[13:09] <mhall119> james_w: ping, I'm working on a summit deployment, are there any special instructions that are needed for your unsubscribe change?
[13:10] <james_w> just a migrate
[13:10] <mhall119> ok
[13:42] <mhall119> james_w: I've got one quick review that we need before going to production
[13:43] <james_w> ok
[13:44] <mhall119> https://code.launchpad.net/~mhall119/summit/auto-set-user-openid/+merge/80070
[13:47] <james_w> mhall119, what would that do to people who already have <lpuser>2 as their username?
[13:48] <mhall119> james_w: I'm going to have IS run manage.py update-openids, which will switch their openid association over to the <lpuser> User record
[13:48] <mhall119> next login, they'll be identified as <lpuser>
[13:48] <james_w> excellent
[13:48] <mhall119> this just prevents us from having to run update-openids after every lpupdate
[13:48] <james_w> approved
[13:49] <mhall119> thanks, I'll get the production branch ready
[14:10] <mhall119> james_w: cjohnston: nigelb: requested summit deployment
[14:10] <nigelb> mhall119: \o/
[14:11] <james_w> woop
[19:05] <james_w> mhall119, I'm thinking we shouldn't hide the details of private meetings any more, what do you think?
[19:08] <mhall119> why would we want to stop hiding them?
[19:16] <james_w> I mean just the title
[19:16] <james_w> given that only admins see them now
[19:17] <james_w> and by just clicking "Edit" they can see the title
[19:40] <nigelb> \o/ I c
[19:42] <mhall119> james_w: talk to jcastro to see what the reason for hiding the data initially was important
[19:42] <james_w> they used to be shown on the main schedule
[19:43] <james_w> but now they are only allowed in private rooms
[19:43] <james_w> and only admins can see private rooms
[19:43] <nigelb> (ugh, sorry)
[19:43] <james_w> an argument could be made that it makes shoulder surfing harder
[19:46] <mhall119> james_w: no, private meetings can still be held in open rooms
[19:47] <mhall119> they just have to be manually scheduled, IIRC
[19:47] <james_w> oh, true
[19:48] <mhall119> FYI, vanguard said it'd take a few days before the deployment, but tiaz was going to bump the RT
[19:48] <james_w> I saw, thanks
[19:49] <james_w> if it had gone to the linaro RT I could have done that :-)
[19:49] <mhall119> done the deploy?
[19:49] <mhall119> or done the bumping
[19:52] <james_w> done the bumping
[19:52] <james_w> I have priority powers in the linaro RT
[19:53] <mhall119> do those come with a cape?
[19:54] <james_w> heh
[20:17] <cjohnston> james_w: since you have priority powers in linaro rt, file to get loco.u.c updated, saying it will help the server ;-)
[20:18] <james_w> :-)
[21:14] <james_w> https://code.launchpad.net/~james-w/summit/usability/+merge/80108 is pretty important for creating private meetings
[23:06] <mhall119> james_w: approved
[23:10] <mhall119> james_w: nigelb: the new summit code it out