=== bigbash is now known as zz_bigbash === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === jrib is now known as Guest46488 === Guest46488 is now known as jrib === dwg___ is now known as dwg [15:44] bdmurray: does ubuntu QA officially support the E17 window manager? [15:44] People use E17? [15:44] lol [15:44] is that still alive? [15:44] E17, now that's a blast from the past [15:44] pedro_: I was surprised as well :/ [15:44] RedSingularity: What do you mean by officially support? [15:44] wow that reminds me of window maker and all the other windows managers from the 90's [15:45] RedSingularity: As a singular point, surely you believe in Unity? [15:45] bdmurray: a user is having a problem with update-manager when using that window manager [15:45] jpds: lol [15:46] jpds: still a gnome user here :) Not ready to move on. [15:46] RedSingularity: what kind of problem exactly? [15:46] I think I will take the opportunity to try e17 again after ~10y or so ;) [15:46] ohhh mvo! Man of the hour. bug 792995 [15:46] Launchpad bug 792995 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update manager will not install updates (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/792995 [15:47] mvo: I talked with you briefly about this problem yesterday. [15:47] hey RedSingularity! triager of the day! :) [15:47] lol [15:48] RedSingularity: sorry, I probably missed that bug yesterday [15:48] mvo: no you mentioned to look at xsessions which was clean. [15:48] aha, cool, memory like a goldfish, I remember now [15:49] mvo: When the user started gnome the problem cleared up. He thinks it may be a daemon not starting with E17.... [15:49] RedSingularity: I try it now [15:52] mvo: are we even obligated to fix that? Thats why I was asking if we officially support it. [15:55] RedSingularity: well, we don't need to, but if its easy to fix … [15:55] mvo: true....easy is always good [15:57] RedSingularity: hm, can't reproduce in e17 [15:58] mvo: guess its just his local setup. Want to close it as unsupported then? [15:59] yeah, we can close it as unreproducable [16:00] mvo: Alright. I will take care of that if u want. [16:00] please do [16:00] thanks! [16:00] thanks for having a look ;) === jtaylor_ is now known as jtaylor === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:54] help [16:54] any body notice this issue [16:54] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/865612 [16:54] Launchpad bug 865612 in unity (Ubuntu) "Unity slow at shutting down (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [16:54] can i add the lightdm in it?? [17:47] hi, I've found a bug in oneiric which is pretty critical for me but fixing should take minutes (I attached a fix). could someone responsible please have a look and predict if a fix will make it into oneiric? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf2/+bug/864615 [17:47] Launchpad bug 864615 in gconf2 (Ubuntu) "Thumbnailers are missing in gconf (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] [17:47] here is a snipped to reproducte the issue: [17:47] : http://paste.ubuntu.com/702869/ [17:51] pulb: best place to ask is at #ubuntu-desktop; personally, I think it seems simple, but I do not deal with the desktop [17:52] lol, i posted this in #ubuntu, #ubuntu+1, #ubuntu-bugs already and all said i'm wrong there ;-) [17:53] mvo: bug 863792 - I'd be collecting the right stuff correct? [17:53] Launchpad bug 863792 in synaptic (Ubuntu) "bug reports would benefit from an apport package hook (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/863792 [17:57] that is using gsettings now.. [17:57] pulb, hggdh ^ [17:58] the thumbnailers are available at /usr/share/thumbnailers/ [17:58] hah! [17:58] and you can check the key with: [17:58] nothing like pedro_ on the rescue ;-) [17:58] gsettings list-keys org.gnome.desktop.thumbnailers [17:59] same for cache on : [17:59] gsettings list-keys org.gnome.desktop.thumbnail-cache [17:59] its probably available trough dconf-editor as well [17:59] checking [18:03] pedro_: the api affected is this: http://developer.gnome.org/gnome-desktop/stable/GnomeDesktopThumbnailFactory.html [18:03] i guess there is no replacement for gtk2 apps yet [18:04] just saw the discussion on the desktop channel [21:19] bdmurray, hey, what's your opinion on bug 850005 ? it's another case where the retracer consolidates unrelated issues. [21:19] Launchpad bug 850005 in jockey (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "jockey-backend crashed with SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2) (affects: 48) (dups: 48) (heat: 394)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/850005 [21:23] jibel: whatever package manager is being used for the backend should return a more verbose error than (2) [21:24] jibel: and probably the apport retracer should grow a ignore this Traceback feature [21:26] bdmurray, I think jockey returns that code, jockey.log contains the full error message. [21:27] bdmurray, so the bug here would be in jockey to return a more useful trace right ? [21:27] so apport wouldn't be confused [21:27] Well I suspect jockey is using aptdaemon or apt or something to install the package so its probably an underlying package [21:27] but yes [21:28] and then I think an apport bug should be opened to specifically block automatic consolidation of some crashes [21:30] ack, thanks [21:30] jibel: there was another bug like this too right? I need to make a list to sort out for Precise [21:35] bdmurray, yes, there was others. bug 808202 for example. It also happens with stack traces in some cases [21:35] Launchpad bug 808202 in apport (Ubuntu) "apport wrongly duplicates package installation failure reports. (affects: 14) (dups: 15) (heat: 132)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/808202 === meetingology` is now known as meetingology