| === micahg_ is now known as micahg | ||
| StevenK | Oh, bah. Firefox, why are you hiding the URI schema for http:// URIs? :-( | 04:14 |
|---|---|---|
| lifeless | because chrome did it and so its obviously cool. | 04:35 |
| lifeless | nevermind that it completely messes things up | 04:35 |
| StevenK | If Firefox is just going to copy Chrome, that's disappointing. | 04:56 |
| lifeless | oh, I agree. | 05:41 |
| nigelb | lifeless: <3 | 05:58 |
| nigelb | thanks! | 05:58 |
| nigelb | StevenK: Speaking of browsers, this might be entertaining - http://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-lwEG-pIhR3Q/TodEKkigwVI/AAAAAAAACgs/ARfogL6LqXM/s512/msft.jpg | 05:58 |
| StevenK | nigelb: I saw that | 06:02 |
| nigelb | :) | 06:05 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| lifeless | under one page of mediums left | 20:59 |
| mwhudson | lifeless: and hey, i just closed two of the bugs you reclassified | 21:38 |
| lifeless | mwhudson: cool | 21:52 |
| mwhudson | three! | 21:53 |
| nigelb | do I hear a four? ;) | 21:53 |
| lifeless | going once | 21:53 |
| lifeless | spring cleaning :) | 21:55 |
| mwhudson | sadly no more yet | 21:58 |
| nigelb | I think I found the best spring cleaning material in tech-debt. | 21:59 |
| nigelb | Although fixing one bug = at least 2 to 3 MPs :P | 21:59 |
| mwhudson | my current launchpad side project is made of tech-debt | 21:59 |
| lifeless | nigelb: thats more like an attic :) - this is stuff that we have lying around uncategorised ;) | 21:59 |
| nigelb | lifeless: heh | 22:00 |
| nigelb | I can see the spiderwebs hang off those bugs :P | 22:00 |
| lifeless | :) | 22:01 |
| wallyworld_ | wgrant: were you going to look at 863098? | 23:33 |
| wgrant | Bug #863098 | 23:33 |
| _mup_ | Bug #863098: OOPS when retargeting a private bug to a context the user cannot see private bugs by default <404> <bugs> <disclosure> <oops> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/863098 > | 23:33 |
| wgrant | I wasn't. | 23:34 |
| wallyworld_ | ok. i can | 23:34 |
| jelmer | hi wallyworld_, wgrant | 23:34 |
| wgrant | Evening jelmer. | 23:34 |
| wallyworld_ | hello | 23:34 |
| wgrant | wallyworld_: Thanks. | 23:34 |
| wallyworld_ | np. just wan't to make sure we weren't going to double up | 23:34 |
| wallyworld_ | i hate unity today. had to totally blow alway all my settings to get it to not lock up the desktop | 23:35 |
| wgrant | wallyworld_: I suspect the solution will be to just subscribe the actor, as we do when making a bug private in the first place. | 23:37 |
| wallyworld_ | wgrant: that would work code wise. is that what we want to do policy wise? i guess so | 23:38 |
| wgrant | + xdr: {use: 'flash'}, | 23:39 |
| lifeless | or just set next_url to a different value | 23:39 |
| wgrant | aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa | 23:39 |
| lifeless | + add a notification | 23:39 |
| lifeless | I wouldn't expect the actor to be subscribed; in fact it will be explicitly *against* one of curtis' rules to do that. | 23:39 |
| lifeless | the rule being 'for "private projects" newly private-in-that-project bugs have no subscriptions other than the default set' | 23:40 |
| wgrant | Private projects don't exist. | 23:40 |
| wgrant | So rules around them aren't relevant yet. | 23:40 |
| wgrant | c-i-p is a default-private-bugs project, where the reporter has a subscription regardless. | 23:41 |
| lifeless | 'private bugs by default' seems to be your proxy for now | 23:41 |
| lifeless | wgrant: the reporter is one of the default set of subscriptions | 23:41 |
| lifeless | wgrant: the triager isn't | 23:41 |
| * wallyworld_ wonders whether to take the red pill or blue pill | 23:41 | |
