| TheMuso | slangasek: Ok so I am working on the separate libpulsedsp package for pulse, however it turns out that pulseaudio-utils has lintian overrides for libpulsedsp.so. How can these effectively be used in the case of a multi-arch same package like libpulsedsp? | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| slangasek | TheMuso: you can use a wildcard for the path, so */libpulsedsp.so in the libpulsedsp package | 00:19 |
| TheMuso | slangasek: Thats not what I was thinking of. I am aware of the wildcard, but the override file is owned by both the amd64 and i386 version of the package... How does that get resolved? | 00:20 |
| slangasek | TheMuso: as long as the file contents are the same, the file is shared | 00:21 |
| TheMuso | slangasek: Oh ok great. | 00:22 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| TheMuso | Anybody else on oneiric using sbuild and schroot for precise finding that dbus is starting in their chroot for any packages depending on dbus? | 01:08 |
| broder | ooh, does that mean that upstart chroot support is working now? | 01:12 |
| TheMuso | I don't know. | 01:15 |
| TheMuso | But I earlier found that I still had lots of chroots mounted, because they had running processes in them. | 01:15 |
| broder | hmm...so schroot tries to kill off all processes in the chroot before unmounting it | 01:16 |
| broder | but /etc/init/dbus.conf has respawn | 01:16 |
| TheMuso | Haven't looked into it, but that sounds possible. | 01:17 |
| broder | does your chroot have a /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d file? | 01:19 |
| TheMuso | just a sec, I'll check. | 01:25 |
| TheMuso | I don't appear to. | 01:27 |
| broder | you probably want one | 01:27 |
| broder | something like "#!/bin/sh\nexit 101" | 01:27 |
| broder | and chmod +x it | 01:27 |
| TheMuso | Oh ok. | 01:28 |
| TheMuso | Thanks | 01:28 |
| broder | (see also the invoke-rc.d manpage) | 01:28 |
| broder | mk-sbuild should handle all of that setup, though, for future reference | 01:29 |
| TheMuso | I find mk-sbuild a bit too generic for my needs, so I've got scripts that derive from it. I'll just extend them. :) | 01:30 |
| Laibsch | good morning | 01:49 |
| Laibsch | does the verification-done-lucid tag also trigger the "green" state in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html? | 01:49 |
| RAOF | I believe the answer to that is ?yes?. | 01:50 |
| Laibsch | OK. I set it on a bug about 17-18 hours ago, but it did not trigger anything so far. | 02:07 |
| pitti | Good morning | 03:48 |
| ajmitch | morning pitti | 03:50 |
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| slangasek | TheMuso, broder: yes, chroot support works in upstart now, and policy-rc.d is the right workaround for a build chroot :) | 05:16 |
| micahg | TheMuso: can you extend the core-dev membership in ubuntu-audio-dev | 05:27 |
| TheMuso | micahg: sure | 05:29 |
| TheMuso | micahg: For what reason? | 05:30 |
| TheMuso | In any case, it should never expire, so changing. | 05:31 |
| micahg | TheMuso: because I got a nice e-mail asking to have it extended :), thanks for the permanent membership :) | 05:33 |
| dholbach | Guten Morgen Berlin! :) | 07:01 |
| gs_ | hello all. I am doing a project in which I need to read .deb files. Is there any library or interface available which I can use in my program to read these files. If this is a wrong channel Please forgive me and if you could suggest me some other channel for query regarding apt ? | 07:04 |
| gs_ | hello all. I am doing a project in which I need to read .deb files. Is there any library or interface available which I can use in my program to read these files. If this is a wrong channel Please forgive me and if you could suggest me some other channel for query regarding apt ? | 07:04 |
| gs_ | Please reply | 07:04 |
| dholbach | gs_, which information do you need? | 07:06 |
| RAOF | gs_: You'd be looking for libapt and friends. Or just extracting them; they're simple archives. | 07:07 |
