[04:07] <holstein> knome ScottL D00Ds
[04:07] <holstein> nice work knome 
[04:08] <holstein> i checked, im in :)
[09:04] <knome> ScottL, hmm, weird, i added you to cc though...
[09:06] <knome> well, i forwarded you both what i got...
[11:04] <ScottL> oustanding knome! 
[11:07] <knome> :)
[13:11] <scott-work> i've never made a team in launchpad, i hope it's not going to be that invovled :/
[13:38] <jussi> scott-work: its like 3 minutes work
[13:40] <scott-work> jussi: i meant more like doing it correctly ;)
[13:40] <scott-work> i've got the launchpad help page up already for creating teams, i just want to make sure i get it under the -dev in the correct heirarchy (sp?)
[13:41] <scott-work> i expect to do get it done today though, i'll thread it into my work cycles today
[13:43] <jussi> scott-work: most things can be changed, just make sure you get the name right :)
[13:43] <scott-work> jussi: : gotcha ;)
[13:44] <jussi> scott-work: I mean the name LP uses, Im pretty sure everything else can be changed...
[13:46] <scott-work> jussi: i was going to evaluate what xubuntu did and moderate to fit
[13:46] <jussi> scott-work: sounds sane
[13:51] <scott-work> jussi: gknome was suggesting that ubuntustudio-website-team (or whatever the name will be) should be under ubuntustudio-dev team, does that seem sane?  i should think so
[13:51] <knome> wut?
[13:51] <knome> :)
[13:51] <knome> i got the highlight btw
[13:51] <knome> if you were trying to avoid that
[13:55] <scott-work> knome: oh, lol, i did mispell your name, although it wasn't intentional
[13:55] <scott-work> gnome + knome = gknome ?
[13:55] <knome> hah
[13:55] <knome> knome = gnome + kde? :P
[13:56] <scott-work> i admit that i really do not fully comprehend the team structures at this point, at times it seems backwards that what i would expect
[14:11] <scott-work> but in looking at the xubuntu teams, it would seem that i should make a website project and a website team for which the team is the driver of the project
[14:12] <scott-work> although i cannot find any direct connection (i.e. this team is a subteam of that team) between xubuntu or xubuntu-dev to the website team
[14:19] <knome> there isn't any direct connect between the two teams. i think there should be, like with xubuntu-artwork
[14:19] <knome> but i'm not sure.
[14:38] <scott-work> the last thing i can think of at the moment is who would "own" the code then?  ubuntustudio-dev or ubuntustudio-website-team?
[14:39] <scott-work> or the ubuntustudio-website project?
[14:50] <scott-work> i think i might ask these question in the launchpad channel
[15:14] <knome> scott-work, the website-team would be the owner od the website-product that contains the code
[17:17] <scott-work> so i tried the decrypting the message chris jones sent to me last night for the current website access
[17:17] <scott-work> i can't, it's encrypted with a different key apparently :/
[17:17] <scott-work> so, back to email tag
[17:20] <scott-work> knome: is there a particular oder i should make the team and project?  does one need to precede the other?  i'm sorry that i keep bothering you with this questions, i tend to not like to do something unfamiliar without having a basic understanding of the process or what to expect
[17:22] <scott-work> i'll be forthcoming as well, i would really like to reorganize the entire ubuntu studio project/team structure because it seems rather ad hoc and without logical organization to me, but not this cycle ;)
[17:37] <scott-work> knome: ubuntustudio-website team team created and invite sent to you
[17:37] <scott-work> holstein: you need a launchpad account ;)   i can't invite you
[17:38] <scott-work> holstein: nevermind, i remembered your account name
[17:47] <scott-work> website team and project created
[18:02] <knome> scott-work, team first yeah ;)
[18:02] <knome> scott-work, well, it's easier to attach the project that way :)
[18:03] <knome> bbl->