| mwhudson | hooray for not landing code until you have a use for it | 23:42 |
| wgrant | lifeless: But the triager is the one reporting the bug in the "private project". | 23:42 |
| wallyworld_ | mwhudson: you referring to your mp from friday? | 23:42 |
| mwhudson | wallyworld_: yes | 23:42 |
| lifeless | wgrant: ahhh, no I'm not :) | 23:43 |
| lifeless | wgrant: meh, I can see arguments both ways. | 23:43 |
| wallyworld_ | mwhudson: do you have a specific use case for it now? | 23:43 |
| lifeless | wgrant: whatever you guys decide, I think it needs documentation if it will increase the visibility of such bugs | 23:43 |
| mwhudson | wallyworld_: basically, it seems stuffing things in annotations is unpleasant, better to just have an IParticipationExtras interface that separately defines the things we care about | 23:44 |
| wgrant | lifeless: I feel that all these changes are insane. | 23:44 |
| wgrant | lifeless: Because they're making an existing confusing and exceptional privacy mechanism even more confusing and exceptional, in a gradual fashion. | 23:44 |
| wgrant | lifeless: Rather than a one-off change to a sensible one. | 23:44 |
| mwhudson | wallyworld_: yeah, trying to (only) store the feature flag controller on the participation | 23:44 |
| lifeless | wgrant: so the goal is a sensible one; I agree that gradual changes can be tricky. | 23:45 |
| lifeless | wgrant: I wouldn't want to see massive code drops, but I could totally see stuff being feature flagged until all the bits are in place | 23:45 |
| wallyworld_ | mwhudson: +1 for that ff change | 23:45 |
| wgrant | For stuff like this they're not tricky: they're dangerous. | 23:45 |
| wgrant | lifeless: Right, that is what I intended from the start. But it seems everyone prefers gradual change :/ | 23:45 |
| wgrant | Normally, sure. But not for something like this. | 23:45 |
| lifeless | wgrant: talk to your team :) | 23:45 |
| lifeless | wgrant: FWIW, to me, feature-flagged to ~launchpad isn't gradual change, because only we're affected, and we can deal. | 23:46 |
| lifeless | wow, our lp-oops install has masssssive cruft in it | 23:47 |
| lifeless | QUERY PLAN | 23:47 |
| lifeless | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 23:47 |
| lifeless | Seq Scan on oops_oops (cost=0.00..1991487.27 rows=2772 width=68) | 23:47 |
| wallyworld_ | wgrant: so, what's the consensus? subscribe or redirect with notification? | 23:48 |
| wgrant | Not sure. | 23:51 |
| wgrant | But looks like we need to roll back the latest devel rev. | 23:51 |
| wgrant | It breaks lots of profiling tests, it seems. | 23:51 |
| wgrant | (and introduces Flash, so getting rid of it is a bonus :)) | 23:51 |
| wallyworld_ | flash? | 23:52 |
| wallyworld_ | what for? | 23:52 |
| wgrant | Bypassing cross-domain request restrictions. | 23:52 |
| wgrant | I assume. | 23:52 |
| wallyworld_ | you mean someone wrote action script? | 23:53 |
| wgrant | No. | 23:53 |
| wgrant | YUI has some Flash embedded. | 23:53 |
| wgrant | To use as an XHR transport. | 23:53 |
| wgrant | To violate browser cross-domain request restrictions. | 23:53 |
| wgrant | Because Flash is more holey. | 23:53 |
| wallyworld_ | i thought flash functionality was implemented using ActionAcript | 23:54 |
| wallyworld_ | ActionScript | 23:54 |
| wgrant | This is a prebuilt SWF in YUI. | 23:54 |
| wallyworld_ | ok | 23:54 |
| wallyworld_ | yuck | 23:54 |
| wgrant | Because fuck good practice, let's put proprietary compiled formats in our tarballs :) | 23:54 |
| lifeless | the 503 page ? | 23:54 |
| wgrant | lifeless: Yes. | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
