| === ashams1 is now known as ashams | ||
| === ashams1 is now known as ashams | ||
| === dshufelt is now known as dsmitty | ||
| jibel | bdmurray, good morning | 07:55 |
|---|---|---|
| jibel | bdmurray, there are tons of update-manager release upgrade failures where the upgrade logs are not attached to the report. Could something be done to improve that ? | 07:57 |
| jibel | bdmurray, there is now a question but I'm not sure people see it when they report the failure. | 07:57 |
| carandraug | Hi! I have a question about how bugs are managed in ubuntu in launchpad. Supposed a bug has been reported in launchpad and then fixed upstream. How should I mark the bug in launchpad? Fix released? It was upstream, it's just not in the ubuntu package yet | 11:04 |
| SwitchDK | Hi all, is it possible to assign a bug to an individual or specific PPA. I have turned a question into a bug report which should be filed against https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/redmine but not sure how to do it. The bug is bug/878090 | 11:05 |
| === gema_ is now known as gema | ||
| SwitchDK | carandraug: I am wondering if it should be marked as duplicate | 11:08 |
| SwitchDK | but we need confirmation from the Gurus on this channel | 11:08 |
| carandraug | SwitchDK, why duplicate? The project is not being developed in launchpad, there's only one istance of that bug in launchpad | 11:08 |
| SwitchDK | carandraug: because there is a master bug record but as I said I am just guessing (still very new to this) | 11:10 |
| kanha | i fixed a bug #818475 and after testing pushed it to launchpad but i dont how to merge it and how to apply for sponsorship.. | 11:37 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 818475 in bash-completion (Ubuntu) "Option no longer available for dpkg still present in completion (affects: 1) (heat: 5)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/818475 | 11:37 |
| kanha | how to merge? | 11:40 |
| brendand | hey pedro_ | 12:51 |
| pedro_ | hello brendand | 12:51 |
| brendand | what do you make of this? | 12:52 |
| brendand | > hugday list | 12:52 |
| brendand | The program 'hugday' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: | 12:52 |
| brendand | sudo apt-get install ubuntu-qa-tools | 12:52 |
| brendand | brendand@brendand-6930p:~/src/hugday-tools/trunk$ sudo apt-get install ubuntu-qa-tools | 12:52 |
| brendand | Reading package lists... Done | 12:52 |
| brendand | Building dependency tree | 12:52 |
| brendand | Reading state information... Done | 12:52 |
| brendand | E: Unable to locate package ubuntu-qa-tools | 12:52 |
| pedro_ | looks like we need to make a package? :-P | 12:55 |
| pedro_ | should work if you do ./hugday list , right? | 12:55 |
| pedro_ | hey vish | 12:55 |
| vish | pedro_: HHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! :) | 12:56 |
| brendand | pedro_ - yeah, i'm just running from from source | 12:58 |
| pedro_ | m looks like hugday list doesn't work though | 12:59 |
| pedro_ | i mean its retuning nothing | 12:59 |
| Pici | Hrm. Getting a few reports of people getting errors during upgrades, unable to hit http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-proposed/main/dist-upgrader-all/0.152.25.1/oneiric.tar.gz | 13:25 |
| arand | Pici: I get a not found on that, am I supposed to? | 13:34 |
| Pici | arand: Well, it depends if you want the bug to exist or not ;) Its referenced from http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release | 13:34 |
| === SWAT__ is now known as SWAT | ||
| hggdh | vish: hello again :-) | 14:24 |
| vish | hggdh: hello sir.. :-) | 14:26 |
| bdmurray | jibel: some examples would help | 14:50 |
| jibel | bdmurray, bug 878141 for example | 14:51 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 878141 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878141 | 14:51 |
| jibel | bug 878107 | 14:52 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 878107 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade 11.10 fails on prestep (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878107 | 14:52 |
| jibel | bug 878092 | 14:52 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 878092 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "unable to upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878092 | 14:52 |
| bdmurray | okay! I get it. ;-) | 14:52 |
| jibel | bug 877890 | 14:52 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 877890 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Update manager cannot upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/877890 | 14:52 |
| jibel | ok | 14:52 |
| jibel | :) | 14:52 |
| bdmurray | so the issue is the package hook doesn't know if you were last trying to perform a distribution upgrade or a regular update | 14:53 |
| bdmurray | that's why the question is asked | 14:54 |
| jibel | In oneiric there is a dialog saying "Is the issue you are reporting one you encountered when upgrading Ubuntu from one release to another?" maybe SRUing to natty it would fix it. | 14:55 |
| bdmurray | oh | 14:56 |
| bdmurray | natty gets the oneiric code when doing the dist-upgrade but the new package hook isn't installed / used | 14:56 |
| bdmurray | jibel: if you could report a bug about sru'ing the package hook I'll take care of it | 14:57 |
