=== medberry is now known as med_out [09:28] Is something weird happening? The PGP Release signature for oneiric-partner is BAD [09:33] ok, what?! I get different content in Release.gpg depending on whether it is downloaded using Apt or (curl,wget) [09:34] lp_archive@cocoplum:~$ gpg --verify /srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-partner/dists/oneiric/Release.gpg /srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-partner/dists/oneiric/Release [09:34] gpg: Signature made Sat Oct 22 09:19:06 2011 UTC using DSA key ID 437D05B5 [09:34] gpg: Good signature from "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key " [09:34] transparent proxy that's cached Release and Release.gpg differently, perhaps [09:35] wget -O /dev/null --no-cache on both sometimes helps [09:35] (cf. bug 804252) [09:35] Launchpad bug 804252 in launchpad "Please support InRelease files (affects: 1) (heat: 5)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/804252 [09:39] cjwatson: I think sadalbari is serving an out of date copy of Release.gpg [09:39] scandium's seems OK [09:46] Yup, all is well once I override archive.canonical.com in my /etc/hosts to talk to scandium only [16:17] lamont, can you kill https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/8.0~b4+build1-0ubuntu1/+build/2865778 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/8.0~b3+build1-0ubuntu1/+build/2860254 ? [16:18] i didn't realize the armel builds had gone the same way as powerpc too.... [18:48] huh, syncpackage fails for me with a 404 error from packages.d.o [18:48] that's new [18:49] slangasek: file a bug report :) [18:49] yes [18:52] bug #880051 [18:52] Launchpad bug 880051 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "syncpackage crashed with AttributeError in copy(): 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'strip' (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880051 [18:55] slangasek: that's fixed in trunk [18:55] is it a bug in syncpackage, or just bad error reporting of a packages.d.o problem? [18:56] slangasek: bug in syncpackage that it crashes, when it can't get the changelog from packages.d.o [18:57] ok - if it didn't crash the operation should complete successfully? [18:57] or does it need the changelog to DTRT? [18:57] my line of questioning is leading up to asking whether this will be SRUed :) [19:00] * slangasek wonders what to do with pulseaudio-utils for multiarch [19:01] ia32-libs wants libpulsedsp... but is the mechanism used to load this multiarch safe anyway? [19:01] should we be setting LD_PRELOAD=libpulsedsp.so, to be architecture neutral [19:02] ah, padsp already does that [19:02] safe enough then [19:04] slangasek: it doesn't need the changelog. it just pulls it to promt it to the user (for confirmation). [19:04] sounds SRU worthy to me, then [19:06] yes, tumbleweed: ^ [20:54] bdrung: agreed. Why are we having so many SRUs in the last month. Or we doing something wrong? [20:54] (re ubuntu-dev-tools) [20:55] bdrung: clear the current SRU first [20:56] tumbleweed: ok, i'll clear oneiric, and you the others? [20:57] * tumbleweed prepared them all, but if nobody else will verify them, I will [21:02] tumbleweed: oneiric is already verified [21:03] bdrung: there's another SRU in progress too [21:05] tumbleweed: but the current one is verified [21:20] cjwatson: It looks like the two nodes that comprise archive.canonical.com may be rather out of sync [21:20] maxb@chimaera:~$ curl --silent --header "Pragma: no-cache" --header "Host: archive.canonical.com" http://scandium.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/Release | grep ^Date [21:20] Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 9:19:05 UTC [21:20] maxb@chimaera:~$ curl --silent --header "Pragma: no-cache" --header "Host: archive.canonical.com" http://sadalbari.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/Release | grep ^Date [21:20] Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:32:27 UTC [21:24] I can't do anything about that myself, but I've passed it on [21:25] thanks [21:58] * slangasek fills the new queue with multiarch packages