[09:04] <stgraber> yeah, got a hotel room and even reasonably fast and stable wireless (at least for the last 10 minutes)!
[09:06] <Laney> you are enlondoned?
[09:09] <stgraber> yep
[12:40] <tumbleweed> keepass2 sync diff on bug 871265
[12:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 871265 in keepass2 (Ubuntu) "Sync keepass2 2.16+dfsg-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/871265
[14:51] <charlie-tca> Are we spinning new images today?
[15:06] <infinity> pitti: How goes?
[15:09] <stgraber> hey infinity! had a good trip?
[15:18] <infinity> stgraber: Wasn't too bad.
[15:18] <infinity> stgraber: You?
[15:18] <stgraber> everything was on time and it was a direct flight, so pretty good too
[15:24] <pitti> slangasek: yes, and patch already went upstream
[15:24] <pitti> hey infinity, how are you?
[15:29] <infinity> pitti: Tired. ;)
[15:29] <infinity> pitti: Just checking in to see if anything's on fire.
[15:30] <pitti> we got green light on the firefox testing
[15:30] <pitti> I'm pondering moving it to oneiric instead of oneiric-updates
[15:30] <pitti> so that the alternates will DTRT when you use them for upgrading
[15:30] <pitti> and once that's published, kick off the images
[15:30] <pitti> apport/kerneloops/base-files went in this morning
[15:33] <stgraber> I'm testing the update-manager upload from yesterday (for Edubuntu), should have the result in an hour or so (hotel internet...)
[15:36] <pitti> firefox done
[15:41] <chrisccoulson> hi pitti
[15:41] <chrisccoulson> how are you?
[15:41] <pitti> hey chrisccoulson
[15:41] <pitti> pretty well, thanks!
[15:41] <chrisccoulson> good :)
[15:41] <pitti> chrisccoulson: many thanks for the firefox upload, so we got this into final
[15:42] <chrisccoulson> pitti, sure, no problem. i'm glad that's fixed now
[15:42] <chrisccoulson> that's been a nightmare. perhaps next time i shouldn't book a vacation in the last 2 weeks of the cycle ;)
[15:45] <pitti> heh, perhaps better not
[15:46] <pitti> chrisccoulson: I hope you still had at least some time to enjoy it
[15:57] <chrisccoulson> pitti - yeah, it was good thanks
[15:57] <chrisccoulson> i can't believe how hard i found it to wind down though
[15:58] <cjwatson> occupational hazard, I think ...
[15:58] <chrisccoulson> heh
[15:58] <cjwatson> I'm sure it was easier to wind down before we had smartphones
[16:42] <Daviey> cjwatson: lack of smartphones just means you end up on a family holiday, parked outside mcdonalds - leaching wifi.
[16:45] <chrisccoulson> heh
[16:45] <chrisccoulson> actually, my smartphone wasn't much use, as the 3G coverage was terrible where we stayed
[16:46] <chrisccoulson> but i made the mistake of taking my laptop, and our cottage had free wifi
[16:46] <chrisccoulson> which was unexpected ;)
[17:05] <Daviey> bug 870121, is concerning me - there seems to be inconsistent values on all flavours (not just cloud) .. requires more investigation.
[17:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 870121 in ubuntu "APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists not set in cloud images (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/870121
[17:18] <pitti> slangasek, cjwatson, infinity: I'd set off the images now, unless you have another blocker?
[17:19] <infinity> I've got nothing, but I've been out of touch while traveling.
[17:20] <pitti> kernel is in, firefox is in, NBS/component-mismatches/oneiric_outdate all clean, oneiric_probs as good as it's going to be
[17:20] <infinity> Yeah, I'm at a "probably just have to live with my bugs" point.
[17:20] <infinity> Until we find something dire tomorrow. ;)
[17:24] <pitti> the world is rebuilding
[17:24] <pitti> will post the lot tomorrow morning
[17:25] <pitti> so long, enjoy your beer in London!
[17:25]  * pitti food/evening/night &
[17:25] <infinity> Did you just background yourself?
[17:43] <tumbleweed> is it still possible to request removals from universe?
[19:01] <cjwatson> tumbleweed: yeah, we still have a little leeway
[19:02] <cjwatson> pitti: there's auto-ISO-posting code in cdimage now, though you have to set some environment variable or other
[19:06] <tumbleweed> cjwatson: ah, I was thinking of bug 815922, (libavg was removed in Debian) but I see it has an ubuntu-only redpend
[19:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 815922 in libavg (Ubuntu) "libavg segfaults on startup (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/815922
[19:48] <SpamapS> I know you guys are in the home stretch. It would be quite helpful if someone can take a look at bug 871375 and approve the upload ASAP. Thanks!
