[01:09] <RAOF> I'm getting a LP oops (oops id: OOPS-2126CO5) when trying to accept the xorg-server SRU into oneiric-updates with sru-release.  Are there known problems with launchpad at the moment?
[01:10] <wgrant> RAOF: Does it fix lots of bugs?
[01:10] <RAOF> No; it fixes a single bug.
[01:10] <RAOF> I no longer try to copy kernels to -updates ;)
[01:12] <wgrant> It's timing out while trying to apply overrides.
[01:13] <wgrant> May be best to get it copied by an archive admin on cocoplum
[01:16] <RAOF> I guess that can wait for pitti.
[08:43] <jamespage> morning: does launchpad have the capability to track bugs in a JIRA issue tracking system
[08:43] <jamespage> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa for example
[08:43] <jamespage> ?
[08:44] <maxb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/+newbugtracker says no
[08:53] <nigelb> maxb: Thanks so much for the mercurial repos :)
[08:53] <nigelb> err PPAs
[08:58] <maxb> I'm rather surprised by the number of appreciative comments I get about them
[08:58] <maxb> The huge irony is that these days I don't use Mercurial at all any more
[08:58] <nigelb> The number of peoople crazy enough to use mercurial?
[08:59] <nigelb> I only used it because mozilla code base is in mercurial and yes, mercurial makes me want to stab myself.
[09:00] <tumbleweed> aww, I find mercurial very pleasent
[09:01] <nigelb> tumbleweed: the queues are no where as powerful as git/bzr branches.
[09:01] <tumbleweed> you mean mq?
[09:40] <nigelb> tumbleweed: yeah
[09:45] <tumbleweed> nigelb: they're are like bzr looms (and also one of the few ways to edit hg history). I use them a lot when using hg
[09:56] <nigelb> tumbleweed: Maybe I'll get used to them over time.
[12:18] <odin_> is someone playing with infrastructure?  getting "bzr: ERROR: exceptions.IndexError: list index out of range"
[12:18] <odin_> and the BZR plugins list changes (from build to build)
[12:23] <czajkowski> is mrevell hiding on me
[13:30] <flacoste> czajkowski: mrevell is on leave until UDS
[13:30] <czajkowski> flacoste: ahhh makes sense
[13:30] <czajkowski> I shall poke him in person so re lp and blueprint ideas :)
[13:30] <czajkowski> flacoste: thanks
[13:31] <flacoste> czajkowski: can i help?
[13:31] <flacoste> ah ok
[13:31] <flacoste> yep, he arrives sunday
[13:31] <flacoste> and leaves the next fri
[13:31] <flacoste> so that should give you plenty of time to catch him in person
[13:31] <czajkowski> flacoste: just the way we can sort bugs on lP by relevance is great, searhing Blueprints could do with similar search functions
[13:32] <czajkowski> like bp creation dates so I can then work our which cycle they were created
[14:24] <achiang> what happens to superseded packages in PPAs? i'm trying to find something relatively old with no luck... (trying to find an old firefox 5 build in the firefox-stable ppa)
[14:25] <bigjools> achiang: they are deleted
[14:25] <achiang> bigjools: ah, so for ubuntu proper, we keep the complete publishing history, but for PPAs, old packages are deleted?
[14:26] <bigjools> yup
[14:26] <achiang> thanks
[14:31] <asac> i remember we had a trick to get a text version of of a bug list in launchpad ... any idea if that feature still exist?
[14:32] <bigjools> asac: append /+text
[14:33] <bigjools> on the bug url
[14:33] <bigjools> not sure about a "list"
[14:36] <asac> bigjools: awesome
[14:37] <Darxus> "An import is currently running on galapagos, and was started 5 hours ago."  The last 10 took 20 seconds to 5 minutes.  There doesn't seem to be a way for me to kill the current import and restart it.  https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/spamassassin/trunk
[14:37] <bigjools> Darxus: let me check
[14:38] <bigjools> Darxus: it looks genuinely active - did the remote repo change in any way lately?
