[07:13] <mvo> bdmurray: hi, I saw that you commented the other day on bug #800908, did anything releated to apt-btrfs-snapshot came up during the testing?
[07:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 800908 in update-manager (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "update to oneiric quit due to missing btrfs (dup-of: 801696)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/800908
[07:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 801696 in update-manager (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "update-manager -d crashed when updating from 11.04 to 11.10 - line 69, in apt_btrfs_snapshot.py", line 69, in btrfs_subvolume_snapshot source, dest]) - OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory (affects: 5) (dups: 3) (heat: 32)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/801696
[14:44] <bdmurray> mvo: about bug 800908, no I didn't find anything
[14:44] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 800908 in update-manager (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "update to oneiric quit due to missing btrfs (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/800908
[14:47] <mvo> bdmurray: thanks! I added another check to be sure into the code, but it really should be fixed by now
[14:56] <pleia2> --
[15:15] <bdmurray> mvo: could you take a peek at bug 871869?  I don't see what dependency issue is there.
[15:15] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 871869 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Update from Maverick to Narwhal fails (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/871869
[15:21] <mvo> bdmurray: thanks, looking at it now
[15:28] <mvo> bdmurray: I replied in the bug, it looks like a poor transition for libwebkit-1.0 to libwebkitgtk-1.0
[15:30] <mvo> bdmurray: so if thats the case I wonder why we have not seen it more often
[15:42] <bdmurray> mvo: is the error in bug 872267 about not being able to access the targetdb?
[15:42] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 872267 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "(iso testing) ubuntu install crash at end of installation (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/872267
[15:46] <mvo> bdmurray: I'm not a experienced reader of the ubiquity logs, but this: "(ubiquity:2857): Gdk-WARNING **: The application 'ubiquity' lost its connection to the display :0;
[15:46] <mvo> most likely the X server was shut down or you killed/destroyed the application." looks pretty scary
[15:46] <mvo> (from debug)
[15:47] <mvo> debconf: DbDriver "passwords" warning: could not open /var/cache/debconf/passwords.dat: Permission denied <- this one is harmless usually
[15:47] <bdmurray> debconf: DbDriver "targetdb": could not open /target/var/cache/debconf/config.dat
[15:47] <bdmurray> that's the onle I was looking at
[17:16] <blueyed> What's the preferred way currently to close a list of bugs automatically?
[17:18] <charlie-tca> fixed bugs?
[17:21] <blueyed> no, I want to invalidate all bugs for a given package.
[17:21] <blueyed> but will just do so by hand, it's just a dozen.
[17:36] <bdmurray> invalidate why?
[17:43] <bdmurray> blueyed: ^
[18:55] <hggdh> pedro_, bdmurray: we have an email on moderation on busquad -- rather gross, but I think we should release -- care to weigh in?
[18:56] <hggdh> pedro_, bdmurray: (if other moderation arrives meanwhile -- it is the one from mutant_whatever
[19:08] <blueyed> bdmurray: because I also requested removal of the package (b2evolution) and it's "won't fix" (for now at least).
[19:21] <micahg> blueyed: well, unless the bugs are for sure not-SRUable, they shouldn't be closed
[19:23] <blueyed> Although it does not matter, here's the relevant list:
[19:23] <blueyed> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/b2evolution/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&f
[19:23] <blueyed> ield.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_supervisor=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&fi
[19:24] <blueyed> eld.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on
[19:24] <blueyed> haha.. :/
[19:26] <bdmurray> hggdh: I'd reject it based on language and send them an email / notice about it
[19:26] <hggdh> bdmurray: roger, will do
[19:26] <bdmurray> hggdh: thanks good luck
[19:27] <hggdh> bdmurray: heh. I am pretty sure I will invite an even coarser reply, but at least we try ;-)