[00:19]  * KombuchaKip bids farewell to Steve Jobs. Rest in peace. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304447804576410753210811910.html
[01:34] <DNS> heya :)
[01:35] <DNS> i have 3 questions, maybe some1 is up who knows this
[01:35] <DNS> 1. where should i file a bug related to a git import at lp? https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-cscvs < there?
[01:36] <wgrant> Not cscvs.
[01:36] <DNS> 2. where can/should i report outdated main branches at lp?
[01:36] <wgrant> That's used for CVS and old SVN imports.
[01:36] <wgrant> What's the issue?
[01:36] <DNS> ok
[01:36] <DNS> well
[01:36] <DNS> https://code.launchpad.net/~rbose-vcs-imports/guile/master
[01:36] <DNS> Somehow this branch does not update, but the import works. Maybe too many revisions?
[01:37] <wgrant> It should be updated, but it looks like LP's scan of it is timing out.
[01:37] <wgrant> It's still accessible, but the LP web UI won't show it.
[01:37] <DNS> hm
[01:38] <DNS> ok
[01:41] <wgrant> DNS: Is that the only git import issue?
[01:41] <DNS> yes the only with git atm, the other issues i have with git import are related to missing sub-mdules
[01:43] <DNS> like this one https://code.launchpad.net/~rbose-vcs-imports/patch/master
[01:43] <wgrant> Right.
[01:48] <DNS> wgrant or some1: do you know an answer for my 2nd question? :)
[01:48] <DNS> 2. where can/should i report outdated main branches at lp?
[01:50] <DNS> with main branches i mean branches which has these short adresses like lp:hello
[01:50] <DNS> *have
[01:51] <wgrant> Do you have a particular example?
[01:51] <wgrant> Import branches, or others?
[01:51] <wgrant> And outdated how?
[01:51] <DNS> lp:hello is an example
[01:51] <DNS> the branch is out of date
[01:52] <DNS> oops
[01:52] <DNS> sorry i mean lp:gnuhello
[01:52] <wgrant> What is out of date about it?
[01:53] <wgrant> It's moved to bzr?
[01:53] <wgrant> So you want a different branch set as the development focus?
[01:53] <DNS> yes i always imported it
[01:54] <wgrant> You need to talk to the project owner. In this case it's the Registry admins, of which I am a member. I have reassigned lp:gnuhello.
[01:55] <DNS> *always = already
[01:55] <DNS> ok
[01:55] <DNS> thanks
[01:56] <wgrant> answers.launchpad.net/launchpad is the right place if nobody responds to IRC, I guess.
[01:56] <wgrant> For projects owned by ~registry.
[01:57] <DNS> if a branch is in a recipe used, and you convert an adress to a short one, does the adress in the recipe automatically change too?
[01:57] <DNS> yea thx, i used this already a few times, just thought irc can be faster :D
[02:22] <DNS> wgrant: just checked the other branches which i have imported and just a few are there which are registered by registry admins.. so only lp:gdbm needs update lp:~rbose-vcs-imports/gdbm/master and those are "new ones" lp:~rbose-vcs-imports/dejagnu/master https://code.launchpad.net/global lp:~rbose-vcs-imports/libgcrypt/master ... can u please shorten them too? :)
[02:24] <wgrant> DNS: All done.
[02:24] <DNS> thank you
[02:48] <shayonj> when i try to upload i got this message Rejected:
[02:48] <shayonj> Source/binary (i.e. mixed) uploads are not allowed.
[02:48] <shayonj> any help on thi ?
[02:48] <shayonj> this*
[02:49] <StevenK> You can not upload binaries to LP
[02:49] <shayonj> i used dput and it did it automatically, how can i not upload the .orig.tar.gz file
[02:49] <shayonj> ?
[02:51] <shayonj> and i used debuild too
[02:52] <wgrant> How are you running debuild?
[02:52] <shayonj> just debuild then pbuilder build
[02:52] <wgrant> 'debuild -S' will produce a source-only upload.
[02:52] <shayonj> ugh
[02:52] <shayonj> right
[02:52] <shayonj> thanks wgrant :)
[04:47] <shayonj> cant i add same package with two different series (lucid, oneiric) under one ppa ?
[04:48] <StevenK> Yes
[04:48] <shayonj> uh-oh
[04:48] <shayonj> alright thanks
[04:50] <wgrant> shayonj: That is, you *can* do it.
[04:50] <shayonj> i see
[04:50] <shayonj> how ?
[04:50] <shayonj> it tells me same file exists error
[04:51] <wgrant> You can't upload the same version twice. You either have to change the version, or copy the source and binaries to the other series using the web UI.
