bookpage | how to make $display be set on a virt? | 03:39 |
---|---|---|
RAOF | bookpage: export DISPLAY=:0 (or whatever) | 03:40 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
didrocks | good morning | 06:21 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
diwic | tjaalton, here we go again...the Nvidia kernel module refuses to load :-( | 07:12 |
diwic | tjaalton, that is, according to Xorg.0.log | 07:12 |
diwic | after latest days update | 07:13 |
tjaalton | nouveau loaded? | 07:13 |
diwic | tjaalton, seems not to, but I don't remember exactly how to check | 07:13 |
tjaalton | lsmod | 07:13 |
tjaalton | :) | 07:13 |
tjaalton | there should be a blaclist file in /etc/modprobe.d | 07:14 |
diwic | tjaalton, according to lsmod, "nvidida" is loaded | 07:14 |
tjaalton | installed by nvidia-current | 07:14 |
tjaalton | ok, so that's not it | 07:14 |
tjaalton | pastebin the log | 07:14 |
diwic | of xorg.0.log? | 07:14 |
tjaalton | yes | 07:14 |
diwic | hmm, how do I easiest do that without X | 07:14 |
tjaalton | pastebinit foo | 07:14 |
tjaalton | install it first if not | 07:15 |
diwic | http://paste.ubuntu.com/701490 | 07:16 |
hrw | I am going to hate LP build failures. my packages (armel-cross-toolchain-base and armhf-cross-toolchain-base) both ftfbs on launchpad. but when I built them locally in pbuilder or in LP chroot they got built fine. arghhhhhh | 07:16 |
tjaalton | diwic: so if you 'stop lightdm; start lightdm' it works ok? | 07:17 |
diwic | let me try | 07:17 |
tjaalton | the logfile complains about the kernel module, but you said it was loaded | 07:17 |
tjaalton | maybe lightdm is too fast | 07:17 |
tjaalton | though the x driver should do the loading | 07:18 |
diwic | tjaalton, ah, that did it (had to do that in sudo though) | 07:18 |
tjaalton | sure | 07:18 |
diwic | maybe file a bug against lightdm? Or nvidia-current? | 07:19 |
tjaalton | put dmesg on pastebin too, i'll check what it says there | 07:19 |
hrw | any ideas how such build failure happens? | 07:20 |
infinity | dpkg-source: error: syntax error in eglibc-2.13/debian/control at line 114: duplicate field Multi-Arch found ? | 07:21 |
infinity | That's hardly buildd-specific. | 07:21 |
diwic | tjaalton, paste.ubuntu.com/701496 | 07:22 |
hrw | infinity: yes | 07:22 |
hrw | infinity: I do not have it in pbuilder or in chroot fetched from LP build farm | 07:22 |
hrw | infinity: with exactly same dsc used | 07:23 |
tjaalton | diwic: ok, so it start's loading the module at 3.9s, X barfs at 4.4s, and then at 5.1s the loading is complete | 07:24 |
tjaalton | an interesting race condition.. maybe a bug in the xserver | 07:24 |
infinity | hrw: There's nothing fancy about how we call sbuild in lp-buildd. Are you sure you're using a clean copy of the chroot from launchpad, and nothing but the build-deps? | 07:24 |
tjaalton | diwic: or in the nvidia driver ratherr | 07:25 |
tjaalton | -r | 07:25 |
infinity | hrw: (You can copy the list of installed packages that sbuild shows in the log, rather than using apt-get source, to be sure) | 07:25 |
hrw | infinity: clean it was | 07:25 |
hrw | infinity: anyway I will unpack this chroot again, do a step-by-step build and check at failed moment | 07:26 |
infinity | hrw: To be honest, I'd rather not have an armhf cross-compiler in oneiric anyway, unless it includes the new loader location, which I'm assuming it doesn't. | 07:26 |
hrw | infinity: armel cross fails same way | 07:27 |
hrw | infinity: as they share source package source | 07:28 |
diwic | tjaalton, ok, let me know if I should file a bug about it and if so against what component | 07:28 |
infinity | hrw: Sure, I know. I'm not saying it's failing on purpose because I don't want it in the archive, just saying I'm not sure I care if it gets fixed (and I'm not sure it should have even been accepted, but it wasn't me who did it). | 07:28 |
tjaalton | diwic: ubuntu-bug nvidia-graphics-drivers | 07:28 |
tjaalton | diwic: and mention that the x driver is too impatient waiting for the kernel module to load | 07:29 |
hrw | infinity: it needs to be fixed cause cross toolchain is not installable now | 07:29 |
hrw | infinity: so... ;( | 07:29 |
infinity | They were new packages... | 07:29 |
infinity | Like, 2 days ago. | 07:29 |
infinity | It's just as easy to remove them as to fix them. :P | 07:29 |
hrw | infinity: nope - gcc-*-armel-cross ones got built in meantime | 07:34 |
diwic | tjaalton, bug 865111 | 07:38 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 865111 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) "X quits, instead of waiting for kernel module to load" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/865111 | 07:38 |
infinity | hrw: Let me reproduce it here. | 07:39 |
tjaalton | diwic: thanks, tseliot will take it from there | 07:39 |
diwic | tjaalton, ok, thanks for the workaround in the mean time :-) | 07:39 |
infinity | hrw: Still, I wish we hadn't accepted this whole lot. It enabled biarch too, didn't it? Which we'll probably have to turn off again. :P | 07:41 |
infinity | hrw: Oh well. | 07:41 |
hrw | infinity: I got multilib toolchain buildable - but need to fix issues while using it | 07:42 |
infinity | "Issues" like "the loader for both arches is in the same filesystem location, and ABI-incompatible"? | 07:42 |
hrw | infinity: report bug? | 07:43 |
infinity | Or like "gcc on ARM is completely missing run-time biarch detection". | 07:43 |
infinity | hrw: We have a fix for the former (the loader issue), as discussed and agreed upon at LPC, but it means disabling biarch builds until we fix the latter. | 07:44 |
hrw | infinity: link to notes/bugs? | 07:45 |
infinity | cross-distro for the LPC notes. | 07:45 |
hrw | ok | 07:45 |
infinity | I have no bug filed for the broken biarch business. | 07:45 |
infinity | But if you'd like to make gcc on ARM work the same as it does on x86, be my guest. | 07:46 |
