[00:00] there is none, that I know of [00:00] this is what pre-up, up, post-up are useful for [00:25] kaushal: one moment [00:26] kaushal: here is mine http://paste.debian.net/139315/ [00:26] twb: ok [00:27] twb: if i just set gateway someip in /etc/network/interfaces ? [00:27] is that sufficient ? [00:28] kaushal: that depends what you want. [00:28] I mean make it permanent [00:28] am i doing it wrong ? [00:28] Probably. [00:29] twb: Probably ? [00:29] not sure i understand [00:29] kaushal: I mean: I think you're an idiot, and you want someone to do your homework for you. [00:31] twb: mind your words ? [00:31] its pretty bad [00:34] I have a bunch of LXC jails, which drop SYS_ADMIN, and thus cannot lower niceness levels. Cron is hard-coded to do so, so I get messages like this: bleed CRON: pam_limits(cron:session): Could not set limit for 'nice' to soft=20, hard=0: Operation not permitted; uid=0,euid=0 [00:35] Now, this I can understand, but recently I created a new jail, and for some reason it is saying the same with uid=20 instead of uid=0. [00:35] How can this be? That uid is not in use, and UIDs below 100 are reserved for distro-wide hard-coded use. [01:31] why in oneiric, nic aliasing only show the main ip of the nic? [01:31] amero: pastebin the output of "ip a" [01:32] who exactly are you *showing* this info? [01:33] s/who/how/ ? [01:33] i could see all the additional ips in 'ip a' but not in ifconfig -a [01:33] heh, it worked both ways :) [01:33] amero: that's because ifconfig is crap [01:33] ipconfig has been depressiated a long time ago [01:33] amero: it predates the idea that interfaces can have >1 address [01:33] how did you make the alias? [01:33] patdk-lap: er, *ifconfig; *deprecated. Go drink some coffee :-) [01:34] heh [01:34] And "depreciated" is something that happens to money, not code [01:34] well, it happens to code :) we just call it bitrot :) [01:38] looks like ubuntu opted to not fix it, but passed it upstream to debian, and waiting for them to fix it [01:39] bug #876829 [01:39] Launchpad bug 876829 in ifupdown "Oneiric's ifupdown breaks ip aliases" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/876829 [01:49] patdk-lap: wow, someone actually made a nontrivial change to ifupdown? [01:49] Like, made it use ip(8) ? [01:50] * stgraber notices a familiar bug # :) [01:50] so yeah, regarding that bug, I'm not familiar enough with ifupdown's code to fix it, especially as the bug is in Debian's 0.7 branch too [01:51] ifupdown is fucking awful code [01:51] the aliasing actually works (as in, the IP gets assigned to the interface), the problem is the missing label [01:51] so hopefully now that the source of the problem is known, it should be quite easy for the author to fix it. Once it's fixed upstream, I'll try to isolate the fix and push it to Oneiric as an SRU. [01:52] stgraber, should be a simple fix :) [01:53] figured someone would have patched it by now though [01:53] maybe if I have a moment this week I'll make one [01:53] but that big isn't big for me, as I don't use oneiric [01:57] hmm, 7hours before I can verify this patch works :( [02:30] patdk-lap: I started looking at the diff last week, though the 0.6 -> 0.7 diff is pretty big so figuring out exactly what broke wasn't too trivial. Though now that I know it's definitely label related, pin pointing the change and reverting/fixing it should be a lot easier. [02:30] I may try to do that next week if I'm not too busy with pre-UDS preparation [02:40] stgraber, can I see the diff? [02:40] it really should be a very simple patch, should be pretty ovious [02:46] patdk-lap: http://pastebin.com/p2Eht102 is the diff from 0.6.10ubuntu5 to 0.7~alpha5.1ubuntu1 (so basically from the latest 0.6 release to the earliest 0.7 release) [02:48] patdk-lap: http://pastebin.com/d40HanPQ when restricting to ifupdown.nw [02:52] there you go :) [02:52] that paste pastebin [02:52] line 940 [02:52] ip link set dev %iface% up label %iface% [02:52] should do it [02:53] maybe for 985/986 also? or is that part of a comment? [02:53] I thought ifupdown 0.7~a was still classed as "here be dragons" [02:56] actially, I wonder if that would work [02:57] wonder what iface is set too there [02:58] I'll have to install an oneiric machine and play [02:59] twb: yeah, my understanding is that we got it in Oneiric to have it well tested for the LTS and because we wanted IPv6 support [02:59] I guess [02:59] ipv6 support for what? [03:00] patdk-lap: IIRC ifupdown 0.7 brings a few more options to "inet6 static" and the one currently in Debian brings dhcpv6 support too [03:01] hmm, I haven't done dhcpv6 yet, just stick with static and auto v6 so far [03:01] The main use is resolv.conf [03:11] how to delete mysqmail [03:33] Anyone know of a way to have scripted input for debconf when installing packages that require human input? (such as for the case of deploying the installation of something across a network of systems, silently; without having to put in data manually at each system. [03:33] Takyoji: DEBIAN_INTERFACE=noninteractive [03:34] But you probably want something like puppet [03:34] because I'm trying to deploy a LDAP/NFS setup on fresh installations and so on [03:44] ahh; apparently you can even just set it (as a variable) before any apt-get command rather than having to permanently set it, as I thought was the only option [03:44] Also preseeding [03:51] preseeding being? [03:51] New bug: #813398 in lxc (main) "lxc-create -t ubuntu spews locale errors " [Low,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813398 [03:51] Takyoji: answering questions in advance [03:52] Like debconf-set-selections <<<'ldap-auth-config ldap-auth-config/override boolean false' [03:52] I'm most likely to be going without puppet; I pretty much already have a bash script written [03:53] with non-interactive; does that mean you can just specify the values using stdin, or? [03:54] Takyoji: no, it means you can't specify anything [03:54] So it just ignores the configuration part entirely? [03:54] It doesn't prompt you at all [03:54] Hi I am trying to mount a western digital usb hdd. but I am runing into errors [03:54] mount -t vfat /dev/sdc /media/external -o uid-1000,gid=1000,utf8,dmask=027,fmask=137 [03:54] that is the command I used. [03:54] so it assumes some default value instead then, or? [03:55] Takyoji: it'll take the defaults (or preseed), yes [03:55] Takyoji: occasionally it'll email you (e.g. debmirror) if there is no useful default [03:55] it said wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc [03:55] /dev/sdc is a whole harddrive, not a specific partition [03:55] Zanzacar: try sdc1 [03:55] tried that got the same error [03:56] Zanzacar: pastebin "cat /proc/partitions"; pastebin "file -s /dev/sdc*" [03:56] I was following the ubuntu help guide on it till I got the errors then came here. [03:56] Make that "sudo file -s /dev/sdc*" [03:57] http://paste.pocoo.org/show/497153/ [03:58] http://paste.pocoo.org/show/497154/ [03:58] Blergh [03:59] Well, /dev/sdc1 is definitely right, so something else is wrong -- like maybe you weren't running mount as root? [03:59] Surprised they're shipping with FAT though, you'd think NTFS would be saner... [04:00] I had a typo, uid-1000 needed to be uid=1000 [04:00] sorry about that guys [04:02] Zanzacar: oh, sorry I didn't spot that [04:05] no I just need to figure out how to copy all .mp4 movies over to the hdd haha. [04:05] upsmon to upsd, that's client pull oriented, right? [04:14] yay I figured it all out, now I can copy 125gigs in less then 5 days. [04:14] usb vs. lan...... lan wins [04:14] whoops [04:14] usb vs ftp.... usb wins [04:14] haha [04:18] zanzacar: sneaker-net always wins :) [04:18] station-wagon full of tapes [04:39] what is flush-8 command? I am copying a bunch of movies from my server HDD to a fat32 HDD [04:39] I am looking at my IO read writes and its says its reading and writing a lot [04:40] man pages says something about email, smtp but I didnt think I had a mail service on this server [04:40] Zanzacar: it's probably a kernel thread responsible for getting the data onto the actual platters of the disk [04:40] Zanzacar: it's 8 because you have 8 CPUs [04:41] Zanzacar: the anpage [04:41] Zanzacar: the manpage is for postfix; unrelated [04:41] twb: thanks I was wondering why it didnt make any since. [04:41] If you're in top and you hit "c", or in ps auxf output, kernel threads have []'s around them [04:41] th0mz: thanks for the info [04:42] twb: O thats pretty cool, ya it says its a kernel