[04:52] <shayonj> where can i find that option in web UI ?
[04:53] <wgrant> Click "View package details" on your PPA page. Then you'll see a "Copy packages" link.
[04:54] <shayonj> oh gotcha. thanks :)
[04:57] <DNS> but take care about the dependencies
[04:57] <DNS> better copy from lucid to higher
[05:12] <shayonj> DNS, okay. thanks :)
[05:15] <DNS> yw
[05:15] <DNS> i go to my bed now
[05:17] <DNS> good night, or good morning ;)
[10:30] <tjaalton> is there any way to get rid of a bogus tarball in a ppa? the one in question doesn't see releases that often, and i'd like to avoid messing with the version number before it has even hit the main archive (debian or ubuntu)..
[10:31] <wgrant> tjaalton: There's not.
[10:31] <tjaalton> damn..
[10:31] <wgrant> How did the bad tarball happen?
[10:31] <tjaalton> someone uploaded an ancient version as the "current"
[10:31] <tjaalton> two years ago
[10:34] <tjaalton> hmm but I can create a new ppa where the problem doesn't exist?
[10:34] <wgrant> You could.
[10:35] <tjaalton> would it also work if I deleted the old ppa?
[10:35] <wgrant> You can't recreate one with the same name.
[10:35] <tjaalton> ok
[10:36] <tjaalton> so deleting ppa:team/ppa and recreating it isn't possible?
[10:38] <wgrant> tjaalton: Correct.
[10:39] <tjaalton> sounds like a bug to me :)
[10:39] <wgrant> Mmm, keeping archives sensible could hardly be called a bug.
[10:39] <wgrant> Launchpad assumes that things signed with your OpenPGP key are not complete lies.
[10:40] <wgrant> It sounds like this orig tarball was a lie.
[10:40] <tjaalton> sure was, but doesn't lp lie about deleting everything when you delete a ppa? :)
[10:43] <wgrant> It deletes the files. It doesn't say it will allow you to violate archive integrity axioms :)
[10:44] <tjaalton> so the deleted ppa will remain on the list greyed out?
[10:44] <wgrant> Nobody outside the team can see it, but for now it will remain visible to members.
[10:44] <tjaalton> got it
[10:45] <tjaalton> i'll just add '+r1' to the version then :)
[10:48] <tjaalton> hmm, maybe not that since it looks like a svn revision, but anyway..
[10:48] <tjaalton> wgrant: thanks for the info!
[12:37] <Renegade15> good day
[12:38] <Renegade15> I'm trying to repurpose an existing (dead) project for something new, but despite my changing of the project name, the original project name remains in the url...is there a way to change that?
[12:39] <nigelb> Yes
[12:40] <nigelb> Ask a question against launchpad requesting that
[12:40] <nigelb> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[12:40] <Renegade15> thank you
[14:47] <dholbach> hiya
[14:47] <dholbach> how safe is it to assume that an email <lpid>@ubuntu.com exists if somebody is member of ~ubuntumembers?
[14:49] <tumbleweed> AFAIK, one can't assume that (although in the majority of cases, it'll be true)
[14:50] <dholbach> it's a painstaking effort to get email addresses of people together and while I realise that it's for a good reason - it makes valid things like elections/surveys very hard - it'd be good to know more about this
[14:51] <tumbleweed> yeah, it's a total pain. And I don't know how many special cases there are (although I guess we could try and work that out)
[15:08] <dholbach> ok, I'm done with ~ubuntumembers
[15:08] <dholbach> can somebody please please please help me find the email address of ~anonymous1?
[15:08] <dholbach> no associated gpg key, no wiki page, etc
[15:10] <tumbleweed> dholbach: +contactuser?
[15:10] <dholbach> I can't get CIVS to talk to +contactuser - but yes - I could ask for the mail address there
[15:14] <tumbleweed> it would be handy if an LP admin who can see all addresses could find out how many members didn't have username@ubuntu.com
[15:15] <tumbleweed> dholbach: err anonymous1 got membership last year, so anonymous1@ubuntu.com should work
[15:16] <dholbach> great
[15:16] <dholbach> thanks tumbleweed
[16:20] <RedSingularity> Anyone familiar with this launchpad error problem when trying to view certain reports?  | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/626798
[16:44] <Darkwing> Is anyone else having issues with launchpad timing out?
[16:45] <nigelb> What were you doing when it OOPS'd out?
[16:45] <Darkwing> adding a series to /kubuntu-docs
[16:46] <Darkwing> It's done it 3 times in the last 15 minutes.