infinity | Right now, while we can do "biarch builds", it's complete BS, cause they don't actually work, at all. | 07:46 |
infinity | And I'm not even convinced we need them, but that's a different discussion. | 07:47 |
infinity | Cross-compiling soft from hard and hard from soft sounds like an odd corner-case to me, rather than just treating them as completely seperate arches. | 07:47 |
infinity | (Usually we want biarch to be able to cross-compile kernels when the kernel arch != host arch, but for ARM, that doesn't matter..) | 07:48 |
hrw | so ubuntu/armel is not able to build ubuntu/armhf packages now? | 07:49 |
hrw | natively? (I did not checked) | 07:49 |
infinity | No. | 07:49 |
infinity | Not with multilib, that is. Obviously, a chroot that's fully-native armhf will work fine (though still has the wrong loader path). | 07:51 |
infinity | But, like I said, to fix the loader path, it's either a rewrite of multilib for ARM (which is beyond broken), or disabling it. | 07:51 |
infinity | Disabling it is the path of least resistance for now, if we want to actually have an hf port in the next 6 months. | 07:52 |
infinity | Unless someone really wants to fix multilib this week. | 07:52 |
infinity | (feel free to volunteer) | 07:52 |
infinity | hrw: You should probably be in #linaro-armhf ... | 07:53 |
hrw | infinity: shit. forgot to add this to autojoinlist | 07:53 |
hrw | I am on 16 irc channels ;( | 07:54 |
infinity | That's all? | 07:54 |
hrw | on 5 networks | 07:54 |
hrw | infinity: for 16 years of doing irc I used <10 for all years before canonical/linaro | 07:55 |
infinity | Heh. | 07:55 |
infinity | IRC channels are cheap, it's a nice way to keep topics focussed. | 07:55 |
infinity | Especially in massive communities like Debian and Ubuntu. | 07:55 |
infinity | Maemo had similar partioning, and the main channels were just completely silent. It was a bit creepy. | 07:56 |
infinity | partitioning* | 07:56 |
infinity | I should probably sleep. It's 2am. | 07:57 |
infinity | hrw: Poke me about your build failure tomorrow if you haven't figured it out. I'll throw some spare cycles at it. | 07:57 |
hrw | infinity: I hope to get it solved today by myself but thanks for offer | 07:58 |
infinity | hrw: But we should talk multilib more, if you're interested enough to consider looking at it, and have the resources to allocate. | 07:58 |
hrw | infinity: would be nice if multilib bugs would be reported | 07:58 |
infinity | hrw: In talking with doko, I thought the "multilib doesn't work on ARM" thing was well-known upstream. | 07:58 |
hrw | infinity: arm multilib was done by doko and it's really fishy | 07:58 |
infinity | hrw: Hence didn't report anything. | 07:59 |
hrw | infinity: upstream did not had multilib for arm iirc | 07:59 |
hrw | infinity: only CSL had | 07:59 |
infinity | hrw: Well, upstream being Linaro, or whatever. Not me. :P | 07:59 |
hrw | ok | 07:59 |
infinity | hrw: Either way, it's completely broken, and would love to actually discuss it sometime, rather than just file a bug and forget about it. But we can file bugs while we discuss too. :) | 08:00 |
infinity | To be fair, it would have "worked" if we'd gone with the crazy "loader auto-detecting HF binaries" route, but that way just looks like madness to me. | 08:01 |
infinity | But for the seperate loaders case, it can't work, cause it doesn't select at compiler run-time like x86 does, it's all hardcoded. | 08:01 |
infinity | Some serious cargo-culting of x86 multilib would probably work. | 08:01 |
ubuntu-baltix | hi all | 08:43 |
ubuntu-baltix | ev: hi, are you online? | 08:43 |
ev | ubuntu-baltix: yes, hi | 08:43 |
ubuntu-baltix | ev: it seems you forgot to update ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu translations from launchpad after translation freeze :( | 08:44 |
ev | I updated them on the 28th of September | 08:45 |
ubuntu-baltix | ev: but translation freeze was on 29th :) | 08:46 |
ev | ubuntu-baltix: I'll stick an upload in the queue, but it's up to the release team to decide if they want to accept it. | 08:47 |
ubuntu-baltix | ev: please update ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu, because at 28th september Lithuanian translation was half complete (about 50%), but at 29th - fully translated (100%) :) | 08:48 |
ubuntu-baltix | I think it's very important to have fully translated slideshow in release candidate | 08:49 |
ev | ubuntu-baltix: I just said I would put an upload of the translations in the queue, but it's not my call as to whether or not it goes in. | 08:50 |
ubuntu-baltix | ev: thanks, could you tell me who should decide if accept or not? Maybe pitti ? | 08:51 |
ev | ubuntu-baltix: I already did. The release team. | 08:52 |
ubuntu-baltix | ev: Where I can talk with release team? ;) | 08:52 |
ev | #ubuntu-release | 08:53 |
ubuntu-baltix | ev: thans again :) | 08:54 |
ev | sure thing | 08:54 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
soren | Did I miss it, or do we not know what 12.04 will be called yet? | 12:34 |
* cjwatson has not yet seen a name | 12:36 | |
cjwatson | sabdfl: ^- getting kind of urgent :) | 12:36 |
azeem_ | I thought it was going to be the pink panther? | 12:36 |
Laney | now that would make a good login sound | 12:37 |
seb128 | Laney, no login sound is a good login sound ;-) | 12:37 |
azeem_ | you could just have the first two notes, then the desktop should be there | 12:37 |
azeem_ | would also remove IP-issues | 12:38 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
janimo | seb128, you mean broken pulseaudio :) ? | 12:58 |
diwic | janimo, a broken login sound is hardly pulseaudio's fault | 13:01 |
diwic | janimo, more likely to have to do with libcanberra or other upper layer | 13:01 |
janimo | diwic, is not every sound going through pulse? | 13:01 |
seb128 | janimo, ;-) | 13:01 |
