[00:00] Hm. [00:00] Again. [00:01] I got a crash with SIGSEGV PrivateWindow::addWindowStackChanges() which is supposedly fixed in today's Unity [00:01] so maybe that was it, not sure whether I want today's Unity though... :( [00:01] humm...today's updates broke unity on my aspire one [00:02] http://paste.ubuntu.com/699403/ was the paste after Unity started [00:05] mdeslaur: glxinfo for your aspire one? [00:05] RAOF: one sec, I'm opening a bug with a couple of screenshots [00:06] RAOF: maybe it was just Unity then, Unity did start after I rebooted too, it's just my first paste sounded similar to the code you were tweaking [00:07] jbicha: It shouldn't be related to my code, but stranger bugs have existed :) [00:08] RAOF: bug 862893 [00:08] Launchpad bug 862893 in unity "weird workspace regression in today's updates" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/862893 [00:10] mdeslaur: is that a dupe of bug 862743 ? [00:10] Launchpad bug 862743 in unity "Desktop drawn with offset" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/862743 [00:11] jbicha: yep, that's exactly it [00:11] jbicha: marking as dupe, thanks [00:11] jbicha: let me know if I can help with this in any way [00:11] mdeslaur: yeah, that's a nasty late one [00:12] I disclaim any responsibility for Compiz/Unity ;-) [00:12] * mdeslaur looks around for didrocks [00:17] didrocks would be sleeping atm./ [00:20] I'd certainly hope so! [00:21] nobody told him about the "upload unity - wait 24 hrs before sleeping" rule? [03:19] hi guys. I'm looking for a solution to read an ebook (pdf) in the background while I'm working. aby ideas, please? [03:19] TTS [03:21] kieppie: try #ubuntu this channel is for Desktop development :) [03:22] thanks [03:45] Good morning [03:46] Morning pitti. [03:46] Whoops [03:46] Only meant one channel. [03:46] lol, good morning [03:46] jbicha: did you try devhelp from sid on oneiric? (build/work) [03:46] hey TheMuso -- can't hurt twice :) [03:46] No I guess not. [03:46] oh, Robert already gone, darn -- wanted to discuss guest session with him [03:47] hey jbicha [03:47] pitti: yes, devhelp works here [03:50] jbicha: ah, diff looks rather harmless indeed [03:51] jbicha: synced [03:52] RAOF: did you see the followup to bug 824099? [03:52] Launchpad bug 824099 in gnome-desktop3 "Max GL texture size can break multi-head" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/824099 [03:53] pitti: Thanks, I have now. [04:00] eww, new unity seems to break multiple monitors rather badly :( [04:05] pitti: it breaks single monitors badly too, bug 862743 [04:05] Launchpad bug 862743 in unity "Desktop drawn with offset" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/862743 [04:07] * RAOF acquires food for lunch. Then, to work out what the hell is happening in 824099 [04:12] RAOF: You naughty boy. :) [04:24] RAOF: hang on [04:24] RAOF: it's running that GL test on login? [04:24] RAOF: I thought it's only doing that when you change resolution in control-center [04:25] doing it at every login seems unnecessarily expensive [04:26] jbicha: wow, I must be missing a package then -- my guest session doesn't have that icon [04:26] jbicha pitti does unity break it or does the GL fix we put in break multi-monitor? I saw the bug 824099 above...is 862743 related? or is it just another multi-monitor bug? [04:26] Launchpad bug 824099 in gnome-desktop3 "Max GL texture size can break multi-head" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/824099 [04:27] jbicha: oh, of course -- it's because we don't start nautilus by default apparenlty, so in a guest session there is no nautilus process [04:27] when I start it, I get it, too [04:27] pitti: nautilus should start by default [04:27] jasoncwarner_: I guess we need to downgrade either and check [04:29] but Unity isn't playing nice either today [04:55] pitti, I totally agree with you [04:56] the new roundel thing looks shit [04:56] DBO: roundel? [04:56] jasoncwarner_, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/732016 [04:56] Ubuntu bug 732016 in unity-2d "UIFe: Desktop should be titled" [Low,Confirmed] [04:56] the circle of friends inside a circle of white [04:57] that sounded racist... [04:57] but the point stands, it looks awful [04:58] :) [04:58] I think the whole menu thing looks awkward. I've been more a proponent of using application icons in the menu if we are going to continue to