[00:07] tonyyarusso: list: ldunn, Jordan_U, KB1JWQ, ocean, probably others I missed [00:08] (that's from #ubuntu and #ubuntu-offtopic ACLs) [00:08] LjL? [00:08] ldunn: already on there [00:08] ohk [00:08] ldunn: he had it because partybot, I think [00:08] or because lolubuntubotsisacorechannel [00:08] hehe [00:09] tonyyarusso: hypa7ia too [00:09] I should probably be PMing this [00:10] well if you want indication of something, I have no clue what you are talking about [00:10] Myrtti: people who aren't on the #u-r-p ACL and should be [00:11] rww: you just messed up [00:11] Myrtti: lies [00:12] also, eir in #ubuntu-release-party would be glorious, but I'm not even going to try going there. [00:18] although with a separate control channel and no ubottu integration, it could work just fine [00:19] (ps, for the love of goddess please keep ubottu out of #u-r-p this release, I just remembered that BT ended up full of crap last time and that's why I disliked it being there) [02:12] qin called the ops in #ubuntu () === ryanakca is now known as Guest66690 [05:04] Is anyone else watching #ubuntu? I've had to deal with a lot of (minor) issues recently but I'd like to leave (without leaving the channel unmonitored). [05:06] More trouble, as if on cue. [05:10] :( [05:15] kinda but not really, sorry, i'm at work [05:23] I'm paying a vague amount of attention. Kinda. [06:06] In ubottu, gr33n7007h said: why is your name ubottu [06:25] LindaLoveLace is back in #ubuntu-offtopic: 23:18 < robinetd> LindaLoveLace: Weren't you told to change your nick? 23:18 < LindaLoveLace> robinetd: yes, but it doesn't break any rules so i changed it back. [06:28] I attempted to PM, no reply yet [06:33] what's the concern? [06:34] Corey: name matches a porn star, apparently [07:16] the rules it breaks: knowing it's upsetting to people and intentionally using it out of spite. Also known as baiting. [07:17] Hi. Flannel wants his judgement reviewed. [07:17] Thanks. [07:18] We'll discuss this tomorrow when you're sober. [07:18] I am sober. [07:18] No you're not. [07:18] My last drink was three hours ago. [07:18] That doesn't make you sober. [07:18] I can walk a straight line. [07:18] * robinetd turns on webcam. [07:18] Nor does that. [07:19] What makes me sober? [07:19] Going to bed and sleeping the alcohol off. [07:19] He admitted the only reason he quieted me was to "avoid getting myself banned". Which I did nothing to warrant a ban. [07:20] So it's an unjust quiet and thus would like either an explanation or an unquiet. Or a submarine sammich. [07:21] If he didn't, I would have. I'm not a fan of drunken declarations of love. [07:21] That happens when I've not drank for weeks. [07:21] More often than now. [07:21] Ask rww. He knows. [07:21] That already happened. [07:22] Precisely. [07:22] So you'll go to bed and discuss this with us tomorrow? [07:23] So what happens if I stay up all night? [07:23] It'll be longer until we discuss it. [07:23] But that doesn't make sense. [07:23] Alcohol wears off regardless of sleep. [07:24] Yes, but I'm not speaking to you until you've been to bed. So the sooner you go to bed, the sooner this can be discussed. [07:24] robinetd: If you'd like, I can go rules lawyer on you and point out that disobeying operators is a violation of channel policy. But I'd rather you just went to bed. [07:24] rww: And where does it say that channel operators can demand that I go to sleep? [07:24] robinetd: where does it say we can't? [07:25] ... [07:25] Was that serious? [07:25] robinetd: If you disagree with an operator action, please feel free to contact an IRCC member. Inconveniently, it appears the awake one just told you to go to bed. [07:25] no point discussing things as long as heads are not clear (from toxics or lack of sleep or ) [07:26] My head is clear. [07:26] I got quieted for no reason. [07:26] * rww goes back to nethack [07:26] You got quieted for being inappropriate. [07:26] Love isn't appropriate? [07:26] That is a valid reason. [07:26] Perhaps hate is better? [07:26] !o4o [07:26] Some topics are controversial and often end in negativity. Take care on subjects like war, race, religion, politics, gender, sexuality, drugs, potentially illegal activities and suicide. The topics are not banned; stating your position is ok, but trolling, baiting, hostility or repetition are not. If you are asked to stop, do so politely. Disputes to !appeals, please adhere to !freenode Policy and the !CodeOfConduct [07:27] Hostility is verboten. [07:27] Love has nothing to do with any of those things. [07:27] robinetd: Go to bed. We can talk in the morning. [07:27] No, it does have something to do with "eww get it off me" and me not liking drunken declarations of love. [07:27] I wasn't on you. [07:28] Figuratively speaking. [07:28] Right. [07:28] If you really want to get into technicalities, I'd call it baiting. [07:28] Yes. Affectionism is baiting. [07:29] Creepy at minimum. [07:29] Creepy is stalking, not announcing that I like your company. [07:29] But if you prefer that I don't like your company, you're doing a good job of it. [07:29] robinetd: last time, please come back after a good sleep [07:30] ... [07:30] goodie [07:31] pointless arguing how others should feel and the whole stopping to small details [08:30] Derpadong says that evva is a bot [09:03] the bot is already banned and reported further [09:03] ok [11:58] interesting [13:23] It's tomorrow. [13:25] u b&? [13:26] I don't think so. [13:26] oh shame [13:26] LjL: Waiting for someone to explain to me why I got quieted last night. [13:26] flannel claimed it wasn't the "lurve" comment. Elky claims it was. Flannel wouldn't explain it last night. [13:28] Do quiets go in the ban