[00:38] <Sarvatt> bryceh: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/commit/?id=67785fa2b1043bd5397669f92abbd210dbf23f24 hmm
[00:38] <Sarvatt> bah wrong channel :)
[00:42] <Sarvatt> that was added at the beginning of october, about the timeframe these bugs started pouring in
[00:42]  * bryceh nods
[00:43] <Sarvatt> hmm
[00:43] <Sarvatt>   * debian/patches/50_add_dell_backlight.patch:
[00:43] <Sarvatt>     - Add 'dell_backlight' module to gsd-backlight-helper (LP: #862474)
[00:43] <Sarvatt> it is only affecting dells too..
[00:44] <bryceh> 873191 is HP
[00:46] <bryceh> anyway, thanks.  hopefully that's enough clue for the gnome guys to take it where it needs to go
[02:40] <bryceh> I've registered a general X session - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-p-xorg
[02:40] <bryceh> should have done that last week
[02:54] <Sarvatt> sweet, thanks for that bryce!
[02:55] <Sarvatt> mesa is my primary concern, really on the fence about it
[02:55] <Sarvatt> 8.0 in january
[04:07] <RAOF> How sure of that are we?
[04:16] <Prf_Jakob> You guys nervous about us not making the release?
[04:17] <RAOF> Well, of it being mesa 8.0 - isn't that predicated on Intel having GL 3.0 support?
[04:18] <Prf_Jakob> Ah, well couldn't you just say the mesa version that goes out on January, I think we rather do a release 7.12 release then have half backed features.
[04:19] <RAOF> But also probably about timing; we want to ensure we've got enough time to test unity on the libGL that we'll be shipping.
[04:19] <Prf_Jakob> So you rather see early January?
[04:19] <RAOF> Yes.
[04:20] <RAOF> Or - branching reasonably early, so we can follow that branch for a while.
[04:20] <Prf_Jakob> Ok
[04:20] <Prf_Jakob> I guess we have to battle it out with the intel guys.
[04:21] <RAOF> We can work out what we're comfortable with, and make it known to you and the intel guys :)
[04:21] <Prf_Jakob> We (vmware) are kinda hoping to get our new driver into 12.04 and it most cerntantly isn't up to snuff in 7.11 so we want another release.
[04:22] <Prf_Jakob> Ok thanks.
[04:25] <RAOF> Prf_Jakob: We can also tell you when that session is scheduled, if you'd like to participate remotely.
[08:05] <tjaalton> Sarvatt: https://launchpad.net/~focus-follows-mouse :)
[14:40] <Sarvatt> ricotz: have you tried unity with that newer utouch-geis by any chance? :)
[14:41] <Sarvatt> then again doesn't look promising since you're crashing it just opening evince without gesture extension support
[15:56] <bjsnider> ricotz, are you using hte 290 blob at the moment? if so, could you test flash? supposedly it doesn't work
[16:00] <ricotz> bjsnider, yes, i dont have any problems with flash
[16:01] <bjsnider> strange
[16:01] <ricotz> i am using a manually installed flash 11.0 64bit
[16:06] <bjsnider> well, i don't approve of that
[16:06] <bjsnider> but i think it's ok on ubuntu because we've got a newer glibc than some distros
[16:06] <bjsnider> or some users anyway
[16:09] <ricotz> bjsnider, manually installed like copying libflashplayer.so to ~/.mozilla/plugins/
[16:10] <ricotz> (i havent seen a stacktrace of it)
[16:10] <bjsnider> the adobe-flashplugin package will do it for you
[16:10] <ricotz> i dont like such installers ;)
[16:11] <ricotz> oh, i know
[16:11] <ricotz> ... that it is up2date now
[16:12] <bjsnider> the plugin is actually included now. it doesn't do a download+unrar+sha256 etc. anymore
[16:14] <bjsnider> anyway glibc 2.11 seems to be part of the flash problem and we have 2.13
[16:15] <bjsnider> so maybe it's broken on lucid
[16:28] <ricotz> Sarvatt, hi, havent tried it, but i dont expect it to work while evince/eog already have problems with it
[20:20] <Sarvatt> http://www.indieroyale.com/
[20:22] <Sarvatt> odd, had linux versions on it, refreshed and they're gone
[20:22] <Sarvatt> bah :)
[21:02] <Sarvatt> the desura linux client is quite nice, all my humble bundle linux versions in one place :)
[21:10] <Sarvatt> ricotz: mind if I upload a wayland-demos with bf8bd5aa3af224121490eada4a224c00d6a1951d and 27d38660459971a039fbbe9ec95a1cec7470634b reverted since we dont have libjpeg-turbo?
[21:16] <ricotz> Sarvatt, actually i would prefer patching it like http://paste.debian.net/plain/140207
[21:17] <ricotz> and see how it goes
[21:17] <ricotz> i have no idea why he picked this colorspace
[21:17] <Sarvatt> nothing is using the jpeg loader yet to even try it
[21:18] <ricotz> i think it is cleaner to replace the colorspace
[21:19] <Sarvatt> wont possibly hurt until there's a consumer at any rate
[21:19] <Sarvatt> sounds good
[21:20] <ricotz> right, and wouldnt interfere with future commits too much
[21:20] <ricotz> Sarvatt, feel free to upload
[21:20] <Sarvatt> yeah i see reverting breaking soon :)
[21:21] <ricotz> Sarvatt, oh which reminds me: power-cord-reminder :)
[21:23] <Sarvatt> double checking now, thanks :)
[21:25] <Sarvatt> ricotz: just to be sure, yours has 3 prongs on the brick side like this right? http://laptopsparesonline.com/uploads1/products/img3/208878_1181874120.jpg
[21:25] <Sarvatt> i've got some with 2
[21:26] <Sarvatt> http://static.eprofeel.com/salons/c/1/442d/6592_Computers-and-Networking_Mouse-Ear-Power-Cord-Compaq-HP-Dell-Sony-IBM-Toshiba-Laptop-Power-Cord_8933_1.jpg
[21:26] <ricotz> yes, 3, one is a bit bigger
[21:26] <ricotz> yes, like this
[21:27] <Sarvatt> alrighty, i've got it then :)
[21:28] <ricotz> thanks! :)
[21:29] <Sarvatt> ricotz: next time you do pixman mind doing natty too?
[21:29] <Sarvatt> x-x-v-intel requires 0.23 now for SNA
[21:30] <ricotz> Sarvatt, wanted to force you to look into precise :P
[21:30] <ricotz> i wasnt comfortable uploading the multiarched one to natty
[21:30] <Sarvatt> is there anything in precise yet making the natty edgers not usable??
[21:31] <Sarvatt> I always just used the natty one in my sources for the first month or so
[21:32] <ricotz> jcristau, hi, thanks for uploading pixman :) (leaving my name would have been better :P)
[21:32] <jcristau> your name is right there in the changelog
[21:32] <ricotz> Sarvatt, the oneiric packages works fine so far
[21:32] <ricotz> jcristau, i know, i meant the bottom line
[21:32] <jcristau> yeah i don't do that.
[21:33] <ricotz> why?
[21:33] <jcristau> because i'm the one doing the upload
[21:33] <jcristau> why is it better the other way?
[21:34] <ricotz> ok, because that way i would actually be listed in the stats
[21:34] <jcristau> fix the stats?