use the global menu... [04:58] jasoncwarner_, if you guys are in a cherry picking mood today... [04:59] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity/trunk/revision/1677 [04:59] that fixes [04:59] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/862743 [05:00] Ubuntu bug 862743 in unity "Desktop drawn with offset" [Critical,Fix committed] [05:00] ooh! [05:00] DBO: since you are here, why does my upper-left corner activation for launcher seemingly not work right now? edge activation works, but upper left (even when set in ccsm) doesn't seem to work [05:00] I'd say didrocks will cherry-pick that when he gets up. [05:00] DBO: nice [05:01] jasoncwarner_, because of a bug from mark which specifically told me to disable the corner activation [05:01] even when we set it in ccsm? [05:01] :( [05:01] jasoncwarner_, unfortunately the implementation does break it when you set the corner in CCSM [05:01] Im sorry [05:01] you not are stuck with edge reveal [05:01] I wanted to fix that but I just didn't have time [05:02] DBO: c'est la vie ... just so I know. i'll have to retrain my brain to no try upper left corner ;) [05:02] jasoncwarner_, it takes about 2 days [05:02] from my experience [05:02] DBO: so, I can upload that fix now [05:02] pitti, if you want I dont really care [05:02] thats a desktop team decision [05:03] * pitti grabs it, it breaks everyone's desktop really badly [05:04] that bug is a pretty bad break [05:04] agree with pitt [05:04] pitti, rather [05:04] sorry about that [05:04] I have now added a *NEW* test case [05:05] dont just log out and back in [05:05] whee, my first unity upload [05:05] restart the entire fucking machine [05:05] because nautilus takes .2 seconds to start in the first case [05:05] and 25 in the second [05:05] DBO: "Use the guest session, Luke" [05:05] pitti, it has to do with nautilus load time [05:05] guest session wont show the issue on my box [05:05] i have to reboot [05:05] ah, I thought for catching this kind of bug [05:05] pitti, its partly related to how long nautilus takes to start up [05:06] guest session has no files for nautilus to generate useless thumbnails of [05:06] so it starts pretty quick :P [05:06] Nautilus desktop mode is a pain any way, Ctrl+T is a cool trick :( [05:06] we should make that not work... [05:10] jbicha: hm, nautilus actually does run by default, but I don't actually get the desktop menu/icon/"Desktop" until I open a nautilus window once [05:10] pitti, thats known as the "nautilus crash and relaunched itself but went full retard about making a new desktop window" bug [05:11] DBO: I have no nautilus crash [05:11] pitti, it can happen without the crash [05:11] it's running right after login, no .crash file, nothing in dmesg [05:11] its just less common [05:12] I tried to debug it one time with upstream [05:12] it did not go well... [05:15] oh, fun [05:15] it doesn't actually need to be a nautilus window [05:15] any window with a menu seems to do [05:28] pitti: That GL test runs at logon, because the g-s-d xrandr plugin probes modes at logon. If it didn't run there, you'd get a broken desktop if you booted with 2 displays plugged in for the first time. [05:28] DBO: working nicely, thanks! [05:29] pitti: It's got a measurable, but small, performance impact; I timed it at ~150msec on my atom netbook. [05:30] RAOF: ah, I see [05:34] Also, it's run iff we're using a Unity 3D session, but that's not much comfort :) [05:39] good morning [05:39] bonjour didrocks [05:39] didrocks: word of warning, I just did an unity upload [05:39] didrocks: but not accepted from queue yet [05:40] pitti: oh? [05:40] didrocks: for bug 862743 (single patch, two-liner) [05:40] Launchpad bug 862743 in unity "Desktop drawn with offset" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/862743 [05:40] pitti: ah great, I just get this one this reboot [05:40] didrocks: just "bzr merge lp:unity", to pick up DBO's patch [05:40] pitti: excellent, thanks! [05:41] ok; I was a bit afraid of breaking some release tool/workflow you have [05:41] pitti: no, bzr merge is what to cherry-pick and all milestoning is fine :) [05:42] * didrocks adds to everytime logout/login to the needed testcase [05:43] didrocks, yep [05:44] i added the same thing [05:44] didrocks, its worse than log out/in though [05:44] DBO: thanks for the patch! [05:44] this takes a full reboot to trigger on my machine [05:44] DBO: