| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| cdunlap | does anyone know if there is a way to remove a change from a quilt patch, rather than removing the 'popping' the whole patch? | 06:14 |
|---|---|---|
| Bachstelze | cdunlap: if you have the original diff, apply it with patch -R and do a quilt refresh | 06:16 |
| Bachstelze | or you an always modify the file manually if the change is not too big | 06:16 |
| Bachstelze | can* | 06:16 |
| Bachstelze | (and quilt refresh afterwards of course) | 06:18 |
| cdunlap | thanks. I have the .deb that has the original patch but I don't think I have the original diff | 06:19 |
| Bachstelze | you cant do a lot of things with a .deb | 06:19 |
| Bachstelze | you would at least need the source package it was built from | 06:20 |
| cdunlap | I think I will see what I can do with the .deb. At worst I have to start over. | 06:20 |
| cdunlap | Thanks for the help and direction Bachstelze | 06:21 |
| Bachstelze | (source package is .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz (or .debian.tar.gz) and .dsc) | 06:21 |
| Bachstelze | depending on where you got the .deb from, the source package should not be far | 06:21 |
| dholbach | good morning! :) | 07:08 |
| ajmitch | morning dholbach | 07:12 |
| dholbach | hi ajmitch | 07:13 |
| truongan | hello ./* | 07:36 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| Laney | howdy ho | 08:46 |
| nigelb | Morning | 08:47 |
| Laney | disturbingly there have been no additions to the udd table since i switched to the new method :P | 08:47 |
| nigelb | Did you b0rk it? | 08:48 |
| Laney | evidently | 08:48 |
| lucas | Laney: shouldn't your change apply to Debian as well? | 08:55 |
| lucas | it would be better to keep the same table struct as much as possible | 08:55 |
| Laney | yeah, if you can supply that data for Debian too | 08:57 |
| Laney | lucas: do you know why the updates fail for ubuntu-upload-history now? | 08:57 |
| Laney | update but no run in timestamps | 08:57 |
| lucas | Laney: I don't know | 08:58 |
| lucas | Laney: sorry, my UDD time is very limited | 08:58 |
| lucas | Laney: are you a DD? I could ask you to be added to the uddadm group | 08:58 |
| Laney | yes | 08:58 |
| Laney | if you like, that would be fine | 08:58 |
| lucas | ok, let's do that | 08:58 |
| lucas | Laney: debian login? | 08:59 |
| Laney | laney | 08:59 |
| lucas | I created the RT ticket, I'll let you know when the request is dealt with | 09:01 |
| Laney | ty | 09:01 |
| lucas | Laney: done | 10:00 |
| Laney | nice | 10:01 |
| Laney | lucas: err, how do I run things as udd? and login to postgres to alter the table? | 10:13 |
| Laney | soz | 10:13 |
| lucas | Laney: you need a sudo passwd, and then sudo -u udd -s | 10:14 |
| Laney | thought that, doesn't seem to be my d.o password though | 10:15 |
| tumbleweed | sudo passwords are different | 10:15 |
| Laney | ok | 10:15 |
| Laney | docs? | 10:15 |
| tumbleweed | developers reference, IIRC | 10:15 |
| lucas | or db.debian.org | 10:16 |
| tumbleweed | yeah, that's where you set it | 10:16 |
| Laney | ah, that | 10:17 |
| Laney | cheers | 10:18 |
| Ceno3x | Hi guys. I want to upload a kernel package I've built to launchpad, but seems I need to make a source package in other to do that. I built my packages using make-kpkg so I shouldn't be too far off, can someone point me in the right direction? | 12:00 |
| tumbleweed | Ceno3x: didn't I point you at the kernel teams documentation a few days ago? | 12:07 |
| Ceno3x | tumbleweed: indeed you did, but I still haven't figured it out, so I thought I'd try my luck again. sorry man, I'm under a bit of pressure to have this done quickly | 12:10 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| tumbleweed | Laney: another qa script (to move to ubuntuwire when we have udd there) http://ubuntu-dev.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/neglected-packages.cgi | 16:45 |
| Laney | nice | 16:45 |
