[06:03] <Laibsch> what is the latest status of "nominate for release" in launchpad?  Is there actually a workflow behing this now?  Back in the days it used to be mostly ignored.
[06:04] <Laibsch> I'm interested in doing SRU work and wonder how I could easily see bugs that are fixed in #ubuntu+1 but affect an LTS.
[06:10] <Laibsch> ping SpamapS. ^^^
[06:12] <micahg> Laibsch: here's the list with nominations: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid
[06:12] <Laibsch> micahg: Thanks.  Who can accept nominations? And is that when the nomination becomes a "bug task"?
[06:13] <micahg> Laibsch: an uploader of the package can accept it
[06:13] <micahg> and yes to the second question
[06:14] <Laibsch> cool
[06:14] <Laibsch> that's really nice to see this improvement in the work flow
[06:15] <Laibsch> previously bugs disappeared from the radar when they were fixed in ubuntu+1
[06:15] <micahg> Laibsch: the link I gave you is a series specific link, it shows tasks open in that series
[06:15] <Laibsch> micahg: "uploader of the package" means somebody with upload rights to the package the bug is filed against?
[06:15] <micahg> Laibsch: yes
[06:16]  * Laibsch has no upload rights whatsoever to Ubuntu :-(
[06:17]  * Laibsch bookmarks that link for future reference
[08:11] <ikt> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/862157
[08:11] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 862157 in ubuntu "11.10 hangs upon boot on Brazos C-50 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]
[08:11] <ikt> what would you set this against?
[08:11] <ikt> since I have the same thing
[08:12] <ikt> there's this screen full of garbage colours and then it loads properly
[08:12] <ikt> but those garbage colours are really not good :/
[08:14] <ikt> might take a screenshot
[17:41] <shayonj> whats the eligibility for membership approval. Apart from the ones mentioned here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad. As in I did fix a bug last night.. does that help ? :)
[17:46]  * penguin42 isn't sure what else to suggest to bug 864271 it's a bit odd
[17:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 864271 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel panic with linux-image-3.0.0-12.19 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/864271
[17:46] <shayonj> i am actually planning for - Preparing New Packages . And i believe for that I need to join the Bugsquad team ?
[17:50] <jbicha> shayonj: bug triaging and packaging are different, you don't have to do one to do the other
[17:51] <shayonj> jbicha, yeah right. So i plan to go with "Preparing New Packages", i still will be needing to join the team and complete the steps right ?
[17:54] <shayonj> with Preparing New Packages i mean taking care of the ones marked with needs-packaging
[17:57] <jbicha> shayonj: joining Bug Squad is easy, see https://launchpad.net/~bugsquad
[17:57] <shayonj> jbicha, cool. thats what i wanted to know.. as in i know its straight, just wondering do i need to or now. thanks :)
[18:04] <txomon> hello, I have  a strange problem, each time I suspend the laptop, after starting it, hibernates
[18:04] <txomon> anyone has got such strange thing?
[18:07] <txomon> so anyone here?
[18:26] <Exodus> txomon, you should ask in #ubuntu it has a larger crowd for support. This channel is more for bug reporting, if you need help reporting the bug this is the channel to ask.
[18:28] <txomon> ok
[18:28] <txomon> so here you don't know if someone reported already that bug Exodus ?
[18:30] <Exodus> txomon, you can look in launchpad for that bug, it has a search box. It is probably reported.
[18:30] <JanC> I'm sure somebody filed a similar bug, but most of the time it's important you file your own bug (because this is often hardware-specific)
[18:31] <JanC> except if you find a bug about the same hardware of course
[18:31] <Exodus> Exactly what JanC said txomon.
[19:02] <txomon> oki
[19:07] <shayonj> okay so i plan on working on this bud/wishlist .So can i just go and start working on it directly, keeping the steps in mind mentioned here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing#Preparing_New_Packages
[19:07] <shayonj> or there is something more needs to be done. I ask because, i just applied for membership and waiting for approval. But that doesnt make a difference, does it ?
[19:21] <shayonj> need som help with "Needs Packaging Bugs" for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/836764 . anyone around?
[19:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 836764 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] RFP: git-flow (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Wishlist,New]
[19:24] <micahg> shayonj: what about them?
[19:27] <shayonj> micahg, so this package is already in debian
[19:28] <micahg> shayonj: so it'll come into Ubuntu next cycle
[19:28] <shayonj> micahg, oh yeah thought so . So should i just leave message as mentioned in the guide ?
[19:29] <shayonj> this oen - Packages for this software appear to exist in Debian already. Ubuntu has semi-automatic tools to sync new packages from Debian so it will most likely appear in the next Ubuntu release.