thread [04:42] Yeah, well, they piss me off [04:42] ps auxf | grep -v ]$ [04:43] the kernel threads piss you off? [04:45] o thats really cool its like a tree of where the commands are coming from basically? [04:51] They piss me off when they fill up the first three pages of top because I have 8 cores instead of 2 [04:55] I am still learning all this, I only started using linux about 2 months ago maybe. [04:55] had a server up after about 1 month. [04:55] every problem I run into I try to figure it out research it, etc. [04:56] I did a bunch of bash stuff but got really frustrated with the syntax so I learned python instead. [04:56] All I know is now that I know linux I never want to go back to pc [04:58] I don't really care about your personal epiphanies. [05:00] twb: ok [05:06] How do you specify a preseed file when installing packages with apt-get? Or do I just append it to some system-wide file, or? [05:11] Takyoji: you pass it to debconf-set-selections before installing the package in question [05:12] ahh, I think I understand what you were specifying earlier. [05:12] Quite [05:14] and you generate the preseed config how? Do the installation as normal and get the added info to debconf-get-selections, or? [05:25] Takyoji: using your brain [05:25] debconf-get-selections helps [05:31] So, I just did do-release-upgrade... it's been stuck on installing a new version of /etc/mysql/debian-start for a few minutes. [05:31] How long until I should be worried? [05:34] Well.. I'm already worried. How long until I should ctrl-c? Or what should I do? [05:35] josePhoenix: you may want to try to strace it [05:36] I don't know which process invoked by do-release-upgrade is actually running [05:36] ah, pstree.. [05:37] josePhoenix: if you interrupt d-r-u it'll explode [05:37] josePhoenix: it really doesn't cope well with that [05:37] Okay, noted [05:37] at least, that's my experience -- I get told off for bad-mouthing d-r-u all the time [05:38] can I kill the hung process (looks like restarting mysql) and will d-r-u move on [05:38] ? [05:39] Dunno [05:39] So... what's the least-bad way out of here? [05:40] Probably kill it off as cleanly as possible, then pick up the pieces [05:40] I would try killing off just the mysql restart at first [05:40] Cool, that seems to have gotten it moving again [05:41] I guess I have to figure out why mysql won't start some other time -.- [05:41] Cos it's crap [05:41] postgres ftw [05:41] Well yeah [05:41] have to support both though [05:41] not my choice [05:41] Stupid users :-/ [05:42] you're telling me [05:42] Just tell them it's a security risk [05:53] and they'll complain about not being able to use wordpress [05:53] which is also a security risk >.> [06:00] hear, hear [06:09] What the hell [06:09] Have a script that spawns some processes on boot (using "@reboot" in a user crontab) [06:09] 60 sec after they're spawned, they get SIGKILL and exit [06:10] Is there some kind of throttling going on? [06:12] no, that's not it.. those lines don't show up until later [06:31] josePhoenix: what's the proc named? [06:31] A thing I've seen sometimes is the init script does like "killall squid" and kills both the squid process and itself, because it's called /etc/init.d/squid [06:31] I think I figured it out.. apparently php5-fpm doesn't clean up its own pid file, and my startup script isn't handling that nicely [06:58] Hm. How can I find per-user crontabs? I need to update this in a few users' crontabs at once [06:58] josePhoenix: /var/spool/cron/ somewhere [06:59] Not sure if you should be blatting them directly, though [06:59] Isn't that warning just because cron needs a sighup to know to rescan the crontabs? [06:59] I'm going to be rebooting anyway [06:59] something like that, yeah [07:02] might be able to fix this without touching the crontabs though... so that'd be nice [07:45] morning all [07:48] morning [08:08] morning all, what would be the best way of making all of my ubuntu client single sign on against my fresh install of oneiric server? === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === RudyValencia- is now known as RudyValencia === RudyValencia- is now known as RudyValencia [08:29] elz89: probably via LDAP authentication, https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OpenLDAPServer