[01:30] <braiam> how much I have to wait till my ppa get updated??
[01:34] <wgrant> braiam: What do you mean?
[01:34] <wgrant> What in particular are you waiting for?
[06:34] <braiam> well I see no new lines since I asked, so I was waiting for some packages that I updated to Lp, right now I need to test
[06:53] <wgrant> braiam: What have you done? What apparently hasn't happened yet?
[06:54] <wgrant> Are you waiting for a source upload to be processed? Builds to happen? Built packages to be published?
[06:55] <braiam> Im uploading the .changes, .dsc, and orig.tar.gz, to my ppa. bzr informs that the upload was done but the ppa don't show the package
[07:08] <wgrant> bzr? You mean dput?
[07:08] <wgrant> braiam: ^^
[07:08] <braiam> yeah
[07:08] <braiam> sorry
[07:09] <wgrant> What's the package name?
[07:09] <braiam> cgminer
[07:10] <wgrant> You've signed the .changes with a key that Launchpad doesn't know about.
[07:10] <braiam> at first
[07:10] <braiam> then I uploaded my key and tried again
[07:10] <wgrant> Ah, then I see others that sent you a rejection email.
[07:10] <braiam> huh??
[07:10] <wgrant> 2011-10-09 01:00:36 INFO    Processing upload cgminer_2.0.5-1_source.changes
[07:10] <wgrant> 2011-10-09 01:00:36 INFO    Upload was rejected:
[07:10] <wgrant> 2011-10-09 01:00:36 INFO        Unable to find distroseries: unstable
[07:10] <wgrant> 2011-10-09 01:00:36 INFO        Further error processing not possible because of a critical previous error.
[07:11] <wgrant> 2011-10-09 01:00:36 INFO    Committing the transaction and any mails associated with this upload.
[07:11] <wgrant> You should have received an email about that.
[07:12] <braiam> huh?? thats when I tried upload from a branch
[07:12] <wgrant> You need to specify an Ubuntu series in debian/changelog.
[07:12] <wgrant> unstable is a Debian series.
[07:13] <braiam> oh...
[07:14] <braiam> so if I have tested the package on my system, what series I must put??
[07:14]  * braiam thinks dh_make its stupid...
[07:15] <wgrant> Whichever Ubuntu series you want the package to build for.
[07:16] <braiam> the stable equivalent??
[07:18] <wgrant> Perhaps one of lucid, maverick, natty, oneiric?
[07:18] <braiam> forget it... natty
[07:19] <braiam> but I want to make one for last 3 versions...
[07:20] <wgrant> braiam: Have you read https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage?
[07:21] <braiam> yes, and I've lost for a couple days trying to understand what I got wrong
[07:21] <wgrant> Read the second half of the "Versioning" section.
[07:21] <wgrant> It describes how to handle multiple series.
[07:22] <braiam> well I dont get that far... I was having problem with build & upload but Im going to read it all
[07:28] <braiam> still lost, I have to change change log, each time that I want to make a new package for each ubuntu version?? It only refers about the name format that the package should have, and about changelog it says that I have no need to change it since I put natty on it??
[07:29] <wgrant> If you need to upload to multiple Ubuntu series, you need to change the version and series in debian/changelog for each one.
[07:31] <braiam> or I can make a brach for each one, export one branch to the others 3 and make it ignore changelog
[07:32] <wgrant> If you are building entirely from a branch, have you considered using https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/SourceBuilds/Recipes? They can handle multi-series builds automatically.
[07:32] <braiam> thats exactly was im using
[07:32] <braiam> Could not be uploaded correctly 	1 minute ago buildlog (5.8 KiB) 	Natty
[07:33] <braiam> now its a seccion error, arggg
[07:33] <braiam> section*
[07:40] <braiam> yay, thanks you wgrant, for breaking my head :D
[07:40] <wgrant> It worked?
[07:41] <braiam> [FULLYBUILT] Successful build 	1 minute ago buildlog (7.7 KiB) 	Oneiric
[07:41] <wgrant> Excellent.
[07:42] <braiam> now, I need to delete all those emails D:
[07:43] <wgrant> Heh.
[11:11] <chrisccoulson> could someone kill this build - https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/2204969 ?
[11:11] <chrisccoulson> not sure why it's been waiting since january
[14:36] <MattJ100> Erm, can I depend on other packages in my PPA in Build-Depends?