[14:39] <Darxus> bigjools: The reason I asked is, the automated builds I have using that import emailed me that they failed to upload:  https://launchpad.net/~spamassassin/+archive/spamassassin-daily/+recipebuild/107643/+files/upload_3002271_log.txt  (checking the repo)
[14:40] <bigjools> Darxus: odd.  it looks to me like the repo changed somehow, look at the revisions in the previous logs
[14:41] <bigjools> "determining revisions to fetch 0/1189081" versus "fetching svn revision info 4603/1135013"
[14:41] <Darxus> Heh.
[14:41] <Darxus> There was a commit today.
[14:42] <bigjools> I am asking on #bzr
[14:44] <asac> bigjools: ok guess thats not working for a search :/
[14:45] <bigjools> asac: yeah it's only on a bug page
[14:45] <bigjools> asac: use the API? :)
[14:51] <asac> bigjools: the api is too hard to use for me :)
[14:52] <bigjools> asac: !
[17:31] <george_e> I'm getting a strange error when pushing to a LP branch:
[17:31] <george_e> > ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
[17:32] <george_e> > bzr: ERROR: Connection closed: Unexpected end of message. Please check connectivity and permissions, and report a bug if problems persist.
[17:32] <george_e> I had just created a branch a few minutes earlier without any problems.
[17:33] <smoser> is it just me ?
[17:33] <smoser> $ ssh bazaar.launchpad.netssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
[17:37] <smoser> allenap ^ ?
[17:42] <m4n1sh> I am trying to merge a remote branch with my local branch
[17:43] <m4n1sh> and I am getting
[17:43] <m4n1sh> ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
[17:43] <m4n1sh> is this a server issue or client side issue?
[17:43] <george_e> Me too.
[17:43] <george_e> I just asked that question before you joined :P
[17:44] <m4n1sh> :)
[17:44] <smoser> m4n1sh, me too. i repeated george_e's question
[17:44] <george_e> Who do we ping to get help?
[17:44] <smoser> :)
[17:44] <george_e> Seems to be working now.
[17:45] <m4n1sh> trying
[17:45] <m4n1sh> not fixed
[17:45] <george_e> m4n1sh: Are you merging or just pushing code?
[17:45] <m4n1sh> merging
[17:45] <george_e> Ah, I was just pushing.
[17:46] <m4n1sh> works now
[17:46] <smoser> i was pushing. and then tried just plain 'ssh bazaar.launchpad.net'
[17:46] <smoser> and, yes, it works for me now too, m4n1sh
[17:46] <george_e> \O/
[17:46] <m4n1sh> [O/
[19:15] <Renegade15> good day
[19:16] <Renegade15> I have two questions regarding the XML import format for LaunchPad bugtracking
[19:17] <Renegade15> 1. Do I see correctly that the bug element itself cannot have attachments, that those must go on comments?
[19:17] <Renegade15> 2. What kind of URLs is the url element meant for?
[19:24] <flacoste> Renegade15: good questions :-)
[19:24] <flacoste> let me find the answers
[19:26] <kiko> Renegade15, you can get the attachments linked to a bug easily, but yeah, to add attachments you need to add them via a comment IIRC
[19:26] <nigelb> For the first one, you're right.
[19:27] <kiko> as for the URL, I can't remember -- is that Bug.url or BugTask.url?
[19:28] <Renegade15> it's...<url>?
[19:28] <flacoste> Renegade15: yep, so attachments are related to a specific comments
[19:28] <flacoste> but they all show up in the attachments portlet
[19:28] <flacoste> but you'll also see in which comments they are tied
[19:28] <Renegade15> yeah, I figured
[19:28] <flacoste> Renegade15: i don't see us processing any url element
[19:28] <Renegade15> element urls {
[19:28] <Renegade15>     element url { attribute href { xsd:anyURI }, text }*
[19:28] <Renegade15>   }?
