[00:07] <rww> tonyyarusso: list: ldunn, Jordan_U, KB1JWQ, ocean, probably others I missed
[00:08] <rww> (that's from #ubuntu and #ubuntu-offtopic ACLs)
[00:08] <ldunn> LjL?
[00:08] <rww> ldunn: already on there
[00:08] <ldunn> ohk
[00:08] <rww> ldunn: he had it because partybot, I think
[00:08] <rww> or because lolubuntubotsisacorechannel
[00:08] <ldunn> hehe
[00:09] <rww> tonyyarusso: hypa7ia too
[00:09] <rww> I should probably be PMing this
[00:10] <Myrtti> well if you want indication of something, I have no clue what you are talking about
[00:10] <rww> Myrtti: people who aren't on the #u-r-p ACL and should be
[00:11] <Myrtti> rww: you just messed up
[00:11] <rww> Myrtti: lies
[00:12] <rww> also, eir in #ubuntu-release-party would be glorious, but I'm not even going to try going there.
[00:18] <rww> although with a separate control channel and no ubottu integration, it could work just fine
[00:19] <rww> (ps, for the love of goddess please keep ubottu out of #u-r-p this release, I just remembered that BT ended up full of crap last time and that's why I disliked it being there)
[05:04] <Jordan_U> Is anyone else watching #ubuntu? I've had to deal with a lot of (minor) issues recently but I'd like to leave (without leaving the channel unmonitored).
[05:06] <Jordan_U> More trouble, as if on cue.
[05:10] <Jordan_U> :(
[05:15] <elky> kinda but not really, sorry, i'm at work
[05:23] <rww> I'm paying a vague amount of attention. Kinda.
[06:25] <Jordan_U> LindaLoveLace is back in #ubuntu-offtopic:       23:18 < robinetd> LindaLoveLace: Weren't you told to change your nick?      23:18 < LindaLoveLace> robinetd: yes, but it doesn't break any rules so i changed it back.
[06:28] <jussi> I attempted to PM, no reply yet
[06:33] <Corey> what's the concern?
[06:34] <rww> Corey: name matches a porn star, apparently
[07:16] <elky> the rules it breaks: knowing it's upsetting to people and intentionally using it out of spite. Also known as baiting.
[07:17] <robinetd> Hi. Flannel wants his judgement reviewed.
[07:17] <robinetd> Thanks.
[07:18] <elky> We'll discuss this tomorrow when you're sober.
[07:18] <robinetd> I am sober.
[07:18] <elky> No you're not.
[07:18] <robinetd> My last drink was three hours ago.
[07:18] <elky> That doesn't make you sober.
[07:18] <robinetd> I can walk a straight line.
[07:18]  * robinetd turns on webcam.
[07:18] <elky> Nor does that.
[07:19] <robinetd> What makes me sober?
[07:19] <elky> Going to bed and sleeping the alcohol off.
[07:19] <robinetd> He admitted the only reason he quieted me was to "avoid getting myself banned". Which I did nothing to warrant a ban.
[07:20] <robinetd> So it's an unjust quiet and thus would like either an explanation or an unquiet. Or a submarine sammich.
[07:21] <elky> If he didn't, I would have. I'm not a fan of drunken declarations of love.
[07:21] <robinetd> That happens when I've not drank for weeks.
[07:21] <robinetd> More often than now.
[07:21] <robinetd> Ask rww. He knows.
[07:21] <elky> That already happened.
[07:22] <robinetd> Precisely.
[07:22] <elky> So you'll go to bed and discuss this with us tomorrow?
[07:23] <robinetd> So what happens if I stay up all night?
[07:23] <elky> It'll be longer until we discuss it.
[07:23] <robinetd> But that doesn't make sense.
[07:23] <robinetd> Alcohol wears off regardless of sleep.
[07:24] <elky> Yes, but I'm not speaking to you until you've been to bed. So the sooner you go to bed, the sooner this can be discussed.
[07:24] <rww> robinetd: If you'd like, I can go rules lawyer on you and point out that disobeying operators is a violation of channel policy. But I'd rather you just went to bed.
[07:24] <robinetd> rww: And where does it say that channel operators can demand that I go to sleep?
[07:24] <rww> robinetd: where does it say we can't?
[07:25] <robinetd> ...
[07:25] <robinetd> Was that serious?