diwic | janimo, usually, yes | 13:02 |
diwic | janimo, but playing the login sound involves other components of the audio stack as well and my point is that PulseAudio is every now and then blamed for things incorrectly. | 13:03 |
seb128 | diwic, speaking of that do you know what would be the right way to have no login sound by default? | 13:04 |
seb128 | we want to do that next cycle | 13:04 |
diwic | seb128, hmm, good question - I assume some kind of override to the gnome sound theme | 13:04 |
diwic | seb128, who are "we", btw? | 13:04 |
diwic | seb128, I haven't heard that request before. | 13:05 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
artfwo | hi | 13:25 |
artfwo | do I have to request an FFE in order to sync the package from debian at this stage of development? | 13:25 |
sgnb | I hope so | 13:26 |
tumbleweed | artfwo: if there are only RC bug fixes, no new features, and it's not seeded, then you can just upload it | 13:27 |
artfwo | tumbleweed, i don't have upload rights, but a sync fixes uninstallable package in my case, take a look at bug 865334 | 13:28 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 865334 in p7zip-rar (Ubuntu) "Sync p7zip-rar 9.20.1~ds.1-3 (multiverse) from Debian unstable (non-free)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/865334 | 13:28 |
om26er | patch pilot is missing :p | 13:30 |
tumbleweed | artfwo: LGTM | 13:31 |
seb128 | om26er, bryceh and micahg are pilots today | 13:31 |
seb128 | om26er, chrisccoulson is on holidays this week | 13:31 |
seb128 | om26er, but it's a bit early for bryceh to be up still I guess | 13:31 |
tumbleweed | meh, this marking bugs confirmed because they affect multiple uses messes with sync requests... | 13:31 |
om26er | seb128, robert_ancell seems to be current thats an error? | 13:32 |
seb128 | om26er, he probably forgot to sign off | 13:32 |
om26er | i'll wait for bryceh to get something re-SRUed | 13:32 |
tumbleweed | artfwo: oh, you only mentioned the most recent changelog entry, not the intermediate ones. That would require an FFe | 13:32 |
seb128 | om26er, https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=6k1e5rq45m1bdqq0n1ge3oqaok@group.calendar.google.com&ctz=Europe/Berlin&gsessionid=OK | 13:33 |
artfwo | tumbleweed, but the current version in oneiric isn't installable anyway, does that qualify for an FFE as well? | 13:33 |
tumbleweed | artfwo: it means I'm very likely to give you a FFe. But you still need to apply for it | 13:34 |
om26er | seb128, thx :) | 13:34 |
om26er | I have a question related to uploads to archive.. if a release 3.8.16-0ubuntu1~natty3 is rejected for some reason after fixing my branch will the same version upload again work fine? or would it automatically get rejected? | 13:49 |
artfwo | tumbleweed, could you take a look at bug 865334 - is there enough data for an exception? | 13:49 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 865334 in p7zip-rar (Ubuntu) "[ffe] Sync p7zip-rar 9.20.1~ds.1-3 (multiverse) from Debian unstable (non-free)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/865334 | 13:49 |
geser | om26er: if the source got rejected you can keep the version number | 13:50 |
gtec | hello everyone: I am unclear on the difference between a pxelinux.0 image and a nbi.img. Is it required that etherboot boots a pxelinux.0 image as oppose to a nbi.img? | 13:50 |
tumbleweed | artfwo: yes, thanks | 13:51 |
=== lenios__ is now known as lenios_ | ||
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
tgardner | does anyone know whats up with armel-cross-toolchain-base in Oneiric? You can't install gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi because of dependency issues. Launchpad thinks armel-cross-toolchain-base was published 2 hours ago. | 15:41 |
hrw | tgardner: I know | 15:41 |
hrw | tgardner: wait two more days ;( | 15:42 |
tgardner | hrw, thats pretty inconvenient at this point in Oneiric development. 2 days ? | 15:42 |
apw | hrw what is it doing which takes 2 days? | 15:43 |
cjwatson | how long it'll take hrw's fix to build, presumably | 15:43 |
cjwatson | "published 2 hours ago" means the source package | 15:43 |
hrw | moment | 15:43 |
tgardner | Launchpad appears to think the build is done | 15:43 |
cjwatson | actually it says pending publication now, so maybe s/2 days/an hour/ | 15:44 |
hrw | one more source to build - armhf-cross-toolchain-base (got uploaded just moment ago, need to be accepted), then rebuild of gcc-4.[56]-armel-cross (ftfbs-ed because of armel-cross-toolchain-base failure) | 15:44 |
cjwatson | oh, it's in NEW | 15:44 |
hrw | I had some linaro tasks to do which had higher priority. | 15:45 |
cjwatson | processed now, so next publisher run I suppose | 15:47 |
hrw | thank you | 15:47 |
tgardner | cjwatson, thanks, will give it a go in an hour or so | 15:47 |
bdmurray | Could somebody look at bug 859188? Its not clear to me what might be going on here. | 15:48 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 859188 in apt (Ubuntu) "E: Internal Error, No file name for libgl1-mesa-glx" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/859188 | 15:48 |
hrw | for p-cycle I will move to 'publish to ppa first' method - as LP builds are not reproductible even with chroots from LP | 15:49 |
slangasek | bdmurray: confusing error message; to apt-get install --reinstall a multiarch: same package that you have more than one version of installed, you have to do "apt-get install --reinstall $pkg $pkg:$otherarch", or else you get that error | 15:49 |
hrw | or I am doing something wrong | 15:50 |
bdmurray | slangasek: so they have installed for i386 and amd64? | 15:51 |
slangasek | bdmurray: yes | 15:51 |
cjwatson | hrw: well - I do have to say, most people with this problem are doing something wrong, or very few of us would ever get anything done! | 15:52 |