and https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LDAPClientAuthentication [08:29] TeTeT: thank you [08:57] New bug: #880716 in squid (main) "package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880716 [09:11] morning o/ [09:33] hi all [09:57] hello koolhead17 [10:02] hey uksysadmin !!! how are you sir? :) [10:02] lynxman: hola [10:02] hey Daviey [10:04] I'm good thanks. and you? [10:04] uksysadmin: am awesome!! so how is hacking coming along? [10:08] logcheck gives "subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2" on 10.04. after failed upgrade aptitude shows partially installed. how do i fix this? [10:08] *partially configured [10:12] I like awesome. I'm getting there. I know the #juju channel will like me saying this - but that's equally as awesome (and all I've done is type juju bootstrap and juju deploy a mysql server!) lol [10:13] uksysadmin: yes juju rocks!! you can try charm for CMS like drupal or wordpress as well :) [10:15] indeed - I'm following kim0 tutorial and its working [10:16] just limited in hardware at the mo which is being alleviated this week and over the next few weeks [10:16] uksysadmin: awesome!! :) [10:17] indeed [10:17] ubuntu rocks [just trying to get it back on track for this room] ;-) [10:17] uksysadmin: i need to install oneric as well on my laptop to use LXC and stop using AWS for deplyment test [10:18] (that's me standing on the stage and saying "Anyone here use Ubuntu?" followed by cheers... ;-) [10:18] * koolhead17 thinks most folks around here are still in weekend hangover!1 :P [10:19] yeah I need to do that - but I'm primarily focussed on OpenStack so providing I can get that up and running then do juju stuff to install to it - that's enough for a couple of demos to the engineers and execs here to show the power of it all [10:19] hmm. [10:20] btw - I wouldn't upgrade to oineric on a desktop... its great for the OpenStack stuff, but Unity sucks (sorry for those who like it and have allegiance to it - its not for me) plus its buggy as hell. [10:21] * uksysadmin puts flame-retardant underwear on [10:21] uksysadmin: we are server folks here, and you always have choice :D [10:22] i will install xubuntu/lubuntu on my netbook [10:23] I've had about 10,000 hits over a few days to my blog since putting up a fix that is caused by an upgrade to 11.04 to 11.10 in some circumstances. [10:23] that's not the desktop distro that has previously "just worked" out of the box that people came to love [10:23] though us Linux folk are fickle I guess - and that comes through choice. [10:24] :P [10:24] uksysadmin: am using LTS on my desktop [10:24] currently [10:24] keep it that way ;-) [10:26] uksysadmin, link to the post?:) [10:26] w00: google for uksysadmin i think :D [10:26] oh right [10:26] http://uksysadmin.wordpress.com/2011/10/14/upgrade-to-ubuntu-11-10-problem-waiting-for-network-configuration-then-black-screen-solution/ [10:27] oh, i read that already cause i got bitten by it :) [10:27] * w00 thanks uksysadmin [10:27] w00, its poor for something that IMHO shouldn't have gotten past testing... [10:28] BUT - how many people upgraded 11.04 (or maybe earlier) to one of the betas? I didn't - I tested the betas using a fresh install [10:29] uksysadmin, tell me about it, i'm kind of dissapointed as a user who just started using Ubuntu few months ago [10:29] I can only guess that it didn't handle /var/run (a mounted fs) in 11.04 and earlier which has files that possibly are in use because you're doing a live upgrade... it doesn't/can't remove it whilst its in use... so when you reboot /var/run doesn't have the needed structure that /run has which is a new tmpfs area [10:29] dpkg --configure logcheck also gives same error [10:30] and most/all packages refer to /var/run so 11.10 symlinks to /run... on a clean install this is the case, on an upgrade you're left with a /run that isn't linked to /var/run [10:31] its made worse by the fact it means networking fails - so if its your one and only desktop - you can't even google for a solution [10:32] dhclient eth0 (or whatever) will sort that out on a dhcp network - but desktop users who have ditched Windows for a cleaner experience mightn't know the magic keypresses and