| shayonj | will the motu be reviewing packages for oneiric ? | 05:40 |
|---|---|---|
| ScottK | Some will, but there are always a lot more packages wanting review than there are reviewers. | 05:45 |
| ScottK | You might consider trying to get your package into Debian (it would be synced into Ubuntu from there) | 05:45 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| shayonj | ScottK, okay. thanks :) | 05:50 |
| micahg | shayonj: any new package would go into precise at this point, not oneiric | 06:16 |
| shayonj | micahg, alrighty :) | 06:20 |
| * ajmitch is still trying to get used to the new name | 06:20 | |
| micahg | ajmitch: what precisely is the issue you're having? | 06:21 |
| * micahg ducks | 06:21 | |
| ajmitch | /kick | 06:21 |
| shayonj | just wondering, is precise the actual tag. as in is precise the tag that will be replacing oneiric/lucid/natty/etc etc | 06:21 |
| shayonj | :p | 06:21 |
| micahg | shayonj: yep, it's the codename | 06:21 |
| shayonj | codename, thats the word. thanks micahg :) | 06:21 |
| micahg | I think suite name is the appropriate word for that entry in the changelog | 06:22 |
| micahg | I didn't want to be imprecise | 06:22 |
| shayonj | hah ok | 06:22 |
| shayonj | just a note- apparently there is no precise for pbuilder | 06:23 |
| ajmitch | micahg: you're going to be on these puns for weeks, aren't you? | 06:23 |
| micahg | shayonj: update oneiric | 06:23 |
| micahg | ajmitch: precisely :P | 06:23 |
| shayonj | micahg, didnt get that ? update oneiric to precise in changelog or pbuilder ? | 06:23 |
| micahg | shayonj: sorry, you can't build for precise yet, the archive doesn't exist | 06:24 |
| geser | shayonj: a precise pbuilder becomes useful once the precise archive is ready (which will be around 2 weeks after oneiric release) | 06:24 |
| shayonj | micahg, i see. so just making the change in the changelog be a good idea ? | 06:25 |
| micahg | shayonj: not yet | 06:25 |
| shayonj | micahg, i see | 06:25 |
| micahg | although pbuilder should recognize it as a suite at this point I think | 06:25 |
| shayonj | geser, okay. thanks for the info. so will precise be still accepting packages ? | 06:25 |
| shayonj | micahg, it just says nknown distribution «precise» | 06:25 |
| shayonj | u | 06:26 |
| shayonj | unknown * | 06:26 |
| micahg | hmm, do you have distro-info 0.2.2? | 06:26 |
| shayonj | no | 06:26 |
| geser | shayonj: most of the tools don't know the new name yet | 06:26 |
| shayonj | just a sec, let me get it | 06:26 |
| shayonj | geser, thought so :) | 06:27 |
| micahg | geser: well, whatever was patched to use distro-info would know about it | 06:27 |
| * micahg isn't sure it pbuilder fits the bill | 06:27 | |
| shayonj | micahg, what exact is distro-info 0.2.2 | 06:27 |
| micahg | shayonj: a package that contains the codenames and when they're active in a single place | 06:28 |
| shayonj | micahg, okay so how will it be helpful ? Sorry to be to buggy :p | 06:28 |
| geser | micahg: IIRC pbuilder doesn't care about it as long as debootstrap know how to bootstrap it | 06:28 |
| micahg | geser: I think that was taken care of already as well | 06:28 |
| geser | yep | 06:29 |
| shayonj | okay, so how exactly can/do you build for precise ? | 06:30 |
| ajmitch | you use an oneiric pbuilder for now - precise doesn't exist yet, but will be based on oneiric | 06:31 |
| shayonj | ajmitch, yeah i did do that and i have the oneiric build with me and on revu.. | 06:32 |
| shayonj | but thats not the same as submitting for precise, right ? | 06:32 |
| ajmitch | you still need to change debian/changelog to target precise | 06:32 |
| shayonj | i see | 06:33 |
| ajmitch | what's in debian/changelog doesn't affect what pbuilder tarball/config you use to build it with | 06:33 |
| shayonj | okay ! | 06:33 |
| shayonj | ajmitch, a question. if i upload it to revu it will overwrite my existing upload of oneiric , right ? | 06:34 |
