as Guest75052
=== Guest75052 is now known as jrib
[21:27] <phillw> Hiyas good bug squashers :) An unusual one for me, I've raised the bug but have no idea 'where' to assign it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/857760 As it self evident, I can happily mark it as 'confirmed' but have no idea to whom it should be sent.
[21:27] <micahg> phillw: that's actually a support issue for launchpad not an ubuntu bug
[21:28] <phillw> okies, I will mark as invalid... any idea whom I should approach?
[21:28] <micahg> phillw: I converted it to a launchpad question
[21:29] <phillw> micahg: thanks :) Never had an lp issue before... just what I needed when the release notes for a beta 2 were not on the ML archive!
[21:30] <micahg> phillw: you can ask about such things in #launchpad generally
[21:31] <phillw> micahg: thanks, whilst a bug person, there is always something new lurking around the corner :)
=== Exodus_ is now known as Exodus