cjwatson | mind you if your build is *that* sensitive to details of the chroot then there's probably something wrong there too | 15:52 |
cjwatson | occasionally there's something that depends on the running kernel, which in the case of LP builds is rather older than the distribution it's building for | 15:53 |
hrw | cjwatson: I fetched chroot from LP and got it built in it. | 15:53 |
hrw | cjwatson: I will try to find time in p-cycle to check some issues | 15:53 |
didrocks | can someone bump the unity build in the ubuntu-destkop ppa (to prepare some testing for an eventual tomorrow upload with those fixes + few additional ones): https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ppa | 15:54 |
SpamapS | barry: is there any progress on porting dh_python2 to lucid? | 16:13 |
didrocks | barry: thanks for the Quickly fix btw :) | 16:14 |
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
barry | SpamapS: doko_ is working on that | 16:54 |
SpamapS | barry: ahh cool thanks | 16:56 |
SpamapS | doko_: and I ask you, how is the dh_python2 port to lucid coming along? :) | 16:56 |
bdmurray | slangasek: Do you have any thoughts on bug 813065? | 16:59 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 813065 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Live session switches to VT console briefly" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813065 | 16:59 |
=== Daniel0108 is now known as EvilDaniel0108 | ||
=== TheDaniel0108 is now known as Daniel0108 | ||
=== beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
bryceh | !pilot in | 18:20 |
bryceh | @pilot in | 18:20 |
=== udevbot_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Beta 2 Released | Archive: Final Freeze | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | build failures -> http://bit.ly/or6CHJ | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: robert_ancell, bryceh | ||
om26er | bryceh, can you please sponsor https://code.launchpad.net/~om26er/ubuntu/natty/unity/unity-fix-761409 :) | 18:20 |
=== micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Beta 2 Released | Archive: Final Freeze | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | build failures -> http://bit.ly/or6CHJ | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: bryceh | ||
om26er | bryceh, you sponsored it last time but seems there was an issue at your end last time so the upload got rejected :/ | 18:21 |
om26er | here is the changelog of the rejected upload http://launchpadlibrarian.net/79155358/unity_3.8.16-0ubuntu1~natty2_3.8.16-0ubuntu1~natty3.diff.gz | 18:23 |
bryceh | om26er, what was the issue at my end? | 18:30 |
om26er | bryceh, the changelog also have --- unity-3.8.16.orig/.bzrignore.THIS | 18:31 |
om26er | +++ unity-3.8.16/.bzrignore.THIS | 18:31 |
om26er | the one that was uploaded to the archives my branch did not have it | 18:31 |
om26er | though i am not sure how things work | 18:31 |
bryceh | ok | 18:34 |
bryceh | om26er, done | 18:36 |
om26er | bryceh, thank you :-) | 18:36 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
infinity | jamespage: Your nova changelog doesn't even remotely match the diff. | 18:43 |
jamespage | infinity: how so? | 18:54 |
infinity | jamespage: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/81802657/nova_2011.3-0ubuntu4_2011.3-0ubuntu5.diff.gz | 18:55 |
* jamespage re-reads his changelog entry | 18:55 | |
infinity | jamespage: I see the permission bits in postinst... And then a ton of other stuff. | 18:55 |
jamespage | infinity: I see - looks like the packaging branch was probably not up-to-date | 18:56 |
infinity | Right, well. I'm going to reject this, if you'd like to re-upload with just the postinst fix. ;) | 18:58 |
jamespage | infinity, absolutely | 18:58 |
jamespage | infinity: somethings not right - it looks like older patches where included in the upload to the archive | 19:21 |
jamespage | can't find zul at the moment but it needs verification/unpicking | 19:21 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
infinity | jamespage: You can just make your postinst change to the archive version? | 19:33 |
jamespage | infinity: well I could but I'm concerned that we have an incorrect backported patch - I'd like to get that resolved/verified as OK as well | 19:38 |
infinity | jamespage: Fair enough. | 19:40 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
dobey | is anyone else having booting/network issues with current oneiric? | 19:56 |
dobey | because i have two laptops that are now pretty much entirely useless after updating them within the last 24 hours :( | 19:56 |
dobey | SpamapS: did you break my laptops? | 19:59 |
SpamapS | dobey: probably ;) | 20:05 |
SpamapS | dobey: whats the issue? | 20:06 |
SpamapS | dobey: do they say waiting for network configuration? | 20:06 |
seb128 | <dobey> in normal boot the splash works fine, it just says "Waiting for network..." | 20:07 |
seb128 | SpamapS, ^ | 20:08 |
seb128 | SpamapS, he said that it never finishes waiting | 20:08 |
bdmurray | @pilot in | 20:08 |
=== udevbot_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Beta 2 Released | Archive: Final Freeze | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | build failures -> http://bit.ly/or6CHJ | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: bdmurray, bryceh | ||
SpamapS | I may have created a huge red herring with that message... | 20:09 |
dobey | SpamapS: yes | 20:09 |
SpamapS | the problem is I can't *hide* it when its completed. | 20:09 |
dobey | SpamapS: my dell duo doesn't boot now | 20:09 |
dobey | it stays waiting for network | 20:10 |
SpamapS | dobey: can you boot with noquiet and --verbose ? | 20:10 |
dobey | my u820 boots but has other issues | 20:10 |
SpamapS | dobey: it never says Waiting at least 60 more seconds ? | 20:10 |
dobey | SpamapS: i don't know. can you be more verbose about where to add them? | 20:10 |
dobey | SpamapS: it does say that | 20:10 |