[07:25] <rww> robinetd: If you disagree with an operator action, please feel free to contact an IRCC member. Inconveniently, it appears the awake one just told you to go to bed.
[07:25] <Tm_T> no point discussing things as long as heads are not clear (from toxics or lack of sleep or <fill in>)
[07:26] <robinetd> My head is clear.
[07:26] <robinetd> I got quieted for no reason.
[07:26]  * rww goes back to nethack
[07:26] <elky> You got quieted for being inappropriate.
[07:26] <robinetd> Love isn't appropriate?
[07:26] <elky> That is a valid reason.
[07:26] <robinetd> Perhaps hate is better?
[07:26] <elky> !o4o
[07:27] <elky> Hostility is verboten.
[07:27] <robinetd> Love has nothing to do with any of those things.
[07:27] <Flannel> robinetd: Go to bed.  We can talk in the morning.
[07:27] <elky> No, it does have something to do with "eww get it off me" and me not liking drunken declarations of love.
[07:27] <robinetd> I wasn't on you.
[07:28] <elky> Figuratively speaking.
[07:28] <robinetd> Right.
[07:28] <elky> If you really want to get into technicalities, I'd call it baiting.
[07:28] <robinetd> Yes. Affectionism is baiting.
[07:29] <elky> Creepy at minimum.
[07:29] <robinetd> Creepy is stalking, not announcing that I like your company.
[07:29] <robinetd> But if you prefer that I don't like your company, you're doing a good job of it.
[07:29] <Tm_T> robinetd: last time, please come back after a good sleep
[07:30] <robinetd> ...
[07:30] <Tm_T> goodie
[07:31] <Tm_T> pointless arguing how others should feel and the whole stopping to small details
[08:30] <usr13> Derpadong says that evva is a bot
[09:03] <Myrtti> the bot is already banned and reported further
[09:03] <frewo64> ok
[11:58] <Myrtti> interesting
[13:23] <robinetd> It's tomorrow.
[13:25] <LjL> u b&?
[13:26] <robinetd> I don't think so.
[13:26] <LjL> oh shame
[13:26] <robinetd> LjL: Waiting for someone to explain to me why I got quieted last night.
[13:26] <robinetd> flannel claimed it wasn't the "lurve" comment. Elky claims it was. Flannel wouldn't explain it last night.
[13:28] <robinetd> Do quiets go in the ban tracker?
[13:29] <robinetd> First he claimed it was "so I wouldn't get banned", but revoking my access to avoid getting my access revoked is not very sensible.
[13:32] <LjL> yes they do
[13:33] <robinetd> LjL: Could you please pull the reason and give it to me?
[13:34] <LjL> robinetd: maybe if the bt didn't deny me access
[13:34] <robinetd> Nice.
[13:35] <h00k> @login
[13:35] <h00k> what
[13:35] <LjL> gives it to me as well
[13:35] <robinetd> Blame seveas.
[13:35]  * Pici just got in just fine
[13:35] <robinetd> Pici: gif reason plox
[13:37] <Pici> robinetd: "Temporary quiet so he'll go to bed and sleep it off before he does something he'll regret later."
[13:38] <robinetd> He claimed it was also because I was being inappropriate.
[13:38] <robinetd> And like I said, revoking access to avoid access revocation is incredibly stupid.
[13:38] <LjL> is it stupid if it's a short quiet as opposed to a long ban
[13:38] <robinetd> I didn't do anything against the rules.
[13:39] <LjL> you never do anything against the rules, you're just consistently annoying ;(
[13:39] <robinetd> ...
[13:39] <LjL> i say it with the best possible intentions. you should try to irritate people less :P
[13:40] <robinetd> Yes. I'll avoid telling people I like them. Someone might take it seriously.
[13:40] <Pici> I don't know if you were really drunk, or just faking, but it was disrupting the channel and people were getting annoyed :/
[13:40] <h00k> I missed all the schenanagins.
[13:40] <robinetd> Pici: Nobody asked me to stop.
[13:40] <robinetd> h00k: There were no shenanigans. I mentioned I was drunk, said I lurve elky, got +q.
[13:41] <robinetd> Because "lurve" is totally serious business.
[13:41] <robinetd> And stalker creepy.
[13:41] <LjL> meh i dunno about that
[13:41] <LjL> i'm speaking in general
[13:41] <robinetd> I'm speaking in relation to last night.
[13:41] <LjL> well in relation to last night i'll say nothing
[13:42] <robinetd> Why?
