=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
=== apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger | ||
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
dholbach | good morning | 06:51 |
---|---|---|
Rhonda | *sigh* | 07:26 |
Rhonda | Why does the software center have to be so strange … and has *no* icon now for wesnoth in oneiric?! | 07:26 |
Rhonda | Who can I bark at for getting that fixed, and potentially not run into the same issue for the wesnoth 1.10 release that might hit precise? | 07:27 |
Rhonda | I seem to remember that we had the same issue when we switched from 1.6 to 1.8 in the first place, but that puzzles me now. :/ | 07:28 |
Rhonda | That it seems to got disfunctional again, in between. | 07:28 |
geser | Rhonda: try talking to mvo | 07:30 |
=== ara is now known as Guest79243 | ||
Rhonda | geser: thanks | 07:40 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
udienz | hi, when mass-sync from debian started? | 12:10 |
udienz | many 'new' packages from debian not sync in precise | 12:10 |
Rhonda | udienz, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule does say it's not defined yet. | 12:12 |
cjwatson | udienz: I started it on Monday | 12:14 |
cjwatson | udienz: I've been processing new packages, but haven't worked my way through all of them yet | 12:15 |
cjwatson | udienz: If there are specific ones you care about, tell me | 12:15 |
cjwatson | (it's awkward to automate because we have to be careful about ones that were previously removed from Ubuntu for some reason) | 12:15 |
cjwatson | I've been getting through, er, rough estimate maybe 50 a day | 12:17 |
* udienz chose to wating 'till monday | 12:19 | |
cjwatson | udienz: huh? | 12:19 |
cjwatson | udienz: I started it Monday as in three days ago | 12:19 |
cjwatson | udienz: if there are specific new packages you care about, tell me | 12:19 |
udienz | cjwatson, owh i think nexy monday | 12:22 |
udienz | i;ll looking my packages first | 12:22 |
udienz | cjwatson, bug 878809 glfw package | 12:30 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 878809 in glfw (Ubuntu) "Please sync glfw 2.7.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878809 | 12:30 |
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
cjwatson | udienz: you can just tell me the package names, I don't need bugs | 12:35 |
cjwatson | er, actually, maybe that's a bad precedent. but I do not want to be told about the same thing by a bug *and* on IRC, in any case | 12:35 |
cjwatson | udienz: also, that isn't a new package! | 12:35 |
cjwatson | udienz: that's a new version of an existing package. perhaps you're unaware that we're syncing from testing by default this cycle, unless explicitly requested otherwise | 12:36 |
cjwatson | udienz: once that bug has been acked by a sponsor, it will appear on the list of manual syncs we need to do | 12:37 |
cjwatson | which is a "run a tool once a day or so" kind of thing | 12:37 |
tumbleweed | grr, this bug bot is a pain | 16:33 |
c_korn | is there a "yes" option for mk-build-deps so it does not ask whether I really want to install the dependencies | 17:12 |
cjwatson | c_korn: untested, but I think -t 'apt-get -y' | 17:14 |
c_korn | ok, I test it ;) | 17:15 |
cjwatson | or MKBUILDDEPS_TOOL='apt-get -y' in ~/.devscripts.conf | 17:15 |
cjwatson | sorry, ~/.devscripts | 17:15 |
c_korn | I try the command line option first. I have mk-build-deps in a alias anyway | 17:16 |
c_korn | hum, a pkgconfig file in an arch-indep library -dev package contains this line "Cflags: -I${includedir}/c++-gtk-utils-2-2.0 -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include " does this mean it has to be arch dependent now? | 19:34 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Laney | good evening | 21:19 |
bkerensa | anyone wanna help me sort out the fact that boinc-client is broken? | 21:43 |
bkerensa | :D | 21:43 |
yofel | bug 878571 for those that don't follow #ubuntu-bugs | 21:51 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 878571 in boinc (Ubuntu) "boinc-client bad signature for URL" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878571 | 21:51 |
bkerensa | yofel: thanks :) | 21:52 |