| jibel | jibel, sure, and another one to attach the system_state which is very useful for troubleshooting or reproduce the user environment. | 14:59 |
| jibel | bdmurray, ^ | 14:59 |
| * jibel talking to himself :/ | 15:00 | |
| bdmurray | jibel: is that not 'VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstatetargz': 'cat /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz' ? | 15:00 |
| jibel | bdmurray, I don't see that attachment on my machine. let me try on another system. | 15:01 |
| jibel | bdmurray, you're right, it is there ... when it exists in the dist-upgrade directory :) | 15:04 |
| musegarden_ | Hi, I'm new to the whole bug triaging thing but I'd like to help out with the Bug Day tomorrow. What can I do? | 15:04 |
| === dshufelt is now known as dsmitty | ||
| bdmurray | I thought there was an update-manager bug regarding not handling a lack of free space well bug report | 16:03 |
| bdmurray | I can't find it at the moment though | 16:03 |
| penguin42 | there's one for /boot | 16:05 |
| bdmurray | and what is it? | 16:05 |
| penguin42 | bug 874954 | 16:05 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 874954 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade error [space on /boot] (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874954 | 16:05 |
| bdmurray | right that's a duplicate of the other one I'm trying to find | 16:06 |
| sroecker | how do i add an release again to a bug? bug 728973 | 16:07 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 728973 in software-center (Ubuntu) "software-center crashed with RuntimeError in on_window_main_delete_event(): called outside of a mainloop (affects: 55) (dups: 8) (heat: 220)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728973 | 16:07 |
| penguin42 | bdmurray: Bug 798462 ? | 16:11 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 798462 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update-manager's free space calculator for /boot seems insufficient (affects: 77) (dups: 74) (heat: 602)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798462 | 16:11 |
| penguin42 | hmm although that claimed fixed in July | 16:12 |
| bdmurray | oh but if they were upgrading to natty they wouldn't have the fix | 16:14 |
| penguin42 | lots of much more recent ones duped onto that | 16:15 |
| mvo | penguin42: do you have a example? I can look into it tomorrow morning | 16:17 |
| penguin42 | mvo: bug 874954 was the one I triaged | 16:18 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 874954 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade error [space on /boot] (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874954 | 16:18 |
| penguin42 | and that looks like an nn->oo upgrade | 16:19 |
| mvo | penguin42: meh, so it calculated it will need 17402666 and there was room for 17959936 - so it appears there needs to be a extra margin here again | 16:20 |
| mvo | penguin42: thanks for tracking this down! | 16:20 |
| penguin42 | mvo: No problem - is that a reserved spaceism, or a MB v MiB screw up? | 16:20 |
| penguin42 | mvo: In general one thing that might not be too bad an idea is to run computer-janitor's clean up for old kernels first | 16:21 |
| mvo | penguin42: its probably block size fuziness (at least that is my current theory) | 16:21 |
| mvo | penguin42: old-kernel-cleanout is a good idea, its just hairy to not accidentely remove one that the user may care about (old but still needed because of a regression in a newer or whatever). but I guess that is a corner case for most users | 16:23 |
| penguin42 | mvo: Yeh; it's not too unusual - although if it can avoid removing the currently booted one it's reasonably safe | 16:24 |
| bkerensa | bdmurray: Thinking about filing a bug report regarding some odd broken behavior of the "Network" settings for proxies on Ocelot | 17:21 |
| bkerensa | since upgrading I have been unable to set a proxy and have it take effect | 17:21 |
| bil21al | pedro_ | 18:40 |
| bil21al | need help give suggession | 18:40 |
| pedro_ | yes? | 18:41 |
| bil21al | see this bug i think i demand for the valgrind log of empathy or advice him to install again ,,what you suggest | 18:46 |
| bil21al | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/877744 | 18:46 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 877744 in empathy (Ubuntu) "Empathy loses all styling after upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 18:46 |
| bil21al | pedro_ | 18:46 |
| pedro_ | looking | 18:47 |
| Laibsch | where can I see how long the SRU queue is for "ready to upload"-debdiff patches? | 18:47 |
| Laibsch | This used to work much better but I'm now back to waiting weeks and months. | 18:48 |
| Laibsch | Previously it was YEARS! | 18:48 |
| pedro_ | bil21al, don't think we need a valgrind log for that, those kind of logs are more useful for crashes | 18:49 |
| pedro_ | bil21al, perhaps is a good idea to ask the reporter for the ~/.xsession-errors file and also to see if they are able to reproduce the same problem with a guest account | 18:49 |
| pedro_ | bil21al, maybe the upgrade broke something in the user account | 18:50 |
| bil21al | ok perdo_ how can we identitfy that this xsession error is match with the bug like i am new how can i knw that this xsession error match with the bug or some programmer see that by it self??/ | 18:51 |