| StevenK | gs_: If you're an Ubuntu machine, 'man 5 deb' tells you about .deb files | 07:07 |
| StevenK | If you're *on* an Ubuntu machine | 07:07 |
| RAOF | Or if you *are* an Ubuntu machine that would work, too. (If you *are* an Ubuntu machine, awesome! Please tell us where the AI research has succeeded ?) | 07:10 |
| ajmitch | heh | 07:11 |
| gs_ | dholbach: I need information regarding some library or interface which can be used for reading debian files | 07:11 |
| gs_ | Actually I am writing a system restore like application for ubuntu | 07:12 |
| gs_ | which will save the current state of packages and then restore them when needed | 07:12 |
| gs_ | RAOF: ok. using these libraries I can get list of the files which a package is intending to install ? and If i need details about the contents of those files then ? | 07:14 |
| dholbach | gs_, sorry, I meant: which information in the packages are you after? | 07:14 |
| RAOF | gs_: Probably, but I wouldn't do it that way; I'd just expand the .deb and list the files in the data.tar.* | 07:14 |
| gs_ | dholbach: I am looking for list of files in the package and their contents so that I can determine what changes have occur to the system | 07:14 |
| gs_ | RAOF: so we can convert .deb file in tar.gz archive ? | 07:15 |
| RAOF | gs_: Note that what you want to do is impossible in general; the packaging can (and will in some circumstances) use programatic means to create or modify files on the filesystem. | 07:15 |
| ajmitch | also the original .deb may not be on the system still | 07:15 |
| RAOF | gs_: The .deb file contains two .tar.* files; control and data. | 07:15 |
| Chipzz | RAOF: md5sums? | 07:16 |
| ajmitch | iirc not every package has a list of md5sums | 07:16 |
| Chipzz | RAOF: this isn't very ingrained in debian, but IIRC in rpm based distro's ALL files have their md5sum stored | 07:16 |
| gs_ | RAOF: like when we open a deb file in gdeb we can get the list of all files so I thought there might be an existing library for doing that | 07:17 |
| Chipzz | ajmitch: yes and that's a defect imo | 07:17 |
| RAOF | gs_: Yes, there is; tar. | 07:17 |
| RAOF | Chipzz: Does the rpm packaging format not have a way of generating files at install time? | 07:17 |
| Chipzz | ajmitch: regardless, merely pointing out that RAOF's statement is incorrect and it is possible in theory | 07:17 |
| Chipzz | RAOF: at does; it also has the concept of ghost files which debian lacks | 07:18 |
| gs_ | OK. So there is a tar and then how will I read that tar ? After extracting it ? | 07:18 |
| Chipzz | s/debian/dpkg/ | 07:18 |
| gs_ | Ya I know the package file might not be on the system. In that case I think I would need to download the package file from internet ? | 07:18 |
| RAOF | Chipzz: No, it's not possible in theory. I've worked on packages whose postinsts process existing files on the filesystem and incorporate state from other files, then write out a new conf file. | 07:18 |
| RAOF | Chipzz: That package cannot have a pregenerated md5sum for all the files it generates. | 07:19 |
| ajmitch | gs_: in terms of libraries, I know of python-debian which you can use to inspect the contents of a .deb | 07:19 |
| Chipzz | RAOF: that statement is simply silly; you can't account for /home/* either | 07:19 |
| gs_ | ajmitch: Could you please give me some link related to that library ? | 07:20 |
| RAOF | Chipzz: True, but that's not owned by the package manager. | 07:20 |
| Chipzz | RAOF: you could argue that config files aren't either | 07:20 |
| gs_ | Could you please provide me some suggestions regarding how to implement a system restore like application for ubuntu | 07:20 |
| gs_ | I have two approaches | 07:21 |
| gs_ | in one approach I will use a copy-on-write and save-on-delete approach | 07:21 |
| gs_ | so that I will take care of all the files in system directories | 07:21 |
| ajmitch | gs_: I'd have to look on google for info about it, but the package is just named 'python-debian', I don't know what is available as a library for other languages | 07:21 |
