/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/10/02/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
ScottKlifeless: Yes.  It was fine.00:56
lifelessScottK: thanks!00:57
shayonjhello there. i am new to motu and ubuntu packaging. i kind of got done with packaging guide. and was browsing through the bitesize bugs and found one. wondering, do i just start working on it directly or is there something needs to be done before that01:07
shayonj?01:07
shayonjfor some reason i feel the guides are too confusing or less organized01:13
shayonjbut its fun :)01:14
ScottKshayonj: Just dive in and ask questions if you have them.01:14
shayonjScottK, sure thanks man :)01:15
ScottKIt would be good if some MOTU could look into Bug 864095 and maybe updating gramps to 3.3.1.01:15
ubottuLaunchpad bug 864095 in gramps (Ubuntu) "list index out of range in gettext.install(TransUtils.LOCALEDOMAIN, localedir=None, unicode=1)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/86409501:15
shayonjdoes anyone know what does this read - Located in obj-i686-linux-gnu/config/ui_qtcurveconfigbase.h:4191 rc.cpp:889 rc.cpp:88901:19
shayonjor just this - 4191 rc.cpp:889 rc.cpp:889  ? For the rest i believe you will be needing to take a look at the source code01:20
ScottKIt's referring to line 4191 of ui_qtcurveconfigbase.h and line 889 of rc.cpp.  You need to look in the source.01:22
shayonjokay i thought so, but there is no file like ui_qtcurveconfigbase.h in the config folder, infact the the file qtcurveconfigbase.ui has the bug (its typo) mentioned in here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-style-qtcurve/+bug/85295701:24
ubottuUbuntu bug 852957 in kde-style-qtcurve (Ubuntu) "typo in translation template qtcurve" [Undecided,New]01:24
jbichaScottK: I didn't think gramps 3.3.1 was released yet01:25
shayonjScottK, and there is no file like rc.cpp in the source code01:28
ScottKjbicha: Not sure.  Just reading what's in the bug.  If there's a fix and it's not released, it might be worth cherrypicking it.01:31
jbichaScottK: I'm subscribed to the gramps mailing list and it sounds like the new release is imminent01:33
ScottKshayonj: It's in config/qtcurveconfigbase.ui01:33
ScottKjbicha: OK.  As long as someone is watching over it.01:33
shayonjScottK, okay01:34
shayonjScottK, thanks !.01:34
ScottKshayonj: I did "grep -r cusom *" in the source package.01:34
shayonjScottK, oh right.. should have used that .01:36
shayonjScottK, so did you make the changes ?01:37
shayonjor i can do ahead do that here :P01:37
ScottKshayonj: No.01:37
ScottK(I didn't)01:37
shayonjScottK, cool.01:37
ScottKshayonj: I did look and see that there's a newer version on the upstream web site.  You might want to look and see if they've already fixed this.01:37
ScottK(look in debian/control for the upstream homepage)01:38
shayonjScottK, okay!01:38
shayonjScottK, nope its not fixed.so is it a good idea to fix this bug or report the new version and then fix it ?01:41
ScottKIt's debatable.01:41
ScottKWe get this package from Debian without change and so in the long run, maintaining such a small diff for the package isn't a great idea.01:42
ScottKOTOH, we are close to a release and it'd be nice to get it fixed.01:42
ScottKSo I'd see about doing both.01:42
shayonjScottK, okay !01:42
ScottKGet a fix in Ubuntu and also let upstream know so that it's fixed.01:42
ScottKWe could also report the bug to Debian if we were being really thorough, but for this I think going upstream is enough.01:43
shayonjScottK, yeah i was going to ask that. how do i do that ? there are steps mentioned on that in so many places.but i am confused which one to go with01:43
shayonjas in letting the upstream know about it01:43
ScottKThat varies based on the upstream.01:43
shayonji see01:44
ScottKFor this one, you go to http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=40492&forumpage=157 and leave a comment.01:45
shayonjScottK, okay. i got one more question, sorry to bug you. So after i make the changes, do i update the changelog, package it and let them know ?01:47
ScottKfor upstream, I'd just make a diff and give them that.01:47
ScottKFor Ubuntu that would also be good, but even better would be a good debian/changelog entry with a complete debdiff if you know how to do that.01:48
shayonjScottK, cool. thanks so much :001:48
shayonj:) *01:48
shayonjScottK, yep. i just got done with this - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff01:48
ScottKFor Ubuntu, once you have something, attach it to the bug and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug.01:48
ScottKsomeone will review it.01:48
shayonjScottK, what do i attach ?01:49
shayonjthe new package right ?01:49
ScottKThe debdiff from the old one to the new one.01:49
shayonjokay01:49
shayonjScottK, i got one more question. The same typo is there in more than one file in the new release ? i can fix that, but do i report it first or leave a comment ?01:54
ScottKI would fix all the templates too.01:54
shayonjScottK, i didnt get that.templates, as in ?01:55
ScottKThe other files it affects are translation templates (the PO files)01:55
ScottK.pot/.po01:55
shayonjoh right yes. i am doing that. i am just wondering, do i need to file a report first about this or just fix it and leave a comment in the upstream ?01:56
shayonjand what ubuntu in this case?01:56
shayonjwhat about ubuntu *01:56
ScottKFix them all.02:01
ScottK(for ubuntu) and then list all the affected files in the upstream comment you leave.02:01
shayonjcool02:02
* ScottK goes for a nap.02:02
shayonjScottK, thanks and have a good one !02:02
=== micahg_ is now known as micahg
shayonji am trying to make the debdiff and it tells me "Can't check signature: public key not found" .03:39
shayonjdo i need to sign the .dsc file too along with the .changes ?03:39
shayonjany help on this ?03:40
shayonjoops it already, guess its just not able to verify03:41
shayonjhow do we create branch for the bugs we work on ?03:54
shayonjthe way mentioned here ?03:54
shayonjhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff03:54
ScottKshayonj: Just attach the debdiff to the bug.  You don't need a branch then.03:58
shayonjyay ScottK is back :).. yep did that. thanks man03:58
ScottKThen as long as you subscribed ubuntu-sponsors to the bug, you've done your bit.03:59
shayonjoh yeah did that too. working on the newer version. and i upload the diff file in the comment there, right ?03:59
ScottKIf it's just that fix, all that's needed is the debdfiff.04:00
shayonjokay !04:00
ScottKWhoever sponsors the package will use the current package plus your debdiff to remake the new package.04:00
shayonji see. okay but this newer version, does not have a debian folder04:01
shayonjso no control/changelog04:01
shayonjsorry04:02
shayonjmy bad.. didnt let it extract :P04:02
shayonjfor some reason debuild is only building the debian folder, any help on this ?04:39
bwrightHey guys package blogtk is broken, it doesn't have python gtkhtml2 library and fails to run.05:02
bwrightPlease look into it.05:02
micahgbwright: someone needs to package a new version05:05
=== rritten-brewing is now known as rrittenhouse
=== tikohumsup_ is now known as Rajsun
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
=== bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98
xxxShi20:13
xxxSpeople20:13
shayonjneed some help with packaging from scratch . this program does not have a make/install file, where as it runs by the shell script file (linux-install.sh). So i am wondering will the guide mentioned here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#Packaging_from_Scratch be helpful ?20:15
shayonjas the rules file is working with the make arguments20:16
shayonjanyone ?20:17
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!