| GrueMaster | Oh, joy. Double my fun. | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | infinity, cjwatson: armhf all done. Just needs a manage-chroot/add-missing-builds when you're ready for builds. And might need some IS pokage to get it onto ports.u.c, I suppose. | 01:28 |
| cody-somerville | lol. If I click 'Ask me later' on the 'Ubuntu 11.10 Upgrade Available' popup, nothing happens. | 05:50 |
| infinity | wgrant: \o/ | 08:03 |
| wgrant | infinity: Have fun with NEW... | 08:09 |
| wgrant | Although I guess you might have old scripts for that. | 08:09 |
| infinity | wgrant: Oh ugh. Did it drop all those arch_all copies into new? | 08:14 |
| wgrant | infinity: No, but all the armhf binaries will. | 08:14 |
| wgrant | Once we start building them. | 08:14 |
| infinity | They... Shouldn't? | 08:14 |
| infinity | I don't recall that happening with armel or lpia. | 08:15 |
| infinity | Though it's been a while. | 08:15 |
| wgrant | Oh, indeed, it falls back to other archs. | 08:16 |
| wgrant | Forgot that bit. | 08:16 |
| wgrant | I see you have quite the army of arm* builders now. | 08:17 |
| infinity | Sort of, though we plan to get rid of all the babbages, so the current list is only temporarily exciting. | 08:17 |
| wgrant | Bah. | 08:19 |
| wgrant | Will be interesting to see how quickly the flock of pandas gets through the archive, anyway. | 08:19 |
| infinity | We'll need more of them. | 08:20 |
| infinity | And we're working on that. | 08:20 |
| infinity | But it might not be too awful. | 08:20 |
| infinity | I hope. :P | 08:20 |
| wgrant | At least we're starting early this time :) | 08:21 |
| infinity | Ish. I seem to be taking vacation at a rather inconvenient time, but I hope to be babysitting builds be the end of next week. | 08:22 |
| infinity | s/be the/by the/ | 08:22 |
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| jdstrand | skaet: hi! | 14:38 |
| jdstrand | skaet: I was asked to talk to you about bug #314432 | 14:39 |
| skaet | hiya jdstrand! :) | 14:39 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 314432 in launchpad "It's impossible to see all the bugs that affect a BugTarget if some bugs are targeted to one or more series and the Master task is closed (affects: 4) (dups: 4) (heat: 60)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/314432 | 14:39 |
| skaet | jstrand, classic. | 14:39 |
| jdstrand | skaet: this is a real problem for my team, and I imagine it would be for you. do you think we can up that to Critical as flacoste mentioned in comment #18 this morning? | 14:39 |
| * skaet looking | 14:40 | |
| jdstrand | I also wonder why I am not allowed to escalate it | 14:40 |
| infinity | Only certain LP people can escalate LP bugs. | 14:43 |
| skaet | jdstrand, as a way of dealing with the backlog, they are taking that input from the representative stakeholders that's all. | 14:43 |
| jdstrand | sure, but this is getting on 4 years | 14:44 |
| jdstrand | slipping is one thing, but we are missing stuff (still) because of it | 14:45 |
| skaet | jdstrand, yup | 14:45 |
| skaet | its on the list now, there are some other things there too. archive skew, and rebuild are there as well. | 14:46 |
| jdstrand | skaet: ok, as my representative stakeholder, this is probably the most important bug the security team has | 14:47 |
| jdstrand | skaet: thanks | 14:47 |
| skaet | jdstrand. gotcha. :) | 14:47 |
| skaet | thanks. | 14:47 |
| jdstrand | skaet: would you mind commenting in the bug in whatever way is appropriate as my representative? :) | 14:48 |
| skaet | yup, doing it now. ;) | 14:48 |
| jdstrand | \o/ | 14:48 |
| jdstrand | skaet: actually, you may want to look at bug #874250. this was discovered today and adversely affects our kernel cadence | 15:00 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 874250 in launchpad "Nominations stop working when bugs have large number of projects (affects: 1) (heat: 12)" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874250 | 15:00 |
| jdstrand | skaet: what this means is we have to skip these bugs entirely when doing our workflow. so, precise for example currently cannot be tracked | 15:01 |
| jdstrand | skaet: I guess I should revise my comment and say "these are the two most important bugs the security team has" :) | 15:02 |
| jdstrand | (cannot be tracked in those bugs where this LP bug bites) | 15:03 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| skaet | jdstrand, which of thw two is hightest priority? | 15:04 |
| jdstrand | skaet: it would have to be kernel workflow at this point | 15:05 |
| jdstrand | skaet: but I worry that it will go to Critical and the other stay at High and the other won't be fixed for another 4 years | 15:05 |
| jdstrand | do I sound jaded? | 15:05 |
| skaet | jdstrand, understandably. :/ Anyhow, I'll reflect the order in my request in. | 15:06 |
| jdstrand | skaet: k, sorry for not remembering the kernel workflow bug | 15:06 |
| skaet | no worries. :) This is the problem the launchpad team has in spades, hence the desire we prioritize amongst each of the stakeholder viewpoints a bit. | 15:07 |
| jdstrand | skaet: well, while the old one affects more teams, the 2nd one is more strategic and there is no workaround | 15:08 |
| * skaet nods | 15:08 | |
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| * Laney promotes 648611 too | 16:21 | |
| === Laney is now known as Guest30511 | ||
| === Guest30511 is now known as Laney | ||
| === jdstrand is now known as jdstr | ||
| === jdstr is now known as jdstrand | ||
| === med_out is now known as medbrry | ||
| === medbrry is now known as medberry | ||
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!