commands to get this going again. [10:32] * uksysadmin stops ranting now [10:33] :P [10:43] heh, I have had issues with tmpfs /var/run before [10:43] mainly programs making subdirs in it, and using them [10:44] that means you either can't have them use /var/run, or you have to recreate that dir each boot === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [11:01] New bug: #880778 in samba (main) "package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed')" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880778 [11:28] http://pastebin.com/2QjTHNZS [11:30] Anyone want to tackle a bitesize bug? [11:35] Daviey: ? [11:36] koolhead17: bug 875262 is a good bitesize bug to tackle [11:36] Launchpad bug 875262 in php5 "PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20090626+lfs/sqlite.so'" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/875262 [11:37] Daviey: waoo. i saw/faced it last night itself [11:37] koolhead17: Great! It should be pretty easy to fix... :) [11:37] during installation of owncloud2 [11:38] New bug: #880791 in samba (main) "Automated Bug Report during Oneiric Upgrade w/Samba" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880791 [11:38] koolhead17: note, you can't use UDD for it. :/ [11:38] Daviey: show me the path o master!1 :) [11:38] koolhead17: $ pull-lp-source php5 [11:38] :) [11:38] k [11:41] Daviey: the suggestion was to remove /etc/php5/conf.d/sqlite3.ini as the same bug was reported for 8.04 as well [11:41] koolhead17: *no*, /etc/php5/conf.d/sqlite.ini [11:42] Daviey: oops [11:42] yes [11:47] Daviey: am on it then. :) [11:49] i have it downloaded now. [11:52] Daviey: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-sqlite3/+bug/281714 are they both not linked ? [11:52] Launchpad bug 281714 in php-sqlite3 "PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/sqlite3.so'" [Undecided,Confirmed] [11:52] Hah, no - they are opposite. :) [11:53] koolhead17: That was a bug on hardy. === mrmist is now known as dave2 === dave2 is now known as Guest88551 === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [11:54] Daviey: yeah. so what about apps which uses sqlite not sqlite3 ? [11:54] even now? [11:54] * koolhead17 is curious [11:55] koolhead17: SoL [11:55] Daviey: SoL ? === Guest88551 is now known as mrmist [11:56] Daviey: sorry am finding too n00b with all the terms!! :D [11:59] good morning [11:59] koolhead17: sorry, Sad Out of Luck [12:00] * koolhead17 writes the meaning in his slag list :D [12:00] koolhead17: as per, bug 747325 [12:00] Launchpad bug 747325 in sqlite "demote sqlite, or remove it from the archive" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/747325 [12:11] Daviey: hey small question for you, what's our HA ipvs of choice right now? :) [12:27] lynxman: simple answer? [12:27] Daviey: yeah [12:28] lynxman: We have none recommended.. If you want kernel level, ip_vs_dh [12:29] I don't believe it is in Lucid. [12:30] Daviey: was looking for something with a bit more punch, virtual IP and active monitoring of DRBD [12:31] Daviey: Not in Lucid? Really? It was there in Hardy. [12:32] Daviey: It's there in Lucid, too. [12:38] soren: Oh, i didn't realise it was a module in hardy or lucid. [12:39] ISTR having to do something funky when using it with Lucid, but i could be wrong. [12:39] lynxman: Really need more detail :) [12:41] lynxman: looked at pacemanker or drbd8 and OCFS2 [12:41] Daviey: pacemaker, that's it :) [12:41] Daviey: thanks! [12:48] Daviey: so is sqlite will be removed from precise :D [12:52] Daviey: Every single Ubuntu release ever has had it as a module. [12:52] Daviey: All the way back to Warty. [12:55] since ifconfig cant recognize alias nic in oneiric, what's the alt way to disable the alias nic? [13:02] damn, ifdown on a alias, downs the whole interface, but doesn't mark the raw interface as down [13:02] that is annoying [13:06] holy.. i was gonna try it with ifdown just now. so glad that i haven't done it [13:07] * patdk-wk tests if this works for alias [13:07] but hmm, making ifdown not break everything will be harder I think === flatline is now known as Guest83070 [13:12] yep, quick easy fix to make ifup work :) [13:14] in ifupdown-0.7~alpha5.1ubuntu5/ifupdown.nw [13:14] line 4380, add: label %iface%, to the