[19:28] <Renegade15> ^--- quoth the import format page
[19:29] <flacoste> Renegade15: i think it means that element that are of type url can have a href attribute
[19:30] <flacoste> otherwise, like i said we are not processing these
[19:30] <flacoste> but the href attribute will be used
[19:30] <flacoste> on attachment for example
[19:30] <flacoste> if there are no filename element
[19:30] <flacoste> we'll default to the last component of the href attribute of the attachment node
[19:31] <Renegade15> the attachment href attribute is defined separately
[19:31] <Renegade15> ...under attachments
[19:31] <Renegade15> if you're not parsing urls/url, that's fine by me, I was just confused what they're meant for
[19:31]  * Renegade15 shrugs
[19:32] <flacoste> yeah, maybe the spec needs an update
[19:32] <flacoste> Renegade15: posting to launchpad-dev might bring the definitive answer
[19:32] <Renegade15> you say that after I wrote half the parser xD
[19:33] <Renegade15> meh, it's not that important...the critical question was the attachments one
[20:30] <yshavit> a few private projects I'm related to are having bugs modified by Michael Barnett @ canonical. The modifications are all similar: the bug is marked as no longer affecting the project. Is this a cleanup script or something?
[20:30] <yshavit> these are private bugs, I might add
[20:39] <flacoste> sinzui: ^^^
[20:40] <sinzui> yshavit, indeed it is a cleanup script
[20:40] <flacoste> yshavit: yes, mbarnett (one of our sysadmin) is running a clean-up script on behalf of sinzui
[20:40] <sinzui> We are deleting invalid bug affects lines or those for deactivated projects
[20:41] <mbarnett> i swear i am not a bot.
[20:41] <beuno> you'll have infinite karma
[20:42] <mbarnett> i will lord it over the other sysadmins!
[20:57] <yshavit> sinzui, flacoste, mbarnett : (sorry, got pulled away to a meeting)  That makes sense, thanks!
[20:59] <yshavit> mbarnett: not that I distrust you, but "i am not a bot" is precisely what a bot would say!
[20:59] <mbarnett> yshavit: nono, i SWORE.. no bot would be so bold!
[21:01] <yshavit> mbarnett: That's a good point. Though maybe you've gone rampant? I bet a rampant bot AI would swear up and down, and it'd even believe it.
[21:01] <mbarnett> plus, the internet is fully populated by  upstanding individuals who would never do anything malicious.
[23:07] <achiang> poolie: hi, around?
[23:10] <poolie> hi achiang
[23:10] <achiang> poolie: hi, just getting some cycles to come back around to https://code.launchpad.net/~achiang/hydrazine/hydrazine-searching/+merge/79201
[23:10] <achiang> poolie: i'd like to fix the thing you mention and land it, then think about refactoring it per your advice
[23:11] <poolie> that's fine with me
[23:11] <poolie> thanks!
[23:11] <achiang> cool, thanks
[23:11] <poolie> we should advertise this when it gets to a good level of done-ness
[23:11] <Kiall> Hiya, I have a fix for a package in Ubuntu, I'm trying to push to branch up for the package maintainers, but for the life of me i cant figure out the push URL ;)
[23:12] <Kiall> The package is this: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/libkohana3.1-php/precise .. what would be the push URL for my account?
[23:39] <achiang> poolie: have a few minutes to walk me through your comment on https://code.launchpad.net/~achiang/hydrazine/hydrazine-searching/+merge/79201
[23:44] <poolie> oh sure
[23:45] <poolie> do you mean, why did i say that?
[23:45] <poolie> well, basically, because the actual exception object may have a clue for the user what the problem was
[23:50] <achiang> poolie: oh, no, i was talking about the refactorization comment
[23:50] <achiang> poolie: i already did the fixup and pushed a new rev; that one's ready for re-review
[23:51] <poolie> oh, ok, i see
[23:51] <achiang> just need some guidance on this nested cmd object thing. ;)
[23:56] <poolie> hm
[23:56] <poolie> so you could do it various ways
[23:57] <poolie> i think possibly there should be a class per type of filter?
[23:57] <poolie> then a dict pointing to the available classes?
[23:59] <achiang> hm, yeah