oh? [05:44] :/ [05:44] didrocks: still no guest session fun on nvidia? [05:44] not even guest session triggers it [05:44] I got it in guest session or my "test" account [05:45] pitti: well, I have a guest session that start to swap my current session, have a lot of graphical artefacts [05:46] didrocks: bah, silly graphics drivers :( [05:47] I can have three full 3D sessions in parallel just fine (didn't try more) [05:50] pitti: yeah, I guess my next laptop will be intel, as everyone [05:51] didrocks: so nouveau is still not good enough? [05:51] pitti: I didn't try it this cycle, but knowing that the unity team only support the blob driver and last time, nouveau had a lot of mem leaks… [05:54] didrocks: to avoid crazy debdiffs like http://launchpadlibrarian.net/81512849/unity_4.20.0-0ubuntu1_4.20.0-0ubuntu2.diff.gz [05:54] didrocks: would you consider switching the unity package to source format 1.0? [05:56] pitti: see my answer on #ubuntu-release [05:57] robert_ancell: Can you shed any light on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/824099/comments/19 ? [05:57] Ubuntu bug 824099 in gnome-desktop3 "Max GL texture size can break multi-head" [Undecided,Confirmed] [05:58] ummmmmm [05:59] It looks there like lightdm is aborting significantly before the gl_check is happening. [05:59] DBO: the offset wallpaper doesn't require a reboot necessarily, I totally have an uptime of 29 hours now [06:00] RAOF, but the only interaction lightdm has with the X servers is to do a connect and to manage the processes [06:00] jbicha, it depends on teh machine [06:00] could an ABRT signal flow back from the X server to the ligthdm process? [06:00] hey robert_ancell [06:00] pitti, hello [06:01] robert_ancell: do you need a hand with bug 849027? [06:01] Launchpad bug 849027 in lightdm "lightdm does not provide an equivalent to the gdm guest session AppArmor profile" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/849027 [06:01] pitti, yes [06:01] robert_ancell: I wouldn't expect so :/ [06:02] robert_ancell: can you give me a coarse description what happens if you launch a guest session from lightdm? how is it different from a normal session? [06:03] pitti, it basically runs 'guest account add', gets the username back, then runs an autologin with that username [06:03] and runs 'guest-account del username' at the end [06:03] robert_ancell: ok; so that's where we need to hook the session wrapper script [06:04] pitti, I think you just need to wrap the normal session wrapper with a guest one [06:04] robert_ancell: ok, I'll have a go at this [06:04] would really like this in the final release [06:04] we already significantly opened up machine access with this [06:05] having a totally unauthenticated and anonymous guest session which can also access all home directories is really really bad [06:06] pitti: Thanks for the libcanberra upload, I would have done so myself, however I couldn't reproduce the issue... [06:06] TheMuso: credit goes to diwic [06:07] pitti: I know, I saw the patch in the bug, and was going to upload it if I could reproduce it./ [06:07] pitti: bug #805252 wasn't about the focus issue [06:07] Launchpad bug 805252 in unity-foundations "appmenu shows wrong menu when desktop is displayed (not the tweaked desktop one)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/805252 [06:07] didrocks: focus issue? [06:08] pitti: it was about "when the desktop is focused, we get a normal nautilus menu" [06:08] didrocks: I didn't complain about a focus problem [06:08] pitti: you are speaking about after login, there is no menu at first [06:08] didrocks: the modified nautilus menu isn't showing at all, until you open any app once which has a menu [06:08] (as if nautilus desktop isn't focus) [06:08] uh? [06:08] pitti: even if you click on the desktop? [06:08] well, maybe it is a focus issue then, but a rather confusing one [06:08] didrocks: let me try again [06:08] thanks :) [06:09] uhm [06:09] wow [06:09] the new wallpapers [06:09] are amazing! [06:09] didrocks: aah [06:09] didrocks: ok, if there's another bug about this then, let's close it agian [06:10] pitti: thanks :) [06:11] DBO: any idea about that one? ^ [06:11] DBO: seems nautilus hasn't the focus after login or that bamf doesn't see it's focused [06:11] DBO: so, appmenu doesn't pick nautilus desktop menu [06:12] it doesn't have focus [06:12] so [06:12] we need to