dobey | SpamapS: it just doesn't ever finish waiting | 20:10 |
SpamapS | dobey: does it ever say that its booting with an incomplete configuration? | 20:10 |
SpamapS | dobey: the process that is used for those messages is really failsafe.. unless /bin/sleep segfaults or something. | 20:11 |
dobey | SpamapS: i'll let you know in a couple minutes | 20:11 |
SpamapS | dobey: so if you see the first two, but not the third, then something is breaking *after* those messages are long dead and gone. | 20:11 |
dobey | oh ffs; now it's doing fsck | 20:11 |
dobey | SpamapS: seems like it is breaking long before, since i shouldn't ever see those messages | 20:12 |
* SpamapS ponders adding a post-start to clear the messages | 20:12 | |
SpamapS | dobey: you'll see them if your loopback adapter isn't up for some reason, or if you have interfaces configured in /etc/network/interfaces | 20:13 |
dobey | waiting up to 60 moar now | 20:13 |
dobey | SpamapS: and neither of those should be true unless an update broke something | 20:13 |
dobey | and well, i think it's obvious an update broke something | 20:13 |
SpamapS | dobey: as far as the noquiet/--verbose .. edit the grub kernel command line and remove 'quiet' , and add '--verbose' | 20:14 |
dobey | booting without full config | 20:14 |
dobey | except it is a message wrought with lies | 20:15 |
dobey | as evidenced by the lack of actual booting | 20:15 |
SpamapS | dobey: ok, so it should boot now.. unless lightdm or plymouth is broken | 20:15 |
SpamapS | dobey: ctrl-alt-f1 should also get you a tty to login to | 20:17 |
dobey | SpamapS: what should i see with noquiet --verbose ? | 20:17 |
dobey | SpamapS: nope, it just had the textual output of the init scripts | 20:17 |
SpamapS | dobey: kernel messages, services starting.. | 20:17 |
SpamapS | dobey: what was the last thing shown? | 20:18 |
SpamapS | alt-f2 might actually be better, it starts on runlevel [23] .. | 20:18 |
dobey | it's still waiting for the network | 20:18 |
SpamapS | dobey: before those messages that you already saw in plymouth.. anything else? | 20:19 |
dobey | stopping failsafe boot delay was the last thing | 20:19 |
dobey | lo is the only thing in /etc/network/interfaces | 20:20 |
SpamapS | Interesting | 20:20 |
dobey | and i have no network connection | 20:20 |
SpamapS | ls -l /run/network | 20:21 |
SpamapS | should be a dir, 'static-network-up-emitted' | 20:21 |
dobey | that exists | 20:21 |
SpamapS | I'm most intrigued why your system hasn't "booted" at this point, because you are clearly in runlevel 2 if you have a login on tty2 | 20:22 |
SpamapS | can you look for clues in /var/log/syslog? Maybe the display manager failed to start | 20:22 |
SpamapS | dobey: at the point that dir exists, and when your filesystems are up, thats when runlevel 2 should have started and the messages should have stopped. | 20:22 |
SpamapS | hmm I wonder though.. /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart creates that dir, and then runs initctl emit | 20:23 |
dobey | well running /etc/init.d/lightdm restart got me a login screen and i can log into unity now | 20:25 |
dobey | but no network or bluetooth | 20:26 |
SpamapS | btw, /etc/init.d/<anything> is deprecated in Ubuntu | 20:26 |
SpamapS | use service | 20:26 |
dobey | i did use service, and it didn't work | 20:26 |
SpamapS | because? | 20:26 |
kenvandine | restart lightdm | 20:26 |
kenvandine | is all you need | 20:26 |
SpamapS | kenvandine: and is very dangerous | 20:26 |
kenvandine | oh? | 20:26 |
dobey | it said "not found" or something like that | 20:26 |
SpamapS | kenvandine: it doesn't reload the upstart job.. and does not properly run pre-stop's | 20:26 |
bdmurray | SpamapS: speaking of service how do you know what services names are avaiable? I get confused about samba vs smbd ... | 20:27 |
SpamapS | use service. :) | 20:27 |
kenvandine | oh... i thought it was an upstart command | 20:27 |
dobey | SpamapS: the deprecated message says to use restart | 20:27 |
dobey | not service | 20:27 |
dobey | maybe you should fix that :) | 20:27 |
seb128 | sudo restart lightdm often fails there | 20:27 |
seb128 | it says there is no lightdm runnin | 20:27 |
SpamapS | bdmurray: unfortunately, that one is still unresolved in a single tool. 'initctl list' for upstart jobs, find /etc/init.d -type f works for sysvinit | 20:27 |
seb128 | where it's running ;-) | 20:27 |
SpamapS | yeah the deprecated message should be fixed | 20:28 |
dobey | anyway | 20:28 |
dobey | my laptops are broken | 20:28 |
bdmurray | SpamapS: thanks initctl was what I was missing | 20:28 |
hallyn_ | Daviey: jdstrand: bug 842845 , final debdiff pulls a bunch of patches from upstream git. Pls take a look. It appears to solve the issue, and I think it should go into oneiric. | 20:28 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 842845 in libvirt (Ubuntu Oneiric) "problems starting multiple lxc instances concurrently" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842845 | 20:28 |
hallyn_ | running out, biack in a bit | 20:28 |
SpamapS | dobey: indeed, trying to determine why lightdm didn't start | 20:28 |
SpamapS | dobey: --verbose would give us a clue. can you boot with that? | 20:29 |
dobey | "unknown instance" | 20:29 |
dobey | i did boot with that | 20:29 |
dobey | where is it supposed to give a clue at? i didn't see any | 20:29 |
SpamapS | right, restart doesn't work when it was never started, thats another annoyance. | 20:29 |
SpamapS | dobey: /var/log/syslog would have any errors about lightdm | 20:30 |
SpamapS | its possible that it didn't exit with any "errors" it just decided not to start. | 20:30 |
SpamapS | but that would be odd | 20:30 |
dobey | i think i need to reboot | 20:32 |
SpamapS | dobey: anything in /var/log/syslog ? | 20:32 |
dobey | some stuff but i can't tell if it's from me doing restart or from booting | 20:32 |