[13:42] <h00k> @login
[13:42] <Pici> I see 5 mentions of robinetd go to bed in the log from the bam.
[13:42] <h00k> come on, ubottu.
[13:42] <Pici> ban
[13:42] <LjL> robinetd: because i have mixed feelings
[13:42] <Pici> h00k: just try a btlogin
[13:42] <h00k> @btlogin
[13:42] <h00k> worked.
[13:42] <h00k> huh.
[13:42] <Pici> magic
[13:42] <robinetd> Pici: I think !stop is meant for telling me to stop. "go to bed" can be construed as a joke.
[13:42] <LjL> h00k: works for me too, but then it says it's unavailable to anonymous users
[13:42] <robinetd> Apparently there are no jokes there though.
[13:43] <robinetd> Specifically, can you tell me what I did that was disruptive?
[13:45] <h00k> LjL: I was actually able to click the magic linky
[13:48] <h00k> I don't have a place, as I wasn't there last night.
[13:52]  * robinetd taps microphone
[13:54] <LjL> robinetd: highlighting random people who aren't speaking can be seen as disruptive
[13:54] <robinetd> LjL: Who did I highlight random people?
[13:54] <LjL> robinetd: i think elky
[13:55] <robinetd> I'm going through the logs. We'll see.
[13:58] <robinetd> what. I swear she was active.
[13:58] <robinetd> I will be back when I figure out what happened.
[14:40] <Neutrinoo> This channel seems to be very serious.
[14:50]  * mneptok blinks
[15:17] <h00k> ...
[18:26] <usr13> looks like something weird is happening  on the channel.
[18:26] <rww> usr13: "the channel" meaning which?
[18:26] <h00k> usr13: what channel?
[18:27] <rww> and given that I see nothing weird, something more descriptive than "something weird" would be nice :P
[18:28] <oCean> ?
[18:28] <charlie-tca> neat
[18:28] <usr13> Ok, maybe it's my PC.
[18:28] <pangolin> usr13: what is this something weird you see?
[18:28] <usr13> The iPod software may have been causing irssi to look weird.
[18:28] <pangolin> heh
[18:29] <usr13> fixme:something or other kept showing up on #ubuntu
[18:29] <usr13> It's gone now... false alarm.  Sorry
[18:29] <pangolin> no problem
[22:45] <BarkingFish> morning guys, could we have a link added to ubottu please?
[22:46] <BarkingFish> the release party channel have posted the obscurest timezone link in history to when 11.10 will be released by, and they're giving a location most people won't know without google earth or a geography degree!
[22:47] <LjL> what a shame
[22:47] <popey> isnt that kinda the point
[22:47] <BarkingFish> popey, no
[22:47] <Myrtti> there is no stone set release time
[22:47] <popey> to make people go away and think before just blurting out IS IT OUT IS IT OUT
[22:47] <BarkingFish> The point is not to have people turning up in #ubuntu asking us where the flaming place is :)
[22:47] <pangolin> !11.10
[22:48] <BarkingFish> How the hell are we supposed to know?
[22:48] <marienz> but there's the whole thisisthecountdown thing that has a, well, countdown :P
[22:48] <pangolin> BarkingFish: #ubuntu turns into a mad house every release anyway.
[22:48] <Myrtti> by the email the release manager sends
[22:48] <BarkingFish> I just wanted the link to the wikipedia page for the place adding to ubottu, assuming not everyone is in a silly mood :)
[22:48] <pangolin> send them to -release-party :)
[22:49] <popey> -r-p is a bit of fun (stressful fun for some of us) but fun before the release
[22:49] <popey> the topic, the bot and the ops all have some fun
[22:49] <popey> i wouldn't take it too seriously
[22:49] <pangolin> +1
[22:49] <BarkingFish> right, well it's obviously stressful for others too :)  I'll just stay the heck out then.
[22:49] <BarkingFish> -1
[22:49] <LjL> aw
[22:50] <LjL> i was going to send him some sense of humor
[22:50] <LjL> but he didn't give me time to ask for his address ;(
[23:25] <gry> #ubuntu-release-party <JamesMc> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[23:33] <rww> and?
[23:42] <Myrtti> traditionally, I guess, it has been forbidden to post links
[23:44] <elky> it's preferable to discourage it since it slows down the eventual release
[23:45] <elky> if the canonical mirrors fall over, it's kinda hard to push the stuff out