make the panel display the "Desktop" stuff when nothing is focused [06:12] DBO: not sure, just a guess that it doesn't (and clicking give it the focus) [06:12] i know it odesn't [06:12] X wont randomly assign focus to a window [06:13] DBO: hum, but that mean still no menu [06:13] I dont know [06:13] or rather, menu not connecting with nautilus' callback [06:15] pitti, should 'guest-session' work in lightdm? bug 799950 [06:15] Launchpad bug 799950 in lightdm "Can't launch guest session from a LightDM session" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/799950 [06:16] robert_ancell: no, it shouldn't; it's called "gdm-guest-session" for a reason [06:16] yeah, that's what I figured... [06:16] robert_ancell: I think we should just remove gdm-guest-session, I'm not even sure if our gdm pacakge still has that patch [06:17] didrocks, whats the state of the nautilus fix? [06:17] robert_ancell: oh, we do have the patch still [06:18] pitti, we should really drop it if upstream isn't going to take it [06:18] DBO: what do you mean? which one? :) [06:18] DBO: the one you did for unity? [06:18] didrocks, yes [06:18] robert_ancell: right; in P [06:18] DBO: pitti uploaded it :) [06:18] didrocks, oh somehow I thought it got halted [06:18] excellent! [06:18] . o O { I can has name for P? } [06:19] DBO: nautilus fix? I didn't do a nautilus upload, if the focus problem needs to be addressed there [06:19] DBO: well, it was in unapproved, but that's the normal workflow since last week [06:19] pitti, no just unity [06:19] pitti: he's speaking about the display shifted [06:19] ah, that; it's in [06:19] pitti: +1 on the name [06:19] :) [06:19] you guys rock [06:19] got infinity to review it quickly [06:19] DBO: no worries, just pushing buttons; you fixed it :) [06:19] people on the french forum are expecting a conspiracy about release cadence as there is still no name [06:19] (well, not sure if it was you who broke it in the first place :) ) [06:20] when does the name normally happen? [06:20] pitti, also, until told other, P is Pretty Pony [06:20] last year, was beginning of august [06:20] wow [06:20] wtf [06:21] aug 17 [06:21] http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/date/2010/08 [06:21] this is the kind of shit that strikes fear into my heart [06:21] waow, my memory isn't that screwed \o/ [06:21] I just make up P names and use them on the forums and watch how others quote me on them [06:23] i hear we're supposed to get a name this weekend [06:23] jbicha: that's evil :-) [06:23] maybe sabdfl hasn't found an obscure enough name yet in his dictionary, lol [06:23] pitti: have you open a bug for the nautilus focus issue? [06:23] didrocks: no, want me to? [06:24] pitti: no no, just that we don't deadlock on each other, doing it :) [06:24] bjf, where did you hear that? [06:24] not sure i can say, but it was a very reliable source [06:34] FYI to those in Europe, NSW has a long weekend this weekend, and maybe other states, I'm not sure. So EOD for me, will see you all Tuesday. [06:36] I'm *very* interested in hearing from anyone else who's had a problem after the gnome-desktop3 upload, like bug #824099. I can't reproduce this no matter how messed up I make my GL stack. [06:37] Launchpad bug 824099 in gnome-desktop3 "Max GL texture size can break multi-head" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/824099 [06:40] RAOF: hey! [06:40] didrocks: Yo yo! [06:41] TheMuso: see you on Tuesday [06:41] RAOF: so yesterday, I again has this Xorg restart on a lot of disk write [06:41] RAOF: I have copied Xorg.0 and Xorg.0.log, interested? [06:41] Ooooooh! Do tell! [06:41] Yes please. Did you happen to nab dmesg also? [06:42] Xorg0.log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/699526/ and .log.old : http://paste.ubuntu.com/699527/ [06:42] RAOF: argh, no :/ [06:42] will do next time if no info from here [06:44] Ok. Looks like evdev is being woken up and crashing. [06:45] Possibly as a result of trying to jump to 0x1be, which seems unlikely to actually contain valid code :) [06:45] evil evdev, who needs you? :p [06:45] Do you have an apport crash report? [06:46] RAOF: no, that's the weirdest part… [06:46] Sigh. [06:46] RAOF: i have a system that was affected by one of the bugs linked in the above report but i don't see any such issues now. [06:47] We've not ironed out all the failure modes of the Xorg apport integration