SpamapS | dobey: you can match up the timestamps with the switch to runlevel 2 | 20:33 |
dobey | SpamapS: it appears something is stopping it, and then killing it with SIGTERM | 20:34 |
dobey | last lightdm related message is "lightdm state changed from post-stop to waiting" | 20:35 |
slangasek | bdmurray: 813065> I think I'll try to reproduce that; it might be an easy win for release | 20:40 |
bdmurray | slangasek: okay, I was able to see it in a virtual machine fwiw | 20:40 |
SpamapS | dobey: brb, need to go move laundry from washer to dryer.. | 20:43 |
SpamapS | dobey: have you tried rebooting w/ --verbose yet? | 20:43 |
slangasek | bdmurray: does "VT console" mean a login prompt, a blinking cursor, or a black screen? | 20:45 |
slangasek | (just to be sure I know what I'm looking for) | 20:45 |
bdmurray | slangasek: none of the above - I saw boot log messages | 20:46 |
dobey | SpamapS: yes, but i can't see anything useful. something is telling lightdm to start, then stop, then it kills lightdm | 20:46 |
slangasek | bdmurray: aha | 20:46 |
slangasek | bdmurray: oh; this bug is for lucid, not for oneiric? | 20:49 |
bdmurray | slangasek: its tagged oneiric too and thats what I tested | 20:50 |
slangasek | ok | 20:50 |
SpamapS | dobey: very intersting. I don't see any direct reasons that lightdm would be sent SIGTERM by upstart... it only stops on runlevel [016] .. none of those are happenign surely. | 21:04 |
dobey | isn't that "poweroff" ? | 21:05 |
SpamapS | 0 is halt/poweroff | 21:05 |
SpamapS | 6 is reboot | 21:06 |
SpamapS | dobey: something could be doing a 'stop lightdm' tho | 21:06 |
SpamapS | it does a stop in its own script..but then exit 0 right after that. | 21:06 |
SpamapS | dobey: does this return 0: | 21:07 |
SpamapS | [ ! -f /etc/X11/default-display-manager -o "$(cat /etc/X11/default-display-manager 2>/dev/null)" = "/usr/bin/lightdm" -o "$(cat /etc/X11/default-display-manager 2>/dev/null)" = "/usr/sbin/lightdm" ] | 21:07 |
dobey | right | 21:07 |
dobey | wtf | 21:07 |
SpamapS | actually hmmmmmmmmmm | 21:07 |
dobey | that's a lot of typing :( | 21:07 |
SpamapS | if [ "$RUNLEVEL" = S | 21:07 |
SpamapS | I think that may be a misuse of the RUNLEVEL variable | 21:08 |
dobey | in lightdm's init script? | 21:08 |
SpamapS | yeah | 21:08 |
=== Lutin is now known as Guest47024 | ||
SpamapS | the script was recently changed to simplify with less ()'s.. I wonder.. | 21:09 |
dobey | waoh | 21:09 |
dobey | woah even | 21:09 |
dobey | somehow i got network | 21:09 |
dobey | </magic> | 21:10 |
=== Guest47024 is now known as Lutin | ||
=== NCommander is now known as Guest45434 | ||
=== Hobbsee is now known as Guest90900 | ||
SpamapS | dobey: I think this may be it.. if one of the other events comes *after* runlevel 2 ... RUNLEVEL is still "S" | 21:17 |
dobey | meh, update/reconfigure didn't help | 21:17 |
SpamapS | dobey: no I think you have found a bonified, majorly crap race condition | 21:17 |
infinity | jamespage: Err, did you re-upload the same broken one again? | 21:17 |
dobey | SpamapS: how can we fix? | 21:17 |
SpamapS | we need to check with the actual runlevel command, I think | 21:18 |
SpamapS | I have a working test case which shows the problem | 21:18 |
SpamapS | dobey: if I give you a replacement lightdm.conf, can you try it out? | 21:18 |
SpamapS | I'm trying it in a VM now | 21:19 |
dobey | SpamapS: give me a diff | 21:19 |
dobey | SpamapS: then i can just change it, since i can't easily just copy stuff over | 21:19 |
slangasek | SpamapS: I don't understand where the race condition is, can you explain? | 21:19 |
SpamapS | slangasek: sure, RUNLEVEL is set only when the 'runlevel' event arrives | 21:20 |
SpamapS | slangasek: but it may have been set by some other event that arrived before 'runlevel' | 21:20 |
slangasek | really? | 21:20 |
slangasek | which event would set it? | 21:20 |
SpamapS | slangasek: Yeah, thats my hypothesis | 21:20 |
SpamapS | I'm testing it out now :-P | 21:20 |
slangasek | ok :) | 21:20 |
SpamapS | slangasek: no idea! | 21:20 |
SpamapS | slangasek: nothing exports it except /etc/init/rc.conf | 21:21 |
* slangasek nods | 21:21 | |
SpamapS | slangasek: one theory I also have is that there's a bug in upstart which copies it in even when it doesn't match | 21:21 |
SpamapS | slangasek: either way, it seems the most likely cause for dobey's problems that RUNLEVEL is coming up as "S" instead of "2" during lightdm's script | 21:22 |
SpamapS | tho.. there's another problem with that, which is that he's seeing the failsafe messages.. hrm | 21:23 |
dobey | this is but one of the many problems i am currently facing with oneiric :-/ | 21:24 |
slangasek | SpamapS: seems strange that only dobey would be affected | 21:25 |
dobey | that's what i said | 21:25 |
slangasek | SpamapS, dobey: you've already ruled out /etc/X11/default-display-manager as the cause? | 21:25 |
slangasek | oh | 21:26 |
jamespage | infinity: no | 21:26 |
dobey | i haven't ruled anything out as the cause. but i really have no idea what is going on at this point | 21:26 |
slangasek | runlevel [!06] | 21:26 |
slangasek | SpamapS: why is that not runlevel [!06S]? | 21:26 |
slangasek | or even [!016S] | 21:26 |
slangasek | apparently we're using lightdm to handle stopping of plymouth in runlevels 1,S ? that doesn't make sense... | 21:27 |
slangasek | (what if you don't have lightdm installed, after all?) | 21:27 |
SpamapS | slangasek: oo I didn't realize.. [!06] is *wrong* | 21:28 |
infinity | jamespage: Well, it came back to the queue 28 minutes ago. :P | 21:28 |
dobey | where is that? | 21:28 |
SpamapS | slangasek: is 'runlevel S' emitted at bootup? | 21:28 |
* infinity rejects harder. | 21:28 | |
* SpamapS tests that | 21:28 | |
jamespage | zul and I are like ships in the night this evening | 21:28 |
slangasek | SpamapS: well, it's deliberate... I'm not sure that changing it in the obvious way is *right* either | 21:28 |