| * Laney is trying to write a "who has made uploads to orphaned packages" query | 16:46 | |
| elgaton | Hi, I'm fixing a small bug (missing dependency in debian/control) and have a few questions: 1) should I generate the patch against the debian/ directory only (as explained in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing) or a debdiff? 2) Since I need to get a sponsor for my patch and I'm working on the fix, is it right to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors and add the "patch" tag to the LP bug, but to set the bug status to "In Progress" and assign it to myself? T | 16:47 |
| elgaton | hanks. | 16:47 |
| Laney | 1) debdiff is fine, 2) subscribe sponsors, status to confirmed, no assignee | 16:47 |
| elgaton | OK, thanks | 16:48 |
| micahg | gilir: I'm assuming we don't want a dev version of abiword for the LTS, right? | 19:10 |
| gilir | micahg, only if a stable release is planned during this cycle :) | 19:11 |
| micahg | ok, so I'll merge the last fix from testing this weekend before the dev version migrates (not sure that a stable version will land this cycle) | 19:11 |
| gilir | sounds good, thanks :) | 19:13 |
| micahg | and Abiword 3.0 is GTK 3 only | 19:14 |
| micahg | or most likely will be | 19:14 |
| mr_pouit | micahg: a sync request has been filed I think already | 19:23 |
| mr_pouit | (for abiword 2.9, I mean) | 19:24 |
| micahg | mr_pouit: do you think we should take it? | 19:24 |
| micahg | I'm happy to comment on it and request it not be brought in | 19:24 |
| mr_pouit | since the official website says explicitly that it's a development release, I think it's better not to sync it | 19:25 |
| micahg | ok, so, we're all on the same page | 19:25 |
| mr_pouit | :) | 19:25 |
| mr_pouit | Bug #881386 | 19:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 881386 in abiword (Ubuntu) "Sync abiword 2.9.1-0.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/881386 | 19:26 |
| mr_pouit | oh, you already replied ;-) | 19:27 |
| micahg | yep :) | 19:27 |
| micahg | and \sh isn't around to discuss... | 19:27 |
| micahg | mr_pouit: sorry, I should've highlighted you originally as well :) | 19:28 |
| mr_pouit | no worry, I saw the sync request this morning and I was thinking about it as well | 19:30 |
| jtaylor | hm what to do when a package has no patchsystem | 20:08 |
| jtaylor | but uses patch in debian rules to patch something in debian/package-name | 20:08 |
| jtaylor | now I need to add a patch that changes the source itself | 20:08 |
| jtaylor | add patch < patch, patch -R < to debian rules? | 20:08 |
| tumbleweed | if it's currently applying patches by hand, it wouldn't hurt to add another one | 20:08 |
| tumbleweed | otherwise just patch directly | 20:09 |
| jtaylor | the problem with using aptch in rules is how does one recognize that it was already applied | 20:09 |
| jtaylor | or does nto need to be reversed | 20:09 |
| tumbleweed | clearly that's a problem it either already has to deal with, or simply ignores | 20:10 |
| jtaylor | no it onlypatches debian/package-name/... | 20:10 |
| jtaylor | one does not need to reverse there | 20:10 |
| tumbleweed | oh I misunderstood | 20:10 |
| tumbleweed | change the source directly | 20:10 |
| jtaylor | yes probably simplest | 20:11 |
| jtaylor | its an pretty bad package, 3.9.1 standard but many pretty bad looking lintian errors ._. | 20:11 |
| jtaylor | bitlbee btw | 20:12 |
| tumbleweed | the lovely thing about being a debian derivative is that we don't have to care about bad packages too much :) we just fix the bug we are there for and move on | 20:12 |
| arand | jtaylor: Seems the bitlbee packaging for debian is actually done upstream.. | 20:25 |
| tumbleweed | is that why it's so bad? :) | 20:26 |
| jtaylor | would explain why its not up to date to current packaging practices | 20:27 |
| arand | Comment at the head of the rules file is interesting :) | 20:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!