=== ashams1 is now known as ashams === ashams1 is now known as ashams === dshufelt is now known as dsmitty [07:55] bdmurray, good morning [07:57] bdmurray, there are tons of update-manager release upgrade failures where the upgrade logs are not attached to the report. Could something be done to improve that ? [07:57] bdmurray, there is now a question but I'm not sure people see it when they report the failure. [11:04] Hi! I have a question about how bugs are managed in ubuntu in launchpad. Supposed a bug has been reported in launchpad and then fixed upstream. How should I mark the bug in launchpad? Fix released? It was upstream, it's just not in the ubuntu package yet [11:05] Hi all, is it possible to assign a bug to an individual or specific PPA. I have turned a question into a bug report which should be filed against https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/redmine but not sure how to do it. The bug is bug/878090 === gema_ is now known as gema [11:08] carandraug: I am wondering if it should be marked as duplicate [11:08] but we need confirmation from the Gurus on this channel [11:08] SwitchDK, why duplicate? The project is not being developed in launchpad, there's only one istance of that bug in launchpad [11:10] carandraug: because there is a master bug record but as I said I am just guessing (still very new to this) [11:37] i fixed a bug #818475 and after testing pushed it to launchpad but i dont how to merge it and how to apply for sponsorship.. [11:37] Launchpad bug 818475 in bash-completion (Ubuntu) "Option no longer available for dpkg still present in completion (affects: 1) (heat: 5)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/818475 [11:40] how to merge? [12:51] hey pedro_ [12:51] hello brendand [12:52] what do you make of this? [12:52] > hugday list [12:52] The program 'hugday' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: [12:52] sudo apt-get install ubuntu-qa-tools [12:52] brendand@brendand-6930p:~/src/hugday-tools/trunk$ sudo apt-get install ubuntu-qa-tools [12:52] Reading package lists... Done [12:52] Building dependency tree [12:52] Reading state information... Done [12:52] E: Unable to locate package ubuntu-qa-tools [12:55] looks like we need to make a package? :-P [12:55] should work if you do ./hugday list , right? [12:55] hey vish [12:56] pedro_: HHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! :) [12:58] pedro_ - yeah, i'm just running from from source [12:59] m looks like hugday list doesn't work though [12:59] i mean its retuning nothing [13:25] Hrm. Getting a few reports of people getting errors during upgrades, unable to hit http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-proposed/main/dist-upgrader-all/0.152.25.1/oneiric.tar.gz [13:34] Pici: I get a not found on that, am I supposed to? [13:34] arand: Well, it depends if you want the bug to exist or not ;) Its referenced from http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release === SWAT__ is now known as SWAT [14:24] vish: hello again :-) [14:26] hggdh: hello sir.. :-) [14:50] jibel: some examples would help [14:51] bdmurray, bug 878141 for example [14:51] Launchpad bug 878141 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878141 [14:52] bug 878107 [14:52] Launchpad bug 878107 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade 11.10 fails on prestep (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878107 [14:52] bug 878092 [14:52] Launchpad bug 878092 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "unable to upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878092 [14:52] okay! I get it. ;-) [14:52] bug 877890 [14:52] Launchpad bug 877890 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Update manager cannot upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/877890 [14:52] ok [14:52] :) [14:53] so the issue is the package hook doesn't know if you were last trying to perform a distribution upgrade or a regular update [14:54] that's why the question is asked [14:55] In oneiric there is a dialog saying "Is the issue you are reporting one you encountered when upgrading Ubuntu from one release to another?" maybe SRUing to natty it would fix it. [14:56] oh [14:56] natty gets the oneiric code when doing the dist-upgrade but the new package hook isn't installed / used [14:57] jibel: if you could report a bug about sru'ing the package hook I'll take care of it [14:59] jibel, sure, and another one to attach the system_state which is very useful for troubleshooting or reproduce the user environment. [14:59] bdmurray, ^ [15:00] * jibel talking to himself :/ [15:00] jibel: is that not 'VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstatetargz': 'cat /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz' ? [15:01] bdmurray, I don't see that attachment on my machine. let me try on another system. [15:04] bdmurray, you're right, it is there ... when it exists in the dist-upgrade directory :) [15:04] Hi, I'm new to the whole bug triaging thing but I'd like to help out with the Bug Day tomorrow. What can I do? === dshufelt is now known as dsmitty [16:03] I thought there was an update-manager bug regarding not handling a lack of free space well bug report [16:03] I can't find it at the moment though [16:05] there's one for /boot [16:05] and what is it? [16:05] bug 874954 [16:05] Launchpad bug 874954 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade error [space on /boot] (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874954 [16:06] right that's a duplicate of the other one I'm trying to find [16:07] how do i add an release again to a bug? bug 728973 [16:07] Launchpad bug 728973 in software-center (Ubuntu) "software-center crashed with RuntimeError in on_window_main_delete_event(): called outside of a mainloop (affects: 55) (dups: 8) (heat: 220)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728973 [16:11] bdmurray: Bug 798462 ? [16:11] Launchpad bug 798462 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update-manager's free space calculator for /boot seems insufficient (affects: 77) (dups: 74) (heat: 602)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798462 [16:12] hmm although that claimed fixed in July [16:14] oh but if they were upgrading to natty they wouldn't have the fix [16:15] lots of much more recent ones duped onto that [16:17] penguin42: do you have a example? I can look into it tomorrow morning [16:18] mvo: bug 874954 was the one I triaged [16:18] Launchpad bug 874954 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade error [space on /boot] (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/874954 [16:19] and that looks like an nn->oo upgrade [16:20] penguin42: meh, so it calculated it will