[10:29] <janimo> wgrant, there's no way to cancel a running build from LP right?
[10:32] <wgrant> janimo: Pretty much correct.
[10:32] <wgrant> Not in any clean way that doesn't make lamont cry and leave the builder dead.
[11:34] <lamont> janimo: last I remember the way it worked from lp was that as soon as the build finished naturally, the builder was marked dead
[11:35] <lamont> this doesn't so much cancel the build (though lp ignores the results), as the builder
[11:58] <janimo> lamont, but no way to programatically cancel a running build, like there is a retry for a failed one.
[12:00] <lamont> correct
[12:00] <lamont> the program there is "poke a GSA"
[15:17] <idnar> deryck: my commercial project seems to have vanished off Launchpad; how do I find out what's going on?
[15:23] <deryck> idnar, hmmm, good question.  maybe mrevell or bac can help you?
[15:23] <mrevell> Hey idnar, what's the project name?
[15:23] <idnar> mrevell: fusionapp
[15:23]  * mrevell looks
[15:25] <bac> idnar: your subscription expired.  you should've gotten email a while back
[15:27] <bac> idnar: we can reactivate the project for you, but you'll need to purchase another 1 year subscription
[15:27] <idnar> that's fine; can't find any email regarding the matter, though, so that must have gotten lost somewhere
[15:28] <bac> idnar: mrevell seems to have taken care of it.  sorry for the inconvenience.
[16:00] <kamal> hi deryck or other launchpadders...  This one bug page *always* yields a "Timeout error" for me:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/507062
[16:00] <kamal> this has been the case for many weeks.   other launchpad bug pages work fine (generally).    what's up with that one?
[16:04] <abentley> deryck: I relieve you.
[16:04] <deryck> abentley, thanks!
[18:07] <lfaraone> Would it be sensible to have Google Chrome include Launchpad.net on the certificate pinning list?
[19:08] <deryck> abentley, I've done an hour on interrupt duties.  I'll also spend some time clearing out the project review queue before I EOD.
[19:08] <deryck> but I'm doing now and will catch that right at the end of the day ;)
[19:08] <deryck> s/doing/coding/
[19:08] <abentley> deryck: cool.
[19:37] <Sweetshark> https://launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+packages <= how do i get _rid_ of these wrong "links to ubuntu package"? I have searched all over the place and must be blind ...
[19:39] <Sweetshark> (i.e. libreoffice-3-4 series is of course oneiric, and -3-3 is natty)
[19:56] <yofel> jelmer: am I doing something wrong in particular? https://code.launchpad.net/~neon/kdelibs/4.7
[20:11] <dobey> Sweetshark: you mean how they're all linked to trunk?
[20:12] <dobey> Sweetshark: ah lovely, looks like libreoffice is hitting the weird permissions bug in lp
[20:31] <soren> What would happen if a build on amd64 resulted in an Arch: all file?
[20:32] <soren> wgrant: ^
[22:18] <slangasek> Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server.  Try reloading this page in a minute or two. If the problem persists, let us know in the #launchpad IRC channel on Freenode.
[22:18] <slangasek> awoooga
[22:18] <broder> yeah, getting the same thing
[22:18] <broder> was just about to ask about it :)
[22:19] <broder> and we're back
[23:21] <wgrant> soren: It'll upload, but if any other build also builds that file then only the first one will upload.