patch. :( [06:48] htorque: Ok. And it hasn't introduced other problems like in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/824099/comments/19 ? [06:48] Ubuntu bug 824099 in gnome-desktop3 "Max GL texture size can break multi-head" [Undecided,Confirmed] [06:50] RAOF: no, it boots fine, connecting a 1920x1080 display works fine - no issues. === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter [06:59] New updates, new bugs: I have a displaced background now, see last three comments of bug 832603. [06:59] Launchpad bug 832603 in gnome-settings-daemon "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_simple_async_result_complete()" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/832603 [06:59] RAOF, robert_ancell, disrocks, agateau: ^^ [07:00] tkamppeter: That's fixed in the most recent unity upload, which hasn't built everywhere yet, I think. [07:00] RAOF, thanks. [07:02] LP is totally overloaded now, I get only timeouts, especially I cannot access bug 507062 and bug 832603. [07:02] Launchpad bug 507062 in xlibs "synaptic assert failure: synaptic: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed." [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/507062 [07:02] Launchpad bug 832603 in gnome-settings-daemon "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_simple_async_result_complete()" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/832603 [07:02] The first of the two happened after logging in after my updates of today. [07:05] pitti: what do you think of bug 841756? [07:05] Launchpad bug 841756 in ayatana-design "Remove "Search for Files..." application from default install of Ubuntu" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/841756 [07:08] Hello desktoppers! [07:09] pitti: libreoffice_3.4.3-3ubuntu1_source.changes is ready for upload on chinstrap [07:14] jbicha: I think it's a reasonable request, but I wouldn't like to change it for oneiric [07:14] hey Sweetshark [07:14] Sweetshark: ah, now need to get this into oneiric [07:14] (past final freeze) [07:18] morning mvo and pitti [07:18] hey glatzor, how are you? [07:18] glatzor: exciting news wrt. PK system d-bus API! [07:18] glatzor: so you made the impossible possible? [07:18] (I thought the API didn't allow interactive questions, etc.) [07:19] pitti, I am fine. tomorrow I will be on vacations! How are you? [07:19] glatzor: oh, nice, where do you go? [07:19] I'm great, thanks [07:19] glatzor, We don't know yet :) [07:20] glatzor: talking to yourself? time for holiday for sure! :-) [07:20] hey glatzor, good monring! [07:20] * pitti waves to mvo [07:20] morning mvo [07:21] hey pitti [07:21] long weekend ahead \o/ [07:21] glatzor: yeah, great new re PK [07:21] glatzor: the mosel is very nice at this time of year ;) just saying … [07:21] pitti: \o/ indeed [07:21] if you don't know where to go to yet [07:23] mvo, pitti the pk compat layer is basically just a mapping of properties. We don't get any interactiveness which isn't allowed by the original packagekit api [07:23] glatzor: ah, ok; still good, as I expect this to be much faster than the original PK :) [07:23] mvo, pitti, Handling medias isn't yet support but will also just result in a failing transaction - as required by the PK api [07:24] Sweetshark: 3.4.3-3ubuntu1 ? [07:24] glatzor: I don't think many people care about CDs these days.. [07:24] pitti, mvo, It is also not a real alternative for software-center, since we require a lot of additional features of the aptdaemon dbus interface [07:25] glatzor: yes, this is mainly to make upstream bits in e. g. control-center "just work" [07:25] installing a codec package or whatnot [07:25] pitti: yes [07:25] pitti, mvo, that was my main intention [07:26] pitti, mvo, in the end we could even think about using RefreshCache, GetUpdates, GetDistroUpgrades [07:26] in the gnome session daemon [07:26] Sweetshark: did you happen to test-build this on ppc? we got a new openjdk yesterday, too [07:28] didrocks: hi! What's the package that is replacing gnome-power-manager? [07:28] pitti, mvo, funnily we could even support the debconf handling of PackageKit in the PK compat layer [07:28] didrocks: i'm having troubles with the automatic suspend [07:28] nxvl: yeah, everyone has, I didn't follow the whole story, probably pitti or rodrigo_ knows [07:28] nxvl: automatic suspend after 30 minutes despite config saying "nothing"? that's