| mdlueck | I logged it under grub2 for now. fin | 00:12 |
|---|---|---|
| mdlueck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 | 00:13 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 874698 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 00:13 |
| MoLE_ | sorry to repeat myself, but is there any bug squad member available to look at triaging bug 715438? | 01:46 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 715438 in linux (Ubuntu) "hermes-I wireless interface will not associate with open access point (affects: 26) (dups: 2) (heat: 84)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/715438 | 01:46 |
| MoLE_ | Ok looks like I'll need to try again later. | 01:54 |
| cprofitt | anyone know what package Ubuntu Software Center is? | 02:07 |
| hggdh | cprofitt: software-center | 02:13 |
| cprofitt | I was missing the - | 02:14 |
| cprofitt | thanks | 02:14 |
| cprofitt | hggdh: It appears that software center is installing the 32bit version of Adobe Flash and reporting that it is version 10 | 02:15 |
| cprofitt | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/873773 | 02:16 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 873773 in ubuntu "Adobe flash provided by canonical partner repositories is not 64 bit in the Software centre (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 02:16 |
| hggdh | cprofitt: well, software-center would propose what it sees in the archivesm is it not? | 02:16 |
| cprofitt | It is reporting that it is version 10. 64 bit version is supposed to be in the repos, but does not appear to be | 02:18 |
| hggdh | I myself do not know, I have not followed it closely. I dimly remember a chat on that this week, and something about 64-bits not being in still | 02:19 |
| hggdh | but... I am not sure, sorry. So the bug is good | 02:19 |
| cprofitt | thanks | 02:20 |
| cprofitt | you going to be at UDS hggdh ? | 02:21 |
| hggdh | cprofitt: yes :-) | 02:21 |
| hggdh | you? | 02:21 |
| cprofitt | yes. I will be there. We will have to grab a dinner together this time | 02:22 |
| hggdh | yeah, and I think charlie will also be there | 02:22 |
| cprofitt | yes, he said he was going | 02:23 |
| cprofitt | We will likely be roommates again | 02:23 |
| cprofitt | synaptic has the correct 64 bit package, but software center does not. | 02:24 |
| hggdh | cool. I do not know, yet, who will suffer me and my snoring | 02:24 |
| cprofitt | I snore badly too | 02:24 |
| cprofitt | lol | 02:24 |
| cprofitt | hey jono | 02:45 |
| jono | hey cprofitt | 02:46 |
| * bkerensa goes to look for new bugs | 06:24 | |
| bil21al | hggdh can u help me ? | 06:35 |
| bil21al | see this bug comment number 7 i dont understand what info he want to ask can u tell me how can i get that info which he described in that comment number 7 or anybody else tel me??? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/873787 | 06:36 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 873787 in banshee (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Banshee does not start (affects: 3) (dups: 1) (heat: 20)" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 06:36 |
| bil21al | any body tell me what he want in the 7th comment i cant get him?? | 06:39 |
| iceroot | are there any rules when i have to append a patch and when a debdiff to a bug? or is debdiff always the best way? | 08:58 |
| gema_ | bil21al: run gconf on a console and you'll find the apps path | 08:59 |
| gema_ | bil21al: gconf-editor | 09:00 |
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| bil21al | helo have a look on it | 11:38 |
| bil21al | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/874348 | 11:38 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 874348 in unity (Ubuntu) "when we change the theme some icons from the launcher vanished (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 11:38 |
| penguin42 | ah lots of nice fresh crunchy bugs | 13:33 |
| === Elbrus_busy is now known as Elbrus | ||
| iceroot | are there any rules when i have to append a patch and when a debdiff to a bug? or is debdiff always the best way? | 14:26 |
| jtaylor | depends on the maintainer and the issue | 15:11 |
| jtaylor | for universe probably debdiff as those usually have no dedicated maintainers in ubuntu | 15:11 |
| jtaylor | sponsors will prefer to not have to write changelogs for issues they have n o clue about | 15:12 |
| jtaylor | iceroot: ^ | 15:13 |
| piratonym | Could someone please review bug #873666 and set its importance? | 16:26 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 873666 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "Nautilus crashes very often (affects: 3) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/873666 | 16:26 |
| * penguin42 wonders why the bot set it to confirmed because of multiple users - I don't see any other users mentioning it | 16:29 | |
