[00:19] * KombuchaKip bids farewell to Steve Jobs. Rest in peace. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304447804576410753210811910.html [01:34] heya :) [01:35] i have 3 questions, maybe some1 is up who knows this [01:35] 1. where should i file a bug related to a git import at lp? https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-cscvs < there? [01:36] Not cscvs. [01:36] 2. where can/should i report outdated main branches at lp? [01:36] That's used for CVS and old SVN imports. [01:36] What's the issue? [01:36] ok [01:36] well [01:36] https://code.launchpad.net/~rbose-vcs-imports/guile/master [01:36] Somehow this branch does not update, but the import works. Maybe too many revisions? [01:37] It should be updated, but it looks like LP's scan of it is timing out. [01:37] It's still accessible, but the LP web UI won't show it. [01:37] hm [01:38] ok [01:41] DNS: Is that the only git import issue? [01:41] yes the only with git atm, the other issues i have with git import are related to missing sub-mdules [01:43] like this one https://code.launchpad.net/~rbose-vcs-imports/patch/master [01:43] Right. [01:48] wgrant or some1: do you know an answer for my 2nd question? :) [01:48] 2. where can/should i report outdated main branches at lp? [01:50] with main branches i mean branches which has these short adresses like lp:hello [01:50] *have [01:51] Do you have a particular example? [01:51] Import branches, or others? [01:51] And outdated how? [01:51] lp:hello is an example [01:51] the branch is out of date [01:52] oops [01:52] sorry i mean lp:gnuhello [01:52] What is out of date about it? [01:53] It's moved to bzr? [01:53] So you want a different branch set as the development focus? [01:53] yes i always imported it [01:54] You need to talk to the project owner. In this case it's the Registry admins, of which I am a member. I have reassigned lp:gnuhello. [01:55] *always = already [01:55] ok [01:55] thanks [01:56] answers.launchpad.net/launchpad is the right place if nobody responds to IRC, I guess. [01:56] For projects owned by ~registry. [01:57] if a branch is in a recipe used, and you convert an adress to a short one, does the adress in the recipe automatically change too? [01:57] yea thx, i used this already a few times, just thought irc can be faster :D [02:22] wgrant: just checked the other branches which i have imported and just a few are there which are registered by registry admins.. so only lp:gdbm needs update lp:~rbose-vcs-imports/gdbm/master and those are "new ones" lp:~rbose-vcs-imports/dejagnu/master https://code.launchpad.net/global lp:~rbose-vcs-imports/libgcrypt/master ... can u please shorten them too? :) [02:24] DNS: All done. [02:24] thank you === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 [02:48] when i try to upload i got this message Rejected: [02:48] Source/binary (i.e. mixed) uploads are not allowed. [02:48] any help on thi ? [02:48] this* [02:49] You can not upload binaries to LP [02:49] i used dput and it did it automatically, how can i not upload the .orig.tar.gz file [02:49] ? [02:51] and i used debuild too [02:52] How are you running debuild? [02:52] just debuild then pbuilder build [02:52] 'debuild -S' will produce a source-only upload. [02:52] ugh [02:52] right [02:52] thanks wgrant :) === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away [04:47] cant i add same package with two different series (lucid, oneiric) under one ppa ? [04:48] Yes [04:48] uh-oh [04:48] alright thanks [04:50] shayonj: That is, you *can* do it. [04:50] i see [04:50] how ? [04:50] it tells me same file exists error [04:51] You can't upload the same version twice. You either have to change the version, or copy the source and binaries to the other series using the web UI. [04:52] where can i find that option in web UI ? [04:53] Click "View package details" on your PPA page. Then you'll see a "Copy packages" link. [04:54] oh gotcha. thanks :) [04:57] but take care about the dependencies [04:57] better copy from lucid to higher [05:12] DNS, okay. thanks :) [05:15] yw [05:15] i go to my bed now [05:17] good night, or good morning ;) === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away [10:30] is there any way to get rid of a bogus tarball in a ppa? the one in question doesn't see releases that often, and i'd like to avoid messing with the version number before it has even hit the main archive (debian or ubuntu).. [10:31] tjaalton: There's not. [10:31] damn.. [10:31] How did the bad tarball happen? [10:31] someone uploaded an ancient version as the "current" [10:31] two years ago [10:34] hmm but I can create a new ppa where the problem doesn't exist? [10:34] You could. [10:35] would it also work if I deleted the old ppa? [10:35] You can't recreate one with the same name. [10:35] ok [10:36] so deleting ppa:team/ppa and recreating it isn't possible? [10:38] tjaalton: Correct. [10:39] sounds like a bug to me :) [10:39] Mmm, keeping archives sensible could hardly be called a bug. [10:39] Launchpad assumes that things signed with your OpenPGP key are not complete lies. [10:40] It sounds like this orig tarball was a lie. [10:40] sure was, but doesn't lp lie about deleting everything when you delete a ppa? :) [10:43] It deletes the files. It doesn't say it will allow you to violate archive integrity axioms :) [10:44] so the deleted ppa will remain on the list greyed out? [10:44] Nobody outside the team can see it, but for now it will remain visible to members. [10:44] got it [10:45] i'll just add '+r1' to the version then :) [10:48] hmm, maybe not that since it looks like a svn revision, but anyway.. [10:48] wgrant: thanks for the info! === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:37] good day [12:38] I'm trying to repurpose an existing (dead) project for something new, but despite my changing of the project name, the original project name remains in the url...is there a way to change that? [12:39] Yes [12:40] Ask a question against launchpad requesting that [12:40] https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [12:40] thank you === zyga_ is now known as zyga-afk [14:47] hiya [14:47] how safe is it to assume that an email @ubuntu.com exists if somebody is member of ~ubuntumembers? [14:49] AFAIK, one can't assume that (although in the majority of cases, it'll be true) [14:50] it's a painstaking effort to get email addresses of people together and while I realise that it's for a good reason - it makes valid things like elections/surveys very hard - it'd be good to know more about this [14:51] yeah, it's a total pain. And I don't know how many special cases there are (although I guess we could try and work that out) [15:08] ok, I'm done with ~ubuntumembers [15:08] can somebody please please please help me find the email address of ~anonymous1? [15:08] no associated gpg key, no wiki page, etc [15:10] dholbach: +contactuser? [15:10] I can't get CIVS to talk to +contactuser - but yes - I could ask for the mail address there [15:14] it would be handy if an LP admin who can see all addresses could find out how many members didn't have username@ubuntu.com [15:15] dholbach: err anonymous1 got membership last year, so anonymous1@ubuntu.com should work [15:16] great [15:16] thanks tumbleweed === zz_joey is now known as joey === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch [16:20] Anyone familiar with this launchpad error problem when trying to view certain reports? | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/626798 [16:20] Ubuntu bug 626798 in policykit (Ubuntu Natty) "update-manager crashed with DBusException in _run()" [High,Confirmed] === zyga-afk is now known as zyga === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno [16:44] Is anyone else having issues with launchpad timing out? [16:45] What were you doing when it OOPS'd out? [16:45] adding a series to /kubuntu-docs [16:46] It's done it 3 times in the last 15 minutes. === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === med_out is now known as medberry === epsy is now known as \u03b5