being worked on [07:29] nxvl: gnome-settings-daemon, FYI [07:29] pitti: no, I just though of doing a testbuild on one of the porter boxes when reviewing the debdiff and seeing the gcj changes [07:29] pitti: oh, so known bug [07:29] yes, got it again last night [07:29] it's not respecting the boolean option [07:29] pitti: great i wanted to know if i needed to file it or it's already known, great [07:29] morning mvo, what does the 'Error %s review' string mean in SC? It's on softwarecenter/ui/gtk3/widgets/reviews.py [07:30] mvo, what is the state of the addlicensekey issue? [07:30] coudl be fixed by http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-control-center/commit/?id=3e20a577a469414914b0361e47648514d161eb38 [07:30] mvo, it is going to be deferred? [07:30] rodrigo_: good morning [07:30] rodrigo_: FYI, I reset all my dconf settings yesterday, and control-center now says to not suspend on AC, but it did [07:30] rodrigo_: is that http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-control-center/commit/?id=3e20a577a469414914b0361e47648514d161eb38 ? [07:30] mvo, thanks for your invitation. could became reallity faster than you could imagine :) [07:30] pitti: although the gcj change also affects amd64, so I would consider it basically tested. [07:31] rodrigo_: it looks a bit incomplete, as I don't see a check for == 0 there, but maybe that's done elsewhere === Zdra is now known as xclaesse [07:36] pitti: our recent mutter upload has a debian-changes patch that might explain why the arm build fails, I don't see that in the bzr branch though [07:37] eww, that looks unintended [07:38] pitti: thanks, ricotz pointed it out to me [07:39] jbicha: seems that the files in bzr got changed [07:40] jbicha: seems it's a problem with the pre-applied 01_Wcast-align.patch or so [07:40] actually, with all patches [07:40] screw you, pre-applied patches [07:42] jbicha: uploaded [07:42] I used the good old apt-get source, let the package importer unscrew this [07:42] dpm: the %s is a action, that should probably be Error %(action)s review", but even then its not very i18n friendly :/ [07:43] glatzor: yeah, that will be a SRU [07:43] glatzor: the license-key stuff, its still pretty important, but the time is just too short, I hope to work on it today again though [07:46] mvo, no worries, I'll file a bug. But in any case, I still don't understand what it means. Could you give me an example of what %(action)s could be? [07:46] pitti: I was thinking about just moving gshell & friends to our ~desktop branches, bzr mu wasn't working right for me with mutter anyway [07:47] jbicha: if you want to, sure [07:47] dpm: I will add a # TRANSLATORS: comment [07:47] mvo, that'd be great, thanks! [07:50] dpm: meh, I will fix it properly, the current way is really i18n unfriendly [07:52] hey [07:52] Monsieur! [07:52] pitti, hey, alter! ;-) [07:52] how are you? [07:52] morning [07:52] hey rodrigo_ [07:52] jasoncwarner_, didrocks, seb128: FYI, us German dudes will be on vacation next Monday, celebrating German reunion [07:53] pitti, that commit is in master [07:53] seb128: I'm great, thanks! did my first unity upload this morning :-P [07:53] pitti, \o/ [07:53] rodrigo_: right; I just wondered if it's enough to fix the "ignores the boolean flags" problem [07:53] pitti: seems most aussies are joining you. Some sort of labor day down here [07:53] but anyway, seems some systems auto suspend and others not :( [07:53] rodrigo_, yeah, mine suspended again during sport yesterday [07:53] seb128: bug 804133 got a fix upstream now (I pointed to the git commit in the bug now); do you fancy giving that a spin and cherrypicking? [07:53] Launchpad bug 804133 in nautilus "Segmentation fault: nautilus_icon_container_search_entry_flush_timeout" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/804133 [07:54] pitti, can do [07:54] * pitti hugs seb128 [07:54] seb128: that'll be one more "fixed" on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/ReleaseStatus \o/ [07:54] pitti, /me hugs pitti back [07:54] ups [07:54] syntax error ;-) [07:55] seb128: I'm looking at adding a proper AppArmor profile back to lightdm [07:55] guest session? [07:56] salut seb128 [07:56] hey didrocks, ca va ? [07:56] oh and btw: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/MinGW-cross-compilation-Runs-td3380547.html [07:56] ça va :) et toi? [07:56] seb128: bug 849027 [07:56]