| RAOF | If you're allowed to use magical filesystems, then btrfs + apt-snapshot-btrfs does all this for you; it takes a snapshot of the system state on each apt transaction that you can roll back to. | 07:22 |
| gs_ | ajmitch: ok I will search for that thanks for helping. | 07:22 |
| gs_ | ok thats quite nice, how much space would that system occupy ? | 07:23 |
| gs_ | But that would require user to reinstall the whole system with "/" on brtfs ? | 07:23 |
| RAOF | It's copy-on-write, so roughly the changed set size. | 07:24 |
| RAOF | It would indeed require / to be a btrfs partition. It also has other constraints (there need to be appropriately named subvolumes, home needs to be a subvolume) | 07:24 |
| gs_ | ok, that would be not good as users need a reinstall for using the system | 07:25 |
| gs_ | If I implement that approach in my program would that be possible | 07:25 |
| gs_ | I can put hooks to the filesystem | 07:25 |
| gs_ | so whenever a file is written I can make a copy | 07:26 |
| gs_ | Or I can have this package approach | 07:27 |
| gs_ | in this approach I will create a package whenever user creates a restore point | 07:28 |
| gs_ | I will use this package to restore the system to an earlier state | 07:28 |
| ajmitch | if you're looking at creating a package, take a look at dpkg-repack | 07:28 |
| gs_ | Ok thanks and could you please provide some feedback on my approach | 07:29 |
| RAOF | I suspect it might be easier to do something similar to a combination of etckeeper and oneconf+snapshotting. | 07:29 |
| RAOF | ie: store a list of all the packages which are installed + all the modified stuff (/etc /var) | 07:30 |
| gs_ | RAOF : ok, like these files are in /var/lib/dpkg/info | 07:32 |
| gs_ | ? | 07:32 |
| gs_ | now for the modified stuff /etc /var is it better to create a separate package or implement a copy-on-write approach? | 07:32 |
| Chipzz | gs_: imo your approach is not the best approach anyway | 07:33 |
| Chipzz | files in /usr aren't interesting anyway | 07:33 |
| micahg | slangasek: you made a change to pygments back in jaunty that suggested python-chardet shouldn't be a recommends: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygments/0.10-1ubuntu2, python-chardet is now in main, do you still feel it shouldn't be a recommends? | 07:33 |
| Chipzz | if those change, the change is probably invalid, and you probably want to restore from the package anyway, so you probably shouldn't care about these | 07:34 |
| gs_ | chipzz : So please could you provide me some suggestions in how can I improve this | 07:34 |
| slangasek | micahg: I feel nothing about it, do whatever you think is best ;) | 07:34 |
| micahg | slangasek: thanks :) | 07:34 |
| Chipzz | you probably want to focus on config files, and maybe files in /var | 07:34 |
| Chipzz | I would look into ucf and try to integrate with that | 07:35 |
| gs_ | ok so files in /var are more imprtant and /etc also | 07:35 |
| Chipzz | and figure something out for other files in /etc that aren't managed by ucf | 07:35 |
| * ajmitch rather likes etckeeper | 07:36 | |
| gs_ | sorry but what is ucf ? | 07:36 |
| Chipzz | dpkg --get-selections will give you a list of packages installed | 07:36 |
| Chipzz | apt-cache show ucf? | 07:36 |
| Chipzz | /srv, /usr/local and /opt are interesting candidates too | 07:37 |
| gs_ | ok thats easier | 07:37 |
| gs_ | but like if some of the files installed by a package are damaged then ? Do I need to recopy those files or reinstalling the package would be a better option ? | 07:38 |
| Chipzz | users aren't supposed to write in /usr, since that's owned by the package management system; if they do, they're probably wrong, for example they have compiled from source and installed in /usr, which is a cause of havoc anyway, and most likely the kind of situation you want to recover FROM, not TO | 07:39 |
| Chipzz | gs_: like I pointed out, if those files are damaged, you can restore them from the package; which is exactly why they are not interesting | 07:39 |