slangasek | SpamapS: no, only 'telinit S' gets you runlevel S, by design | 21:29 |
slangasek | otherwise /etc/init/rcS.conf would fire on every boot | 21:29 |
slangasek | dobey: could you post the log from booting with --verbose? | 21:30 |
dobey | i suspect not easily | 21:31 |
SpamapS | slangasek: I thought rcS.d *was* executed every time the system booted. :-P | 21:32 |
slangasek | SpamapS: running sulogin? :) | 21:33 |
slangasek | dobey: if you have networking up, perhaps pastebinit is of use? | 21:34 |
dobey | well i'm guessing the log doesn't rotate on every boot | 21:35 |
dobey | what block would be most useful? | 21:35 |
SpamapS | dobey: I'd be interested to compare the output of 'last' with 'grep init: /var/log/syslog' | 21:36 |
slangasek | dobey: I'd want everything logged by init since boot | 21:36 |
SpamapS | dobey: also the long line in /etc/init/lightdm.conf right after 'if [ -n "$UPSTART_EVENTS" ]' | 21:37 |
SpamapS | dobey: actually just cat /etc/X11/default-display-manager would be helpful | 21:38 |
=== erward is now known as erward_ | ||
* SpamapS goes afk again for 5 min | 21:39 | |
dobey | default-display-manager just says "lightdm" | 21:39 |
=== erward_ is now known as erward | ||
slangasek | dobey: and just to be sure, what does 'debsums -s -e lightdm' show? | 21:42 |
dobey | what provides debsums? | 21:42 |
slangasek | the debsums package :) | 21:42 |
dobey | good thing network decided to actually start working | 21:43 |
dobey | too bad it doesn't on my other laptop | 21:43 |
dobey | changed file /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf | 21:44 |
bigon | mmmh I hava valac (0.12) that segfault when building https://edge.launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/+archive/gnome3/+build/2820433 | 21:44 |
bigon | with debian version it build perfectly | 21:44 |
slangasek | dobey: "changed file" - did you change it as part of the debugging, or was it already broken and that's what's causing your failures? | 21:45 |
slangasek | dobey: you should have an /etc/init/lightdm.conf.dpkg-dist that you can compare with... and in theory replace with to get the system working again... | 21:45 |
dobey | slangasek: that file was already changed, and doesn't seem like it would be related | 21:46 |
dobey | slangasek: wrong lightdm.conf | 21:46 |
slangasek | oh, right | 21:46 |
slangasek | sorry | 21:46 |
dobey | and i actually have no idea why it's different from the packaged version | 21:46 |
slangasek | I think that one might get dynamically modified by lightdm itself | 21:48 |
slangasek | (means conffiles are the wrong tool for it, but anyway - not relevant here) | 21:49 |
dobey | right | 21:49 |
dobey | where should i put this log? | 21:50 |
slangasek | dobey: in a bug report / pastebin / people.c.c? | 21:50 |
dobey | slangasek: https://chinstrap.canonical.com/~dobey/syslog.verbose | 21:52 |
slangasek | <yoink> | 21:52 |
SpamapS | slangasek: it strikes me that calling 'stop' in the script section may not be a good idea | 21:55 |
SpamapS | slangasek: exit 0 should suffice... | 21:55 |
slangasek | SpamapS: 'stop' is preferred | 21:56 |
SpamapS | slangasek: in this case, stop would cause upstart to send SIGTERM.. would it not? | 21:56 |
slangasek | maybe it's triggering a bug here, but it's a bug to be fixed if so | 21:56 |
dobey | well i need to go for now; thanks for helping debug | 21:56 |
slangasek | SpamapS: SIGsomething, sure; but the event's already received and processed by that point, so it shouldn't hurt? | 21:56 |
dobey | let me know if i need to test anything, my awaylog will catch it | 21:57 |
SpamapS | slangasek: it shouldn't, no. | 21:57 |
slangasek | dobey: does this system have hybrid graphics? | 21:58 |
SpamapS | wait | 21:58 |
SpamapS | 14:39 < dobey> default-display-manager just says "lightdm" | 21:58 |
SpamapS | dobey: not /usr/bin/lightdm or /usr/sbin/lightdm ? | 21:59 |
slangasek | ah, heh | 21:59 |
SpamapS | that *would* do it | 21:59 |
bdmurray | I'm looking at a pytrainer bug regarding communicating with gpsbabel and gpsbabel uses a 'usb:' parameter to communicate with the gps. Anyway what device is 'usb:' so I can change permissions on it? | 22:03 |
slangasek | bdmurray: probably something under /dev/bus/usb | 22:04 |
bdmurray | slangasek: yes, a way to check occurred to me | 22:05 |
slangasek | depending on how the device name is being constructed, there's probably something under /sys/bus/usb/devices that lets you query the mapping I guess | 22:06 |
cjwatson | bdmurray: how do you know which services are available> 'service ' <tab> <tab> | 22:09 |
SpamapS | slangasek: my laptop is affected too | 22:23 |
SpamapS | lightdm is waiting for 'plymouth deactivate' | 22:23 |
SpamapS | also the stop signal is being ignored in the pre-start for failsafe... | 22:24 |
slangasek | SpamapS: "too"? isn't that an entirely different issue? | 22:24 |
SpamapS | slangasek: my symptoms are identical to dobey | 22:24 |
SpamapS | I almost never reboot.. so when I did just now.. no lightdm | 22:24 |
slangasek | SpamapS: stop signal> ah yes, did you not see the bug I reported about that/ | 22:24 |
SpamapS | slangasek: no I didn't see that bug. | 22:24 |
SpamapS | slangasek: do we need to set some handler to die quicker? | 22:25 |
slangasek | SpamapS: one sec, I'll assign it to you ;) | 22:25 |
slangasek | SpamapS: bug #863864 | 22:25 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 863864 in upstart (Ubuntu) "/etc/init/failsafe.conf doesn't actually stop on runlevel" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/863864 | 22:25 |
SpamapS | anyway, lightdm is waiting on plymouth deactivate.. which is polling an "anon_inode" | 22:25 |
slangasek | strange... | 22:26 |
slangasek | I haven't seen this in any of my testing | 22:27 |
slangasek | can you file a plymouth bug? | 22:27 |
