[06:59] <agateau> hi
[07:00] <agateau> it seems a user account got compromised and is now used to spam bugs, what can I do to get this fixed?
[07:02] <geser> agateau: file a question and a LP admin will deal with it (block the account and remove the spam)
[07:04] <geser> I don't know how urgent this is / how massive the spam is but you could try to reach the help contact (currently jtv-eat) to speed things up if needed
[07:06] <agateau> geser: not massive yet, it's quite odd
[07:06] <agateau> geser: thanks I am going to file a question
[07:34] <jtv> Hi agateau, geser; I'm back.
[07:37] <agateau> hi jtv, I filed a question here: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/174110 . The spam is not massive, I suspect the user got his email account compromised.
[07:37] <jtv> agateau: thanks.  It could also be an XSS attack, I guess (though I haven't read the question yet).
[07:40] <jtv> agateau: I hid the comments.  Did I miss any?
[07:41] <agateau> jtv: I don't think so
[07:41] <agateau> jtv: haven't found other spammed bugs for onw
[07:41] <agateau> *now
[07:42] <jtv> Thanks.  It's actually quite useful to get these quick warnings, because we don't want search engines to index it.
[07:55] <mrevell> Hallo
[08:21]  * czajkowski ticlkles mrevell 
[08:23] <mrevell> czajkowski, Crumbs. Hello.
[08:25] <czajkowski> mrevell: sort your sim card option out ?
[08:26] <mrevell> czajkowski, The baconator gave me a suggestion of a PAYG phone from Best Buy. I'll check if there's one near the hotel.
[08:27] <czajkowski> cool
[08:28] <czajkowski> mrevell: or ask mhall119 if you can have it delievered to him before hand it lives in florida and will be at uds
[08:28] <mrevell> Ah superb, thanks for the suggestion.
[08:30] <czajkowski> np
[08:30] <czajkowski> mrevell: he's one of your lot anyways :)
[09:22] <aquarius> I'm setting up a new LP project; the code is already in LP in a +junk branch. What's the best way to get that code into the new project as its main branch? I planned to import the junk branch, btu https://launchpad.net/$project/trunk/+setbranch doesn't let me use lp: URLs in the bzr "import a branch hosted somewhere else" section. Am I doing things wrong?
[09:23] <poolie> hi aquarius
[09:23] <aquarius> heya poolie :)
[09:23] <poolie> just push from your branch to the new branch of the project
[09:24] <aquarius> so i shoudl "Create a new, empty branch in Launchpad and link to this series" and then push to that branch/
[09:24] <aquarius> ?
[09:24] <aquarius> or do I not need to create the new empty branch at all?
[09:24] <aquarius> this stuff always confuses me :(
[09:24] <poolie> you don't need to create it, just push
[09:24] <aquarius> ok
[09:25] <poolie> you might like to consider first making a team for the project
[09:25] <poolie> then eg push lp:~fooproject-dev/fooproject/trunk
[09:26] <aquarius> aha, I just did "bzr push lp:fooproject" and it worked. nice.
[09:40] <lifeless> I'm more than a little amazed
[09:41] <lifeless> aquarius: what is fooproject called ?
[09:43] <wgrant> The default ownership is probably not entirely sensible, but that's easily changed later.
[09:45] <aquarius> lifeless, youoneteeoh
[09:46] <aquarius> I wish there was an easy way to turn a junk branch into a project
[09:46] <aquarius> he says, having no intention of writing such a way :)
[09:46] <nigelb> that was talked about at some point
[09:47] <nigelb> I don't know what came of it though
[09:55] <lifeless> aquarius: literally ?
[09:56] <lifeless> indeed
[09:56] <lifeless> ah, ~sil
[09:56] <aquarius> lifeless, literally, yep
[09:56] <lifeless> right, thats what we need to fix
[09:56] <aquarius> so, hm. Did I screw this up, then?
[09:56] <lifeless> no, not at all
[09:56] <aquarius> I am always wildly confused when I set up a new project :(
[09:56] <lifeless> just mrevell and I were talking about this the other day
[09:56] <hrw> hi
[09:57] <hrw> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/82653090/buildlog.txt.gz - 'bzr: out of memory' - any ideas?
[09:59] <jtv> lifeless: you know bzr stuff, right?
[10:00] <jtv> lifeless: got to be an insane time for you though—I guess jelmer's the one to approach?
[10:01] <lifeless> jtv: 11pm, and cythnia had her immunisations today
[10:01] <jtv> Insane time.
[10:01] <lifeless> so am a little scatterbrained
[10:01] <jtv> May also be a good idea to ask lamont for ideas.
[10:02] <jtv> It's a gcc build, so I guess there's the possibility that we simply need more memory…
[10:02] <rvba> jtv: maybe it's related to https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/173422
[10:03] <lifeless> there is an open bug about out of memory in recipes
[10:03] <rvba> lifeless: yep, that's the one :)
[10:04] <hrw> repo has ~600MB size
[10:04] <jtv> Thanks rvba!
[10:04] <jtv> hrw: that means that you could try resubmitting for now.
[10:04] <hrw> https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-pkg/+archive/testing-daily-builds/+recipebuild/97644 resubmitted
[10:08] <hrw> Retrieving 'lp:~hrw/+junk/gcc-linaro' to put at '/home/buildd/build-3b95eb05bfd886751bad0840dcf048fcbe055079/chroot-autobuild/home/buildd/work/tree/recipe-{debupstream}-{revno:gcc}-{revno}'.