| yofel | Laibsch: there's a sponsoring queue if you've subscribed the sponsors: http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/index.html | 19:02 |
| bil21al | yofel is there any ubuntu wiki pag or some thing to understand the xsession error and logs ?? | 19:03 |
| bil21al | any body else knws about it? | 19:04 |
| yofel | bil21al: ~/.xession-errors simply has what the applications that you start in your session print to STDERR, so it depends on the application how you need to read it's error output | 19:05 |
| bil21al | and how can i get it? | 19:05 |
| Laibsch | yofel: thanks, exactly what I was looking for. | 19:06 |
| bil21al | mean how can i get xsession error of an empathy | 19:06 |
| bil21al | ? | 19:06 |
| yofel | bil21al: look for the empathy errors in ~/.xsession-errors | 19:06 |
| yofel | that file has the error output of ALL applications | 19:06 |
| yofel | no sorting | 19:06 |
| yofel | if anything it's sorted by time | 19:06 |
| bil21al | yofel: ok thankx bro i m new if u distrub than sorry | 19:08 |
| yofel | nah, feel free to ask ;) | 19:08 |
| bil21al | ok | 19:09 |
| Laibsch | I hear you can do many wonderful things with launchpadlib. I used to have a couple of scripts for manipulating bugs based on launchpadbugs python module but they are bitrotten now. | 20:14 |
| Laibsch | who can share a currently-working script that allows me to add a comment and set status for a particular task in a ticket? The ones I saw on the web were not suitable for me. | 20:15 |
| yofel | Laibsch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~yofel/+junk/lp-scripts/view/head:/lp-set-expired.py from me - line 150ff does the actual bug changing | 20:16 |
| Laibsch | yofel: thank you. Will have a look at it in the morning. | 20:17 |
| yofel | Laibsch: make a note of line 187 - or you'll wonder why nothing happens (bit me when I wrote the script) | 20:18 |
| Laibsch | couldn't resist to look right away ;-) Whoa, quite complicated. My python foo really sucks despite years of wanting to learn it. | 20:18 |
| yofel | Laibsch: line 33ff has the bug task fetching, the long stuff can be shorted quite a bit if you don't use a credentials file | 20:19 |
| yofel | *login stuff | 20:19 |
| Laibsch | I'll need credentials to be allowed what I have in mind, I think | 20:20 |
| Laibsch | but it looks like I can hack that into something usable for me. I wonder how many false changes I'll make with it ;-) | 20:20 |
| Laibsch | My earlier scripts were based on http://people.canonical.com/~asac/mozillateam/moztools_lp/ and that was several magnitudes simpler stuff. | 20:22 |
| Laibsch | :-( | 20:22 |
| salty-horse | hey. during the installation process, I created an "unused" partition and the graphical bar in the partition editor added a "(ext4)" at the end of it. I think it should have printed "(unused)" | 20:48 |
| Laibsch | welcome, salty-horse | 20:50 |
| salty-horse | hey :D | 20:50 |
| Laibsch | are you asking about where to file the ticket or where to dig the source so you can provide a patch? | 20:50 |
| salty-horse | where to dig | 20:51 |
| salty-horse | It's hard to reproduce since I have to install ubuntu (don't want to set up a vm) | 20:51 |
| penguin42 | is bug 852343 really a dupe of 543609 or not? | 20:54 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 852343 in indicator-session (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "gtk-logout-helper crashed with signal 5 in __libc_start_main() (affects: 270) (dups: 74) (heat: 1598)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852343 | 20:54 |
| penguin42 | bug 543609 got closed on a not-enough-information; but both show up on the most-dupes sort | 20:55 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 543609 in indicator-session (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "gtk-logout-helper crashed with signal 5 in __libc_start_main() (affects: 724) (dups: 48) (heat: 1862)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/543609 | 20:55 |
| Laibsch | salty-horse: I don't know the answer. But I think there is a package called partman or something. Have a look if you can spot something in http://packages.ubuntu.com/part | 21:00 |
| hggdh | penguin42: they have rather different stacktraces | 21:01 |
| penguin42 | hmm true | 21:02 |
| salty-horse | Laibsch, I think that's parted, the standalone tool | 21:04 |
| hggdh | penguin42: also, I wonder how many of the me-toos in the old bug are piping in just because it has the same title | 21:04 |
| penguin42 | yeh it's hard to split the two | 21:05 |
| penguin42 | getting dangerously close to 100k open bugs | 23:13 |
| bkerensa | penguin42: Indeed and lots of boinc related bugs | 23:28 |
| * bkerensa just found a new boinc bug himself | 23:28 | |
| bkerensa | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/878571 | 23:28 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 878571 in boinc (Ubuntu) "boinc-client bad signature for URL (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] | 23:28 |
| penguin42 | boinc? | 23:28 |
| bkerensa | why yes | 23:28 |
| bkerensa | penguin42: Berkeley Open Infrastructure something computing | 23:29 |
| bkerensa | :D | 23:29 |
| penguin42 | what does it do? | 23:29 |
| bkerensa | Distributed Computing for a Good Cause | 23:31 |
| bkerensa | http://boinc.berkeley.edu | 23:31 |
| penguin42 | ah ok | 23:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!