[00:12] I logged it under grub2 for now. fin [00:13] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 [00:13] Launchpad bug 874698 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] [01:46] sorry to repeat myself, but is there any bug squad member available to look at triaging bug 715438? [01:46] Launchpad bug 715438 in linux (Ubuntu) "hermes-I wireless interface will not associate with open access point (affects: 26) (dups: 2) (heat: 84)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/715438 [01:54] Ok looks like I'll need to try again later. [02:07] anyone know what package Ubuntu Software Center is? [02:13] cprofitt: software-center [02:14] I was missing the - [02:14] thanks [02:15] hggdh: It appears that software center is installing the 32bit version of Adobe Flash and reporting that it is version 10 [02:16] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/873773 [02:16] Launchpad bug 873773 in ubuntu "Adobe flash provided by canonical partner repositories is not 64 bit in the Software centre (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [02:16] cprofitt: well, software-center would propose what it sees in the archivesm is it not? [02:18] It is reporting that it is version 10. 64 bit version is supposed to be in the repos, but does not appear to be [02:19] I myself do not know, I have not followed it closely. I dimly remember a chat on that this week, and something about 64-bits not being in still [02:19] but... I am not sure, sorry. So the bug is good [02:20] thanks [02:21] you going to be at UDS hggdh ? [02:21] cprofitt: yes :-) [02:21] you? [02:22] yes. I will be there. We will have to grab a dinner together this time [02:22] yeah, and I think charlie will also be there [02:23] yes, he said he was going [02:23] We will likely be roommates again [02:24] synaptic has the correct 64 bit package, but software center does not. [02:24] cool. I do not know, yet, who will suffer me and my snoring [02:24] I snore badly too [02:24] lol [02:45] hey jono [02:46] hey cprofitt [06:24] * bkerensa goes to look for new bugs [06:35] hggdh can u help me ? [06:36] see this bug comment number 7 i dont understand what info he want to ask can u tell me how can i get that info which he described in that comment number 7 or anybody else tel me??? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/873787 [06:36] Launchpad bug 873787 in banshee (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Banshee does not start (affects: 3) (dups: 1) (heat: 20)" [Undecided,Incomplete] [06:39] any body tell me what he want in the 7th comment i cant get him?? [08:58] are there any rules when i have to append a patch and when a debdiff to a bug? or is debdiff always the best way? [08:59] bil21al: run gconf on a console and you'll find the apps path [09:00] bil21al: gconf-editor === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 [11:38] helo have a look on it [11:38] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/874348 [11:38] Launchpad bug 874348 in unity (Ubuntu) "when we change the theme some icons from the launcher vanished (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] [13:33] ah lots of nice fresh crunchy bugs === Elbrus_busy is now known as Elbrus [14:26] are there any rules when i have to append a patch and when a debdiff to a bug? or is debdiff always the best way? [15:11] depends on the maintainer and the issue [15:11] for universe probably debdiff as those usually have no dedicated maintainers in ubuntu [15:12] sponsors will prefer to not have to write changelogs for issues they have n o clue about [15:13] iceroot: ^ [16:26] Could someone please review bug #873666 and set its importance? [16:26] Launchpad bug 873666 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "Nautilus crashes very often (affects: 3) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/873666 [16:29] * penguin42 wonders why the bot set it to confirmed because of multiple users - I don't see any other users mentioning it [16:29] piratonym: Given it's so repeatable you might try getting a more detailed bug report [16:30] penguin42: how can i do this? [16:31] piratonym: You could install the debug packages for nautilus, and then you could start apports crash reporter with sudo service apport start force_start=1 [16:31] penguin42: the affects count is > 1 [16:31] piratonym: Then it should capture a backtrace that would have more detail that might be able to find exactly where it crashes [16:32] yofel: I tend to forget about that when they aren't subscribed! [16:33] but if nautilus is really that easy to crash, someone that gets the crash should enable apport and use it to file a proper crash bug [16:33] penguin42: I installed nautilus-dbg and ran the command, then started nautilus and it crashed. What should I do now? [16:34] piratonym: OK, do you now have a file in /var/crash for it? [16:35] penguin42: Yes, there is a file called _usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash [16:36] piratonym: OK, now do apport-bug _usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash I think [16:38] thing is it doesn't fail for me, otherwise I'd take gdb to it [16:38] penguin42: It says file or directory not found [16:38] ok do apport-bug /var/crash/_usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash [16:38] penguin42: Now it works, had to use full path [16:39] nod [16:42] Is there a way to add this information to the existing bug? Launchpad asks me to create a new bug. [16:44] nope [16:45] OK [16:47] we've already got 850k another one won't do any harm [16:49] make that 95k open ones, not all 850k are for us [16:50] true [16:50] Launchpad shows bug #865115, this looks exactly like the problem I have. I'll check if this is the same bug. Thank you for helping. [16:50] Launchpad bug 865115 in ubuntuone-client-gnome (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 7 other projects) "nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get(), if both nautilus-open-terminal and ubuntuone-client-gnome are installed (affects: 335) (dups: 53) (heat: 1670)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/865115 [16:51] piratonym: Are your folders sync'd with Ubuntu one ? [16:52] penguin42: I do not use Ubuntu One, but ubuntuone-client-gnome is installed [16:52] piratonym: And if you uninstall nautilus-open-terminal does it stop failing? [16:54] penguin42: Yes, it doesn't crash anymore. [16:54] piratonym: OK, probably the same one - you could also install the package from -proposed [16:55] penguin42: I'll try that, thank you [17:41] Hi, I ran into a problem while upgrading to 11.10. The desktop basically stopped responding to events. What package would the problem have been in? Compiz? [17:42] I was able to finish the upgrade by switching to a virtual terminal, so I don't think there are any relevant log files in var/log/dist-upgrade. === Elbrus_busy is now known as Elbrus [18:44] anyone got any idea whatelse to ask for bug 874622 - it's not really got much to go on [18:44] Launchpad bug 874622 in linux (Ubuntu) "login stalls at check for battery status (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874622 === yofel_ is now known as yofel === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 [22:49] is there a particular bug to group the ubuntu-minimal errors to? [22:59] penguin42: server? [23:00] hggdh: Not sure, there are a bunch of bugs all complaining that during install/upgrade there were problems finding ubuntu-minimal - e.g. 873589 and 873576 [23:00] bugs 873589 and 873576 [23:00] Launchpad bug 873589 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to 11.10 failed (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/873589 [23:00] Launchpad bug 873576 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Attempt to upgrade from 11.04 and got message 'ubuntu-minimal' not found (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/873576 [23:05] penguin42: no, looks like desktop. Interesting. I wonder if this was reported on the ISO testing [23:06] ubuntu-minimal *is* in main, so...