| gs_ | Ok so I would ignore the files present in /usr | 07:41 |
| gs_ | or better I could clear /usr to a fresh installed system state | 07:41 |
| gs_ | and if the files in /bin or /sbin are damaged then ? | 07:42 |
| gs_ | I would get a list of installed packages and then reinstall those packages ? | 07:42 |
| gs_ | Better I need to see which packages have missing files | 07:42 |
| gs_ | and so those only *system packages* need to be downloaded and reinstalled ? | 07:43 |
| gs_ | Also is there any documentation describing exact steps performed by the system when any package is installed ? | 07:48 |
| gs_ | or I could see that by browsing apt-get or dpkg code ? | 07:48 |
| fhd | How is the Ubuntu stance towards Vala? Good idea for apps primary targeting Ubuntu? | 08:57 |
| fhd | Don't want to alienate. The typical choices seem to be C++ or Python. | 08:58 |
| cjwatson | fhd: well, it's listed on developer.u.c - http://developer.ubuntu.com/resources/programming-languages/vala/ | 09:16 |
| cjwatson | fhd: I believe Unity lenses are typically written in Vala, for example | 09:17 |
| fhd | cjwatson: Java is also listed, haven't seen many Java apps in Ubuntu | 09:24 |
| fhd | cjwatson: But if the Unity guys use it... | 09:25 |
| cjwatson | fhd: it depends where you look | 09:45 |
| Daviey | I can't understand why ruby-stomp has seeminly never been in Ubuntu. Is it blacklisted? | 10:41 |
| Daviey | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-stomp , no publishing history | 10:42 |
| Daviey | Been in sid since Jan 2009 | 10:42 |
| === gs_ is now known as gs | ||
| geser | Daviey: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libstomp-ruby ; the source package got recently (this month) renamed from libstomp-ruby to ruby-stomp | 10:44 |
| cjwatson | Daviey: it's not blacklisted, but attempting to sync it says http://paste.ubuntu.com/720566/ | 10:44 |
| cjwatson | we have what might politely be called an abysmal lack of crowdsourcing for this kind of thing | 10:45 |
| === gs is now known as gauravsaxena | ||
| cjwatson | so basically somebody needs to say "yes, dear archive admins, please throw away the existing Ubuntu-specific package and replace it with this one with a different source package name from Debian" | 10:45 |
| cjwatson | well, not Ubuntu-specific, Ubuntu-modified | 10:46 |
| Daviey | cjwatson: it needs AA intervention, or can i just sync with --force? | 10:47 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| Daviey | (geser: thanks) | 10:48 |
| cjwatson | Daviey: you can syncpackage it if you've checked that none of the Ubuntu modifications are still needed | 10:48 |
| cjwatson | (although it'll land in the NEW queue, but that's trivial) | 10:48 |
| Daviey | cjwatson: Great, thought so - thanks | 10:49 |
| cjwatson | it wasn't just an upstream update, James made some packaging changes too | 10:49 |
| Daviey | Yeah, seems i sponsored it :) | 10:50 |
| cjwatson | unfortunately I'm not sure syncpackage notices the Ubuntu modifications to matching binary packages | 10:51 |
| cjwatson | which is IMO a syncpackage bug if true | 10:51 |
| cjwatson | yeah, doesn't require --force, buggily | 10:52 |
| Daviey | Thanks. | 10:54 |
| \sh | hmm...anybody with upload powers can use syncpackage now? (instead of using requestsync) | 10:55 |
| Daviey | \sh: Yes, but requestsync is still needed for sponsored sync's | 10:56 |
| \sh | Daviey, sure, what I mean is i.e. for universe uploaders who are doing the merge/sync run now | 10:57 |
| Daviey | \sh: yup | 10:57 |
| \sh | Daviey, nice :) | 10:57 |
| Daviey | \sh: $ syncpackage -d (wheezy|sid) -r precise foobar | 10:58 |
| cjwatson | we should update docs and stuff | 10:58 |
| cjwatson | there are still some limitations, e.g. not usable for sponsored syncs | 10:58 |
| Daviey | and no karma.. "oh well" | 10:59 |
| \sh | Daviey, no need to sign ? or does it do it automagically? | 11:00 |
| cjwatson | no need to sign | 11:01 |
| cjwatson | it doesn't sign, it copies the publishing record from Debian | 11:01 |