| penguin42 | piratonym: Given it's so repeatable you might try getting a more detailed bug report | 16:29 |
| piratonym | penguin42: how can i do this? | 16:30 |
| penguin42 | piratonym: You could install the debug packages for nautilus, and then you could start apports crash reporter with sudo service apport start force_start=1 | 16:31 |
| yofel | penguin42: the affects count is > 1 | 16:31 |
| penguin42 | piratonym: Then it should capture a backtrace that would have more detail that might be able to find exactly where it crashes | 16:31 |
| penguin42 | yofel: I tend to forget about that when they aren't subscribed! | 16:32 |
| yofel | but if nautilus is really that easy to crash, someone that gets the crash should enable apport and use it to file a proper crash bug | 16:33 |
| piratonym | penguin42: I installed nautilus-dbg and ran the command, then started nautilus and it crashed. What should I do now? | 16:33 |
| penguin42 | piratonym: OK, do you now have a file in /var/crash for it? | 16:34 |
| piratonym | penguin42: Yes, there is a file called _usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash | 16:35 |
| penguin42 | piratonym: OK, now do apport-bug _usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash I think | 16:36 |
| penguin42 | thing is it doesn't fail for me, otherwise I'd take gdb to it | 16:38 |
| piratonym | penguin42: It says file or directory not found | 16:38 |
| penguin42 | ok do apport-bug /var/crash/_usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash | 16:38 |
| piratonym | penguin42: Now it works, had to use full path | 16:38 |
| penguin42 | nod | 16:39 |
| piratonym | Is there a way to add this information to the existing bug? Launchpad asks me to create a new bug. | 16:42 |
| yofel | nope | 16:44 |
| piratonym | OK | 16:45 |
| penguin42 | we've already got 850k another one won't do any harm | 16:47 |
| yofel | make that 95k open ones, not all 850k are for us | 16:49 |
| penguin42 | true | 16:50 |
| piratonym | Launchpad shows bug #865115, this looks exactly like the problem I have. I'll check if this is the same bug. Thank you for helping. | 16:50 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 865115 in ubuntuone-client-gnome (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 7 other projects) "nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get(), if both nautilus-open-terminal and ubuntuone-client-gnome are installed (affects: 335) (dups: 53) (heat: 1670)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/865115 | 16:50 |
| penguin42 | piratonym: Are your folders sync'd with Ubuntu one ? | 16:51 |
| piratonym | penguin42: I do not use Ubuntu One, but ubuntuone-client-gnome is installed | 16:52 |
| penguin42 | piratonym: And if you uninstall nautilus-open-terminal does it stop failing? | 16:52 |
| piratonym | penguin42: Yes, it doesn't crash anymore. | 16:54 |
| penguin42 | piratonym: OK, probably the same one - you could also install the package from -proposed | 16:54 |
| piratonym | penguin42: I'll try that, thank you | 16:55 |
| dlbike76 | Hi, I ran into a problem while upgrading to 11.10. The desktop basically stopped responding to events. What package would the problem have been in? Compiz? | 17:41 |
| dlbike76 | I was able to finish the upgrade by switching to a virtual terminal, so I don't think there are any relevant log files in var/log/dist-upgrade. | 17:42 |
| === Elbrus_busy is now known as Elbrus | ||
| penguin42 | anyone got any idea whatelse to ask for bug 874622 - it's not really got much to go on | 18:44 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 874622 in linux (Ubuntu) "login stalls at check for battery status (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874622 | 18:44 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| penguin42 | is there a particular bug to group the ubuntu-minimal errors to? | 22:49 |
| hggdh | penguin42: server? | 22:59 |
| penguin42 | hggdh: Not sure, there are a bunch of bugs all complaining that during install/upgrade there were problems finding ubuntu-minimal - e.g. 873589 and 873576 | 23:00 |
| penguin42 | bugs 873589 and 873576 | 23:00 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 873589 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to 11.10 failed (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/873589 | 23:00 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 873576 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Attempt to upgrade from 11.04 and got message 'ubuntu-minimal' not found (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/873576 | 23:00 |
| hggdh | penguin42: no, looks like desktop. Interesting. I wonder if this was reported on the ISO testing | 23:05 |
| hggdh | ubuntu-minimal *is* in main, so... | 23:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!