slangasek | also, please boot with plymouth:debug=file:/var/log/plymouth-debug.log and attach | 22:27 |
SpamapS | slangasek: sure.. anything I can do to debug immediately? | 22:27 |
slangasek | debug or unstick? | 22:28 |
slangasek | debugging, I think you need to boot with plymouth debugging on | 22:28 |
slangasek | unstick, I'd try stop lightdm ; plymouth quit; start lightdm | 22:28 |
slangasek | (from tty2, say) | 22:28 |
SpamapS | is it possible failsafe's plymouth tickling is causing plymouth deactivate to not work? | 22:29 |
slangasek | I don't believe so | 22:29 |
slangasek | ok - it's *possible* | 22:29 |
slangasek | but that's a plymouth bug if so | 22:29 |
SpamapS | hrm.. does stop not actually tell pre-start's to exit? | 22:32 |
slangasek | correct | 22:32 |
SpamapS | Garhhh.. ok.. poor assumption there. | 22:32 |
slangasek | it changes the goal for the job, but does not kill a running process | 22:32 |
slangasek | not a running pre-start, that is | 22:32 |
slangasek | it waits for that to end on its own | 22:32 |
SpamapS | ok, so does that mean I need to change it to a task and change the rc-sysinit to 'stopped failsafe' ? thats kind of the mechanics I was looking for, but its not as clear in rc-sysinit | 22:33 |
SpamapS | that or I have to check runlevel before every plymouth message | 22:34 |
SpamapS | oh wait I can check my status with status | 22:35 |
slangasek | SpamapS: that's my suggestion in the bug report - completely untested though | 22:37 |
slangasek | checking with status - yuck :) | 22:37 |
SpamapS | I suppose I should switch back to X from console and read your suggestion | 22:38 |
SpamapS | slangasek: so I think 'stopped failsafe' should be fine, rather than an explicit event... is this acceptible as a fix for 11.10 ? | 22:56 |
slangasek | SpamapS: 'stopped failsafe' would cause /etc/init/rc-sysinit.conf to fire *twice*, unless you somehow made it a conditional 'stopped' | 22:59 |
SpamapS | slangasek: twice? | 23:00 |
SpamapS | slangasek: failsafe would only start at boot, no? | 23:00 |
slangasek | SpamapS: the failsafe job is always going to stop, the question is whether it stops due to timeout or because it's killed. so rc-sysinit is "start on (filesystem and static-network-up) or started failsafe"; if you change "started" to "stopped" at the same time you move the bulk of its functionality into 'script', on a successful startup you will *always* match both parts of that 'or' | 23:01 |
SpamapS | slangasek: ahh right | 23:01 |
slangasek | hence, needing an explicit event instead of 'stopped' | 23:01 |
=== Guest45434 is now known as NCommander | ||
=== NCommander is now known as Guest61019 | ||
SpamapS | slangasek: ok, simple diff, and it fixes the problem with lightdm waiting on plymouth deactivate too | 23:09 |
slangasek | wait, what? how does it fix that? | 23:10 |
SpamapS | ???? | 23:10 |
SpamapS | I had it happen 3 times in a row before this fix | 23:10 |
SpamapS | slangasek: my guess.. plymouth waits for some socket to be closed which is held open by 'plymouth message' ? | 23:11 |
slangasek | 'plymouth message' is one shot, should return immediately | 23:11 |
slangasek | I mean, the execution of that script wouldn't work correctly if it didn't | 23:11 |
SpamapS | slangasek: I think this is more important than "Medium" .. I noticed on my other more pure oneiric laptop that I saw Waiting for network configuration ... once just before lightdm popped up... | 23:12 |
slangasek | yeah, I was going to raise the severity but hadn't gotten 'roundtuit yet | 23:12 |
slangasek | (after realizing the implications on boot, not just shutdown) | 23:12 |
SpamapS | ok, how about I raise it, and upload this diff which is relatively small, but probably needs serious scruitiny | 23:12 |
slangasek | SpamapS: sounds good to me | 23:14 |
bdmurray | What's the right status for a merge that shouldn't happen? A typo fix in the debian control file of a package we sync. | 23:16 |
SpamapS | Needs Fixing in the comment, and Work in Progress for the MP | 23:16 |
bdmurray | Work in Progress seems like a bad fit | 23:17 |
slangasek | well, the right way is 'rejected' | 23:17 |
slangasek | but I think there might still be a bug where only the TB can reject merge proposals for ubuntu-branches? | 23:17 |
SpamapS | I always feel like if its fixable easily, then Work in Progress is appropriate.. it means its the owner's problem | 23:17 |
slangasek | (whereas it should be "anyone who can upload") | 23:17 |
slangasek | SpamapS: this is "this should not be merged because it should be done in Debian instead" | 23:18 |
slangasek | so "rejected" is correct... if you can get to it | 23:18 |
bdmurray | which I can't | 23:18 |
SpamapS | Oh I misread the point of the question | 23:18 |
TheMuso | 3~/c | 23:19 |
hallyn_ | Daviey: hey are you there? | 23:19 |
hallyn_ | Daviey: d'oh, you never pushed http://people.canonical.com/~serge/ipxe-bin.debdiff . (I forgot about it and forgot to check and prod :) | 23:21 |
hallyn_ | Daviey: it's needed in o | 23:21 |
SpamapS | slangasek: uploaded | 23:28 |
SpamapS | whoa and just as I hit enter on emit, one of my tests fails .. second upload pending.. damnit | 23:28 |
* SpamapS vows to starve his fingers till they lose another ring size | 23:29 | |
SpamapS | slangasek: want to reject that upload? | 23:30 |
SpamapS | actually I rejected it | 23:31 |
slangasek | SpamapS: hum, as long as we're uploading upstart, I think I'd like to fix up the various manpage bugs at the same time | 23:36 |
slangasek | (undocumented events) | 23:36 |
SpamapS | slangasek: ok, I'll backout my debcommit --release.. | 23:37 |
SpamapS | slangasek: ok my change is in there as r1331 | 23:38 |
slangasek | SpamapS: cheers | 23:38 |
=== NCommand1r is now known as NCommander | ||
=== Guest16725 is now known as StevenK |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!