james_w | what was the name of that script that could tell you what ubuntu releases there were, which was the development release etc? | 22:01 |
broder | distro-info | 22:03 |
james_w | thanks | 22:07 |
Kiall | anyone familiar with git-buildpackage? I'm having an issue where the orig.tar.gz is not being extracted from the git repo .. resulting in a "failed .. no orig.tar file found" | 22:36 |
arand | Kiall: is it finding the upstream branch ok? | 22:44 |
Kiall | it seems to... | 22:44 |
Kiall | when i `rm debian/source/format` (native package) it works .. | 22:45 |
Kiall | but with a 3.0 (quilt) package, it fails | 22:45 |
Kiall | arand: I end up with this error: http://pastie.org/2732409 | 22:46 |
Kiall | It doesnt seem to even try and extract the tar.. | 22:47 |
Kiall | any ideas what might be causing it? :) | 22:48 |
RAOF | Kiall: Do you have a pristine-tar branch? Is the gbp.conf set up right to build from pristine-tar? | 22:50 |
Kiall | RAOF: yea branch is there .. and I think I have it setup right: http://pastie.org/2732432 | 22:51 |
RAOF | Kiall: Yeah, that looks right. What's the full output of git-buildpackage? | 22:52 |
Kiall | Full output is here: http://pastie.org/2732409 | 22:52 |
Kiall | no mention of pristine-tar in it though | 22:52 |
arand | Hmm, what happens if you omit the export dir? | 22:56 |
Kiall | the ../build-area option? | 22:56 |
arand | Yeah.. | 22:56 |
Kiall | same thing, no mention of pristine-tar | 22:57 |
arand | If you just run it with --pristine-tar option? | 22:58 |
Kiall | you mean --git-pristine-tar ? | 22:58 |
arand | Ah, yeah | 22:58 |
Kiall | I'll try again, just in case! | 22:58 |
Kiall | Humm.. | 22:58 |
Kiall | Oh .. dooh .. tried it in a copy without quilt ;0 | 22:59 |
Kiall | Oh .. dooh .. tried it in a copy without quilt ;) | 22:59 |
Kiall | same thing again, no mention of pristine-tar | 23:00 |
Kiall | Do you know of a public repo that uses GPB and pristine-tar? Maybe I can test that | 23:00 |
Kiall | Humm .. Okay, testing with a repo I found and its working | 23:02 |
RAOF | http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-xorg/app/apitrace.git;a=summary does. | 23:02 |
RAOF | Hah, too slow. | 23:02 |
Kiall | The only obvious difference is one has an pristine-tar and origin/pristine-tar, while my only has pristine-tar | 23:04 |
Kiall | nope .. thats not it :( | 23:05 |
Kiall | Mind taking a look? https://github.com/kiall/test/tree/pristine-tar | 23:05 |
Kiall | I've obv got something wrong with the repo | 23:06 |
Kiall | aha! | 23:10 |
Kiall | https://github.com/kiall/test/blob/master/debian/changelog#L1 .. | 23:10 |
Kiall | needed to add a -1 to the end of the version | 23:10 |
RAOF | Oh. To make it non-native. Right. | 23:11 |
Kiall | yea, makes sense (now) | 23:12 |
Kiall | thanks RAOF / arand | 23:12 |
Kiall | since you guys would probably know, since the upstream package is also managed in git, is it possible for me to clone that repo, and use gpb + quilt without git-import-orig? | 23:19 |
RAOF | Kiall: Absolutely; the apitrace repository I linked to above does exactly that. | 23:22 |
Kiall | ah .. tried that first and didnt get it working :) | 23:22 |
Kiall | how does the pristine-tar branch get managed so? | 23:23 |
RAOF | I just manage it manually - ?pristine-tar commit ../path-to-tarball upstream-branch? | 23:24 |
Kiall | so you create actually create a .tar.gz based on the upstream branch? | 23:25 |
RAOF | Well, that depends. If there *is* no upstream tarball then you need to create one, but if you're packaging a release you start with their tarball. | 23:26 |
Kiall | and pristine-tar picks up on being inside a git repo and does the rest? | 23:27 |
RAOF | Yeah. pristine-tar commits to the pristine-tar branch :) | 23:37 |
Kiall | cool :) should be easy to switch over then | 23:40 |
arand | RAOF: So when you import-orig you only touch the pristine branch, and the debian branch? | 23:41 |
RAOF | arand: I don't import-orig. | 23:44 |
RAOF | arand: I merge the upstream release tag the tarball is based on into the ?upstream? branch, merge ?upstream? into debian, and pristine-tar commit the tarball. | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!