[19:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 871375 in juju (Ubuntu) "[FFe] update juju to upstream revision 398 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/871375
[20:34] <slangasek> pitti: yay, my first patch in udev :)
[20:34] <slangasek> pitti: no blockers here, +1 for kicking off the builds
[20:50] <SpamapS> slangasek: is this by any chance the weird race some people have been seeing in udev?
[21:00] <slangasek> SpamapS: one of them.
[21:00] <slangasek> SpamapS: there's still an LVM-specific issue, and the netbooting issue hasn't been triaged to the point yet that I can say whether it's the same (waiting for feedback on the bug).
[21:04] <SpamapS> slangasek: we experienced udev issues with and without LVM this past week.. I think adam_g was involved in some of the triage. I'm glad at least some progress has been made.
[21:04] <slangasek> yes, adam_g's bug was the LVM one... that bug still exists, although with the latest comments on the bug it seems that it now manifests in a friendlier way (60s delay at boot, instead of failed boot)
[21:08] <stgraber> wow, my Edubuntu dist upgrade finally completed, took a while but at least everything seems to have upgraded fine!
[22:22] <slangasek> infinity, pitti: do you have any idea what's happening in bug #871083?  The manpages are being compressed with the correct options to be idempotent (-9nf), the uncompressed content is identical, and the compressed files are the same size; yet the .gz files don't match between amd64 and i386
[22:22] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 871083 in pam (Ubuntu) "package libpam-modules 1.1.3-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: './usr/share/man/man8/pam_shells.8.gz' is different from the same file on the system (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 14)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/871083
[22:44]  * slangasek pushes a no-change rebuild to -proposed for this
[22:46] <cjwatson> Bug 572128 has passed QA, and hopefully will be deployed to cocoplum tomorrow morning
[22:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 572128 in debmirror (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Ubuntu Archive translations are missing Index metadata file (affects: 3) (heat: 18)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/572128
[22:47] <cjwatson> squeaking in just in time for oneiric
[22:47]  * cjwatson -> bed
[22:47] <slangasek> cjwatson: 'night!
[23:17] <skaet> slangasek,  doko__;   I've rejected the binutils patch for now, since it seems it could have a pretty broad impact, and hence regression potential exists.   Since we've been living with this since the start of the year, it isn't too urgent.   Would rather this be deployed in precise,  and then discuss at UDS whether it makes sense to add it to updates for oneiric,  after its had some exposure and wider testing.
[23:18] <slangasek> skaet: which binutils patch was this?  I wasn't aware that any patches were still under consideration for binutils in oneiric
[23:19] <skaet> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openmpi/+bug/697229
[23:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 697229 in openmpi (Debian) (and 7 other projects) "openmpi link failure with ld --as-needed (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 18)" [Unknown,New]
[23:19] <skaet> spotted it in the oneiric queue for proposed this evening when I just checked on things.
[23:20] <skaet> wanted it was enabling several more architectures,  and may well be safe and fine,  but seemed to have a potential for regressions as well.
[23:21] <skaet> hmm... that last sentence didn't quite emerge as planned. ;p
[23:21] <slangasek> skaet: ok, well according to pitti the uploaded package seemed to not do the intended anyway
[23:22] <slangasek> but I think it's clear there was no intention to include this in the release, only as an SRU
[23:23] <skaet> slangasek,  yup, saw that, but want to make sure its effects are well understood, discussed and worth the risk before we add it in.
[23:40] <Daviey> Isn't that an SRU team issue?
[23:41] <skaet> Daviey,  I'm on the SRU team as well.
[23:46] <Daviey> aye, but i mean - is it something that needs UDS consideration, rather than just handling at team level?
[23:47] <Daviey> *shrug*
[23:53] <hggdh> slangasek: please see bug 871528 -- just noticed it on a netbook, sounds related to the udev bugs (but the delay here is ~ 100 seconds?)
[23:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 871528 in udev (Ubuntu) "slow boot, udev-related? (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/871528
[23:55] <slangasek> hggdh: why do you attribute this to udev?
[23:55] <slangasek> there's no 100s delay anywhere in udev
[23:59] <Daviey> another slow boot, bug 870214
[23:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 870214 in ubuntu "iSCSI root installation creates manual eth0 configuration + long boot (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/870214