[04:29] <Chauncellor> would someone be kind enough to point me to directions on reporting a needs-packaging bug? I can't for the life of me find any instruction
[04:30] <micahg> Chauncellor: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages/ExamplePackageRequest
[04:31] <Chauncellor> micahg, thanks. Sorry, I truly had been looking around. Will remember this.... Thank you!
[05:32] <greg-g> bdmurray: hggdh: mind extending my membership in ubuntu-bugcontrol? Thanks! :)
[05:58] <v1z__> u guys are aware of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/876195
[05:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 876195 in scilab (Ubuntu) "scilab graphics doesn't work in Oneiric (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[05:58] <bkerensa> Proxy Settings dont work on 11.10
[05:58] <v1z__> very grave bug..
[05:59] <v1z__> If theres anything I can do to help out
[05:59] <v1z__> it seems to be related to libgl1-mesa
[05:59] <v1z__> the scilab package is basically broken
[06:00] <v1z__> in 11.10
[07:03] <bkerensa> Update Manager is not providing changelog info for any updates
[07:51] <perscitus> When ubuntu crashes, she crashes hard
[08:02] <perscitus> Anyone see this bug? https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/TrcdMvUyIN4o2-nA1OJXhw?feat=directlink
[08:05] <AlexzAK> Hi all! Can anyone test my bug #877191?
[08:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 877191 in indicator-appmenu (Ubuntu) "Unity 2d shows Aptana Studio 3 main menu incorrect (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/877191
[08:05] <AlexzAK> I'll need latest kate, unity 2d and 11.10...
[10:52] <jibel> mvo, I've seen a couple of bugs where the upgrade to oneiric fails because nspluginwrapper fails to upgrade on amd64
[10:52] <jibel> mvo, eg bug 874625
[10:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 874625 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Update from 11.04 to 11.10 fails (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874625
[10:52] <jibel> mvo, bug 874713
[10:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 874713 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Could not calculate the upgrade 11.04 to 11.10 (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874713
[10:53] <jibel> mvo, I can't figure what's wrong and how to reproduce it, any idea?
[10:53] <jibel> looks like a multiarch issue somewhere
[11:01] <jibel> mvo, and also bug 877194 is uncommon.
[11:01] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 877194 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "do-release-upgrade in console to oneric fails: SystemError: E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'multiarch-support'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/877194
[11:06] <cdavis> I assisted with bug 876699 and turned out to be a configuration issue. Do I mark this as invalid?
[11:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 876699 in totem (Ubuntu) "totem "Could not determine type of stream" (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/876699
[11:11] <iceroot> cdavis: yes, please post to the bug that it is a configuration issue (maye also what is the correct configuration) and then mark the bug as invalid
[11:13] <AlexzAK> Can anyone try to reproduce me bug #877191? You'll need kate+unity2d+11.10
[11:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 877191 in indicator-appmenu (Ubuntu) "Unity 2d shows Aptana Studio 3 main menu incorrect (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/877191
[11:13] <mvo> jibel: bug #877194 is common or uncommon?
[11:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 877194 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "do-release-upgrade in console to oneric fails: SystemError: E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'multiarch-support'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/877194
[11:14] <mvo> jibel: I check the other one about nspluginwrapper/downloader now
[11:14] <cdavis> iceroot: Will do and thanks for your help.
[11:15] <jibel> mvo, uncommon. I found only one occurrence.
[11:18] <mvo> ok, great
[12:04] <jibel> mvo, it looks like something pulled libcups2:i386 and  libgtk2.0-0:i386 on amd64 systems which in turn blocks the upgrade of ia32libs and nspluginwrapper as a consequence
[12:05] <penguin42> I think the answer on OO is to remove ia32-libs
[12:06] <mvo> jibel: I traced one of the issues down to "libcupsys2" being installed still on the system
[12:07] <mvo> jibel: that caused issues, removing that fixed it
[12:07] <mvo> jibel: I meant to debug it monday, but then a high profile issue keep me occupied all day monday and most of today :/
[12:13] <jibel> mvo, yep, I tracked it down to the same package on 4 different reports. I think it's there because users try to install i386 printer drivers on amd64.
[12:14] <mvo> jibel: oh, thats interessting!
[12:51] <penguin42> talking of printing, I heard there is a known kernel printing bug - which bug number is it, and what should merge with it
[13:29] <iceroot> what steps ae needed that a package from "proposed" is going into the main-repos? is it time-based? must someone do a test of it?
[13:41] <yofel> iceroot: it has to be tested and the tag changed to verification done, and at least a week must have passed
[13:49] <iceroot> yofel: ah who can test it and change the status? everyone?
[13:50] <iceroot> so for some learning/supporting i can search all bugs which have an upload pending in proposed and give feedback about it? or is this useless because someone from canocial/dev-team has to do it?
[13:53] <hggdh> iceroot: you can test and *tag* it, either verification-done or verification-failed
[13:54] <iceroot> hggdh: great, now i know what i will do the next days :)
[13:54] <hggdh> iceroot: all packages in -proposed are waiting to be tested
[13:54] <iceroot> so the best would be to enable proposed, use apt-pinning so that nothing is installed from that repo and use explicit commands to install something from there?
[13:55] <hggdh> yes, this is a way indeed
[13:55] <iceroot> any other usefull ways?
[14:10] <hggdh> iceroot: this is good enough; another way would be to explicitly download the packages from the archive (by going to the /pool/ directory
[16:20] <lilrubyprog> Hey
[16:25] <greg-g> hi
[16:27] <lilrubyprog> What's up?
[16:28] <ikt> nm you lilrubyprog :)
[16:29] <lilrubyprog> Same same =)
[16:29] <ikt> a little bug fixing here, a little bug triage there :D
[16:30] <lilrubyprog> Nice
[16:32] <lilrubyprog> How would I help?
[16:34] <ikt> lilrubyprog: bug triage?
[16:34] <lilrubyprog> yea
[16:36] <ikt> the bugsquad wiki i'd say
[16:36] <ikt> has a jillion articles in it
[16:36] <ikt> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/KnowledgeBase
[16:36] <ikt> also got a g+ ?
[16:40] <ikt> lilrubyprog: any luck?
[16:41] <lilrubyprog> Oh, I haven't checked yet sorry
[16:46] <ikt> :M
[16:46] <ikt> :<&
[16:47] <lilrubyprog> lol
[22:49] <sroecker> hi, can someone check bug 877791?
[22:49] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 877791 in appmenu-qt (Ubuntu) "appmenu crashes on AppMenuPlatformMenuBar::setAltPressed (affects: 14) (dups: 3) (heat: 44)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/877791
[22:51]  * penguin42 looks
[22:54] <sroecker> I've never programmed with qt but the workaround let's me use calibre again
[22:55]  * penguin42 hasn't done qt either - but the backtraces in the other bugs look consistent
[22:55] <penguin42> sroecker: I suppose the question is whether m_exporter should be null and that routine being called
[22:56] <penguin42> i.e. are you curing the cause or the symptom
[22:59] <sroecker> penguin42: True, just wanted to make sure someone with qt knowledge can fix this bug now, i.e I reported it correctly
[22:59] <penguin42> sroecker: You certainly have, and they always like a fix!
[23:00]  * penguin42 has just poked ubuntu-dev to see if there are any Qt people around and suggested it's appropriate for an update
[23:01] <sroecker> penguin42: thanks
[23:01] <penguin42> no problem
[23:08] <taowa> how do i access bugs that i filed
[23:10] <ashams> taowa:  go here: https://launchpad.net/~/+reportedbugs
[23:10] <arand> Is it not listed in the bugs section in your LP profile?