[10:08] <hrw> cool
[10:08] <hrw> now 1h for bzr checkout
[10:10] <hrw> bzr: out of memory again
[10:35] <jtv> hrw: I'd suggest keeping an eye on that question rvba posted earlier.
[10:38] <hrw> ok
[10:38] <hrw> I love 'In the meantime, could you please try resubmit it as you may end up getting one of the builders that isn't so resource constrained.' suggestion ;D
[10:39] <hrw> I thought that builders are VMs so more or less same
[10:49] <jtv> hrw: maybe some of the VMs have more VM.  :)
[10:58] <hrw> yay! built source
[11:05] <jtv> hrw: that's the big hurdle I believe… now let's just hope more builders get more memory.
[11:05] <hrw> too bad that I have two such dailies
[11:39] <hrw> "You have exceeded today's quota for ubuntu oneiric."
[11:40] <hrw> 5 builds which failed due to out of memory
[11:40] <hrw> ;(
[12:25] <hrw> good that natty also exists - another 5 attemps possible
[12:25] <hrw> ~curse bzr again
[14:24] <idnar> huh what
[14:25] <idnar> Launchpad just sent me an email: "Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: generating the diff for a merge proposal.  It was logged with id OOPS-2112MPJ7.  Sorry for the inconvenience."
[14:25] <nigelb> idnar: There's a fix underway :)
[14:26] <idnar> nigelb: great! it might be more helpful if emails like that mentioned what merge proposal experienced the problem, though
[14:27] <nigelb> idnar: I'm smiling because that was either part of the merge or the bug that was beeeing fixed.
[14:27] <nigelb> The exact words
[14:28] <idnar> ah
[14:57] <lamalex> hi launchpad, i'm trying to do some series/branch organization but i've sort of gotten myself into a jam. could someone help me sort things out? I wanted to make my /trunk my new series but i can't figure out how to get trunk off of the old series. I also may just be doing things entirely wrong
[15:03] <bigjools> lamalex: I am sure allenap can help you
[15:04] <allenap> lamalex: Sure. Point me at your project and I'll take a look.
[15:05] <lamalex> launchpad.net/unity-lens-music
[15:09] <lamalex> allenap, ^
[15:15] <sinzui> lamalex, are you saying you want to delete trunk or that you just do not want to see it?
[15:16] <lamalex> sinzui, neither
[15:16] <lamalex> i want trunk to be a synonym for my development focus series
[15:16] <sinzui> oh
[15:16] <lamalex> so if development is on 0.3 series, trunk and 0.3 should be the same
[15:17] <sinzui> lamalex, Visit https://launchpad.net/unity-lens-music/trunk
[15:17] <sinzui> Choose the yellow edit icon next to is not the focus of development.
[15:17] <sinzui> that actually takes you to the project's edit page
[15:18] <sinzui> Select the series that is the focus of development
[15:18] <sinzui> The field is before the big license section
[15:20] <sinzui> lamalex, Lp does not support synonyms Trunk and 0.3 are separate series. lp:unity-lens-music is mapped to the series set as the focus of development.
[15:21] <lamalex> sinzui, but 0.2 was both 0.2 and trunk
[15:21] <lamalex> https://code.launchpad.net/unity-lens-music
[15:21] <lamalex> see? i want trunk to move to 0.3
[15:22] <sinzui> lamalex, I do not know what you mean then. are you talking about the branches that the series represent
[15:22] <sinzui> series are a planning device. branches are real you assign branches to series to state what is really being planed
[15:25] <sinzui> Maybe you want to visit https://launchpad.net/unity-lens-music/trunk and choose the edit icon next to the branch to unassign trunk. then visit https://launchpad.net/unity-lens-music/0.3, choose the edit icon next to trunk and set the value to ~unity-team/unity-lens-music/trunk
[15:25] <lamalex> sinzui, well is it then possible to just delete the trunk series?
[15:26] <sinzui> Yes, that will unlink the branch, delete the milestone and released on the series, and untartarget bugs
[15:26] <sinzui> oh, lamalex you cannot because trunk is linked to packages in distros
[15:26] <sinzui> This looks like a mess
[15:26] <lamalex> ah yah, i wanted to fix that
[15:26] <lamalex> indeed, it is
[15:27] <sinzui> You will need to up ubuntu/unity-music-lens to know which series those packages came from before you can delete
[15:28] <sinzui> You will probably need to do that if you are moving branches between series anyway
[15:41] <lamalex> sinzui, i figured it out, i just needed to point the trunk series at the same branch as 0.3, now everything is great
[15:42] <sinzui> lamalex, you did not have to remove that same branch from the trunk series?
[15:42]  * sinzui thought series could not share branches
[15:43] <lamalex> it would seem that they can
[15:43] <lamalex> 0.3 series and trunk series are both pointing to ~unity-team/unity-lens-music/0.3
[17:45] <thopiekar> hi
[17:46] <thopiekar> is there any way to enable armel builds for a ppa? I'm interested in building armel in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cordia-team/+archive/daily
[20:56] <james_w> does anyone know why a copy decided to build https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/tools/+packages for ia64 and sparc?
[20:56] <james_w> and is there anyway to stop it so that I can carry on with what I was doing?
[20:58] <maxb> If it was copied oneiric->lucid, it would build on architectures enabled in the PPA which have been disabled at some point between lucid and oneiric
[20:58] <maxb> I think ia64 and sparc support was dropped in that timeframe?
[20:58] <james_w> aha, that sounds right
[20:58] <james_w> thanks
[20:59] <james_w> still annoying though, as I have to wait for them to finish before I can do other copies