| ajmitch | yes | 06:34 |
| ajmitch | if revu complains about not supporting precise, ignore the warnings & they'll be fixed | 06:35 |
| shayonj | sounds good thanks | 06:35 |
| shayonj | thanks so much. you guys have a been a great help as a community. appreciate that. good night/morning for now | 06:37 |
| ajmitch | night | 06:37 |
| * ajmitch should probably upgrade to oneiric tonight to see what all the fuss is about | 06:37 | |
| ajmitch | finally upgraded the laptop to natty, rebooting it now :) | 06:39 |
| dholbach | good morning | 06:39 |
| ajmitch | morning dholbach | 06:39 |
| geser | good morning dholbach | 06:40 |
| dholbach | hi ajmitch, hi geser | 06:40 |
| ajmitch | dholbach: and how are you today? :) | 06:42 |
| dholbach | I'm trying to wake up :) | 06:42 |
| dholbach | how about you? | 06:42 |
| ajmitch | just considering dinner & upgrading to oneiric | 06:42 |
| dholbach | nice :) | 06:43 |
| === jibel_ is now known as jibel | ||
| * ajmitch upgraded to natty today on the laptop, was a bit rough in places | 06:44 | |
| geser | ajmitch: file bugs :) | 06:45 |
| ajmitch | mostly my own fault for having packages installed from PPAs, so bugs aren't really worth it in those cases | 06:45 |
| ScottK | ajmitch: To natty or from natty? | 06:52 |
| ajmitch | ScottK: to natty, I upgraded to maverick a few weeks ago | 06:53 |
| ScottK | I see. | 06:53 |
| ajmitch | my laptop had been on lucid for quite awhile | 06:53 |
| ScottK | Don't try to use LibreOffice if you've got your hard drive encrypted. | 06:54 |
| ScottK | There's a really fun combination that makes LO virtually unusable. | 06:54 |
| ajmitch | poor performance, or does it cause everything to blow up? | 06:54 |
| ScottK | Both. | 06:54 |
| ajmitch | mine's not encrypted or using LVM or anything special | 06:54 |
| ScottK | Should be fine then. | 06:54 |
| ScottK | Fixed in oneiric, BTW (was a kernel bug) | 06:55 |
| ajmitch | fun | 06:55 |
| ajmitch | I've been running natty on my desktop for quite awhile, it's not like I'm completely out of touch :) | 06:55 |
| ajmitch | maybe I can upgrade my desktop's hardware for the next LTS, iirc it was installed with a dapper daily ISO | 06:58 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| ajmitch | ScottK: what happened with the proposal of opening -backports at feature freeze? was that discussed with the TB? | 07:22 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === Guest79607 is now known as jussi01 | ||
| verwilst | Ng, ping | 10:04 |
| Ng | verwilst: hi | 10:10 |
| verwilst | Ng, you have 1 minute in private? :) | 10:11 |
| Ng | sure | 10:11 |
| verwilst | Ng, on a side-note, your email made me discover terminator | 10:48 |
| verwilst | never looked back to gnome-terminal :) | 10:49 |
| Ng | heh | 10:49 |
| Zhenech | o/ Ng | 10:49 |
| Ng | hey Zhenech :) | 10:50 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| === cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| blueyed | Is there another way than apt-build to build (some) packages natively, i.e. using -mtune=native? | 18:34 |
| blueyed | I have found apt-src, too. | 18:34 |
| * blueyed would really like to have an optimized build of firefox, especially while using i386 on a 64bit system (I will reinstall with Oneiric getting (more) stable). | 18:36 | |
| jtaylor | using dpkg-buildflags might do it for a bunch of packages | 18:36 |
| jtaylor | see the manpage for its configurationfile | 18:36 |
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| ScottK | ajmitch: What happened is I still didn't get time to write it down and make a coherent proposal to the TB. Still on my TODO. | 19:04 |
| blueyed | jtaylor: dpkg-buildflags would still require manual building (will pbuilder pick it up?), and apt-build/apt-src might be easier to handle upgrades. | 19:22 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === kiall_ is now known as Kiall | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!