| Daviey | Incidently there is the 'beta' webui method, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+localpackagediffs .. a bit whizzy for some. | 11:03 |
| \sh | let's try :) | 11:05 |
| \sh | so I need --force to overwrite ubuntu modifications | 11:06 |
| \sh | cjwatson, what does this mean: syncpackage: Source package gauche-c-wrapper is blacklisted. | 11:13 |
| cjwatson | an obscure way of saying that it has Ubuntu modifications which need to be reviewed. Use --force | 11:14 |
| cjwatson | Daviey: please don't use or recommend that - it doesn't and can't apply Ubuntu-specific policy | 11:15 |
| cjwatson | (well, s/can't/won't/ perhaps) | 11:15 |
| Daviey | cjwatson: wow, it doesn't do ACL? | 11:15 |
| cjwatson | there is more policy than ACL | 11:15 |
| cjwatson | it can't do things like handling packages with Ubuntu-specific modifications with more care | 11:15 |
| cjwatson | use the API tool and pretend the UI doesn't exist | 11:16 |
| Daviey | cjwatson: You mean it doesn't give a warning to say, "Are you sure you want to overwrite ubuntu changes?" | 11:17 |
| cjwatson | no | 11:17 |
| cjwatson | essentially because the way to detect that isn't particularly consistent across derivative distributions and Launchpad officially doesn't know about it | 11:18 |
| Daviey | Does syncpackage care greater than checking for 'ubuntu' in the version string? | 11:20 |
| cjwatson | that's what it does, but Launchpad doesn't do that | 11:20 |
| cjwatson | in general we can do much more sophisticated things using an API tool because we don't have to make them fully general for all derivative distributions | 11:21 |
| cjwatson | (+localpackagediffs was designed principally for Ubuntu derivatives and requested by Linaro, not for us) | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | oh, syncpackage also detects fakesync-requiring situations, I don't think +localpackagediffs does (or if it is it's less helpful about it) | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | and syncpackage allows you to sync from suites other than the single nominated "derivative parent" suite (currently Debian testing) | 11:23 |
| cjwatson | and deals with closing bugs which I don't think +localpackagediffs currently does | 11:23 |
| cjwatson | etc. | 11:23 |
| Laney | think it got that one | 11:24 |
| Laney | well, you can't nominate an additional bug | 11:24 |
| cjwatson | could be | 11:24 |
| TLE | pitti: hey, we saw some lang packs in -proposed, are they all good to go? | 11:25 |
| pitti | TLE: good for testing, anyway, yes | 11:27 |
| pitti | German looks fine | 11:27 |
| TLE | pitti: great, thanks | 11:27 |
| SpamapS | slangasek: re bug 859075 , I have laid no claim to it, though I do think its something wrong with the order in which we bring down the network and unmount things. | 11:35 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 859075 in sysvinit (Ubuntu) "Oneiric does not shutdown" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/859075 | 11:35 |
| doko | pitti, bdmurray: why do we still get reports like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/882445? | 12:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 882445 in Ubuntu "package openjdk-6-jre 6b23~pre10-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured" [Undecided,New] | 12:16 |
| pitti | we can write a pattern for it, to avoid further reports | 12:16 |
| pitti | I'm fairly sure I've seen that --fsys-tarfile bug somewhere | 12:17 |
| pitti | let's take bug 773172 | 12:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 773172 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive" [Undecided,Expired] https://launchpad.net/bugs/773172 | 12:18 |
| pitti | doko: added bug pattern, closed as dupe | 12:21 |
| doko | pitti, thanks | 12:24 |
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| zyga | did postgresql change the default listen port for 9.1? | 12:35 |
| zyga | it was 5432 and now I can see 5433 | 12:36 |