end [13:15] * koolhead17 is bit excited [13:15] I also did it on 4494, but probably not needed, but might be, for tun interfaces [13:15] the testbuild file needs to be edited to add the label onto those checks for all ipv4 tests though, easy enough [13:15] see if I can locate the ifdown issue [13:15] well, locate is esay, fixing it not so much [13:21] hmm, ifdown isn't too hard, depending [13:21] need to add label %iface% to the ip flush dev [13:21] but then, need not all link set down at all, or it brings the whole interface down [13:34] Daviey, hello [13:34] Hello [13:34] im trying to make wpa_suplicant connect to a hidden ssid but not successfull :( [14:14] Daviey: fyi, while cyrus-imapd-2.2 is in universe, I thought I might point out http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/d2u/. there are several simple merge candidates for several releases. this could be good practice for core-dev/motu for someone here [14:15] Daviey: and hello! :) === cloakable_ is now known as cloakable [14:30] Wondering if anyone here has had any success in getting Ubuntu to install on HP rx2620? after booting from the installation CD you enter setup and it then fails to continue to reconnize the CD anymore === smb` is now known as smb === med_out is now known as medberry [14:47] jdstrand: Ooo, thanks! [14:47] Ursinha: heya [14:51] Daviey, hey [14:58] hey Ursinha [15:00] jdstrand: Am i being a banana? There are not yet LP bugs for those CVE's are therE? [15:01] (I assume you don't help a helper tool for raising bugs, where you throw in a CVE number? :) [15:03] Daviey: I don't see bugs for that, no. we also don't have a tool to add a bug to LP. I won't go into why, but suffice it to say that LP does not meet the security team's needs for CVE triage, and we work out of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-cve-tracker (add bug references to it when they come in) [15:04] Daviey: if you open a bug, ping me and I'll add it to the open CVEs [15:05] jdstrand: sad, it looked like LP did start to do some good stuff for CVE work. I guess it didn't get finished. [15:06] Daviey: well, we need to track just way to much stuff. to get an idea, see README in uct [15:07] jdstrand: It's been a few months since i tried to switch to uct, is it that time again to try again? :) [15:07] hehe [15:11] jdstrand: is bug 880909 correct? (series targets?)) [15:11] Launchpad bug 880909 in cyrus-imapd-2.2 "bypass access restrictions for some commands" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880909 [15:15] Daviey: yeah. fyi, there is also CVE-2011-1926 and CVE-2011-3208 [15:15] jdstrand: The STARTTLS implementation in Cyrus IMAP Server before 2.4.7 does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert commands into encrypted sessions by sending a cleartext command that is processed after TLS is in place, related to a "plaintext command injection" attack, a similar issue to CVE-2011-0411. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1926) [15:15] jdstrand: Stack-based buffer overflow in the split_wildmats function in nntpd.c in nntpd in Cyrus IMAP Server before 2.3.17 and 2.4.x before 2.4.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted NNTP command. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-3208) [15:15] mornin [15:15] uvirtbot: Yeah, i was about to open seperate bugs for those. [15:15] Daviey: Error: "Yeah," is not a valid command. [15:15] err, jdstrand [15:15] ack === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [15:50] stgraber, do you see any reason why we need resolvconf in the default list of packages installed by the ubuntu lxc template? [15:50] (re bug 880020) [15:50] Launchpad bug 880020 in lxc "oneiric container install problem #1: resolvconf" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880020 [16:01] hallyn: nope, it's actually the first thing I remove in my containers [16:02] stgraber, I updated that ifupdown bug with a mostly working fix :) [16:05] stgraber, ok, i'm still wondering why that fails to install, but i'll go ahead and remove that [16:05] i guess we can just remove it upstream and let it trickle down? or do you think it's more urgent than that? [16:06] it only fails when inetutils-ping is also in the packagelist, btw [16:06] cool, I