| cwillu | and I specifically don't see what unityshell is doing that changes the behaviour of move | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| cwillu | (et al) | 00:00 |
| cwillu | Trevinho, a quick test has revealed that lazy positioning is being defeated by a new'ish lock in move.cpp with a big fixme saying "It MUST be removed after 0.9.6 when we can [...] do lazy positioning correctly!" | 01:27 |
| cwillu | (added a printf to both sides of the branch that handles the individual move events, and every time compiz is hung, there's a slew of non-lazy) | 01:28 |
| * cwillu will try reverting https://code.launchpad.net/~compiz-team/compiz-core/compiz-core.fix_860304/+merge/77156 locally tomorrow | 01:36 | |
| Trevinho | cwillu: good testing... | 02:14 |
| didrocks | good morning | 06:12 |
| cwillu | Well, a quick hack to ignore the lock hasn't blown anything up yet; I'm sure it'll reintroduce a bunch of Fix Released bugs though | 06:14 |
| oSoMoN | good morning | 07:01 |
| === rodrigo__ is now known as rodrigo_ | ||
| cousin_luigi | Cimi__: hello | 07:36 |
| cousin_luigi | Cimi__: Someone on #ubuntu-devel suggested to tell you about a small problem with gnome-session-fallback, namely the need to remove appmenu-gtk and appmenu-gtk3 to solve this http://i.imgur.com/SWwLI.jpg . | 07:37 |
| cousin_luigi | bbl | 07:39 |
| === rodrigo__ is now known as rodrigo_ | ||
| === Cimi__ is now known as Cimi | ||
| davidcalle | Hi kamstrup, anything I can do to help pushing the pygobject SRU? :) | 09:48 |
| Andy80 | I'm giving Gnome 3.2 a try... there are things that we should just copy, that's it :\ | 10:22 |
| Andy80 | and of course other things I don't like of it | 10:23 |
| === API is now known as Guest28476 | ||
| === Guest28476 is now known as apinheiro | ||
| kamstrup | davidcalle: you can poke tomeu or j5 on #python on GIMPNet to review the patch, or punk pitti into puttin up a test ppa or something... | 10:55 |
| mardy | Saviq: hi, I'm still working on the spread keyboard navigation, and I found another problem: https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-21999 | 10:58 |
| Saviq | mardy: looks related to my "missing label" experience | 10:59 |
| mardy | Saviq: it affects us, because when a workspace is zoomed in, if it has just two windows and you press "down", the focus is lost to another workspace which is not currently visible | 10:59 |
| mardy | Saviq: and it seems that I cannot workaround it (at least, so far I could come up with a decent solution) | 11:00 |
| Saviq | +not | 11:00 |
| mardy | Saviq: so I thought of this simple "solution": | 11:00 |
| mardy | Saviq: when the zoomed workspaces looses focus, it unzooms | 11:01 |
| mardy | Saviq: another solution would be to zoom to the workspace which got the focus, but I'm afraid it will be more confusing | 11:02 |
| Saviq | first one's better, IMO, but we need to prevent navigating to an empty workspace, /methinks | 11:02 |
| Saviq | or somehow indicate which workspace has focus | 11:03 |
| mardy | Saviq: I think that that will not happen, but I'll double check | 11:03 |
| Saviq | mardy: it does happen now, if you go down from the last window in a workspace | 11:03 |
| Saviq | the label is gone | 11:03 |
| Saviq | and focus looks lost | 11:03 |
| Saviq | mardy: hrm... ok now I think I get it... you don't want to move away from current workspace at all | 11:05 |
| Saviq | not with navigation keys, at least | 11:05 |
| Saviq | Tab / Shift+Tab, then? | 11:05 |
| Saviq | for me the most intuitive experience would be to treat all of the windows together as ~ one grid | 11:06 |
| Saviq | and Tab / Shift+Tab on top of that to move between the workspaces | 11:06 |
| mardy | Saviq: in my branch, the focus is never lost if the current workspace has more than 3 windows (because it has at least two columns, and two rows) | 11:06 |
| Saviq | yup, got it | 11:07 |
| Saviq | that's what you filed as the bg | 11:07 |
| mardy | Saviq: in other cases, it can get lost, but I don't know how to prevent this | 11:07 |
| mardy | Saviq: so I'm thinking of what the best way to deal with this situation is | 11:07 |
| Saviq | mardy: first thing, IMO - indicating currently focused workspace | 11:08 |
| Saviq | with some glow, or dimming the other ones | 11:08 |
| mardy | Saviq: that's indicated by the label, already | 11:08 |
| Saviq | only if there's a window in that wspace | 11:08 |
| mardy | Saviq: oh, right | 11:08 |
| Saviq | also, it seems now that if there are no windows in a workspace, you still need to click twice to get to it | 11:09 |
| Saviq | I don't particularly like the two-clicks to get to a window, myself | 11:09 |
| Saviq | I'd rather have a single click take me to my window directly, but that, I assume, is design decision | 11:10 |
| Saviq | mardy: in your Test.qml, you could have another empty cell in the "big" grid | 11:11 |
| Saviq | to see that the focus gets there | 11:12 |
| Saviq | and yeah, actually preventing from going to an empty wspace would be wrong | 11:12 |
| Saviq | you couldn't access it at all without a mouse | 11:12 |
| Saviq | u3d has an orange glow around current wspace | 11:12 |
| Saviq | and empty ones are desaturated | 11:14 |
| Saviq | mardy_: I'll paste in PM | 11:16 |
| Saviq | mardy_: tbh I'd disable keyNavigationWraps on both grids, looks more intuitive to me | 11:22 |
| Saviq | or at least in the inner ones | 11:22 |
| Saviq | with some complicated hackery on pressed keys with we could probably have a single-grid-like experience | 11:25 |
| davidcalle | kamstrup, thanks | 12:15 |
| === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