[19:29] <micahg> shayonj: sounds fine
[19:29] <shayonj> micahg, thanks !
[19:29] <micahg> shayonj: thank you :)
[19:30] <shayonj> micahg, hah !anytime ;)
[19:34] <shayonj> micahg, need one more help ?
[19:34] <micahg> shayonj: just ask
[19:35] <shayonj> okay, so i am working on this other bug which is tagged as need-packaging. And it does not appear in ubunut and debian package list. Now i am looking for its license type. and on th the sourceforge page it says
[19:35] <shayonj> GNU Library or Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Other License
[19:36] <shayonj> so is LGPL the license type ?
[19:36] <shayonj> as in the upstream one
[19:36] <micahg> shayonj: yes, but questions on how to package are best served in #ubuntu-motu, this channel is for triaging bugs
[19:37] <micahg> shayonj: rather, it could be that license type, you'll have to look at the source code to be sure
[19:37] <shayonj> yes at the moment i am triaging it.. so if everyhting works out fine, i will start packaging it :)
[19:37] <shayonj> micahg, oh okay !
[19:50] <shayonj> so i found the license types in the source code.. but i am wondering where/how do i link it in the comment
[19:51] <micahg> shayonj: you can just list it in the description
[19:51] <shayonj> okay
[19:52] <shayonj> thanks micahg, would you want to go through it once before I mark it triage. this will be my first triage(ed) bug, or should i ask for a proofread in the mailing list ? :)
[19:53] <micahg> shayonj: bug #?
[19:54] <shayonj> micahg, 830052 . but i am still adding the license types
[19:54] <micahg> shayonj: bug 830052
[19:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 830052 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] PortableSigner (affects: 1) (heat: 4)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/830052
[19:54] <shayonj> micahg, yep
[19:55] <shayonj> micahg, yes you can check now
[20:00] <micahg> shayonj: I think it's fine, I can't seem to find the template ATM
[20:01] <shayonj> micahg, okay, thanks so much.
[20:01] <shayonj> micahg, but am i suppose to mark it triaged i am not a bugsquad team member (yet)
[20:02] <micahg> shayonj: they generally stay as new, I'd have to find the template to mark it triaged
[20:02] <shayonj> micahg, okay.
[20:15] <CQ> hello, can someone point me to where I should report kubuntu bugs? googling only points me to the ubuntu launchpad...
[20:18] <shayonj> CQ, https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Bugs/Reporting
[20:21] <CQ> shayonj: been there already, that points me to the KDE tracker, or to create a launchpad account which I already have... and through a Plasma awidget I cant get to a help page where I can submit the bug...
[20:24] <CQ> ...and following the instruction to file the bug on launchpad gets me to the ubuntu launchpad which tells me to look at the kubuntu page you pointed me to.
[20:24] <CQ> circular references are fun ...
[20:24] <shayonj> oh i see..yeah sorry about that
[20:25] <micahg> CQ: if the bug is ubuntu specific, file on launchpad, otherwise upstream on KDE's tracker
[20:27] <shayonj> micahg, i couldnt find the template. you got the source from svn right ?
[20:28] <micahg> shayonj: I don't know where it is ATM
[20:28] <shayonj> micahg, http://portablesigner.sourceforge.net/ and the Source Code Repository at http://portablesigner.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/portablesigner/
[20:28] <ali1234> i would just like to say that it is really annoying when apport retracer marks my bugs invalid because i have some out dated package, especially when that package has nothing at all to do with what crashed, and also the updated versions aren't available on my mirror
[20:29] <micahg> shayonj: no, I meant the template for a needs-packaging bug
[20:29] <shayonj> micahg, as in the guide ?
[20:29] <micahg> ali1234: I'd suggest sending an e-mail to ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
[20:29] <shayonj> micahg, this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Needs_Packaging_Bugs ?
[20:29] <CQ> micahg: ok, thanks... I filed upstream, and on launchpad with a pointer to upstream.
[20:30] <CQ> micahg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/864848 ... thanks for your help
[20:30] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 864848 in ubuntu "plasma network manager widget does not connect to UMTS net (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[20:39] <shayonj> micahg, sorry i didnt get with what you meant by template
[20:40] <micahg> shayonj: there's a template for how to file a needs-packaging bug
[20:42] <shayonj> micahg, well the only one i know is this - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Needs_Packaging_Bugs
[23:23] <yofel> someone know what I should file this against? http://paste.kde.org/129697/
[23:23] <yofel> python-keyring crash when it tries to use kwallet
[23:24] <yofel> in oneiric