tracker? [13:29] First he claimed it was "so I wouldn't get banned", but revoking my access to avoid getting my access revoked is not very sensible. [13:32] yes they do [13:33] LjL: Could you please pull the reason and give it to me? [13:34] robinetd: maybe if the bt didn't deny me access [13:34] Nice. [13:35] @login [13:35] Error: You are not identified [13:35] what [13:35] gives it to me as well [13:35] Blame seveas. [13:35] * Pici just got in just fine [13:35] Pici: gif reason plox [13:37] robinetd: "Temporary quiet so he'll go to bed and sleep it off before he does something he'll regret later." [13:38] He claimed it was also because I was being inappropriate. [13:38] And like I said, revoking access to avoid access revocation is incredibly stupid. [13:38] is it stupid if it's a short quiet as opposed to a long ban [13:38] I didn't do anything against the rules. [13:39] you never do anything against the rules, you're just consistently annoying ;( [13:39] ... [13:39] i say it with the best possible intentions. you should try to irritate people less :P [13:40] Yes. I'll avoid telling people I like them. Someone might take it seriously. [13:40] I don't know if you were really drunk, or just faking, but it was disrupting the channel and people were getting annoyed :/ [13:40] I missed all the schenanagins. [13:40] Pici: Nobody asked me to stop. [13:40] h00k: There were no shenanigans. I mentioned I was drunk, said I lurve elky, got +q. [13:41] Because "lurve" is totally serious business. [13:41] And stalker creepy. [13:41] meh i dunno about that [13:41] i'm speaking in general [13:41] I'm speaking in relation to last night. [13:41] well in relation to last night i'll say nothing [13:42] Why? [13:42] @login [13:42] Error: You are not identified [13:42] I see 5 mentions of robinetd go to bed in the log from the bam. [13:42] come on, ubottu. [13:42] ban [13:42] robinetd: because i have mixed feelings [13:42] h00k: just try a btlogin [13:42] @btlogin [13:42] worked. [13:42] huh. [13:42] magic [13:42] Pici: I think !stop is meant for telling me to stop. "go to bed" can be construed as a joke. [13:42] h00k: works for me too, but then it says it's unavailable to anonymous users [13:42] Apparently there are no jokes there though. [13:43] Specifically, can you tell me what I did that was disruptive? [13:45] LjL: I was actually able to click the magic linky [13:48] I don't have a place, as I wasn't there last night. [13:52] * robinetd taps microphone [13:54] robinetd: highlighting random people who aren't speaking can be seen as disruptive [13:54] LjL: Who did I highlight random people? [13:54] robinetd: i think elky [13:55] I'm going through the logs. We'll see. [13:58] what. I swear she was active. [13:58] I will be back when I figure out what happened. [14:40] This channel seems to be very serious. [14:50] * mneptok blinks [15:17] ... [17:36] pangolin called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic (Stoken was warned yesterday about this sort of language) [18:26] looks like something weird is happening on the channel. [18:26] usr13: "the channel" meaning which? [18:26] usr13: what channel? [18:27] and given that I see nothing weird, something more descriptive than "something weird" would be nice :P [18:28] ? [18:28] neat [18:28] Ok, maybe it's my PC. [18:28] usr13: what is this something weird you see? [18:28] The iPod software may have been causing irssi to look weird. [18:28] heh [18:29] fixme:something or other kept showing up on #ubuntu [18:29] It's gone now... false alarm. Sorry [18:29] no problem [20:40] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from xpress) [22:45] morning guys, could we have a link added to ubottu please? [22:46] the release party channel have posted the obscurest timezone link in history to when 11.10 will be released by, and they're giving a location most people won't know without google earth or a geography degree! [22:47] what a shame [22:47] isnt that kinda the point [22:47] popey, no [22:47] there is no stone set release time [22:47] to make people go away and think before just blurting out IS IT OUT IS IT OUT [22:47] The point is not to have people turning up in #ubuntu asking us where the flaming place is :) [22:47] !11.10 [22:47] Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) will be the fifteenth release of Ubuntu. Codename announcement here: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=646 Discussion and support in #ubuntu+1 | /join #ubuntu-release-party and wait for the announcement. [22:48] How the hell are we supposed to know? [22:48] but there's the whole thisisthecountdown thing that has a, well, countdown :P [22:48] BarkingFish: #ubuntu turns into a mad house every release anyway. [22:48] by the email the release manager sends [22:48] I just wanted the link to the wikipedia page for the place adding to ubottu, assuming not everyone is in a silly mood :) [22:48] send them to -release-party :) [22:49] -r-p is a bit of fun (stressful fun for some of us) but fun before the release [22:49] the topic, the bot and the ops all have some fun [22:49] i wouldn't take it too seriously [22:49] +1 [22:49] right, well it's obviously stressful for others too :) I'll just stay the heck out then. [22:49] -1 [22:49] aw [22:50] i was going to send him some sense of humor [22:50] but he didn't give me time to ask for his address ;( [23:25] #ubuntu-release-party http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ [23:33] and? [23:42] traditionally, I guess, it has been forbidden to post links [23:44] it's preferable to discourage it since it slows down the eventual release [23:45] if the canonical mirrors fall over, it's kinda hard to push the stuff out