| pitti | zyga: no; presumably you still have an 8.4 cluster around which is on 5432; check pg_lsclusters | 12:36 |
| zyga | ah | 12:36 |
| zyga | pitti, so after having both installed I need to tweak something to get the default port back | 12:36 |
| zyga | yeah, I have 5433 used now, I removed my 8.4 cluster earlier today | 12:37 |
| zyga | thanks | 12:37 |
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| Daviey | Anyone know of a prior example of an SRU introducing a new src package? | 13:38 |
| Daviey | (as a dep) | 13:38 |
| Daviey | Or rather, the SRU requiring a new source package which is a dep. | 13:38 |
| SpamapS | Daviey: meaning the src package would effectively be "NEW" for -proposed ? | 13:42 |
| Daviey | SpamapS: yes sir | 13:43 |
| tumbleweed | talking of this, can an AA process bin-NEW for my botan1.8 SRU? | 13:50 |
| geser | Daviey: I guess you would need a good rationale for this | 13:54 |
| Daviey | geser: that some upstreams are really bad at following their own policy? :) | 13:54 |
| Daviey | right, soren? :) | 13:55 |
| SpamapS | Daviey: how big is this new dependency? Might it work embedded in the source? | 14:00 |
| soren | SpamapS: I dont' see how that would be preferable. | 14:01 |
| SpamapS | soren: if its a 1 file python module or something that is better. | 14:01 |
| soren | Daviey: We have had kernels come in this way. Backported kernels from newer releases back to the most recent LTS. | 14:01 |
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| Daviey | SpamapS: yeah, checked that.. it's not just one .py | 14:03 |
| Daviey | SpamapS: but embedding a whole module, need to start worrying about upgrade paths. | 14:03 |
| soren | SpamapS: Even then, it seems questionable. | 14:04 |
| soren | Precise will have it in a separate package. That's what we'll test. | 14:04 |
| soren | Right? | 14:04 |
| soren | And once validated, will backport to Oneiric. | 14:04 |
| soren | I'm just not sure I think breaking two rules (embedding "foreign" libraries in other source packages + not staying close to how you're solving the same problem in the dev release) is necessarily better than breaking something that isn't even a rule, AFAICT (uploading new source packages to -proposed). | 14:06 |
| cjwatson | yeah, I'm not aware of a rule against new source packages in -proposed; it's certainly unconventional but not forbidden TTBOMK | 14:09 |
| cjwatson | if the purpose of the fix meets the SRU rules, then I wouldn't exclude it simply on the basis of requiring a new package | 14:10 |
| cjwatson | although it would have to have a good reason | 14:10 |
| soren | Yeah. | 14:10 |
| soren | ...and avoiding embedding it in the source package that depends on it isn't that good a reason, IMO. | 14:11 |
| soren | Didn't the openss{l,h} blacklist stuff come in its own source package? | 14:12 |
| cjwatson | yes | 14:12 |
| cjwatson | albeit through -security not -proposed, but whatever | 14:12 |
| soren | Yeah, but that usually has a higher barrier of entry, not lower. | 14:13 |
| soren | Anyway, I think we agree :) | 14:13 |
| slangasek | SpamapS: well, a) one of the commentors is having the problem with USB disks, not network mounts, b) we've been through all this before with network-manager being killed before umountnfs.sh and that's been fixed - so if something's regressed I think it's on the NM side of the equaton | 14:36 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| Wismon | Hi, I'm new to Ubuntu development (bug fixing) and fixed a bug the other day, uploaded my branch to Bazaar and made a merge request. I'm just wondering what the next logical step would be? I read about the sponsoring process but have to admit I don't really get how it works in reality. I just don't know if I should simply wait for now or if there's something more I should do. Maybe someone more knowledgeable than m | 15:09 |
| Wismon | e can point me in the right direction? | 15:09 |
| Wismon | </wall of text> | 15:09 |