saw some comments in the debian bug too (for the ifupdown one) [16:07] what is the debian one? [16:07] see if I can steal any ideas to totally fix mine :) [16:07] yeah, I'm fine with removing it upstream [16:07] not that I care, as long as it's fixed for 12.04 :) [16:08] hey all, accidentally mounted my external over a mount point that already had another partition mounted to it, everyworked, except, now the original mount is stuck and i can't stop the process relying on the mount, and i can't unmount cause the process is relying on it.... ? i'm sure a reboot would fix it, but i can't really do that right now [16:08] its linked from the one in launchpad, sorry I'm on my cell :) [16:08] no problem, just didn't notice it [16:11] heh, the debian people are misdirected on this issue :( [16:13] stgraber, funky actually i think resolvconf isn't hte problem, but inetutils-ping [16:17] * patdk-wk wonders if his email got lost, or if debian just takes forever to update bugs [16:18] It took alma [16:18] doh... [16:19] It took almost an hour last time I sent a mail to the bugtracker [16:19] yuk [16:26] heh, it updated :) [16:30] * koolhead17 thinks why is he so dumb [16:36] does someone have a rutorrent installation running on ubuntu 11.10? [16:43] Why is it that when I 'apt-get update' on a fresh oneiric install, the last package fails with Hash Sum Mismatch? [16:48] Daviey: I've commented on bug 878180, you aren't subscribed. Not sure whether to put certain comments in the bug or the merge request or what. [16:48] Launchpad bug 878180 in xmlrpc-c "missing Breaks/Replaces" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878180 [16:51] I was told to uncomment the CD line in sources.list, but this does not help the matter, and I can't figure out why I have the same CD line commented twice. I really do not understand how a fresh installation can be bug ridden. This is not the first stupid and trivial little problem I have had with this new Ubuntu Server Oneiric either? [16:53] elz89, after commenting the lines, did you run a sudo apt-get update [16:53] ? [16:53] Ursinha: O it was you! lmao yes, of course I did, I just followed your instructions :-) [16:55] elz89, :) [16:55] elz89, and you keep getting the same error? [16:55] rbasak: wow, helluva script [16:55] yeah [16:56] Daviey: yeah well, it beats doing it by hand again and making mistakes :) [16:56] Daviey: I don't expect that the script covers all cases but I'm pretty sure it covers this one OK [16:57] Daviey: (since the results are almost identical to what I got by hand last time) [16:57] Daviey: (and I've checked the differences by hand) [16:57] Ursinha: yes [16:58] elz89, hmm.. can you paste the whole thing for me on a pastebin? pastebinit is a really useful tool to do that :) [16:59] rbasak: well it looks good, but i am getting confused myself.. [16:59] :) [16:59] Lots of things changed between those three versions :) [17:02] New bug: #880968 in lxc (main) "natty containers do not shut down - ureadahead task keeps running" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880968 [17:05] Ursinha: ok [17:05] grrrrrrrrrr [17:07] Daviey: am still at same :( === Guest83070 is now known as flatline [17:20] stgraber, are you still on cell phone? [17:21] stgraber, if not, could you review and sponsor http://people.canonical.com/~serge/lxc-resolvconf.debdiff ? [17:36] New bug: #880984 in cloud-init (main) "error resizing root filesystem" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880984 [17:44] hallyn: I'm back from lunch. Having a look now [17:45] hallyn: oh nice, I meant to write that /run/lock fix as I had to do it for some of my containers already :) [17:46] hallyn: patch looks good, uploading now [17:47] * koolhead11 needs some help with pbuilder === koolhead11 is now known as koolhead17 [17:48] stgraber, thanks [17:48] http://paste.ubuntu.com/718047/ [18:01] guess i'ts time to sync lxc === mconigliaro_ is now known as mconigliaro [19:06] guys, I will try to stay calm - it's 3am and I've been in the DC installing this new server for the last 6 hours [19:06] I have one question [19:06] # apache2ctl start [19:06] Action 'start' failed. [19:06] The Apache error log may have more information. [19:06] what is the flippin' problem? [19:07]