[01:50] good night [01:51] :D [01:52] madnick, yes, sorry about the interface, i forgot to add a schudule for today so it broke when searching for it, i've changed the code so now if the schudele file is absent it will say so [01:52] :) [01:52] * GridCube reads the ubuntulogs XD [01:52] oh okay :) [01:53] anyway i've checked and now there is a schudele for all the week [01:53] :P [01:54] charlie is the only one updating it tho [01:54] i was going to :P [01:56] :D [07:39] madnick: so, what's the call on blueman [07:44] hey everyone [07:44] micahg: both versions seems to work almost the same, replicating the same scenarios makes them both do the same thing, however the new one seems to have more features [07:44] also the new one have not crashed for me [07:44] hi ochosi [07:45] madnick: ok, can you comment in Bug #836324 please? [07:45] Launchpad bug 836324 in blueman (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync blueman 1.22~bzr707-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/836324 [07:45] did any of you test greybird-gtk3 and run into any problems/bugs with it? [07:46] ochosi: I won't be able to look at thunderbird before the weekend unfortunately, it's unlikely we'll be able to get a fix in before release [07:46] micahg: ok, that's a pity, i think it's the only known bug in greybird atm [07:46] the good news is thunderbird gets updated regularly, so we just have to get a fix upstream and we'll inherit it 4 weeks after release [07:46] right [07:47] err, not quite right...16 weeks :( [07:47] yeah, i'm not sure there is much i can do to fix this in the theme... [07:47] new stuff has to land on trunk [07:47] hm, 16 weeks is almost 12.04 :) [07:47] once it lands though, we can probably distro patch [07:48] personally i don't use tb, but i know people will complain about it [07:48] ochosi: if we're distro patching, I'd have to SRU it in any event and it could even be right after release [07:49] micahg: Im unsure what to write in that bug [07:50] should i just tell them "i did some testing on multiple devices comparing the versions, and i find the new one better" [07:51] madnick: yep and that the new version crashes less [07:51] or doesn't crash [07:51] whatever appropriate [07:51] okay [07:52] micahg: k, will you comment on the bug (856939) or shall i? [07:55] i was about to write "i found a couple of wierd things in both versions", but i guess thats not relevant to this bug report? its just which one is better [07:56] madnick: write what you discovered, the release team can weigh what's better I guess [07:59] I hope my entry is enough, im really bad at expressing myself [08:01] mr_pouit: we got our conffile for the greeter now :) [08:01] madnick: seems fine, thanks for the testing [08:02] I don't like that it makes it impossible to know if you accepted a key, because it does not go away [08:03] and also that it changes name on the device if you reject it, to something i guess is the bluetooth modules name itself [08:03] did that happen in the old version? [08:04] yes [08:04] both versions [08:05] I guess this is better than pulling in half of GNOME though [08:05] yeah, its not that bad, the phone / tablet / keyboard / amtel chip device / etc knows when its done :P [08:06] its just that if you dont look, you may get confused [09:25] micahg: yay \o/ [09:25] mr_pouit: we also got blueman approved, I'll upload a little later, I'm off Thu/Fri, can you keep an eye on it for emergencies, also do you need anything else fixed in -meta? [09:30] I've already to take care of x-d-s (add the greeter theme for lightdm), murrine-themes (greybird updates), and the only-ubiquity bug, so, one more, one less, it's fine ;-) [10:53] I see mr_pouit has fixed lightdm-gtk-greeter [10:53] nice job! [10:54] How can I help translating it, as the current greeter is still 100 % in English, in Xubuntu 11.10? [11:01] no, it's not fixed :( [11:02] iirc, the labels etc are marked as translatable [11:02] But im not sure how one does anything with that [11:04] I'm not here this afternoon, so when charlie-tca comes online, please tell him to push Bug #861316 [11:04] Launchpad bug 861316 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "Uncleaned conffile in lightdm-gtk-greeter" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/861316 [11:04] thanks [11:05] mr_pouit: wasn't it fixed here? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/845549 [11:05] Ubuntu bug 845549 in lightdm (Ubuntu Oneiric) "Do not ship /etc/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf" [High,Fix released] [11:06] Pjotr: see the bug link I pasted above [11:06] I see. This is bad. [11:07] Even Lubuntu has a nicer greeter now. :-( [11:15] For what it's worth, I just marked bug 861316 as "affects me too" on Launchpad. [11:15] Launchpad bug 861316 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "Uncleaned conffile in lightdm-gtk-greeter" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/861316 [14:56] mr_pouit: now that we got things accepted, do I need to have someone push bug 861309 out for us? [14:56] Launchpad bug 861309 in xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "[{UI,F}Fe] lightdm-gtk-greeter theme" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/861309 [21:09] Away grandkids [21:35] Have fun! Lubuntu has a nicer "greeter" because they are using LXDM (Something someone said a bit up) [21:40] I'll upload the new meta with blueman over the weekend (unless mr_pouit beats me to it) [21:42] micahg: I can upload it right now if needed [21:42] mr_pouit: it's not seeded yet (no time), I'd do a recommends on blueman if you want to handle it [21:44] micahg: I can add a recommends, then upload [21:45] mr_pouit: feel free, thanks! [21:47] micahg: does it need a FFe? or was it already filed (which bug #?)? [21:47] mr_pouit: there's a task against xubuntu-meta for it [21:48] bug #836324 [21:48] indeed [21:48] Launchpad bug 836324 in xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "FFe: Merge blueman 1.22~bzr707-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/836324 [22:15] hop, uploaded, good night! [22:26] mr_pouit: thanks!