| SpamapS | slangasek: I do think that eventually we'll find the problem outside of sysvinit. I have it assigned to sysvinit because thats where the debugging has led the investigation thus far | 15:10 |
| slangasek | SpamapS: ok | 15:10 |
| Riddell | Wismon: is the package has a likely team or person who might upload it you can politely ping them | 15:11 |
| Wismon | Riddell: Hmm, I think I found one person... Thank you, I'll try that! | 15:16 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| kirkland | mterry: hiya | 16:08 |
| mterry | kirkland, hi! | 16:08 |
| kirkland | mterry: fyi, ecryptfs-verify-private just landed in precise | 16:08 |
| mterry | kirkland, oh, that didn't get into oneiric? | 16:08 |
| kirkland | mterry: nope, sorry | 16:08 |
| mterry | hmm | 16:09 |
| kirkland | mterry: needed an FFE | 16:09 |
| kirkland | mterry: i never filed it, don't know if anyone else did either | 16:09 |
| kirkland | mterry: was it you who was asking for this? | 16:09 |
| kirkland | mterry: or someone else? seb maybe? | 16:09 |
| mterry | that means it's probably easy to break your system in oneiric by enabling autologin (the patch I added to gnome-control-center used verify-private if available) | 16:10 |
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| barry | @pilot in | 17:33 |
| === udevbot_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Precise open for uploads | Ubuntu 11.10 Released! | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | build failures -> http://bit.ly/or6CHJ | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: barry | ||
| smoser | am i the only one having problems ssh to bazaar.launchpad.net ? | 17:38 |
| smoser | (ie, i can't push a branch) | 17:39 |
| smoser | $ ssh bazaar.launchpad.net | 17:39 |
| smoser | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host | 17:39 |
| jelmer | smoser: it appears to be fine here ("No shells on this server.") | 17:41 |
| smoser | carp. | 17:41 |
| smoser | it doesn't like me from 2 different systems (same key/user, but its not just my laptop thats foobarred) | 17:41 |
| * micahg hugs barry for the mail to UDD | 17:41 | |
| * barry is glad he remembered! | 17:42 | |
| Daviey | smoser: odd, i am getting the same.. I used to get No shells on this server. | 17:45 |
| Daviey | dave@voodoo:/tmp/test$ bzr push lp:~davewalker/+junk/delete_me | 17:45 |
| Daviey | Created new branch. | 17:45 |
| Daviey | dave@voodoo:/tmp/test$ ssh davewalker@bazaar.launchpad.net | 17:45 |
| Daviey | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host | 17:45 |
| smoser | others in #launchpad are echoing my issues. | 17:45 |
| Daviey | smoser: but push seemed to work | 17:46 |
| smoser | it was refusing 30 seconds ago | 17:46 |
| smoser | but now seems good. | 17:46 |
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| rbasak | slangasek: I was just looking at bug 881579 and noticed that you did a merge today, but the bug is still present. It's a missing '\' in debian/samba.if-up | 21:19 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 881579 in samba (Ubuntu Precise) "syntax error in /etc/network/if-up.d/samba" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/881579 | 21:19 |
| rbasak | slangasek: I was going to fix it but if you're working on it anyway... | 21:19 |
| slangasek | rbasak: hah, fail. Sorry for not noticing that. Feel free to fix, I've moved on to other things already | 21:31 |
| rbasak | slangasek: well I'm going to need you to sponsor it anyway... :) | 21:31 |
| slangasek | rbasak: ok, pushing | 21:45 |
| rbasak | slangasek: thanks! | 21:46 |
| === james is now known as Guest75970 | ||
| TheMuso | @pilot in | 22:02 |
| === udevbot_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Precise open for uploads | Ubuntu 11.10 Released! | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | build failures -> http://bit.ly/or6CHJ | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: barry, TheMus | ||
| === AaronMT is now known as AaronMT|dinner | ||
| === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!