| apinheiro | njpatel, this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/843280 | 14:05 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 843280 in unity (Ubuntu) "unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()" [High,Fix committed] | 14:05 |
| apinheiro | is marked as SRU0 | 14:05 |
| njpatel | yep | 14:05 |
| apinheiro | but although I merged it last week, AFAIS, it is not included on unity/4.0 | 14:05 |
| njpatel | really? | 14:05 |
| njpatel | damn | 14:05 |
| njpatel | didrocks, ^ | 14:05 |
| njpatel | distropatch? | 14:05 |
| apinheiro | njpatel, ok, I will look debian/patches | 14:06 |
| njpatel | apinheiro, can you please merge it into lp:unity/4.0 now? | 14:06 |
| apinheiro | should I wait first for didrocks? | 14:07 |
| didrocks | njpatel: apinheiro: sure merge | 14:08 |
| apinheiro | njpatel, ^ | 14:08 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, ok | 14:08 |
| didrocks | njpatel: I'll pick with the unity-panel-service patch | 14:08 |
| njpatel | thanks | 14:09 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, so, in the end, should I merge this on lp:unity/4.0 or not? | 14:10 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: yes please, in lp:unity and unity/4.0 | 14:10 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, it is already merged on lp:unity | 14:15 |
| apinheiro | so this is the reason I was asking about what to do with /4.0 ;) | 14:15 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: yeah, merge into it please | 14:17 |
| apinheiro | njpatel, didrocks well, it seems that it is already merged | 14:18 |
| apinheiro | I was just looking to the log, and I didn't find | 14:18 |
| apinheiro | that commit | 14:18 |
| apinheiro | sorry for the noise | 14:18 |
| njpatel | apinheiro, ah, okay | 14:19 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: great, it needs a test case then | 14:20 |
| didrocks | njpatel: ^ | 14:20 |
| didrocks | steps to reproduce for the SRU | 14:20 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, a test case to reproduce the bug? | 14:21 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: yeah, like 1. enable a11y, 2… | 14:21 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: people needs to confirm it's fixed in the SRU bug | 14:21 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, hmm, it seems complex, as it was a race condition | 14:23 |
| apinheiro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/843280/comments/7 | 14:23 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 843280 in unity (Ubuntu) "unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()" [High,Fix committed] | 14:23 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: ok, at least, ask to ensure that after xxx run, there is no more crash | 14:24 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: edit the description to state that | 14:24 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, btw, should I change the status from Fix Committed to Fix Released? | 14:25 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: not yet, we didn't change the upstream status as 4.24 is buggy | 14:25 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, ok | 14:26 |
| apinheiro | so I should change the description from "unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()" to something like "unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() solved on 4.24"? | 14:26 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, ^ | 14:26 |
| didrocks | apinheiro: not needed, just change the description (not bug title, the description which is the first comment) to "should be fixed in 4.24, ensure you don't get any crash after 5 sesssion restarts" for instance | 14:28 |
| apinheiro | didrocks, ok | 14:29 |
| didrocks | thanks :) | 14:31 |
| apinheiro | njpatel, btw, as now the master is for 5.0 | 14:31 |
| apinheiro | can I start to make the merge proposals for those huge a11y branches? | 14:31 |
| apinheiro | or should I wait | 14:32 |
| apinheiro | until things get lets in a rush for finalizing 4.24? | 14:32 |
| apinheiro | s/lets/less | 14:32 |
| njpatel | apinheiro, right | 14:33 |
| njpatel | yes, you can make proposals for lp:unity | 14:33 |
| pippo | can i kill who have invented unity user interface please?? | 14:35 |
| pippo | i hati it | 14:35 |
| pippo | *hate | 14:35 |
| apinheiro | njpatel, ok, thanks | 14:36 |
| greyback | Saviq: have you Unity3d handy? Can you check if Alt+F1 remembers state there? As in, Alt+F1, press down a few times, Escape, press Alt+F1 again. What is highlighted? | 14:38 |
| Saviq | greyback: alt+f1 doesn't work in u3d | 14:38 |
| Saviq | greyback: but I agree, it should reset to the dash icon | 14:38 |
| greyback | Saviq: Me too. Just wanted to check. Thanks. Merge req on its way | 14:38 |
| Saviq | greyback: I'll review your launcher fixes tomorrow, have no head for it at that point of the day and don't want to mess it up | 15:02 |
| greyback | Saviq: no problem. It took me a long time to get it working nicely (IMO anyway). | 15:02 |
| nerochiaro | does anyone know if the items returned by bamf_matcher_get_running_applications are ordered in any specific way ? | 15:10 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga-afk | ||
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| === mardy_ is now known as mardy | ||
| === seif is now known as mhr2 | ||
| === mhr2 is now known as mhr4 | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === mhr4 is now known as seif | ||
| === bregma is now known as bregma|afk | ||
| === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | ||
| jderose | congrats everyone on a beautiful 11.10 release! really fantastic work :-D | 21:57 |
| === bregma|afk is now known as bregma | ||
| Andy80 | Trevinho: ping! | 22:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