[14:36] <MattJ100> I thought the answer was yes, but I'm getting dependency errors
[14:42] <MattJ100> Ah yes: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage#Dependencies
[14:42] <MattJ100> Interesting, I wonder why it's not working
[14:54] <tumbleweed> they need to be published first
[15:14] <MattJ100> tumbleweed, define "published"? They're already in and built successfully, and I can install them from the PPA onto my system
[15:15] <MattJ100> and then dpkg-checkbuilddeps is happy locally
[15:15] <tumbleweed> MattJ100: right, that's published (it'll say published next to the package on the ppa's web page)
[15:15] <MattJ100> Ah yes, I see
[15:19] <MattJ101> Sorry, what was the last mesage of mine that got through?
[15:19] <MattJ101> I need a new DSL filter :)
[15:21] <tumbleweed> 17:15 < MattJ100> Ah yes, I see
[16:16] <MattJ> https://launchpad.net/~mwild1/+archive/ppa/+build/2833360 is the failing build
[16:17] <MattJ> Maybe it's just me getting something wrong about Build-Depends
[16:18] <MattJ> It's complaining mongodb doesn't match the required version, but I have " | libmongoclient-dev (>= 1.6)" in Build-Depends, and that package in my PPA should match that
[16:20] <MattJ> Hmm yes, actually I see in the build log it's just running apt-get with mongodb
[16:21] <MattJ> I guess I thought it would be a bit smarter than that, I'll try making sure my package is listed first, regardless of version
[18:00] <tumbleweed> https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/microcode.ctl/+publishinghistory appears to be published, without any publication record that getPublishedSources can find
[18:03] <tumbleweed> err I made a typo, never mind
[20:59] <aber> Anyone familiar with the build farm?
[21:00] <aber> This project seems to run out of space:
[21:00] <aber> https://code.launchpad.net/~widelands-dev/+recipe/widelands-daily
[21:01] <lifeless> aber: during the build?
[21:02] <aber> lifeless: bzr: out of memory, so its probably the branch part
[21:17] <c0cac00l> hi
[21:17] <lifeless> aber: there is a bug about this
[21:17] <c0cac00l> who can help me to delete a comment?
[21:23] <yofel> aber: bug 746822
[21:32] <aber> I see. Not even enough memory to build a text editor...
[21:39] <lifeless> aber: its not about compilation
[21:39] <lifeless> aber: its cloning very large histories that causes issues
[21:49] <mwhudson> i'm getting lots of timeouts this morning
[21:49] <lifeless> bug search ?
[21:49] <wgrant> mwhudson: eg?
[21:50] <mwhudson> bah, i've not been saving the ids :(
[21:50] <mwhudson> lifeless: no, mostly code related
[21:50] <wgrant> What sort of action?
[21:50] <wgrant> yes, the scanner is slow :)
[21:50] <mwhudson> https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson, merge proposals
[21:50] <lifeless> bug fti is back at 90% bloat
[21:50] <mwhudson> it's probably the scanner i guess
[21:50] <lifeless> mwhudson: when submitting ?
[21:51] <mwhudson> lifeless: no
[21:51] <wgrant> Huh, times out for me too.
[21:51] <wgrant> That's a newish one...
[21:51] <mwhudson> wgrant: did you snag the id?
[21:52] <wgrant> OOPS-2108CP126
[21:52] <wgrant> Hm, that's a worry.
[21:53] <wgrant> No single obvious bad query.
[21:53] <wgrant> Lots of VPC/SPN/Product queries.
[21:54] <wgrant> Although there is a 3.5s SELECT COUNT(*) FROM branch WHERE [...] query.
[21:54] <mwhudson> how are you seeing this?
[21:54] <wgrant> carob:~wgrant/logs/*/2011-10-09/*.CP126
[21:55] <mwhudson> ah
[21:55] <wgrant> ~wgrant/+code-index just took 8.74s :/
[21:56] <wgrant> And now just timed out.
[21:56] <wgrant> We have a problem.
[21:59] <lifeless> 1.2 seconds in teams with branches
[21:59] <lifeless> and vpc is a bad sig
[21:59] <lifeless> n
[22:00] <wgrant> And one of mine had 2.2s in an MP search.
[22:00] <wgrant> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=2108CP126 is hanging, so probably there.
[22:03] <wgrant> Perhaps branch has just crossed some stats threshold.
[22:03] <wgrant> Like we saw with I forget which table a couple of months ago.
[22:03] <wgrant> ~6.5s in CP126 is on queries involving branch.
[22:04] <wgrant> lifeless: Can you explanalyse them? oops-tools can see it now.
[22:04] <lifeless> losa should be here now
[22:04] <wgrant> Ah, true.
[22:07] <lifeless> if they aren't, ys I can