[00:21] <cjwatson> wgrant: I admit to being a little surprised that we apparently didn't have any tests that called a-f with include_long_descriptions=False before.
[00:21] <cjwatson> Probably my mistake - I think we just checked that apt.conf looked right.
[00:22] <wgrant> cjwatson: Indeed.
[00:23] <wgrant> cjwatson: Anyway, buildbot is fixed, and ec2 is updating.
[00:23] <wgrant> Will re-ec2land it once it's done.
[00:23] <cjwatson> yay, ta
[00:33] <nigelb> Morning *yawn*
[00:55] <wgrant> cjwatson: Still around?
[00:56] <wgrant> If so, could you apply https://pastebin.canonical.com/54077/ to your branch?
[00:58] <cjwatson> looking
[00:58] <cjwatson> why does changing that in my branch do anything? :)
[00:58] <wgrant> That list specifies valid AMI owners.
[00:59] <wgrant> I can change it locally, but once this lands everyone needs to be able to see the new AMI.
[00:59] <wgrant> So ideally they land together.
[01:00] <wgrant> I could just land it separately, I suppose.
[01:02] <cjwatson> I can do it
[01:03] <cjwatson> Given you're landing it you get to say whether it's policy-OK :)
[01:04] <wgrant> Yep.
[01:05] <cjwatson> done
[01:07] <wgrant> Thanks, it's back in ec2, with the new image.
[01:07] <wgrant> If it fails again, I'll try to sort it out.
[01:10]  * cjwatson wonders why http://lpqateam.canonical.com/ was last generated over a day ago
[01:10] <cjwatson> (though nice website)
[01:13] <nigelb> wow, I didn't think I could see that.
[01:13] <nigelb> That is neat.
[01:13] <cjwatson> It used to be in a private location.  I think it was made public quite recently.
[01:13] <cjwatson> Or at least the deployment report did.
[01:14] <nigelb> Yeah, I remember jumping with joy for that one :)
[01:14] <cjwatson> http://blog.launchpad.net/general/deployment-reports-are-now-public
[01:25] <nigelb> heh
[01:25] <nigelb> <3 the incident report section
[01:31] <wgrant> cjwatson: Good question. Possibly related to staging being a bit broken lately.
[01:31]  * wgrant checks.
[01:33] <wgrant> The incident report finder is broken.
[01:35] <wgrant> Ah, wiki.c.c seems to be kicking people out of teams quickly, or something.
[01:36] <wgrant> Ah, yes, mentioned in #is. The ACL keeps getting erased.
[01:46] <nigelb> hah
[01:48] <wgrant> Anyway, dashboard robustified and working again.
[09:57] <cjwatson> hm, https://lpbuildbot.canonical.com/changes/3807 probably should've been credited to me, not wgrant
[09:57] <cjwatson> (the last commit was author=wgrant committer=me)
[09:57] <cjwatson> (but all the rest were mine)
[09:57] <cjwatson> I wonder what the deployment report will make of that
[09:59] <cjwatson> and Contributions for that matter
[10:09] <jelmer> cjwatson: I think this is just the person that landed it
[10:10] <jelmer> since most contributors can't land stuff, I suspect the Contributions page uses something different
[10:16] <cjwatson> jelmer: No, I'm always in this boat and my other landings are generally credited to me.
[10:17] <cjwatson> It's definitely because the last commit was requested by wgrant so I --author-ed it
[10:17] <cjwatson> I'll remember not to do that in future, I guess :-)
[10:37] <jelmer> heh
[10:37]  * jelmer doesn't get credits on the Contributions page because he was once in the Launchpad team
[10:42] <wgrant> cjwatson: Contributions looks through the entire history.
[10:42] <wgrant> cjwatson: So it will work fine.
[10:42] <wgrant> Deployment report I'm not quite sure about.
[10:42] <wgrant> jelmer: Ah, it works for people like mwhudson, because they now use linaro addresses.
[10:43] <wgrant> You need a date threshold, I guess.
[10:44] <jelmer> I might contribute such a change to the contributors script at some point.. :)
[10:44] <wgrant> cjwatson: Both of your landings from today/yesterday are one https://dev.launchpad.net/Contributions#colin_watson
[10:44] <wgrant> s/one/on/
[10:53] <cjwatson> wgrant: cool, thanks
[10:53] <cjwatson> not that it's more than vanity :)
[11:00] <wgrant> Heh
[11:01] <wgrant> sigh, buildbot has gotten slow again.
[11:25] <lifeless> oh, so its working?
[11:31]  * jelmer waves to lifeless 
[11:36] <wgrant> lifeless: What's working?
[11:38] <lifeless> bb
[11:39] <wgrant> Yes.
[11:39] <wgrant> It even passed once today.
[11:39] <wgrant> After failing because of nodowntime.
[11:56] <lifeless> how did ndt fail it ?
[11:56] <wgrant> Ah, you must have been away the day I realised this.
[11:56] <wgrant> Graceful appserver restarts only watch the main haproxy page.
[11:57] <wgrant> Not xmlrpc-private.
[11:57] <wgrant> So xmlrpc requests can be killed.
[11:57] <wgrant> And result in a 502.
[12:05] <lifeless> I don't recall a bug on this
[12:05] <lifeless> or an RT
[12:07] <wgrant> I meant to file an RT.
[12:07] <wgrant> Only discovered it last week.
[12:07] <lifeless> cool
[12:09] <lifeless> nn
[12:12] <wgrant> Night.
[12:16]  * nigelb waves
[12:16] <wgrant> Evening nigelb.
[12:25] <nigelb> wgrant: ohai
[12:25] <nigelb> Oooh. Need 3 more landings to be third :)
[22:40]  * wgrant WHUIs the vhost config system.
[23:16] <elmo> WHUI?
[23:20] <wgrant> elmo: Past form of YAGNI.
[23:26] <elmo> ah