[02:08] <sagaci> http://people.canonical.com/~dpm/stats/ubuntu-11.10-translation-stats.html - awesome but must just mean the desktop side of ubuntu
[02:16] <blahdeblah-web> test
[02:17] <sagaci> it works!
[02:17] <blahdeblah-web> thanks sagaci - my DSL keeps dropping out and my local client doesn't seem to have kept up
[02:18] <blahdeblah-web> greetings blahdeblah!
[06:18] <sagaci> head_victim: streaming isn't looking to be happening, unfortunately
[06:38] <head_victim> sagaci: no worries, just throwing the idea out there
[06:39] <sagaci> head_victim: how'd you find the 2nd-on-the-list translations?
[06:43] <head_victim> Well the only reason we're not #1 is because of that empathy one we can't do
[06:48] <sagaci> yeah, but that doesn't matter
[06:56] <head_victim> Oh sorry, just reread your question. I saw it in the -translators channel
[06:58] <sagaci> oh nah, I just meant what was your thoughts about it
[07:01] <head_victim> If it helps some people get excited about it (or a little competetive) why not, is my thoughts.
[07:03] <sagaci> I was just surprised
[07:03] <sagaci> but it must just mean the main ubuntu packages, not cli programs or kubuntu things
[07:03] <head_victim> Yeah, I guess it's aimed at "default" installatins
[07:04] <head_victim> dpm would probably love feedback in -translators if you had anything in particular
[07:06] <sagaci> it was a surprise to get some kind of overall stats
[07:07] <head_victim> Yeah, much more visual than just a list of packages
[07:11] <sagaci> yay
[07:16] <head_victim> sagaci: done :)
[07:16] <head_victim> brb
[07:29] <sagaci> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-l10n-en-au and https://launchpad.net/~lp-l10n-en-au
[07:37] <blahdeblah> head_victim: Are we still on for this Saturday?
[07:40] <sagaci> blahdeblah: maybe https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-au/2011-September/007442.html, but might be more up-to-date info
[07:40] <sagaci> even http://loco.ubuntu.com/events/ubuntu-au/1300/detail/
[07:43] <blahdeblah> thx sagaci
[07:52] <sagaci> head_victim: how does one go about easily changing the next meeting date: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam
[07:54] <sagaci> oh, also needs to be updated in re to loco status
[07:58] <sagaci> nvm, found the meeting template :)
[08:16] <head_victim> It's in the includes ;)
[08:17] <head_victim> The template = the todo list?
[08:19] <sagaci> ?
[08:24] <head_victim> The wiki questions you just asked
[08:25] <sagaci> yeah, crossed wires maybe
[08:26] <sagaci> changed the date anyhow
[08:28] <head_victim> Cheers mate, signed up to the new ml for translation as well
[10:28] <jargonfactory> hi folks \o
[10:28] <head_victim> Evening jargonfactory 
[10:29] <jargonfactory> how's it going head_victim
[10:30] <head_victim> Not too bad, having a crack at some translation strings
[10:30] <jargonfactory> ahh 
[10:49] <gorilla> evening folks.
[10:57] <jargonfactory> hi gorilla
[10:58] <gorilla> hi jargonfactory 
[16:26] <ntrly_owl> hello
[16:27] <ntrly_owl> im helping a friend update network manager from a ppa because the wifi network keeps dropping out. it is v0.8 and the ppa is 0.8.4. this is ubuntu 10.04
[16:27] <ntrly_owl> The following packages have unmet dependencies:   network-manager-gnome: Depends: libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.88) but 0.84-1ubuntu0.2 is to be installed                          Depends: gconf2 (>= 2.28.1-2) but 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
[16:28] <ntrly_owl> and libdbus-glib-1-2 wants to update libc6
[16:28] <ntrly_owl> so im not sure how to update libc6 without updating the whole distro
[16:28] <ntrly_owl> which i might do anyway
[16:28] <ntrly_owl> im going to update it from an 11.10 cd
[16:29] <ntrly_owl> hopefully updating from 10.04 to 11.10 works ok
[16:29] <ntrly_owl> or do i need to update to each release? that would be annoying
[16:29] <ntrly_owl> if so i might just update it to 10.10 and seem if that help
[16:29] <ntrly_owl> s
[16:29] <ntrly_owl> sudo apt-get upgrade
[16:29] <ntrly_owl> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done The following packages have been kept back:   devede dhcp3-client dhcp3-common linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic network-manager network-manager-gnome 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 8 not upgraded.
[16:30] <ntrly_owl> The following packages have been kept back: network-manager network-manager-gnome
[16:30] <ntrly_owl> sudo apt-get install network-manager network-manager-gnome
[16:30] <ntrly_owl> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information m The following packages have unmet dependencies:   network-manager-gnome: D
[16:31] <ntrly_owl> libdbus-glib-1-2 wants newer libc6
[16:31] <ntrly_owl> i used this ppa but if i update the distro ill probably remove it https://launchpad.net/~network-manager/+archive/ppa
[16:35] <ntrly_owl> so what should i do? 1)force upgrade libc6 and risk breaking everything 2) upgrade to 10.10 from cd (or network if i can) and break some stuff maybe 3) upgrade to 11.10 from cd (or net if i can) and maybe break stuff
[16:35] <ntrly_owl> http://pastebin.com/1hQtQKfz
[16:36] <ntrly_owl> so those are the options i see
[16:36] <ntrly_owl> thanks
[17:43] <ikt> ntrly_owl: did you try using wicd first?
[20:58] <head_victim> ntrly_owl: and I'd be looking at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Synaptic/PackageDownloadScript as an easy way of trying to install stuff without internet on the specific computer.
[22:53] <kaushal> Hi
[22:53] <kaushal> can someone please suggest me about https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2011-October/252250.html ?
[22:59] <blahdeblah> kaushal: My suggestion: buy hardware that is better supported by Linux.  If upgrading to the latest kernel didn't fix it, the amount of pain you will go through in getting it working is many times greater than simply buying an add-in card with an Intel or Broadcom chipset.
[23:00] <kaushal> blahdeblah: ok
[23:00] <kaushal> blahdeblah: so the card is a Atheros chipset ?
[23:01] <blahdeblah> Evidently, based on your lspci output
[23:01] <kaushal> ok
[23:01] <blahdeblah> I'm surprised that it doesn't work, given that it is fully recognised at the PCI level
[23:02] <blahdeblah> You may have some other configuration issue
[23:02] <blahdeblah> pastebin your dmesg output and we might be able to offer some better advice
[23:02] <kaushal> I have modprobe atl1ke
[23:02] <kaushal> blahdeblah: sure
[23:03] <kaushal> blahdeblah: please give me a moment
[23:05] <blahdeblah> I have to get to work, kaushal - post your pastebin and i'll look at it later. /me afk
[23:05] <kaushal> sure