[00:17] TuxTrends: Howdy and welcome to the Ubuntu Ohio LoCo! [00:23] Hello again! [00:23] It's been a long while. [00:24] How long? [00:24] Over a year at least. [00:26] Ah, so I wouldn't know you :P (I was only here in 2008, and this full year) [00:27] jacob was on when I was but I think that's about it from this bunch. [00:28] heya TuxTrends, what's up? [00:29] hey jacob, not too much. I just jumped on IRC to ask a question and this channel came up so I thought I'd say hello. [00:29] cool cool [00:30] I suppose I may have forced that a little, but that was kinda the point ;) [00:31] * jrgifford waves at Ohio [00:32] * jacob waves at jrgifford [00:34] Hello jacob! [00:35] hey :D [00:35] what's up? [00:38] finishing up some homework for some classes, and idling about on reddit. mostly the latter. you? [00:38] mostly the former haha. [14:04] Hello Ohio [14:05] so I know we're all F/OSS advocates, and for the programmers here, I'm sure you all mainly use github/bitbucket/launchpad for your repos [14:05] this is true [14:05] but does anyone think there is room for paid private repo hosting still? or is the likes of github/bitbucket just going to overshaddow everything? [14:06] * paultag ponders [14:06] thafreak: see, code hosting is such a critical thing [14:06] i saw some companies offering private svn/git/mercurial + trac hosting [14:06] it's tough to trust your code to a company that's not established [14:07] personally, I don't care - I use git (or similar) - so if shit hits the fan, I push elsewhere [14:07] but svn can't do that, and don't even get me started about svn [14:07] erm, cvs [14:07] haha [14:08] paultag: I remember the days when I eagerly awaited for svn to be available [14:08] yeah :) [14:08] thafreak: cutting out some bit of the market for say - startups [14:08] when they finally released a stable version, I was all over that [14:08] cheep, hip, clean, nimble [14:08] that'd work [14:08] but github's all those things [14:09] So how do you compete with github for the private space? [14:09] thafreak: well, their bug tracking sucks, and they know it [14:09] Better reliability? Better price? [14:09] but their pull request stuff and forking is epic [14:09] being able to undercut their price and offer a better bug tracker that's linked tightly would be rad [14:09] thafreak: true [14:09] nothing else out there that's open has that [14:09] thafreak: but the merges via the interface suck [14:10] when you use git by hand [14:10] because it does a crappy merge method [14:10] you ever used trac+git? [14:10] yeah [14:10] it's ok [14:10] I found something awesome a few days ago [14:10] we use trac+svn here at work [14:10] ? [14:10] sec thafreak [14:12] thafreak: http://gitlabhq.com [14:12] that's the one [14:12] it's frankly pimp [14:13] did the diaspora kids build that? [14:13] I have no idea thafreak [14:13] thafreak: but someone sent it to me, it looked nice [14:15] RoR though... [14:15] just like redmine... [14:15] yeah [14:15] I'm not a super big fan of RoR [14:15] I don't not like it [14:15] but I don't like it [14:15] just like django [14:19] haha,,,i like django better...atleast it's python [14:20] only thing that gitlab had that redmine doesn't is ssh key management... [14:20] and redmine is a bit more mature currently... [14:26] thafreak: Agreed with paultag [14:26] (about github bug tracker suckage) [14:30] :) [14:30] one of these days I'll fix whube [14:31] it's too fancy though [14:50] http://gizmodo.com/5836145/rankmyhack-gives-you-achievement-points-for-your-ballsiest-cyber-attacks [17:40] Looks like new news on the TZ database