need 17402666 and there was room for 17959936 - so it appears there needs to be a extra margin here again [16:20] penguin42: thanks for tracking this down! [16:20] mvo: No problem - is that a reserved spaceism, or a MB v MiB screw up? [16:21] mvo: In general one thing that might not be too bad an idea is to run computer-janitor's clean up for old kernels first [16:21] penguin42: its probably block size fuziness (at least that is my current theory) [16:23] penguin42: old-kernel-cleanout is a good idea, its just hairy to not accidentely remove one that the user may care about (old but still needed because of a regression in a newer or whatever). but I guess that is a corner case for most users [16:24] mvo: Yeh; it's not too unusual - although if it can avoid removing the currently booted one it's reasonably safe [17:21] bdmurray: Thinking about filing a bug report regarding some odd broken behavior of the "Network" settings for proxies on Ocelot [17:21] since upgrading I have been unable to set a proxy and have it take effect [18:40] pedro_ [18:40] need help give suggession [18:41] yes? [18:46] see this bug i think i demand for the valgrind log of empathy or advice him to install again ,,what you suggest [18:46] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/877744 [18:46] Launchpad bug 877744 in empathy (Ubuntu) "Empathy loses all styling after upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] [18:46] pedro_ [18:47] looking [18:47] where can I see how long the SRU queue is for "ready to upload"-debdiff patches? [18:48] This used to work much better but I'm now back to waiting weeks and months. [18:48] Previously it was YEARS! [18:49] bil21al, don't think we need a valgrind log for that, those kind of logs are more useful for crashes [18:49] bil21al, perhaps is a good idea to ask the reporter for the ~/.xsession-errors file and also to see if they are able to reproduce the same problem with a guest account [18:50] bil21al, maybe the upgrade broke something in the user account [18:51] ok perdo_ how can we identitfy that this xsession error is match with the bug like i am new how can i knw that this xsession error match with the bug or some programmer see that by it self??/ [19:02] Laibsch: there's a sponsoring queue if you've subscribed the sponsors: http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/index.html [19:03] yofel is there any ubuntu wiki pag or some thing to understand the xsession error and logs ?? [19:04] any body else knws about it? [19:05] bil21al: ~/.xession-errors simply has what the applications that you start in your session print to STDERR, so it depends on the application how you need to read it's error output [19:05] and how can i get it? [19:06] yofel: thanks, exactly what I was looking for. [19:06] mean how can i get xsession error of an empathy [19:06] ? [19:06] bil21al: look for the empathy errors in ~/.xsession-errors [19:06] that file has the error output of ALL applications [19:06] no sorting [19:06] if anything it's sorted by time [19:08] yofel: ok thankx bro i m new if u distrub than sorry [19:08] nah, feel free to ask ;) [19:09] ok [20:14] I hear you can do many wonderful things with launchpadlib. I used to have a couple of scripts for manipulating bugs based on launchpadbugs python module but they are bitrotten now. [20:15] who can share a currently-working script that allows me to add a comment and set status for a particular task in a ticket? The ones I saw on the web were not suitable for me. [20:16] Laibsch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~yofel/+junk/lp-scripts/view/head:/lp-set-expired.py from me - line 150ff does the actual bug changing [20:17] yofel: thank you. Will have a look at it in the morning. [20:18] Laibsch: make a note of line 187 - or you'll wonder why nothing happens (bit me when I wrote the script) [20:18] couldn't resist to look right away ;-) Whoa, quite complicated. My python foo really sucks despite years of wanting to learn it. [20:19] Laibsch: line 33ff has the bug task fetching, the long stuff can be shorted quite a bit if you don't use a credentials file [20:19] *login stuff [20:20] I'll need credentials to be allowed what I have in mind, I think [20:20] but it looks like I can hack that into something usable for me. I wonder how many false changes I'll make with it ;-) [20:22] My earlier scripts were based on http://people.canonical.com/~asac/mozillateam/moztools_lp/ and that was several magnitudes simpler stuff. [20:22] :-( [20:48] hey. during the installation process, I created an "unused" partition and the graphical bar in the partition editor added a "(ext4)" at the end of it. I think it should have printed "(unused)" [20:50] welcome, salty-horse [20:50] hey :D [20:50] are you asking about where to file the ticket or where to dig the source so you can provide a patch? [20:51] where to dig [20:51] It's hard to reproduce since I have to install ubuntu (don't want to set up a vm) [20:54] is bug 852343 really a dupe of 543609 or not? [20:54] Launchpad bug 852343 in indicator-session (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "gtk-logout-helper crashed with signal 5 in __libc_start_main() (affects: 270) (dups: 74) (heat: 1598)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852343 [20:55] bug 543609 got closed on a not-enough-information; but both show up on the most-dupes sort [20:55] Launchpad bug 543609 in indicator-session (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "gtk-logout-helper crashed with signal 5 in __libc_start_main() (affects: 724) (dups: 48) (heat: 1862)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/543609 [21:00] salty-horse: I don't know the answer. But I think there is a package called partman or something. Have a look if you can spot something in http://packages.ubuntu.com/part [21:01] penguin42: they have rather different stacktraces [21:02] hmm true [21:04] Laibsch, I think that's parted, the standalone tool [21:04] penguin42: also, I wonder how many of the me-toos in the old bug are piping in just because it has the same title [21:05] yeh it's hard to split the two [23:13] getting dangerously close to 100k open bugs [23:28] penguin42: Indeed and lots of boinc related bugs [23:28] * bkerensa just found a new boinc bug himself [23:28] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/878571 [23:28] Launchpad bug 878571 in boinc (Ubuntu) "boinc-client bad signature for URL (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] [23:28] boinc? [23:28] why yes [23:29] penguin42: Berkeley Open Infrastructure something computing [23:29] :D [23:29] what does it do? [23:31] Distributed Computing for a Good Cause [23:31] http://boinc.berkeley.edu [23:31] ah ok